Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
No 10 Rejects New 'Torture Cover-Up' Claims
Downing Street insists the Foreign Office did not ask the US for help in suppressing crucial evidence concerning torture allegations
Downing Street today rallied to the defence of David Miliband, the foreign secretary, over claims that the Foreign Office asked the US for help in suppressing crucial evidence concerning torture allegations.
Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown stands in front of the door of 10 Downing Street in London February 12, 2009. Regulators should be given the power to penalise banks that pay bonuses to reward short-term deal-making rather than long-term performance, Prime Minister Gordon Brown said on Thursday. (Reuters/Luke MacGregor /Britain) The prime minister's official spokesman insisted the Foreign Office had merely asked the US to "set out its position in writing" when it solicited a letter for the American authorities to back up its claim that if the evidence was disclosed, Washington could stop sharing intelligence with Britain.
The claim persuaded two high court judges earlier this month to suppress what they called "powerful evidence" relating to the ill treatment of Binyam Mohamed, the British resident being held in Guantánamo Bay.
"The Foreign Office has made clear that they asked the US to set out their position in writing for us and the court," a spokesman for Gordon Brown said.
In response to the British request, John Bellinger, the US state department's chief legal adviser, said in a letter to the Foreign Office last August: "We want to affirm the public disclosure of these documents is likely to result in serious damage to US national security and could harm existing intelligence information-sharing arrangements between our two governments."
In their judgment, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones made it clear that without Miliband's claim about what they called the "gravity of the threat" from the US, they would have ordered the evidence to be revealed. Though the judges repeatedly used the word "threat", Miliband subsequently denied the US had threatened to stop sharing intelligence with Britain.
Miliband's denial last week led lawyers for Mohamed and the media, including the Guardian, to ask the judges to reopen the case on the grounds that the foreign secretary had fundamentally undermined his case. The judges agreed, against Foreign Office opposition, to reopen the case next month.
Clive Stafford Smith, director of Reprieve, the legal charity which represents Mohamed, said yesterday: "This just isn't going to go away unless both the US and the UK stop trying to suppress evidence of torture".
- Posted in



7 Comments so far
Show AllWe are not getting the whole story, methinks.
Oh I think that is obvious from the Downing STreet memo and also the leaks from that MI6 operative.
There was also the 'altered' legal advice from Lord Goldschmit (was that his name?) Basically the British equivalent of John Yoo who changed his advice as to whether the war was 'legal'. This advice clearly has never come out.
Miliband, I believe, just altered intelligence reports to change their tone....it was never clear what additional information he had that none of the professionals had access to. (If it wasn't Miliband it was someone high up in Blair's cabinet.)
The UK's collusion is such a poorly kept secret!
If it weren't for the fact that the Tories are still reeling from Thatcherism they would have been in power at the last election. As it stands we are likely headed for a hung parliment next year...not that this would be a bad thing IMHO.
If the headline was truthful it would read: #10 REJECTED.
I am surprised that Brown "rallied behind" Miliband. Miliband wants the Prime Minister's job so bad he can taste it. Would have been easy as can be to leave him flapping in the wind.
Of course, what he could have revealed would have probably forced an immediate election.
An election is Not something Brown wants...ever.
Tom Edgar
You must believe the Prime Minister. British politicians, unlike American ones NEVER lie.
Tom Edgar
You must believe the Prime Minister. British politicians, unlike American ones NEVER lie.
Sure, they'll lie to get into war. They'll break oaths as they defecate on domestic and international laws. They'll ejaculate as they flaunt the most basic mores of human behavior and desecrate life. When they tell us that they didn't, though, should we believe them?
Aloha, salud, lechiem,
- Tobias
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex