Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
No Quick Fix for Malnutrition and Hunger
ROME - Almost five million children under the age of five die of malnutrition every year in the developing world. Food aid - which mainly contains nutrient-poor carbohydrates - does little to address the absence of a diverse diet that would prevent the condition.
Somalis carry sacks of food aid distributed by the World Food Program near Mogadishu in 2008. Global food production, already under strain from the credit crunch, must double in the next four decades to head off mass hunger, the head of the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation said. (AFP/File/Abdurashid Abikar) Humanitarian relief organisation Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is therefore urging policy makers to boost food security and improve the quality of food aid that feeds the world's hungry. To fight malnutrition in the long-term, however, African governments need to invest in small-scale farming to create food autonomy.
More than 20 million children suffer from severe, acute malnutrition in the developing world. Half of the 9.7 million deaths of children under five each year are caused by the condition, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). It will cost $5 billion a year alone to feed children under the age of three in developing countries, MSF said.
Malnutrition is not only triggered by lack of food, as is commonly assumed, but also by poor nutritional quality. It is particularly prevalent in areas such as the Sahel region, where children have little access to a diverse diet that contains a variety of minerals, proteins and vitamins. In many developing countries, families have to live off starchy staples, such as maize, millet and sorghum.
"This goes to show that Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 1, to halve poverty and hunger by 2015, and MDG 4, to reduce child mortality by two thirds by 2015, are strongly interlinked. Hunger directly influences levels of child mortality," said MSF programme manager Huub Verhagen.
"Yet, malnutrition is globally under-recognised as a problem and is not even specifically mentioned as one of the causes for child mortality in the MDG document," he added.
Providing any type of food to fill the stomachs of the hungry is not enough to solve the problem, though. Food aid needs to be diverse to form a wholesome, nutritional base so that those who have suffered hunger can grow back their strength, gain weight and rebuild muscle in a healthy manner. But most food aid currently shipped to regions where hunger and poverty are rife is made up of carbohydrate-heavy, but protein- and vitamin-poor cereal-based products, developed more than 30 years ago.
"Those cereal-based products are completely sub-standard because they lack the right nutrients and proteins under-nourished people need," explained Verhagen, suggesting that governments and aid agencies rather invest in newly developed, ready-to-use therapeutic foods, which are especially manufactured high-nutrient meals that help malnourished people to recover quickly.
Sub-standard food aid
To a large degree, the issue of hunger and malnutrition within African countries remains unsolved due to political reasons, Verhagen further explained, because governments are reluctant to acknowledge the extent of the problem and are unwilling to invest in food aid because "food is a politically sensitive issue".
"Hunger is often a problem that seems financially not solvable, so governments try to sweep it under the carpet. They don't want to attract global attention to the fact that they are unable to feed their population," he believes. The Nigerian government, for example, has prohibited MSF from working on malnutrition in the country.
Ultimately, however, hunger and malnutrition are not averted by providing high quality food aid to the hungry, but by enabling people to feed themselves - through major investments in local agriculture.
"Food aid is a necessary form of emergency relief, but it should go beyond a quick fix solution," Verhagen added. "We need to develop long-term, economic policies to address the problem of malnutrition and hunger."
Unfortunately, this has not been the case in the last couple of decades. "There has been a major decrease of funding allocation to agriculture, despite the fact that there are more than one billion hungry people in the world," said Laurent Thomas, director of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) emergency operations and rehabilitation division.
"Malnutrition has become a chronic emergency," Thomas added, noting that 30 billion dollars are needed annually to fight world hunger, "but this investment has not happened".
Chronic emergency
There has been little progress in scaling up support for agriculture, especially for smallholder farmers in developing countries, and no advancement in stepping up food production, he explained, while highlighting the fact that "this needs to the be the main, overarching intervention if we want to reduce hunger."
Pio Wennubst, deputy permanent representative of Switzerland to FAO, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the World Food Programme (WFP), agreed with Thomas. "Programmes like the WFP, are actually not feasible because they bring food into countries in a very expensive way. That money could instead be invested into agriculture so that people can grow and eat locally produced food," said Wennubst.
International aid programmes need to include clauses that help developing countries to protect their local agricultures, particularly small-scale farming, and make them sustainable, he further explained.
More than 80 percent of agricultural land worldwide is farmed by smallholder farmers who each own less than two hectares of land, according to IFAD. But those farmers, who are mainly women, generally lack access to irrigation, infrastructure and markets to distribute and sell their produce. In addition, due to gender discrimination, women are frequently unable to gain land ownership and access loans and resources. As a result, their yields are small and their sales low.
"Small-scale farming has a woman's face," said IFAD senior technical advisor on gender and household food security, Annina Lubbock. "Women produce 60 percent to 80 percent of the world's food, yet their work remains largely unrecognised."
