Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Latin American Leaders Say 'No' to U.S. Drug War
WASHINGTON - A commission led by three former Latin American heads of state has called the 30-year U.S. "war on drugs" in Latin America a failure and urged a drastic change in policy.
The Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy issued a report Wednesday, "Drugs and Democracy: Toward a Paradigm Shift," which calls for the creation of a Latin American drug policy and proposes three specific actions under the new paradigm: treat addicts as patients in the public health system; evaluate decriminalisation of cannabis possession for personal use; and reduce consumption through public education campaigns primarily directed at youth.
"The available evidence indicates that the war on drugs is a failed war," former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso said in a conference call with reporters from Rio de Janeiro. "We have to move from their approach to another one."
The commission headed by Cardoso and former presidents Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico and Cesar Gaviria of Colombia calls on U.S. and Latin American governments to acknowledge the insufficiencies of current policy and to engage in a debate about new alternatives.
"They're (the Commission) saying enough is enough," said John Walsh, senior associate for the Andes and Drug Policy at the Washington Office on Latin America. "There's a real drug war weariness in Latin America and its bad enough to feel like a policy had been imposed, and its worse when the policy doesn't work."
According to the report, Latin America remains the major global exporter of cocaine and cannabis, has become a growing producer of opium and heroin, and is developing the capacity to produce synthetic drugs.
"I think that it is absolutely crucial to have a rethinking of the drug policy," said Mike Shifter, vice president for policy and director of the Andean programme at the Inter-American Dialogue. "There's no policy that has been invested in more that's produced so little."
The report calls for a review of U.S. prohibitionist strategy, which it says has deficiencies, and a look at the benefits and drawbacks of the harm reduction strategy followed by the European Union (EU).
The levels of drug consumption continue to grow in Latin America while there is a tendency toward stabilisation in North America and Europe, according to the report.
The report cites Columbia and Mexico as nations where U.S. prohibitionist policies, despite the large investment of resources and loss of innocent lives, have failed to put an end to drug trafficking and narco-violence. It cautions other countries from adopting these kinds of policies and urges them to search for innovative alternatives.
The long-term solution for the drug problem is to drastically reduce the demand for drugs in the main consumer countries, the report states. As U.S. and European domestic markets are the main consumers of the drugs produced in Latin America, the report calls on the U.S. and EU to share the responsibility faced by Latin American countries to design and implement policies leading to an effective reduction in their levels of drug consumption.
The commission proposes that Latin American countries adopt several initiatives aimed at reforming drug war policies.
One such proposition is to change the status of addicts from drug buyers in the illegal market to patients cared for in the public health system. This will weaken the foundation of the drug business by reducing the demand for illegal drugs and lowering their price.
The report calls the convenience of decriminalising the possession of cannabis for personal use to be evaluated from a public health standpoint and on the basis of the most advanced medical science.
According to the report, available empirical evidence shows that the harm caused by cannabis is similar to the harm caused by alcohol or tobacco. It cites that most of the damage associated with cannabis use - including arrest and incarceration of consumers and the violence and corruption that affect all of society - is the result of the current prohibitionist policies.
The report calls the U.S. policy of massive incarceration of drug users questionable, both in terms of respect for human rights and its efficiency. That policy is not applicable to Latin America, given the penal system's overpopulation and material conditions.
Rather, public policy should be targeted to fighting the most harmful effects of organised crime on society, such as violence, institutional corruption, money laundering, arms trafficking, and the control over territories and populations, the report states.
The commission urges Latin America to establish a dialogue with the U.S. government, legislators and civil society to jointly develop workable alternatives to the current war on drugs strategy. It sees the new administration of U.S. President Barack Obama as a unique opportunity to reshape a failed strategy and engage in the common search for more efficient and humane policies.
Analysts say the report opens up a debate which is badly needed, though it remains to be seen if it will have any effect on U.S. policy.
"There has been no signal at all from the Obama administration that I've seen that they're really prepared to take serious review of this policy," said Shifter. "I think if Obama has a chance to focus on this he will be very sympathetic," he added.
"I think because of Mexico and the large investment the U.S. has in Columbia, the administration knows that finding a better way to deal with drug problems has to occur," said Walsh. "That doesn't make it a top priority in the coming months."
