A 'Fraud' Bigger Than Madoff
Senior US soldiers investigated over missing Iraq reconstruction billions
In what could turn out to be the greatest fraud in US history, American authorities have started to investigate the alleged role of senior military officers in the misuse of $125bn (£88bn) in a US -directed effort to reconstruct Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein. The exact sum missing may never be clear, but a report by the US Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) suggests it may exceed $50bn, making it an even bigger theft than Bernard Madoff's notorious Ponzi scheme.
"I believe the real looting of Iraq after the invasion was by US officials and contractors, and not by people from the slums of Baghdad," said one US businessman active in Iraq since 2003.
In one case, auditors working for SIGIR discovered that $57.8m was sent in "pallet upon pallet of hundred-dollar bills" to the US comptroller for south-central Iraq, Robert J Stein Jr, who had himself photographed standing with the mound of money. He is among the few US officials who were in Iraq to be convicted of fraud and money-laundering.
Despite the vast sums expended on rebuilding by the US since 2003, there have been no cranes visible on the Baghdad skyline except those at work building a new US embassy and others rusting beside a half-built giant mosque that Saddam was constructing when he was overthrown. One of the few visible signs of government work on Baghdad's infrastructure is a tireless attention to planting palm trees and flowers in the centre strip between main roads. Those are then dug up and replanted a few months later.
Iraqi leaders are convinced that the theft or waste of huge sums of US and Iraqi government money could have happened only if senior US officials were themselves involved in the corruption. In 2004-05, the entire Iraq military procurement budget of $1.3bn was siphoned off from the Iraqi Defence Ministry in return for 28-year-old Soviet helicopters too obsolete to fly and armoured cars easily penetrated by rifle bullets. Iraqi officials were blamed for the theft, but US military officials were largely in control of the Defence Ministry at the time and must have been either highly negligent or participants in the fraud.
American federal investigators are now starting an inquiry into the actions of senior US officers involved in the programme to rebuild Iraq, according to The New York Times, which cites interviews with senior government officials and court documents. Court records reveal that, in January, investigators subpoenaed the bank records of Colonel Anthony B Bell, now retired from the US Army, but who was previously responsible for contracting for the reconstruction effort in 2003 and 2004. Two federal officials are cited by the paper as saying that investigators are also looking at the activities of Lieutenant-Colonel Ronald W Hirtle of the US Air Force, who was senior contracting officer in Baghdad in 2004. It is not clear what specific evidence exists against the two men, who have both said they have nothing to hide.
The end of the Bush administration which launched the war may give fresh impetus to investigations into frauds in which tens of billions of dollars were spent on reconstruction with little being built that could be used. In the early days of the occupation, well-connected Republicans were awarded jobs in Iraq, regardless of experience. A 24-year-old from a Republican family was put in charge of the Baghdad stock exchange which had to close down because he allegedly forgot to renew the lease on its building.
In the expanded inquiry by federal agencies, the evidence of a small-time US businessman called Dale C Stoffel who was murdered after leaving the US base at Taiji north of Baghdad in 2004 is being re-examined. Before he was killed, Mr Stoffel, an arms dealer and contractor, was granted limited immunity from prosecution after he had provided information that a network of bribery - linking companies and US officials awarding contracts - existed within the US-run Green Zone in Baghdad. He said bribes of tens of thousands of dollars were regularly delivered in pizza boxes sent to US contracting officers.
So far, US officers who have been successfully prosecuted or unmasked have mostly been involved in small-scale corruption. Often sums paid out in cash were never recorded. In one case, an American soldier put in charge of reviving Iraqi boxing gambled away all the money but he could not be prosecuted because, although the money was certainly gone, nobody had recorded if it was $20,000 or $60,000.
Iraqi ministers admit the wholesale corruption of their government. Ali Allawi, the former finance minister, said Iraq was "becoming like Nigeria in the past when all the oil revenues were stolen". But there has also been a strong suspicion among senior Iraqis that US officials must have been complicit or using Iraqi appointees as front-men in corrupt deals. Several Iraqi officials given important jobs at the urging of the US administration in Baghdad were inexperienced. For instance, the arms procurement chief at the centre of the Defence Ministry scandal, was a Polish-Iraqi, 27 years out of Iraq, who had run a pizza restaurant on the outskirts of Bonn in the 1990s.
