EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Obama Did It For the Money
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Renowned Scientist Stephen Hawking Joins Academic Boycott of Israel
Popular content
Today's Top News
Activists Warn US Lawmakers of Uranium Mining Perils
WASHINGTON - A French physicist and a US actor have joined representatives of indigenous peoples from Africa, Australia and the United States to send US lawmakers a stark warning about the dangers of uranium mining.
"We want US lawmakers to understand that uranium mining is highly pollutant and that there is currently no scientific answer to the question of radioactive waste containment," Bruno Chareyron of France's CRIIRAD laboratory, which measures radioactivity in the environment, told AFP Friday.
A Greenpeace activist attempts to disrupt a nuclear waste transportation effort in France. A French physicist and a US actor have joined representatives of indigenous peoples from Africa, Australia and the United States to send US lawmakers a stark warning about the dangers of uranium mining. (AFP)
"We want them to know that the information they are given by the mining companies is not wholly reliable," he said.
Representatives of the Tuareg nomads of Niger, Native Americans and Australian aborigines told of the ravages of uranium mining on their communities.
In Niger, French company Areva has been mining uranium for more than 40 years with "no regard for the environment, people's health, animals," Sidi-Amar Taoua, a Tuareg who has lived for seven years in the United States, told AFP.
"Uranium mining has impacted every area and sparked a war between the Tuareg who took up arms to defend their land, and the government, which is complicit with Areva," he said.
Areva announced last month that it has applied for US government approval to build a two billion dollar uranium enrichment plant in the northwestern state of Idaho.
The project would be the French state-controlled group's first uranium enrichment plant in the United States.
Native American lands in the southwestern United States have been the site of more than 1,300 uranium mines. Although most have been closed, the mines' legacy includes contaminated drinking water and illnesses from cancer to kidney disease, said Native American environmental activist Manny Pino.
"In this process of nuclear renaissance, it's almost like the federal government is ignoring the historical legacy of uranium mining in the past and prioritizing the economic benefits of nuclear power in the future at the expense of our land, our water and our people," he said.
Mitch, an aboriginal militant against radioactive waste dumps and uranium mining in Australia, currently the world's biggest producer of the mineral, said: "Short term monetary gain will leave us with long-term deadly waste for generations to come."
Uranium mining saw a long boom period in the United States between the 1940s and 1980s, before coming to a near halt in the 1990s as prices paid for the mineral plummeted.
In 2005, as uranium prices were starting to climb upwards again, the Navajo passed a law banning the mining or processing of uranium on their lands.
But when the price of the mineral peaked at around 140 dollars a pound in 2007, mining companies descended "like vultures" on uranium-rich areas, 70 percent of which are situated on land inhabited by low-income indigenous communities, said James Cromwell, the actor who played George H.W. Bush in the film "W."
As oil and gas prices spiked last year, nuclear power gained ground as an attractive energy option to ensure US energy independence.
Then secretary of the interior Dirk Kempthorne authorized uranium exploration near the Grand Canyon, a UNESCO World Heritage site.
"There's a lot of activity. When uranium prices went up we saw proposals for exploration all over the place," said Sandy Bahr of environmental group the Sierra Club's Grand Canyon chapter.
In January, Arizona lawmaker Raul Grijalva introduced a bill in Congress that would permanently withdraw from mineral extraction one million acres of public lands in watersheds surrounding the Grand Canyon.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

6 Comments so far
Show All"In this process of nuclear renaissance, it's almost like the federal government is ignoring the historical legacy of uranium mining in the past and prioritizing the economic benefits of nuclear power in the future at the expense of our land, our water and our people," he said."
What nuclear renaissance, Bush's? We'll follow that mofo's lead straight into hell.
There is legacy pollution from mining in the 1940'-60s, but regulations have been improved. The proposed new mines would probably be safely operated, but we need to make sure. Here is a fairly even handed article about potential mines near the Gand Canyon:
http://features.csmonitor.com/environment/2008/08/19/do-uranium-mines-belong-near-grand-canyon/
Areva either was formally known as Cogema, or purchased Cogema. Either way, Areva/Cogema is accused of gross negligence in operating is uranium mine in Niger until circa 1986:
http://www.environment.co.za/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1792
The IAEA has develpoed guidelines. Are they enforced?
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1244_prn.pdf
I don't think nuclear power or uranium mining should be outlawed. The world needs the GHG free energy. However, there is no reason to allow pollution. Nuclear plant operators must take responsibility for purchasing uranium that has been safely mined and processed. Legacy pollution should be mitigated as much as possible. The IAEA should be allowed access to all mines and processing facilities. Enforcement of regulation should be evenly strict, not subject to the whims of deregulationists or special interests.
To bbr-001---
"Enforcement of regulation should be evenly strict, not subject to the whims of deregulationists or special interests."
A "deregulationist" presided in the White House for the past 8 years and the damage he did cannot be undone. How are you going to prevent a recurrence of that insanity while storing nuclear waste for the next 100,000 years---far longer than our stupid species has existed?
-30-
Tough questions, Ol' man. A lot of damage can be caused by people with an agenda who assume they have ultimate authority.
They will be able to recycle the waste down to short lived species some day.
Most of what we dig out of the ground turns out not to be of lasting value. Lots of the stuff such as mercury, cadmium should not be spread around. Even the coal and oil end up producing CO2 that needs to be reduced to values that trees and its kin to soak up these bad things. Mercury however doesn't really have any processes that put things back.