- Posted in

16 Comments so far
Show AllThis is a good article, on good suggestions for good drug-policies.
Let's hope the advice is followed - and spills over to US.
Love
Sane
Drug-policies
I do not know the credentials of this author, the agencies whose spokesperson she cites nor am I familiar with the press service for which she works. I do know that the claim that the "War on Drugs" has not worked nor continues to work is a fable.
That so-called war has worked very well indeed in that it has kept the budgets of certain agencies and forces high, it has put great sums of money into the pockets of corrupt officials throughout Central and South America and has enabled our prison system in becoming the largest employer of govt workers.
To expect the new administration to change such an efficient and well oiled cash cow is to be labeled as a member in good standing of the Cult of Obama, a club in which there should be an increasing level of doubt and insecurity as the days pass, the appointees bow out and the thrust of this new boss becomes increasingly evident, meet the new boss same as the old boss.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
It is good to see South America wise up to the harm America's self righteous and harmful Drug laws have hurt them.
OBAMA SMOKED AND DID THE HARD STUFF TOO AND HE ISN'T QUITE BRAIN DEAD... YET.
If a dollar a pack tax on cigarettes will help pay for kids heath care, a Dollar a joint tax can help pay for health care for all adults.
When Carter was prez it was decriminalized to have a couple ounces of weed in Cleveland and nobody OD'd; But when Reagan came in it was off to prison you go and then all you could find for a long time was coke, heroin and speed.
Than the Miami vice came in with Bush and Ollie North trading Drugs for Guns to the Contras via Gov. Clinton's Mena airstrip and others in Florida and now the Drug trade supports both sides in practically every war on the planet.
If they want to follow the money, it is in illegal Drugs. The Banks launder it and they love the Cash.
Jim Glover,
Maybe Mr. Obama is the best evidence that drugs do have a life long harm.
Mr. Obama made be smart and personable, but he is doing the wrong thing for the ecomony, and foreign affairs.
Or maybe Mr. Obama is just a shill of the ruling elite, like some of us believe.
"Maybe Mr. Obama is the best evidence that drugs do have a life long harm."
Maybe you can find someone who hasn't done drugs, and make them President. Good Luck!
Or maybe he is more intelligent than most of us but is only human and might do a better job than the other choice we had.
Maybe Maybe Maybe.... Yes Maybe.
Now we know how you feel about Obama, how do you feel about the issue of this article?
America has had it's head in the sand on this one,literally.They spray agent orange type chemicals over Columbia and get the same results as Viet Nam in the destruction to the land.Now not fit for habitat and will not shoulder the blame.So now is it any wonder if they see us knocking,they won't answer and it's only common sense,they shouldn't.America has a plan,which came first the chicken or the egg.We provide weapons for wars and the drugs supplied to us supply the money for the weapons,etc.Simple logic will determine who's going to be on top,so they think.Looking at the table differently would help,reinvent the brain.
We have wasted billions on these so called Drug Wars our government has conducted for 30 years. About all they do is keep some law enforcement employed and hand them millions annually to try and plug a hole in a dam that's bursting at the seams. This has been going on since the 70's some time. I do not see where the problem is anywhere near being resolved. In fact, it appears to me to be getting worse. When something doesn't work and proves time and time again to not work. It's time to start rethinking the problem and quit throwing good money at a bad program. It's time to start using our heads. Make it legal and tax the hell out of it like we do cigarettes and alcohol. At least some of the crime will be taken out of it when it becomes legal.
Maybe logic will make a comeback!
The elites in Washington will be thrilled to change course in their "war on drugs" as long as it meets two fundamental criteria: 1. it expands the quantity of economic activity in the previous generation "war on drugs", preferably in the military/tech sector, and 2. it enhances elite influence, power and control over the people, which may be accomplished through the people's addiction to elite-controlled substances, synthetic or natural (e.g. opium from satellite Afghanistan). We'll see what new rackets the elites cook up. Will the people resist?
