Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Holder: US a 'Nation of Cowards' on Race Issue
The United States is "a nation of cowards" when it comes to race relations, the country's newly minted attorney general said today.
Attorney General Eric Holder signs autographs at the Justice Department today after addressing the nation's reticence to confront racial issues. (Photo by Lawrence Jackson) In remarks made during a speech to honor Black History Month, Eric Holder said the country remains "voluntarily socially segregated," making head-turning comments that could spark fierce dialogue and the ire of some conservatives.
"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot in things racial, we have always been, and we, I believe, continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards," Holder said at the Justice Department in Washington, D.C. "Though race-related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about things racial.
"This is truly sad. Given all that we as a nation went through during the civil rights struggle, it is hard for me to accept that the result of those efforts was to create an America that is more prosperous, more positively race-conscious, and yet is voluntarily socially segregated."
Holder become the nation's first black attorney general earlier this month.
Addressing reporters after the speech, Holder, 57, said his comments were "a question of being honest," adding that "we have to have the guts" to talk about race issues instead of avoiding them.
"It is an easy thing not to talk about these things. It is a painful thing to discuss them," said Holder, who was raised in New York City by parents whose roots are in Barbados.
In turn, Holder pledged to boost the work and mission of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, saying, "It's a division that has not gotten the attention it deserves, the resources it deserves, and people have not been given a sense of mission."
While Holder spoke about the masses spending more time together, ABC News polls show there has been sharply increased social interaction between black and white Americans in the past few decades. In June, 79 percent of whites reported having a "fairly close personal friend" who's black, up from 54 percent in 1981. Ninety-two percent of blacks reported having a white friend, up from 69 percent a generation ago.
Similarly, a 2005 poll found that 48 percent of whites and 63 percent of blacks said someone in their family had brought a friend of the other race home for dinner -- also far higher than when the data series began in 1973.
Still, three-quarters of African-Americans say they've personally experienced racial discrimination.
AG Reflects on Obama Speech, Discusses Future Plans
Holder also referenced a speech President Obama gave during the presidential campaign in addressing the controversy over his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
"I think that the speech the president gave in Philadelphia was really an opening for us, and one that I think we really have to exploit," Holder said today. "It has to be seen as an opportunity and the beginning of a process that I think can actually heal the racial division that has long separated us as a people.
"We have made a lot of progress. The fact that we have an African-American attorney general, an African-American president, I think, is extremely significant. But it is not an indication that all of the problems that we have confronted as a nation over the years are now resolved," he said.
"I think we have an obligation. We have to continue the fight of all the people who I mentioned in my speech to really kind of ultimately get this nation to the place where I think it can and should be."
After his speech, Holder also said he would be heading to Guantanamo Bay next week, accompanied by acting head of the Justice Department's National Security Division, Matthew Olsen.
"We need to have our feet on the ground to really see what is really going on at that facility, to see how people are being detained, to talk to people down there about the interrogation techniques being used," Holder said.
As part of Obama's executive order to eventually close the facility, Holder has been tasked with chairing the committee to implement Guantanamo's closure.
Holder will coordinate the review of the controversial detention facility with other Cabinet officials from the departments of Defense, State and Homeland Security as well as the director of National Intelligence and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
ABC News' Gary Langer contributed to this story.

73 Comments so far
Show All"The United States is "a nation of cowards" when it comes to race relations, the country's newly minted attorney general said today."
Yeah, we're also "a nation of cowards" when it comes to class relations and its questionable methods of wealth distribution!
"Yeah, we're also 'a nation of cowards' when it comes to class relations and its questionable methods of wealth distribution!"
You've got that right. And as far as cowards go, I want to see Mr. Holder prove his cojones in going after Bush administration war criminals and Wall Street financial criminals. Can he walk the walk or does he just disparage the cowardice of others?
solving the class relation solves the rest of it
edweg
Excellent, blunt statement by Mr. Holder. We might have a real Department of Justice for the first time in decades.
Their is not only cowardice, but denial of the institutional racism still in place.
Admittedly, it is a little more sophisticated now. If you are black and already rich from playing the capitalist game, and dress impeccably, you will be treated well by your fellow neighbors in the gated community and suits at work. But if you are poor and have only honest labor to offer, a fellow working-class white will still get hired ahead of you most of the time; the police will harass you for simply being on the street; and, when searching for a place to live, you will find many neighborhoods where the landlord or RE agent will never return your calls.
---USAn---
USAn
"But if you are poor and have only honest labor to offer, a fellow working-class white will still get hired ahead of you most of the time; the police will harass you for simply being on the street; and, when searching for a place to live, you will find many neighborhoods where the landlord or RE agent will never return your calls."