In many cases, contractors never started or finished facilities they were supposedly building. As security deteriorated in Iraq from the summer of 2003 it was difficult to check if a contract had been completed. But the failure to provide electricity, water and sewage disposal during the US occupation was crucial in alienating Iraqis from the post-Saddam regime.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
12 Comments so far
Show AllThis investigation will undoubtedly bring new light to "Mission Accomplished".
Actually, I need to thank you for writing this article. I've followed some of the key words in your article. Now, I've found documents that show more details about the fraud case you disclosed in your article, along with names.
I was able to find more information about the people involved and how they operated. Some of what they did is what's happening at Robins Air Force Base...I just didn't know how to word it and what laws to apply to it.
Good gracious! You just gave me what I needed to help me write the formal complaint to Robins Air Force Base next week. I've wracked my brain for several months trying to figure out how to describe what was taking place at the base, but you can't just word it without citing laws and cases. You can't cite laws and cases if you don't know the cause of actions. Now I know what I was missing.
Here's one of the documents I found, using information from your article. http://www.sigir.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/Oct06/pdf/App_J_-_October_2006.pdf
It lays out who was involved in what, and for how much. It even has a diagram of how the operation worked.
I already see several events in this document, and the other references I found (some in Wikipedia) that spells out how to write up what took place, and is taking place at Robins AFB.
Actually, I need to clarify what I meant by saying "your article is nothing" I meant, it's nothing to hear of the bribery and the amount of money at stake.
It's just that it's a common practice in contracting, that to read about this story, it's just "another contracting corruption".
I'm not surprised at any of this, at all. I've seen what the contractors do at Robins Air Force Base. The government put military and civilian people in the chain of command, but the contractors are slick. They promise the government people jobs, so those who were supposed to deal with the corruption do nothing.
Next thing you know, the military and civilian personnel are working for the contractors who were caught in fraud.
It isn't something they hide either. I have received emails from a military domain that lay out the details of who they want as contractors and if you don't back away, the contracts are awarded through back doors.
I even have depositions, affidavits, briefings and other court document that prove the government put these contractors in charge of duties that only authorized government personnel can do, and the government people go TDY and the contractors have a field day.
When you're dealing with millions of dollars in contracts, I guess they just can't help themselves to a slice of the pie. Your article is nothing.
You can't even report bribery and other fraud to the senators because they are dependent on the contractors to raise funding for them. There is a whole lot of money going around in military contracts that even the courts (at least in Georgia) get in on the act of assisting certain contractors in getting military contracts.
I've been offered enough bribes that would have made me a wealthy woman in military contracting. That's just how they work. You either go along with their way of doing business, or you're out. I upset their cookie jar, so I'm out. :-)
Why is anyone surprised at this?? And why would anyone think that the extent of corruption will be made public enough to make a difference? The same thing is happening in Afghanistan.
This isnt the first article to surface....it wont be the last. The extent of the corruption will be covered up and taxpayers will pay the price for their officials bad management and downright dishonesty. How can you trust anyone....clear them all out and start fresh!! Get rid of them all...prosecute them....without rights to a lawyer....they should be familiar with that scenario....and then seize their assets to repay. Let them feel what its like to be unemployed and not have money in the bank.
Expose them publicly....very publicly...so that they will never have the chance to work again. Ignorance should not be a defense, in fact it should be added to the list of their crimes. This is embezzlement, fraud of the highest magnitude.
But in reality, this wil be swept under the carpet like everything else....unless Americans finally stand up and demand justice. This will never happen. If this was possible, it would have happened long ago.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants. ....Thomas Jefferson
This is BS. The greatest fraud ever perpetrated was the first FELONY/GRAND THEFT BAILOUT and the next FELONY/GRAND THEFT BAILOUT will be even greater.