The truth is scary Ya better get involved in government ... ... Or Maybe NOt.
geez
looks like the president needs to send a new batch of assassins down to south america to get everyone back on track
moral: don't fuck with american drug money and its related profits
for the arabs: don't fuck with american oil - just because it happens to be under the soil of iraq - an accident of nature - it is still american oil
just ask saddaam hussein
cheers, b
Yeah or how about Jaime Roldós Aguilera or Omar Torrijos.
Intrepid Californio
kickingthenewknowledge.blogspot.com/
One can only hope that US takes heed and makes a move to "shift the pardigm". The thing is that the illegal drug trade is too much of a cash cow for the bigwigs to be willing to change it up. It provides an unreported source of capital for clandestine actions that ultimately benefit the ruling classes in their respective countries.
Intrepid Californio
kickingthenewknowledge.blogspot.com/
Hi intrepid, a bit off topic but I noticed you had the name "Californio" at the end of your name. I'm an 9th generation Californio myself. I'm descended from the Lugo clan of southern California. They had land scattered in Downey, Bell, Chino,Rancho Cucamonga and some other locations. I'm mixed with a lot of gringo blood however as each generation intermarried. One of my Californio ancestors married a turn of the century California governor.
On topic: I do agree that the ilegal drug trade is a big cash cow for the ruling elites and they will guard it with a vengeance.
Back when I was attending CSUN. I asked a marijuana dealer that I knew back then if Marijuana should be legalized, and he emphatically said "No!", claiming that it would reduce his profitability. The War on Drugs might as well be called the "Drug Dealers Full Employment Act".
I disagree with Walsh wherein he's quoted at the end of the article. Contrary to him, I believe this is a top priority and one that should be easily and quickly resolved, by simply applying honesty and sanity as real law requires. The whole war on drugs is a phony affair for it's really a protection racket, as well as racial discrimination racket, that the U.S. govt, the CIA, the DEA, the DoD, ... operate with this program, one that causes millions of innocent U.S. citizens to be convicted of crimes when they committed [no] crimes and then leaves them with criminal records that have long-term negative effects on their lives once they're released.
Instead, release all of the people imprisoned for questions of drug possession, as well as sales and cultivation, as long as they weren't convicted of acts of violance, and then stuff the prisons with the people who deserve to be there; like, f.e., all of the [many] hypocritical, hegemonic, despotic, perverted, ... judges, senators, congress members, presidents, vice presidents, say! And then sit back and enjoy yourself some fine spaghetti spiced a little with some nice cannabis and [relax]! (Add the spice and let simmer a low heat for say 10 minutes, probably 5 will do fine too. Interesting substitute for oregano, but can include it and others anyway, too.)
Former Canadian PM Pierre E. Trudeau would surely agree (although maybe didn't like spaghetti), given he stated in 1973 that he consumed and enjoyed it, that it helped to destress, so relax, laugh more easily or readily, and so on.
I wonder if the three heads of the Latin American commission would order Trudeau to be treated at a health clinic for his cannabis consumption "problem". And I also wonder if they'll do the same with everyone who consumes liquor and tobacco; you know, like to avoid being hypocritical and/or incompetent in terms of integrity. Cubans might not appreciate that, given both men and women smoke cigars and can legitimately argue that they have among the highest average lifespans in the world, if not the highest average. Indigenous peoples of North Americas or the Americas, perhaps also of other continents, also wouldn't appreciate being required to seek help at health clinics for their tobacco consumption and could legitimately argue that their populations or peoples have been consuming tobacco very harmlessly since ancient times, while the rest of us could legitimately argue that smoking tobacco is not all that bad given it's effective against airborne viruses.
Etctera.
Convict PE Trudeau? Canadian govt is far too hypocritical, hegemonic, fascist, bourgeois, ... to do this, but not too hypocritical, ... to criminalise the average citizen though. Or if they don't criminalise for possession, only, then they'll confiscate and would do they do that to Trudeau's stash? NO way; they're too damn hypocritical, hegemonic, fascist, bourgeois, and so on, so integrity is beyond their capabilities.
Send him to a health clinic to see to his cannabis habit? Who can join; is it open house? And what about "on the house"; a great way for the U.S. House of Rep's to spend their time, opening the House for the public to enter and use the premises for smoke and relaxation. Say?