Obviously I'm about to disagree with that statement, but first let me say these statements in the following paragraph are not absolutes. There are of course and always will be instances of anything you can name.
You are right. A clerk at the DHS office is seldom invited to dinner at his neighbor, who is a stock broker...they have little to talk about (but now they live in the same neighborhood), you are speaking of class here. If you believe that a white has an advantage over a black for a job because of race, you are mistaken or live in the North or some pockets of the South. The Police don't harass someone because they are black per se, there is usually a reason, but each person is quick to hollar "racism" Thats like claiming the prison population has more Blacks simply because they are Black. And how would a landlord or agent know your race if you are calling on a phone? Many don't rent to peoople because they are deadbeats or have torn up prior properties.
There is no such thing as institutionalized racism other than that installed by affirmatuive action.
I suggest you read "Bowling Alone" by Robert Putnam. It explains things far better than I could. I believe many things you still see as racism are nothing more than human nature no matter the ethnic background, or personal preferences among the races.
I am proud to have been kicked off Alternet for using the comparison of Mr. Obama to a House Negro.
The comparison is valid, but not racist. Yet, Alternet did not want the controversy, methinks.
Here is the reference to House Negro. I think Malcolm X hit a home run with this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znQe9nUKzvQ
This exposes Mr. Obama, and others in Mr. Bush's administration, as a hypocrites and a phonies.
I am always amused by white people and their peculiar nerviousness and squeamishnessness in talking about race - especially if there are black poeple around. I'm white and I see it in myself. There is this odd notion that absence of racism is demonstrated by complete blindness regarding race or any mention of it whatsoever.
In other words, open any kind of discussion about race and racism and get called a racist!
This happened on this site. In the discussion of the NY Post Cartoon, a contributor wrote "Obama ain't no brother" (obviously referring to obama's downplaying of continuing reality of racism), and got his post deleted for it. The ironic thing was that he was probably the only black person contributing to the discussion.
---USAn---
"I am proud to have been kicked off Alternet for using the comparison of Mr. Obama to a House Negro. "
That is extremely racist!
It's like when Nader called Obama "Uncle Tom".
Joehope,
Do you know what an uncle Tom is? Do you know what a house negro is? Look at the link and have Malcolm X explain this to you.
Some people, my self included, don't like phonies and hypocrites. Uncle Tom and House Negro are said to attract attention to the impostor, hypocrite, phony. It is the similar as calling someone an "ass kisser" or "boot licker" or "boss" except they may have more authority.
You really don't get it. Do you?
"That is extremely racist!"
He doesn't mean it in that way at all. You missed the discussion on this apparently.
This was a huge political mistake and also a bunch of Horsefeathers. Here's a man that doesn't understand his position.
"Still, three-quarters of African-Americans say they've personally experienced racial discrimination."
This is the Attorney General of the United States talking about terms of race discriminatiion in reference to African Americans. Does he think that Browns and Yellows don't run into race discrimination? Did he address the race discrimination (more than 3/4 of Latino's will attest to that) faced by Browns from Blacks? Is he not aware that Whites experience as much or more discrimination from Blacks? And to infer that the higher incarceration of Blacks is due generally to their race is dishonest.
Aside from all that, I would suggest to this idiot that if your enemy is sitting in a tree with a sniper rifle it is nort smart to hand him a box of .50 cal. bullets.
This is beginnig to look like the shortest government in history.
Mr More,
You arguents come straight from the KKK songbook.
I cannot even begin to refute you argument here Please consider reading some of the work of Tim Wise. Google him. Also Google terms like "sociological studies job discrimination" or the like.
but a few words regarding incarceration rates
Of course the higher incarceration rated of blacks is due to racism. When a young white man get a first drug posession conviction, he almost never goes to prison, a black person gets the same charge, he almost always does. illegal drug usage is higher among whites than blacks by the way.
In my town an FBI agent was shot dead while entering a home on a drug raid, clearly announcing himself while entering. The cop-killer claimed she thought the agent was an intruder and she got a completely sympathatic coverage from the local media. This sympathetic treatment absolutely would have never happened if she had been black.
---USAn---
PJD
You will find that most black crime is black on black.
"When a young white man get a first drug posession conviction, he almost never goes to prison, a black person gets the same charge, he almost always does."
This is because of the absolutely stupid and I would say racist sentencing guidelines from years back (that are still in force). Powder cocaine is gets a lesser sentence than crack cocaine and these are mandatory sentencing years.
"You arguents come straight from the KKK songbook."