"Paradoxically, most of the hungry are those who produce food," agreed Thomas. "To address the root cause of the food crisis, we need to support small-scale farmers and livestock owners."
Governments and aid agencies need to implement long-term policies and programmes aimed at increasing the production capacity of farmers, he demanded. "The good news is that the recent food crisis has raised renewed international awareness around the importance of local food production versus just focusing on building safety nets."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

34 Comments so far
Show AllBut wait, Joe Brewer said we can just "redefine" away malnutrition and hunger. No, that's not really fair. He said poverty could be "redefined."
No need to be a schmuck. I think his article was very good...I myself recently began looking for ways to enrich my life, outside of money and material accumulation. It is certainly different, but is far more satisfying in a different way than having plenty of money.
Oafs and stupid people do not make the sort of comments I make. Self-assertive I am; and so are you; so, I guess that renders you a schmuck too.
We don't have a food scarcity problem... We have a resource distribution problem ...
As long as Cargill, ADM, Monsanto, et al put profits over people, food will continue to be a weapon of the Class war...
As long as the US and other nations continue to have deregulated financial industries, the bankers will view food as just another commodity for speculation, thereby assuring that food affordability for most of the world's population will continue to worsen, while the bankers increase their personal wealth exponentially.
Thanks for tying it into the bankster influence, while subsidized agriculture policy is one problem... Speculation is definitely another...
No Quick Fix for Malnutrition and Hunger
Yes, there is. It's called Death, an American specialty in the 21st century (if you live in certain blighted parts of this world).
Nice one.
A few neutron bombs would be quick.
Cluster bombs, depleted uranium and white phospher work too. Israel has been testing these on real people for ages just like their Pentagram.
Food Aid? Only if Birth Control and education about the need for zero population growth goes with it.
We should require that any country or any peoples who receive food aid have the freedom (from politics, religion, cultural traditions) to be able to educate themselves on the need for human population control / reduction by peaceful, voluntary means (2, 1, or no children.)
That means, we, especially here in the US, recognize that overpopulation is the biggest threat, with runaway consumption taking a prominent second place.
Paul Siemering
why is "population control" only for poor erople? Why do rich hogs claim the right to consume 50, 60 70, times as much stuff as the people in the Global South?
Try doing it the other way: bring your manic consumption down to the level of South Asia, or the Sahel, then talk about other people controlling their populations
Exactly. The 400 million or so people in the industrialized West use far far more resources than the several billion poor people of the world.
Population control is a different issue than resource consumption, although they are inextricably linked...
As far as industrial nations or cities go, the avg. # of kids per family is between two and three...
For various reasons like the cost of living, education, footprint, food, etc that it takes to house, feed, and nurture each child...
In agrarian nations or rural areas, the more kids you have, the more human labor you can utilize in working the farm...
And the more likely some of them will be able to care for you when you are an old fogie...
If the Merchants of Death would stop selling guns people don't need at costs beyond their means then there would be enough food to go around.
You folks are kidding right? Do you fully understand our defense budget? Do you know the price of bombs these days? Feed the children when the armed forces need weaponry?
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
Actually the price of bombs is rather cheap. They're using up 70s and 80s-era bomb stocks and making them 'smart' by adding guidance packages to the front and back of the bombs.
Now, imagine that, due to a little more Pentagon/Bush administration wizardry, even this black budget estimate is undoubtedly a low-ball figure. One reason is simple enough: The proposed $541 billion Pentagon 2009 budget doesn't even include money for actual wars. George W. Bush's wars are all paid for by "supplemental" bills like the $162 billion one Congress will soon pass -- so the Department of Defense's $34 billion black budget skips "war-related funding." This means that even the overall figure for that budget remains darker than we might imagine (as in "black hole"). The Pentagon not only produces stealth planes, it is, in budgetary terms, a stealth operation. If honestly accounted, the actual Pentagon yearly budget, including all the "military-related" funds salted away elsewhere, is probably now more than $1 trillion a year.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174948/nick_turse_the_pentagon_s_stealth_corporations
Of course,zmann, we both know that the cost of our military goes far deeper than mere money.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
Oh believe me I know, I was just saying that actual bombs are relatively cheap compared to all the other shit they have.
Arrange for farmers to sell their produce directly those who need foodstuffs.
Allow no one to broker food as a commodity as long as one child goes to bed hungry, anywhere. Cut out the middleman completely, he is feeding only himself.
Rice and maize in sufficient quantity can easily provide adequate protein. Animal protein and engineered foods are not necessary and are uneconomic
To get adequate protein from rice and maize, unless you "enrich" the rice or maize, you need enormous amounts of rice or maize, or wheat, or any cereal crop. To say that rice can "easily" provide enough protein is simply put, not happening in the real world, no matter how "easy" it might seem theoretically.
