EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
- NSA Whistleblower Revealed: Q&A with Edward Snowden
Popular content
Today's Top News
Homeless Kids Lack School to Call Home
As more kids become homeless, finding stable school environment is a struggle
As Kathy Johnson walked from her family's cramped room in a West Side shelter to pick up her 10-year-old twin daughters from school, she asked God to make good on what she had promised them.
(photo: Chicago Coalition for the Homeless) "Release housing for me and my children. . . . God, give me strength. We didn't ask to be in this shape; unfortunately we are," Johnson prayed. Health issues cost her a job as a hotel room attendant three years ago, she said.
Chicago Public Schools officials say an increasing number of students are losing their homes, becoming casualties of the economic downturn.
The number of homeless students has risen dramatically in the last year. From July 1 to Dec. 31, the district counted 9,698. That's 23.5 percent more than the 7,851 for the same period in 2007. By the end of the school year, the district is expecting to top last year's record of 10,642 students, said Patricia Rivera, director of the district's homeless education program.
"I see that it will probably get worse," she said. "It has far-reaching consequences for our students."
For three years, Johnson, 43, and her children have drifted through a half-dozen Chicago shelters as she struggled to find work and housing. The twins, Laquita and Lakresha, and an older daughter, Pearlie, 18, have had to cope with new living conditions and people almost every semester, because shelters require clients to move every few months to free up space for others.
"Laquita came up to me and said, 'Mom, I'm very tired. I just want to get out of here. Can we just please move into an apartment?' " Johnson said. "I said, 'Baby, Mama's going to try and get us out of here this year, I promise.' "
The girls have struggled with homework because there is little privacy in shelters, Johnson said, and with making friends. Shelter rules prohibit outsiders, meaning the twins could not invite classmates to a birthday slumber party.
"I don't like being in a shelter because when I get to school I get friends and then I lose them," Laquita said.
Their grades have suffered, too. Johnson tried to keep her children at Shoop Academy on the Far South Side after they switched shelters and had to travel several hours to get to school. The girls failed state tests last spring and now are repeating the 3rd grade at Cather Elementary School, near their current shelter.
Federal law requires schools to provide services to homeless students, but little money is allocated. Chicago school officials said there have been slight increases in the last few years, with the district receiving $700,000 from the federal government for the current school year. Most of the money goes to transport students to the schools they attended before becoming homeless. The district also waives school fees and often gives students multiple sets of uniforms.
Each school has a homeless advocate to help children and families arrange for services. Students also receive free breakfasts and lunches through a federal program that allows $100 for each homeless child, Rivera said.
"It doesn't cover a lot," Rivera said.
A three-year grant made volunteers available to tutor children in some shelters. They hope to continue the program, Rivera said.
Rene Heybach, a lawyer with the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, said the district generally is doing a good job of working with the group on behalf of children. But upheaval is looming, she said, because of plans to close dozens of neighborhood schools for the district's Renaissance 2010 program to close under-enrolled or struggling schools.
"All of that displacement that Renaissance 2010 is causing is a huge problem," Heybach said.
Tiara, 6, has attended three schools since her mother, Aisha, lost her fast-food job and her apartment in September. Aisha, who did not want her last name used, said she changed schools each time so Tiara could arrive on time.
Tiara attends Westcott Elementary on the South Side, where her mother said teachers and others don't always understand the challenges she and her children face.
"The teacher says she's behind. I work with her but it is extremely hard," Aisha said. "It's not like I can just sit down and work with her one on one. There are 50 people that live in the same place as me."
Homeless high school students have their own issues, said Jimell Byrd, liaison for homeless students at Fenger High School. The schools used to deal with teens locked out of their homes because of family conflicts but who moved in with friends. Now more families are being evicted, Byrd said.
"Some students are really embarrassed that they don't have their own home or their own key," Byrd said.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


10 Comments so far
Show AllAmerica the beautiful: shower banksters with billions of cash while we throw away our children. You will reap the harvest you'll have sewn, America.
19 million homes in America empty.
Houses houses everywhere yet not a one to live in.
There is only one answer to this problem and its jobs. The opportunity to work and provide for your children.
Both winning ticket and GW make cogent points. We ought to be able to do something about showering millions on Bankers and CEO's...expect we will.
Housing is another problem. Even if you confiscated houses from their rightful owner and gave them to the homeless, what then? They would be in worse shape than before.
What is confiscate and what is "The Rightful owner"?