Horsefeathers. I simply refuse to listen to the arguments made by the racist industry to designate every bad instance involving Blacks as racist. Any fair and reasonable person can read the statistics and see that of course there is still some racism, but most of the problem here is indeed the fact that blacks indulge in a higher rate of crime by any measurement and its mostly Black on Black by statistics. Its no different that my saying out of wedlock births by Blacks is far higher than Whites. Browns higher still. Those are both true statements. Does that make them racist?
And I would suggest when you immediately demonize someone suggesting a different reason for something, you weaken any argument you make. KKK indeed. I know you are not a fool so I don't take offense.
Hopeless!
"Sometimes you seem to want to elevate yourself above the kind of redneck ignorance so prevalent in Texas & in the military."
I would consider indulging in stereotypes like this hopeless.
I have seldom seen a more arrogant statement. Or one with less validity.
As to the original point, I do not care where dishonesty or lies come from, Neocons or progressives, a lie is a lie. Ideology is not a good thing if someone can't see past it.
I'm surprised that you made such uncivil and offensive remarks and I would say to you the same thing I said to PJD, trying to demonize someone who disagrees with you weakens any argument you make.
I find it significant that in the second sentence of this news analysis report, ABC News paves the way for the next few days of predictable spin by the mainstream US media pundits when the editors label Attorney General Holder's Black History Month speech "head-turning comments that could spark fierce dialogue and the ire of some conservatives."
What is so controversial about stating that Americans live in a country that is "voluntarily socially segregated", regardless of community demography, economic class or geographic region?
What is so "head-turning" about saying that despite the omnipresence of perceived racial issues in today's society, "average Americans simply do not talk with each other enough about things racial. This is truly sad."?
Thanks a lot for nothing, ABC News.
You couldn't move fast enough to legitimize the overt or thinly disguised white bigotry that is likely to spring forth during the next couple cable TV news cycles, by first predefining it "fierce dialogue" sparked entirely by Mr. Holder, and then excusing the backlash as justifiable conservative "ire".
Bill from Saginaw
"What is so "head-turning" about saying that despite the omnipresence of perceived racial issues in today's society, "average Americans simply do not talk with each other enough about things racial. This is truly sad."?"
Because its a lie, pure and simple. If any nation on earth has had conversations about race its the US, For the last 40 years its been omnipresent.
I'd also say if there are any cowards around its people like Holder that ask for "frank conversations" and then accuse anyone that disagrees with them of racism.
Your comment on "white bigotry" explains your predisposition to dismiss the Black bigotry of the Holders of our world. This was an absurd comment by the Attorney General of the United States.
TM -
Nations do not collectively engage in conversations. Only people do - average people, as Mr. Holder specifically focused upon in his Black History Month comments.
Could you please give me an example of some previous times that Eric Holder has accused somebody he disageed with of being racist?
For that matter, why do you automatically assume that I (just another submitter of comment to CD) dismiss black bigotry?
All I did was call white bigotry by its own name. What makes you think I'm not an equal opportunity condemnor of racism when I see it?
Bill from Saginaw
Bill
"For that matter, why do you automatically assume that I (just another submitter of comment to CD) dismiss black bigotry?"
Unfortunately I do. Sometimes I'm just as guilty of assuming someone agrees with the majority of posters here...that do for a fact dismiss black bigotry. They seem stuck in the sixties and seventies. They can't concieve that Black racism surpasses White racism now. Its fairly evident to most unless they just don't pay attention.
Mr. Holder is simply aiding the racist industry with his remarks but I certainly couldn't give any other instance of his accusing someone in particular of being a racist. But in my view too many people have been anything but cowards on this issue and his remark was in my view, cowardly. (I must note a prior prejudice because of his help in pardoning Rich and the BOA members. (He was wrong both times)
"All I did was call white bigotry by its own name. What makes you think I'm not an equal opportunity condemnor of racism when I see it?"
As you say, it was a supposition on my part. Your posts are usually honest and clear, so I will hope you are indeed "an equal opportunity condemnor of racism when I see it?"
Have you heard about the Jena Six? Do you know that African-Americans experience 6 times higher rates of imprisonment even though they are only 12% of the population? That they have the higher rates of unemployment?
I know people are going to blame them for all that, but honestly how can a people who 40 years ago didn't even have the right to vote, are supposed to recover from centuries of discrimination and brutality?
So if race is not a problem anymore, then why do Mr Holder's comments bother some of the posters here so much?
ladybug
Your stats are pretty much correct. I would suggest that in spite of the claims made by many here I don't believe any reasonable persion could believe that this was due solely to their color. Some is most certainly due to racism. No doubt at all. Most is due to the fact that they are involved in far more criminal activities. And the real shame is its mostly Black on Black.