"Uneconomic" and "necessary" are more than just a simple matter of (empty) calories.
Only if you strip out the germ and the bran.
Also, it isn't even simply a matter of proteins.
Certain fats are essential for human survival. The so called essential fatty acids. Which rice and maize are not viable sources of. Viable sources are flax, oily fish such as sardines, salmon, milk and meat from grass fed animals.
Malnutrition is (much) more than just a simple matter of calories.
I practice and teach critical care medicine at a large medical research INGO in Dhaka, Bangladesh. My ICU is full of severely malnourished children, mostly infants, with sepsis, pneumonia, meningitis, profound dehydration due to diarrhea and other consequences of extreme poverty. My patients come from urban slums worse than anything you can imagine. Our patients' nutritional status pretty well parallels the Dow and is declining fast at a time when our resources are already constrained.
As several of you have pointed out, our consumerism and militarism are to blame as much as our imperialist business practices. I don't have a lot of sympathy for the corporate titans who have to tighten their long belts and line up at the government trough to save themselves and their investors from their folly and greed. My sympathies are with the skeletal babies clinging to life against the odds for whom I have no ventilators because the Mexico City policy forbade us funds because one of our satellite hospitals does abortions to save impoverished women from deadly village quacks and prevent children from coming into the world to starve to death.
The "pro-life" conservatives in Congress have a lot to answer for due to the military, economic and social policies they've supported; they'd better hope they're wrong in believing in Hell and that Jesus knew what he was talking about.
Nice article, but there's a missing word: Livestock! There's a great source of higher quality nutrition.
Ok, speaking of African women farmers, I just found the "DECLARATION OF NYÉLÉNI." She was legendary. Oh, yea, I find "livestock" in the declaration three times. http://www dot grassrootsonline.org/news/press-releases/declaration-nyéléni.
Support the Heifer Project International to help get local sustainable farming going, with nutritious livestock.
Support Grassroots International and their "The Creole Pig Repopulation Program" http://www dot grassrootsonline.org/files/haiti_fact_sheet.pdf
They don't need our bad high carb diets and bad vegetable fats. They need healthy meats in their diets.
Weston Price searched the world for people with healthy teeth indicating healthy diets. The Weston Price Foundation promotes this. We can all learn from these diets world wide.
Check out this on food in the fight against cancer: "How to Protect Yourself Against Cancer With Food" http://www dot westonaprice.org/moderndiseases/cancer_broch.html. As it turns out, so many of the key vitamins and other nutrients are found in meat, fish, etc. as in traditional diets. Sometimes that's the only food source for them (ie. "True vitamin A," Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Cholesterol,) on an on. On the other hand look there for what causes cancer: stuff in our diets including those bad vegetable fats.
How about soy protein? Whoa, check out the huge list of "Studies Showing Adverse Effects of Dietary Soy, 1971-2003!" http://www.westonaprice.org/soy/soy_studies.html
Wait, wait, this isn't what we've been told in the mainstream media in the USA? No, we've gotten the ADM line on soy, the agribusiness (transfat) output complex's diet. Wait, what about government protection? Check out "Shenanigans in Congress" in "The Oiling of America" (http://www dot westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/oiling.html#congress). That explains it. The agribusiness complex dominated and look where it took it. Dr. Mary Enig, an author on that last piece was, for a long time, the lone whistleblower against it.
(See also Barbara Ehrenreich piece on "Low-Fat Capitalism" from the Progressive, August 20, 2002 (http://www dot progressive.org/node/1471, also at http://www dot alternet.org/story/13880/?page=entire, also at Weston Price: http://www dot westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/lowfatcapitalism.html.)
Ok, one more citation. Let me quote "Omnivore's Dilemma," p. 248: "Dr. Weston Price .... traveled all over the world researching the diets of teh healthiest, longest-lived populations, and found certain common denominators in their diets: They ate lots of meat and fats from wild or pastured animals; unpasturized dairy products; unprocessed whole grains; and foods preserved by fermentation. Today the foundation, whih is run by a nutritionist and a cookbook author named Sally Fallon, pormotes these traditional diets... where Joel (Salatin, featured in Omnivore's Dilemma) is one of the producers often cited."
Michael Pollan
This is another issue where we need to spread the word. The mainstream media still feeds us the corporate science of agribusiness.
Ok, have you had the corporate line too long to change? Consider these facts, "The Skinny on Fats," including "The Benefits of Saturated Fats." http://www dot westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/skinny.html#benefits.