We have to change how we view OWNERSHIP and community. The entire concept of private property wherein one person acquires more and more while others have less and less has to be thought out.
There are Aboriginal Communities all over Canada's North. Thye have this tradition of what is called a "community freezer". When a hunter goes and and kills cariboo he takes what he needs and then puts the rest into the community freezer. Even though he might have made the kill it is not seen as HIS. It belongs to the community.
Thereafter anyone, the elderly, single moms, even those who are POOR hunters or just too lazy to hunt can go into that freezer at will without having to demonstrate destitution and help themselves to the meat.
There is no "Moral" reason for declaring a person a "rightful owner" of a resource. It is not something that MUST be. The concept is something our governments and the rule of law create.
Just as MONEY as a concept is something our Governments create.
This means , given that Governments are formed BY The people and are OF the people, those Concepts can be changed at will for the greater welfare of the people.
Governments OF The people should concern themselves with the welfare of all and not of a priveleged few. A Government that rewards ONLY the better hunter is not concerned with the welfare of all.
That would be correct if we lived in a Socialist state, which thank God we don't. But I see your point if you look at it from your Socialist point of view.
My point was as it stands even if the owners ( banks anyway mostly) agreed to house sitting by homeless families the family would be unable to live there because they could not afford utilities or insurance or upkeep.
But there is no reason you couldn't work out a house sitting arrangement with homeless families wher the banks paid these costs too, empty houses deterioriate, so it would be in their own interests for them to help out. (of course they are a selfis lot of bastards as we know) Or to stop forclosure on a family that has owned the house for years and could keep living there rather than leaving it vacant. And perhaps government needs to take a hand in this area.
Though I wouldn't favor your solution, we should certainly be able to do better than we are. Which is not much. The local level is being overwhelmed.
Well YOUR Capitalist state is a disaster.No Capitalist state has ever been successful at any time in history.
Thank heavans I am not a Capitalist. I just dont believe in stealing from others to enrich myself.
PK
We aren't a disaster yet! Give us time. You meant Socialist state hasn't ever been sucessful I'm sure.
Is it stealing if I work 60+ hours a week, don't take vacations for years and save money? So if someone else didn't, spent every dime, saved nothing your feeling is take it from me and give it to them?
Just an example, not personal..... Consider human nature.
Have a good day!
>>Is it stealing if I work 60+ hours a week, don't take vacations for years and save money? So if someone else didn't, spent every dime, saved nothing your feeling is take it from me and give it to them?
You call THIS sucess...working 60 hours a week for WHAT? So you can die old and rich?
What a stupid system. Even stupider the people who buy into it. Wake up work wake up work wake up work save money and WHAT...Buy a Motot home to see the country and drop dead when you cross the border into Kansas?
All Mr Buffet has to do is BUY stocks one day, lean on his friends in congress to pass bills favoring the companies he bought stocks in the next day, then sell at a profit for 250,000,000$$.
WORKING 60 hours a week to save enough to retire on is SLAVERY. Flipping stocks and paying off friends to make 250 MILLIOn dollars is CAPITALISM.
Your country is pumping TRILLIONS of tax payer dollars to prop up that HOLY system you have been worshipping for all of your life. Drug use is rampant, Criminals run the country, poverty everywhere, people living in the streets, prisons filled and you call this SUCCESS?
Talk about Orwellian doublespeak.
There are less extreme options than taking the house from someone who may have worked very hard to get it. That is like a straw man meant to create fear in home owners.
How about building housing for use, not for speculation? Then assisting people in getting a reasonable size dwelling through rational loaning systems like the GI bill after WW II? One problem with public housing is there is no option to buy. In a capitalist system, owning a home or apartment leads to caring for it and having a nest egg to sell if you have to relocate.
How about a safety net that recognizes unemployment or illness and gives some extensions on mortgages or rent in case of personal calamity? The government would put out money and then still have a much better chance of getting it back eventually than they have with the banks.
That would be a TARP, not a TRAP.
Joe
This thread seems dominated by work not work, who deserves this, who does not, la la la...
Hey-Assume these homeless kids have a disabled parent. Or maybe one who finds it's all they can do to raise a few young kids alone, much less work as well-daycare like soccer mommies? Yeah right.
The kids are what is important. Screw socialism this, who deserves that. Who worked harder than who. The kids need homes which are easily available. Put them in cheap motel rooms with a door that locks, a shower, heater and microwave. Is that SOCIALISM?
It's about the kids. Not arguing 'principles' while children languish-THAT'S the principle. azjoe.
azjoe.