The higher rate of unemployment is easily explained. Many still resist and don't have an education. Have you ever heard a black child say to another who is reading and studying..."why you being white?" (not meant as a compliment), I have heard exactly that said and teachers tell me its not that unusual. The Urban Institute suggests that the average black drop out rate is 49.8, heres where its really bad....female dropout rate is 43.8 while the Black male dropout rate is 57.2.
I would point out that many Blacks in our country today did not have ancestors that were slave's and Blacks haven't suffered from "centuries of discrimination and brutality." Before the end of the Civil War many Blacks were slaves and most weren't brutalized at all. The Uncle Tom's Cabin BS was just that. Pure Hoakum. Of (course) there was some, but people seldom damage their valuable goods. The brutality and discrimination in our country didn't really begin till after the Civil War. And it was bad enough.
The next problem is that many of the jobs that these men would usually fill are being filled by illegal aliens and legal aliens being brought in under one of the work programs like H1B. (I believe about 2000 hotel workers were brought in under H1B itself a few years ago). The jobs they can do are generally manual labor. Many others have a violent criminal record that precludes hiring them by many companies.
Are they to blame? Yes and no. They have had 40 years where they have had every educational advantage, were hired before more qualified Whites, affirmative action promoted their circumstances before others. So yes, they should as a whole progressed more. At the same time the Great Society tore the Black family apart more than any other...in my opinion...but the numbers say I'm right.
I'm getting to wordy, but at this point I see little discrimination per se, I see the same excuses being made as they were 30 years ago, 20 years ago and 10 years ago. There are just too many examples of other people coming here with less than many Blacks have and moving past them. Perhaps Texas and the South are a bit ahead because we started dealing with this years before others did, I don't know.
Generally speaking Bill Cosby hit the nail on the head when he said " Not too many people are going to hire a surgeon whose diagnosis is, dat tumor be nasty." Thats the truth. Most of what passes discrimination these days is most people have no interest in hiring someone without an education and one that speaks a street patois. Many here may not like it, but thats the truth.
And continuing to blame Black failure on racism is simply a form of disrespect. An accusation that they can't cut it because they are Black. It to me is the most blatant racism of all.
Its not that race is not still a problem, because it is. But not as presented here. Ole Whitey holding down the oppressed Black. Thats Rev. wright style racism. As long as people practice it in my view, the longer it will take for the majority of Black children to join Whites and Yellows if we want to put it in racial terms.
One reason they bothered me as I admitted a prior prejudice to Bill from Saginaw that I really hadn't thought of is that I have little respect for Mr. Holden because of prior choices he made and I felt it was inappropriate for the Attorney General of the US to make remarks like that.
I believe holding onto dogma from 50 years ago is a mistake.
Obama's "The Audacity of Hope" addresses this issue of unemployment and criminality.
It's not new, since I observed and learned about the same thing in Europe over 50 years ago, and it's not even a Black issue since it derives from poverty, lack of stable family units and the limitation on social mobility. Without family and social support even highly motivated children lose their interest in the public schools that, I understand, provide limited education in the US. Few can afford to attend college, unless they are athletes or highly motivated and extremely gifted to be awarded academic scholarships. Consequently the poverty cycle repeats from generation to generation and in the absence of being able to obtain employment the only source of income derives from the underground (criminal) economy.
Government can address this issue with various measures, such as funding schools and educators and providing unbiased sex education and condoms to reduce the rate of teenage pregnancy and single parent families.
Ultimate resolution of this racial disparity depends upon a caring, empathic society, something that does not fit the capitalist ideology of the US. So until a more socialist caring society replaces the current one non-blacks can expect to feel fearful in black neighborhoods.
My comments are, I believe, the type of dialogue that Eric Holder is suggesting. The chance this will happen are, I fear, negligible.
Eric please stay focused on the task at hand for this nation.
RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION AS LAW OF THE LAND.
1. Restore Checks and balances to the three branchs of government.
2. End warrant less surveillance, it is a cancer of torture that will tear this country apart, not make us more safe.
3. End Gang stalking torture in this country.
Bornfreemen
A lot of confusion among white arises die to a lack of what racism is and what it isn't, and in particular this notion of "black racism against whites".
Racism isn't bigotry, styereyotyping, racial jokes, or personal dislikes - although racism makes use of these things). Such things are objectionable of course, but don't result, by themselves in persistent distortions in a society.
So, for the purposes of recognizing and dismantling racism, the best definition of racism is the sociologists one:
- Racism is defined as an organized system of social customs and institutions for the maintenence of power and privlege of one group over another. -
Under this definition blacks can certainly (and understandably in many cases) hold prejudices toward whites, but they cannot be racist, because, as a group, they do not hold a position of poivlege and power in our society.
