EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bloggers, Liberal Groups Challenge Corporate Dems
WASHINGTON - A coalition of liberal bloggers and activists backed by organized labor announced a campaign Thursday to pressure Democrats to move to the left by financing challenges to centrist members of Congress.
The group, which calls itself Accountability Now, plans to raise money online and recruit liberal candidates to run in the primaries against Democratic incumbents it considers out of step with constituents.
The group has the backing of the Service Employees International Union, one of the most politically active in organized labor, and MoveOn.org. Both have raised and spent tens of millions of dollars in recent elections.
The formation of the group highlights a tricky political dynamic for Democrats that could complicate President Barack Obama's efforts to advance his agenda. The effort threatens to deepen rifts that separate the party's liberal Democratic leaders, personified by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., from the growing group of moderates who have helped the party expand its majority in Congress.
Leaders of Accountability Now say they have no ideological litmus test for their targets, but it's clear they are focusing on Democrats - including some who are members of the fiscally conservative Blue Dogs and the New Democrat Coalition - who typically side with business interests.
"What we're set up to oppose is the influence of lobbying money," said Jane Hamsher of the blog firedoglake.com. "The danger is that (Democrats are) going to become as responsive to the influence of money over their constituents as Republicans did."
Backers of the movement say they're hoping their efforts will give Obama greater latitude to push liberal policies in key areas such as health care by creating an organized and well-funded group of Democrats who can act as a counter to more conservative voices in the party.
They also say Accountability Now is a way to keep Democrats from losing touch with their constituents, which they argue is what sentenced Republicans to minority status.
"This is not an ideological crusade," said Markos Moulitsas, creator of the blog DailyKos and a supporter of the group. "What we want to do is move the Democratic Party to the mainstream."
Still, mainstream is in the eye of the beholder, and Moulitsas said the group will target those who "keep saying this is a center-right nation."
Top Democrats are skeptical of such enterprises. They fear they will highlight damaging divisions within the party and potentially cost Democrats congressional seats.
"Anything that increases the chance of a seat falling into Republican hands is a mistake," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., the head of Democrats' House campaign committee.
Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, the Democrats' Senate campaign chief, said he wasn't familiar with the group, but called it "a bad idea."
"The bottom line is that we need candidates who reflect their state, and the values of that state, and their ability to win that state, and having primaries for ideological purposes is not the way in which Democrats continue to have a majority," Menendez said.
The organizers have had one prominent success already. They helped fuel and fund the successful primary campaign by liberal Democratic Rep. Donna Edwards that toppled eight-term Democratic Rep. Al Wynn in Maryland's Prince George's County.
And some of the same players were instrumental in Ned Lamont's successful 2006 primary challenge to Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut in frustration over his backing of the Iraq war. Lieberman switched parties and won re-election as an Independent.
Even Edwards said it's "foolish to believe that one can mount those kinds of efforts successfully in all districts, or even most districts." But she said the effort could add heft to liberal lawmakers' attempts to make their voices heard "as loudly as we've heard from the conservative forces of our party and the Republicans. That will serve President Obama really well," she added.
The group, which has raised $500,000 so far, is scrutinizing lawmakers' voting records and polls reflecting public opinion in their districts to find opportunities to launch challenges.
"The key," said Jeff Hauser, the executive director, "will be where there's a gap between the incumbent and their constituents."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show AllBoth SEIU and MoveOn are in bed w/ the same corporate Dems they claim to want to go after, especially in the close SEIU relationship with the right-wing, business-funded Democratic Leadership Council. Both organizations have ties to the Clintons and SEIU has funded meetings of the National REPUBLICAN Governors Conference.
Also SEIU's had (once-secret) agreements with a number of large national employers to exclude massive numbers of workers from union membership and give SEIU a monopoly on the handful that the employers would allow, according to a well-documented article in the Wall St. Journal, of all places, last May.
Not to mention the fact that the SEIU-led rebellion to take seven unions out of the AFL-CIO weakened the already-pitiful labor moevement significantly. And recently, in an effort to strangle democracy within its own union, the SEIU international office put United Health Care West (UHCW) -- the most successful and democratic general health care union in the nation -- into an illegal receivership weakening the labor movement, the fight for the Employees' Free Choice Act (EFCA) and the fight for single-payer health insurance (which SEIU has long opposed).
The only good news in all of this is that tens of thousands of former UHCW union members have broken away to form their own union: the national Union of Health Care Workers (NUHCW).