Read "Why Grassfed is Best," by Jo Robinson, or "Pasture Perfect." The science will set you free, free from the corporate dogmatism.
And it will help the poor farmers to take back livestock (value added) from animal factories, and make a decent living, in the U.S. and worldwide.
Learn the science. Listen to the peasants of La Via Campesina, "the representatives of 30 organizations of pastoralists, indigenous peoples, smallholder farmers and NGOs from 26
countries in both the North and the South" in their "Wilderswil Declaration on Livestock Diversity" (http://www.viacampesina.org/main_en/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=441).
Oh, and: "Avoid zealots, they're generally humorless." Leo Buscaglia
Thanks Brad... I was vegetarian for seven years, during my twenties, for political and personal reasons...
Most of my friends were vegetarian then as well... Now I eat meat, and most of my vegetarian friends do now as well...
I went vegan for 6 months, then started to feel like I was missing out on the divine dance of the food chain...
I ate alot of processed corn and soy products then, thinking it was healthier... Then I started doing research on industrial agriculture, and how it is just as exploitive as industrial cattle operations regarding water, petrochemicals, etc
When I came across that research by Weston Price a few years ago, I decided to eat meat again... I make my own chicken soup stock, prepare with whole grains, dry beans, and fresh veggies from my own kitchen garden or local farmers market...
Now I feel like I am a vibrant part of a holistic food chain...
I think industrial monocrop agriculture and feedlots are a travesty and disgrace... Yet livestock is a natural and healthy part of life...
Thank you Dr. Brian. I don't know where you find the energy to participate in this discussion, given the tragic circumstances you are facing in your daily work.
Julian Lennon has a beautiful song called "Saltwater". My favorite line, one that always brings tears to my eyes: "why should one baby be so hungry she cries? saltwater wells in my eyes"
There is a quick fix for malnutrition and food insecurity. Make the UNFAO to recognize hemp seed as food for humans by charging the UN with criminal negligence.
The world's most nutritious and potentially most available, abundant, globally distributed agricultural resource is banned in most developing countries and the US because of marijuana prohibition.
Summary: The seed of Cannabis sativa L. has been an important source of nutrition for thousands of years in Old World cultures. Non-drug varieties of Cannabis, commonly referred to as hemp, have not been studied extensively for their nutritional potential in recent years, nor has hempseed been utilized to any great extent by the industrial processes and food markets that have developed during the 20th century. Technically a nut, hempseed typically contains over 30% oil and about 25% protein, with considerable amounts of dietary fiber, vitamins and minerals. Hempseed oil is over 80% in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and is an exceptionally rich source of the two essential fatty acids (EFAs) linoleic acid (18:2 omega-6) and alpha-linolenic acid (18:3 omega-3). The omega-6 to omega-3 ratio (n6/n3) in hempseed oil is normally between 2:1 and 3:1, which is considered to be optimal for human health. In addition, the biological metabolites of the two EFAs, gamma-linolenic acid (18:3 omega-6; GLA) and stearidonic acid (18:4 omega-3; SDA), are also present in hempseed oil. The two main proteins in hempseed are edestin and albumin. Both of these high-quality storage proteins are easily digested and contain nutritionally significant amounts of all essential amino acids. In addition, hempseed has exceptionally high levels of the amino acid arginine. Hempseed has been used to treat various disorders for thousands of years in traditional oriental medicine. Recent clinical trials have identified hempseed oil as a functional food, and animal feeding studies demonstrate the long-standing utility of hempseed as an important food resource."
J. C. Callaway
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
University of Kuopio, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l4kr3v51j21tkx16/
I've seen ground hemp seed available as a supplement in some 'alternative' shops, and online too.
Yeah, it is available online on some sports supplement sites.
There is a definite fix to malnutrition. Lower the number of humans on this planet to a size that is sustainable for the planet to provide a HEALTHY nutrition. We are in overshoot and not one person looks at the problem of too people, in fact the word is 'how to produce more from less to feed more than nature is capable of doing'. Amazes me how people think and as a collective whole. Trying to hang on to the things, the ways that everyone has become so cozy with and still staring oblivion in the face.
As an interesting historical note, when archaeologist found a gladiator graveyard in what is now Turkey, they tested some of the bones to discover what the gladiators had been eating. It showed a diet rich in barley, beans, and dairy. Bland, yes. But it met all of the nutritional requiremnts of these VERY active and athetic men and women.
Perhaps we can learn somethng from this...
Walk in peace.
Check out this article:
"Study:
Organic Dairy and Meat Improves Quality of Mothers’ Breast Milk"
http://www dot cornucopia.org/2007/07/study-organic-dairy-and-meat-improves-quality-of-mothers’-breast-milk/
Again science discovers benefits of traditional family farm diets.