---USAn---
If we accept that definition of racism:
"Racism is defined as an organized system of social customs and institutions for the maintenance of power and privilege of one group over another"
By definition then, there are many countries -e.g. Israel, as a prime example- that are racist and by extension those countries' inhabitants. The list of racist countries must also include the one that seeks to maintain unilateral world power.
Please provide a source for your definition of racism.
The "definition" that you have given is more properly a description of institutional racism. Racism itself is an attitude or belief based on perceived racial differences among people.
q
Beat me to it. I would add, to me its how people of each race actually treat each other on a day to day basis.
Holder, shove your opinions up you know where. Right now I am looking at the news out of Switzerland about the UBS bank giving up the 'swiss bank account' secrecy for those americans that hide their money in secret swiss bank accounts to avoid paying taxes. Just what 'brave' steps are you going to take to investigate and bring the law down on these tax dodgers and get some well owed money to the US back in the US. Here's the link to that:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29268064/
And what about the lates 'mini' bernie madoff debacle where the suspect, Texas financier R. Allen Stanford, has disappeared leaving a bunch more people without their money? Here's the link to that:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29277787/
How many tons of evidence does it take to get action taken on these crooks that are scooping up all their fraudulent funds and now are even skipping town. Here is another financier that was being investigated and trying to hold down a lot of disgruntled investors and employees just long enough to skip. I know it is still early on in the new administration but that administration is not instilling much confidence in me. And it all breaks down to having unregulated, non-transparent and 'free to do as they want' money changers and laundryers that are the very crooks that that 'unfettered' part of the business sector attracts just like so many flies to dead meat.
The stimulus will not mean squat unless those that are responsible are hauled in and made to pay for their crimes instead of giving them rewards for their greediness. This country really needs something to show real accountability is still around for the trash that disguise themselves as the best and brightest.
AG Holder, who refuses to prosecute the Bush crime family for crimes against humanity, is the true coward. I guess he doesn't know that members of the Japanese high command were hanged after the war for having allowed waterboarding of prisoners on their watch. I guess he doesn't know that the invasion of Iraq was in violation of the UN Charter and therefore of the US Constitution. He is just another Bush-shielding Pelosi; how dare he, the biggest coward of all, dare call others cowards? If he were a real Attorney General, the ex-members of the Bush administration would be hiring defense lawyers. Instead, Holder lashes out on racial stuff. I, for one, am not even slightly distracted from the real problem. We need an AG who is not a coward to bring a bunch of mass murderers to justice. Nice try, Holder, but no dice. Now, get to work and do what any self-respecting AG would do. You've got a major prosecution staring you in the face. Quit trying to pretend you have more important matters to pontificate about. Prosecute Bush and his fellow criminals or shut up.
There are a bunch of brown people playing dodge-ball with hellfire missiles dropped illegally by Predator drones in Pakistan.
If you want to show your courage Mr. Holder, investigate and prosecute those responsible for this crime against people of color.
Just what I thought, COWARD.
How can Holder prosecute the Bush crime family for crimes against humanity when his own boss is committing the same crimes?
The biggest Bush-shielding swine is not Pelosi, though she is one all right, it's Obama.
That's why he'll never allow his goons to prosecute Bush and his fellow criminals. Obama wants to commit the same crimes and go on unpunished like Bush.
Deepa
What Eric Holder said regarding pervasive racial discrimination in the US is nothing new. Similar observations and comments were made by ACLU, some NGOs, and the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD).
In March 2008, the separate U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) issued a strongly worded critique of the United States' record on racial discrimination and urged the government to make sweeping reforms to policies affecting racial and ethnic minorities, women, immigrants and indigenous populations in the U.S.
Several civil liberties and human rights organizations have urged the special rapporteur to critically examine the continuation of racism and racial discrimination in various areas identified by CERD and well documented in extensive NGO reports, including criminal justice, education, housing, juvenile justice, immigration policy, police brutality, hate crimes and racial profiling.
"The message from the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is clear when it comes to the U.S.’ record on human rights and racial equality – the government can’t just talk the talk, it must also walk the walk,” said Jamil Dakwar, Advocacy Director of the ACLU Human Rights Program. “To claim the high moral ground and assert leadership on the issue of human rights, the U.S government must address the systemic discrimination and injustice that exists in its own backyard."
The ACLU testified in mid-February 2008 in Geneva before the Committee on the contents of a flawed U.S. government report that underreported the state of racial discrimination in the United States. In December 2007, the ACLU released a responsive independent shadow report highlighting the pervasive institutional, systemic and structural racism in America.