I mean really, are Eli Pariser and his multi-millionaire and billionaire funders and SEIU going to call the bluff of the DLC and blue dog Democrats?
"Anything that increases the chance of a seat falling into Republican hands is a mistake," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., the head of Democrats' House campaign committee."
If the seat falls into the hands of a Republican who wants to save American jobs for "American citizens", it won't be a mistake. Get that straight!
Who is she, that Republican who wants to save American jobs?
Joe
Pelosi is a "liberal"? Working to create more democracy is bad? And more might be said about this goofy article. The demise of the Republicans is the only reason for any growth in the Democrat Party, not any virtue of centerist Democrats. The USA needs a great deal more democracy, which means the Duopoly parties must shrink. The Duopoly is against this, of course.
Something to ponder: The US constitution of 1787 was ratified by almost none of the adult populace then residing in the 13 states--it is NOT a democratic document, nor was approved of by way of a democratic referendum, and it is meant to inhibit democracy in several ways. It's one thing to defend the constitution from those who abuse it and another to see it's indefensible in its essence IF we're serious about democracy. The need for a better federal government is very clear given the current state of affairs. But a better federal government demands a better constitution, one that vests much more power in We The People at the expense of both corporations and the current government.
I think the article understates the rubber like qualities of Moveon and SEIU and the KOS and others. There biggest contribution so far was pandering Barack Obama to its "progressive" supporters rather than sway DLC or bluedogs.
This article also distorts the reality of where all of the contributor's donations went when the author highlights one progressive win in Maryland
I think progressives are better served getting out from under the thumb of these self-proclaimed, self-referencing PACs Moveon types design. I think when they start asking for your money and time, resign to your local community of activism where we can once again learn the basics. Do not mistake online donations for the hardwork we must do to change our own street corner.
That's what we need, an online format intended to foster only connections and movements specific to 'shovel ready' projects at the local level. No more of these showboat, blowhard action groups that stuff the pockets of professional politicians.
Do not mistake online donations for the hardwork we must do to change our own street corner.
Exactly. Organize.
Thank You
""This is not an ideological crusade," said Markos Moulitsas, creator of the blog DailyKos and a supporter of the group. "What we want to do is move the Democratic Party to the mainstream."
Good activism. I signed up.
I am totally onboard with this and constantly blogging news sites in the same fashion. We need more people to do this regularly.
The only reason that people voted dem is because they were mad at the repugs but it was obvious from the last 8 years that many dems were and are as guilty of any thing the repugs are guilty of and it is time to weed them out and if we cant we are up shit creek anyway and any dem who stands in the way run over her/him because they will turn with the wind.Tony
"Anything that increases the chance of a seat falling into Republican hands is a mistake," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., the head of Democrats' House campaign committee."
This guy must love gerrymandering and vote fixing. Not the type of man who deserves to be in Congress.
Bloggers, Liberal Groups, you deserve what you get by having supported Democrats and this fraud known as Obama during the campaign, or as I call him, President George W. Brown.
So don't complain now, we warned you in 2007 and 2008.
Democrats are corporatist reactionaries, posed as centrists. Like Republicans, they will do everything in their power to transfer even more wealth to the already fabulously wealthy.
Like Republicans, they will do everything in their power to continue the butchering of innocent civilians in the Middle East so the American Empire can continue.
Elections are a charade, they don't count, they never did. Nothing will change. Case closed.
If that's true, why are you bothering to write here?
Here, I was hoping for a new third party, Progressive Democrats.
President Obama and Rahm Emanuel are no more progressive than Nancy Pelosi and her husband's interests in tuna fish and America Samoa. They all support a continued presence in Iraq and expanding the "war" in Afghanistan and extending it into Pakistan........So much for progressive thinking.
Why are we in Iraq and Afghanistan anyway? Oh, I forgot, it is not about the "OIL" and the 1000 military bases that function off of "OIL".....Isn't that the "Carter Doctrine"? "The United States has the right to intervene in any nation when the flow of "OIL" is threatened." Isn't that why Democrats have been supporting the Neo-Conservatives? Lots of Democrats have been serving conservative interests for years.
I thought, with three parties, maybe the people would get to choose "Human Rights" over "War"........"Healthcare" over "Wall Street" ......."Balanced Budget" over "Military Industrial Complex"......"United States" over "World Domination" !!!!!
What's a better strategy for liberals and progressives, to move the winning Dems to our side or to start from scratch with a third party and risk another Repug win?