You're wrong February - this is not BS - this is critical to everything that we have done during the past 6 years. It is testament to the lies, the inhumanity, the manipulation, the greed and the political and economic control Bush and the Neocons have forced upon this country. It is simply reflective of the attitude "we can do whatever we want and the stupid democracy (people) will never catch onto us." It never had anything to do with fighting terrorism - it was good old American imperialism at its worst - with a profound accent on wealth accumulation, and a pronounced deficit of truth and integrity.
The military-industrial complex has now neutered the State Department, avoided nearly all oversight in its conquest and occupation of Iraq, killed hundreds of thousands, stole literally billions while Congress was busy discussing the national and international perils of steroid use by professional ball players! The personality disorder that is responsible for this type of conduct will continue to thrive as long as the American people refuse to hold them accountable. And this is a PERSONALITY DISORDER.
Regarding the "personality disorder" claim. In 1987 Anne Wilson Schaef wrote a book called WHEN SOCIETY BECOMES AN ADDICT, in which she builds a comparison between individual addictive behavior and society. She concludes that the U.S. is an "addictive system" that essentially forces addictive behavior on its members. The economic premises that perpetual growth and increasing consumption are "good"--despite all evidence to the contrary--have produced a sick system in which all Americans must participate to some degree (even if its just to buy groceries). To knowingly participate in a flawed, now failing system requires behavior that is clearly addictive. Just as individual addicts can be self-centered, dishonest, confused, perfectionist, forgetful, codependent, negative, defensive, and blaming, so can society. They (we) suffer illusions of control, tunnel vision, and a deterioration of ethics.
To quote Schaef: "We see exactly the same characteristics operating in the [American] system as we see in the individual addict. In order to understand the system in which we live and help move it toward recovery, the time has come to admit, without reservation, that it is an addict and functions on systemic level the same as any decompensating or deteriorating drunk. We must move beyond our participation in this disease process, beyond our denial, and see the elephant in its context for what it is, an addictive system."
That was twenty-two years ago, and the "drunk" that is American is now well into the DTs! How absolutely remarkable that the president who finally dropped us into the filthy gutter of undeniable sickness is an alcoholic!
But it gets worse. Corporations are treated as individual persons in our system of "justice." If corporations truly were individual people, they would be immediately diagnosed as psychopathic (read THE CORPORATION, by Joel Bakan, or see the dvd of the same name), and their behavior would land them in treatment or, more likely, in jail. Psychopaths, according to the diagnostic criteria, are irresponsible, manipulative, grandiose, lacking in empathy, asocial, incapable of accepting responsiblity for their actions, and unable to feel remorse.
So, in essence, Americans are addicts (consumers) controlled by psychopaths (corporations). What else can such a system do but self-destruct?
And the large circle of crooks will soon be linked to Poppy Bush and the family of secrets... like every monumental crime on this planet, his friends are always busy, the old financial military intel information war guys....
War is expensive, Peace is priceless and Where's the Money?
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants. ....Thomas Jefferson
I believe you mis-read what I have said. I do not disagree one bit with the outrageous fraud that has occurred in Iraq and for that matter, the atrocities committed under deception and lies from the administration. I am simply stating that the FRAUD of the past bailout and the upcoming bailout is monetarily much greater.
Incidentally, my moniker is O, not "February".
"O," Sorry if I misinterpreted your message. And I agree the current economic mess is a huge ripoff. It simply temporarily sustains the system that is the problem - kind of like giving pain medication to a cancer victim who is slowly but surely dying. And no doubt, like Iraq, the bailout will produce actually human casualties - AND I MEAN DEATHS. Whether by suicide, homicide because of extreme deprivation/looting/social upheaval, or by government control of the masses - it seems inevitable is something different is not attempted to alleviate this mess.
I like your moniker "O" - seems to have alot of relevance in these times . . . . .
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants. ....Thomas Jefferson
Could not agree more with everything you have said.
Seems that after the next bailout, the SWHTF...even the sheeple/sleeple have their limits.