The CERD committee, which oversees compliance with an international treaty to end racial discrimination that was ratified by the U.S. in 1994, reviewed testimony and research by the ACLU and other human rights groups before issuing its final report.
Among its recommendations, the committee called on the U.S. to:
• Pass the federal End Racial Profiling Act or similar legislation and combat widespread ethnic and racial profiling practices by law enforcement, especially against Arabs, Muslims and South Asians in the wake of the 9/11 attacks;
• Protect non-citizens from being subjected to torture and abuse by means of transfer or rendition to foreign countries for torture;
• Adopt and strengthen the use of affirmative action programs to eliminate discrimination, and allow school districts to voluntarily promote school integration;
• Eliminate systemic inadequacies in criminal defense programs that have a disproportionate effect on indigent minorities and ensure competent counsel in all cases;
• Address the problem of the school-to-prison pipeline – the trend of funneling minority children into prison;
• Restrict felony disfranchisement policies and eliminate barriers to post-sentence voting rights restoration;
• Address the problem of violence against indigenous, minority and immigrant women, including migrant workers, and especially domestic workers; and
• Pass the Civil Rights Act of 2008 or similar legislation, and otherwise ensure the rights of minority and immigrant workers, including undocumented migrant workers, to effective protection and remedies when their employers have violated their human rights.
So, focus honestly on the issue that the article addresses.
I have not read the CERD report, but I did notice that you did not mention, and Holder did not mention, the elephant in the room -- criminal penalties for minor drug possession that end up incarcerating millions of African-Americans. Decriminalizing drug use could have a bigger impact than any of the items you listed.
kivals
I'm glad someone else is bring that up. Or at least equalizing the penalty for crack and powder cocaine. That would at least be a start.
Deepa
"Protect non-citizens from being subjected to torture and abuse by means of transfer or rendition to foreign countries for torture"
A no brainer.
"Eliminate systemic inadequacies in criminal defense programs that have a disproportionate effect on indigent minorities and ensure competent counsel in all cases"
This is an extremely large problem and frankly there isn't enough "competent counsel" to go around. Rural areas are better than cities, but I frankly can't see an answer to this problem. Perhaps a review of indigent cases by 3rd and 4th year law students? Perhaps an internship of one or two years representing people who can't afford it (though I can just see the ABA going for that)?
"Adopt and strengthen the use of affirmative action programs to eliminate discrimination, and allow school districts to voluntarily promote school integration"
Affirmative Action is discrimination. Its the very definition of it. Frankly the problem we are having is that Blacks want to resegregate....perhaps return to neighborhood schools would be more to the point.
"Restrict felony disfranchisement policies and eliminate barriers to post-sentence voting rights restoration"
Excellent idea, especially for drug convictions. Violent criminals need not apply, but there are many others that could more than benefit.
"Address the problem of the school-to-prison pipeline – the trend of funneling minority children into prison"
You'll have to figure out how to lower the drop out rates and restore manufacturing jobs to the US.
The only way to stop the exploitation of illegal aliens is to stop allowing them to take American jobs so the rest of the abuses can't hide inside this problem. Many problems are solved by simply obeying the law.
This is a truly misguided statement, on par with Bill Cosby...
As a man of his age, ethnicity, background, education, and now office...
He should be fully aware of the institutionalized racism inherent in the system...
What about the Banksters red-lining the downtown areas, then denying small biz loans or home loans based on ethnicity?
What about the developers who built suburbia and gated "communities", that rely on cars and are alienating to one's neighbors?
What about the industrialists who locate their polluting factories in poor minority areas, and relocate our jobs to other countries?
What about the War on Drugs with racial profiling and manditory minimums and the CIA flooding the ghettos with crack?
What about the Privatized prison industry, with corrupt judges and crooked laws and a powerful prison guard lobby?
What about military recruiters targeting kids in poor neighborhoods, courthouses, immigrants, sporting events, TV & video games?
With gentrification now making entire neighborhoods unrecognizeable to the original inhabitants, further alienating our own past...
How about discuss these issues, build a case, then go after the banksters and corporatists who created these conditions...
Funny how Holder makes these comments at the same time the corporate media pushes hard the story of the racist Obama cartoon in the New York Post.
It's almost as if this is an orchestrated distraction.
And all this is happening while Obama is putting 17K more troops to Afghanistan, the entire banking system continues to melt down and layoffs of 20K everyday are the norm.
There won't be a country left to argue race at this pace.
If I was African American I'd be far more concerned with the stories I mentioned than an insipid cartoon.
Remember, never watch the magician's left hand, that's the bait.
Deepa
February is African Americans’ History Month in the U.S. It gives an extra reason to ponder the journey of African-Americans from the early days of slavery, through Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, and to the present day. Even though one should be thankful that the US society has evolved to where African Americans are no longer bought and sold, treated not like people but rather as property, without reward, without a voice, and virtually without any rights at all. However, while the African Americans are no longer “slaves”, are they truly equal in the US society as The Declaration of Independence proclaims that all persons are created equal?
Let me highlight few areas:
1. Economic:
While African-Americans are certainly much better off than they were in centuries past, the socio-economic disparity between the races remains pronounced in the U.S. today. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the 2005 median income for European American households was $48,554, while that of African American households was only $30,858. The Bureau also reports that in 2001, 22.7 percent of African Americans lived below the poverty level, while only 7.8 percent of European Americans lived below the poverty level. Witness Hurricane Katrina. We didn't see very many European Americans trapped inside that stadium.
2. Political:
You know how many African Americans have served as governors or mayors (leave alone president, vicepresident, speaker) in the 200+ years of American history.
“Ex-Justice Dept. Attorneys Accuse Bush Admin of Restricting African American Vote to Favor Republicans”
“Former Justice Department attorneys have publicly accused the Bush administration of politicizing the department's Civil Rights Division which was formed 50 years ago to protect the voting rights of African-Americans.
According to a recent report by the McClatchy newspapers, the Bush administration has pursued an aggressive legal effort to restrict voter turnout in key battleground states in ways that favor Republican political candidates.” www.democracynow.org, Tuesday, April 24th, 2007.
3. Judiciary:
On a wider scale, race-based inequity is perhaps most apparent in the criminal justice system, where the color of the defendant's skin and the victim's skin play a significant role in determining who receives the death penalty in the U.S. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), people of color have accounted for a disproportionate 43 percent of all executions since 1976, and currently account for 55 percent of inmates currently awaiting execution. While European American victims account for approximately one-half of all murder victims, 80 percent of all death penalty cases involve European American victims. Furthermore, according to the ACLU, "as of October 2002, 12 people have been executed where the defendant was white and the murder victim black, compared with 178 black defendants executed for murders with white victims."
Unspoken, of course, is the assumption that jails are meant for poor, young people of color, particularly young African-American males. According to the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, one in seven African-American males are currently or permanently disqualified from voting because of criminal charges. One in three young black males between the ages of 18 and 39 will spend time in prison, on parole or probation.
Is that because African-American men are particularly violent and murderous? A 1997 study of death sentences in Pennsylvania from 1983 through 1993 showed that a black defendant was 38 percent more likely to receive a death sentence than a white defendant accused of a similar crime. According to another report an African American is ten times more likely to get life imprisonment than European American counterpart for a similar crime in the US.
4. Law Enforcement (Police):
Sean Bell, a 23 year old groom-to-be and his two African American friends were gunned down by five plain-clothed New York City police officers who felt compelled to fire over 50 shots total at the three unarmed African American men who were celebrating Bell's impending marriage. Why? The three were unmistakably young, black, and deemed suspicious and menacing--even without possessing weapons. Apparently these young men didn't need to be armed to be considered dangerous.
How do minorities fare at traffic stops? African American, Hispanic and European American drivers are equally likely to be pulled over by police, but African Americans and Hispanics are much more likely to be searched and arrested, a federal study found. Police were much more likely to threaten or use force against African Americans and Hispanics than against European Americans in any encounter, whether at a traffic stop or elsewhere, according to the Justice Department.
Therefore, racism and racial prejudice is systemic or structural in the US. The prisons are disproportionately filled with black men and women, schools serving predominately African American and other minority communities remain understaffed and underfunded, the minority communities receive inferior health care, employment opportunities and many are destined to live in poverty their entire lives.
If the people of the powerful dominant community could somehow grasp the notion that it is only to the degree that they acknowledge and unearth the racist notions that lie hidden in them-often just beneath the surface— and in their narratives (Obama’s political presence is definitely threatening to the status quo) that we may see the same yardstick being applied to all irrespective of colour, creed, and class, and they too would join hands in bringing into reality The Declaration of Independence that ALL PEOPLE ARE CREATED EQUAL.
Deepa, you ended your earlier ppost with this admonishment: "So, focus honestly on the issue that the article addresses."
It appears, sir, that you are the person who is not honestly focused on the "issue that the article addresses" which is a lack of a general dialogue among Americans about racial issues. The AG's complaint is that, in spite of many economic gains by Black Americans over the past few decades, we remain wilfully segregated at the social level.
Instead of discussing the reasons for the absence of such a dialogue, you chose to do little more than recatalog both historical and current discriminatory practices against Blacks by Whites.
Perhaps attitudes such as your own are a major reason that there is no such discussion about race in America as Holder desires.
q
quickstepper
As popular as I am here today, I hate to bring this up, but many Blacks have no real interest in integration at the social level. Many do, many don't.
Again I'd refer any one to Robert Putnam's "Bowling Alone" Its an honest discussion and study. I think one thing everybody forgets when you discus Blacks they are no more monolithic than Whites or Browns.
Technology advances, human interactions remain primitive. Obama is a mix of black and white, so obviously people of different races can love one another and produce children. Now, as far as being able to teach your children how to respect those who are different from you is a different story altogether.
Mr. Holder is stating the obvious because he has to deal with it on a daily basis, just as we all do. For some reason, people flake out when they can't seem to talk about why they hate someone who is different from them. Hate spews from ignorance, power and control or better yet, by those who believe it is their right to oppress others.
Race baiters are like commie baiters; afraid to show their lack of altruistic behaviors...Wall Street is the biggest charade of them all. Basic rule of Contracts 101, you can take advantage of someone who made a mistake, provided good faith was the code of conduct.
Who would you give part of your paycheck to, an elderly African-American on SSI or an African-American who owns a bank?
Why can't February be VALENTINE'S MONTH instead of "Black history" month? Divorce rates are at 50% and rising and today's Afros are getting more ignorant anyway. When we can "tolerate" over-commercialized "Christmas" for two months straight, we could as well just have a month to reflect on LOVE for a change so that our dysfunctional electorate can heal itself ! Enough with the race baiters already !!
I'm not accusing you of anything, but can you explain the statement "today's Afros are getting more ignorant anyway" because I don't understand what you mean.
No problem. What I'm referring to is that a lot of today's younger African Americans don't know much about MLK and in fact mistake Obama as the next MLK even though Obama was nowhere close to being the next MLK. Also, today's African Americans are allowing themselves to be framed, duped, and even imprisoned by the current system whereas yesterday's African Americans fought hard for some equal opportunities for all races.
Holder and his ...remark: Several observations; Why not offer a solution when you feel compelled to stand and call fellow Americans cowards? Racism is definately against the caucasion. For example, Robert Reich (economic advisor to obma) Jan 09 says "...don't give jobs to white...workers...give them to minorities/women(women are minorities)...do not give it to skilled workers..." . This is not even a case of perception, it is what it is; cowardly racism and appears as if, oh well never mind. Well I don't want an unskilled worker making my computer or building the bridge my family drives over or the post office building I go in to buy stamps. Good grief.
What ever happened to the land of opportunity and or the feeling of accomplishment when earning a degree or post degree, etc. or some trade?
Deepa
An honest discussion is possible when there is an honest perception and knowledge of Reality.
I recall seeing a billboard some time ago. It showed a picture of a native american, an oriental, an african american, a jew, (star of david around his neck) and a caucasion. All the pictures were children about 4-5 yrs old.
The caption said, "NO BODY IS BORN A RACIST" I guess I never learned how to be a
racist. I never saw a black man face to face until I enlisted in the U.S.A.F.
Great speech. Long overdue!
Being European, I have to admit that I normally have a better time with blacks in America than with many whites. We share a sense of humour, I find.
As a - white - friend of mine who lives in the American heartland once put it so graphically: "If you inserted a piece of coal into most white folks' assholes, it would come out as a diamond after leaving it in there for a while, that's how tight-assed they all are."
Which is why I find the visible segregation so deplorable. Because if I want to have a really good time in America, I tend to visit with the blacks I know.
With whites I know in America, the odds are high that I have to endure far too many stories about psychoses and neuroses and depressions.
Whites could learn a lot from blacks. And vice versa, I hasten to add.
Gosh, we will just have to aspire to the enlightened state Europeans have reached. Speaking of racism..........
The Ag's comment was true, and despite his honesty, there are still elements of raical hatred, and bigotry that exists in this country. The only way to help solve this demise is to get it out in the open and discuss it. This action will help some but not all as some prejudices are deeply rooted. My congratulations to the Ag for having the courage to make the case.
We love the symbolic, and we avoid what's real. It's a type of maturity, and maybe he's right that it is just cowardice.
Idiot newspaper prints an idiot cartoon which may or may not be comparing Obama (or more likely, just a law he signed) to a chimp = protests in the streets.
More troops to Afghanistan, no doubt will cause death of impoverished brown-skinned people = nothing.
Why do we have such huge reactions to symbolic things like cartoons and use of language? I understand that those things do matter, but not nearly as much as bombs and cholera and AIDS and starvation matter. It's like that's all we can deal with at this point, that's the level of what we're ready to talk about. Chimp cartoons.