Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Worse Than Obama's Kill List? American Support for It
- States Take On GMOs in Battle Over Labeling
- Nearly 50 Climate Activists Arrested Outside Obama's White House
- Genetically Engineered Meat, Coming Soon to a Supermarket Near You
- DOJ Kill List Memo Forces Many Dems Out of the Closet as Overtly Unprincipled Hacks
- Watch a City-Sized Glacier Collapse
- Nearly 50 Climate Activists Arrested Outside Obama's White House
- Around the World, A 'Billion Rise' to Fight Violence Against Women and Girls
- Study Finds 80% of All Antibiotics in US Used for Big-Ag
- DOJ Kill List Memo Forces Many Dems Out of the Closet as Overtly Unprincipled Hacks
Popular content
Today's Top News
UK Minister Fears Rise of Fascism Amid Economic Gloom
The economic crisis could spark a resurgence in the Far Right, a close ally of Gordon Brown has suggested.
Ed Balls, the Children's and Schools Secretary, said the downturn was likely to be the most serious for 100 years, and his comments appeared to raise the prospect of a return to the Far Right politics of the 1930s and the rise of Facism.
Ed Balls fears rise of fascism amid economic gloom (Photo: Julian Simmonds) His warning, in a speech to activists at the weekend, came after a trade union baron warned that far right parties were trying to hijack the campaign for "British jobs for British workers".
The row over foreign workers has gathered momentum in recent weeks and Mr Balls seemed to suggest the recession could trigger a return to the Far Right politics that prospered in the Great Depression of the 1930s.
He told Labour's Yorkshire conference: "The economy is going to define our politics in this region and in Britain in the next year, the next five years, the next 10 and even the next 15 years.
"I think that this is a financial crisis more extreme and more serious than that of the 1930s and we all remember how the politics of that era were shaped by the economy."
The remarks are significant because Mr Balls was a key adviser to Mr Brown during his decade at the Treasury as Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Mr Balls said that he believed this to be "the most serious global recession for over 100 years".
He said: "We now are seeing the realities of globalisation, though at a speed, pace and ferocity which none of us have seen before. The reality is that this is becoming the most serious global recession for, I'm sure, over 100 years as it will turn out."
Last week Derek Simpson, the general secretary of Unite, gave warning that far right elements were hijacking a campaign against foreign firms bringing in non-British workers.
He said: "We are deeply concerned that other organisations like the BNP are latching onto the movement for their own racist agenda."
Last night, George Osborne, the shadow Chancellor, said Mr Balls' comments were at odds with Treasury forecasts suggesting a recovery in the third quarter this year.
He said: "This is a staggering and very worrying admission from a Cabinet Minister and Gordon Brown's closest ally in the Treasury over the past ten years.
"We are being told that not only we are facing the worst recession in 100 years, but that it will last for over a decade - far longer than Treasury forecasts predict.
"In this time of recession, a Cabinet rift over the economy could be deeply damaging.
"We need immediate clarification of whether Ed Balls is speaking for his colleagues in the Government."
The Liberal Democrats compared the comments with those made by Treasury minister Baroness Vadera, when she claimed she was seeing "green shoots" of economic recovery, echoing remarks by former Tory Chancellor Norman Lamont in 1991.
She was criticised for saying last month: "I am seeing a few green shoots, but it's a little bit too early to say exactly how they'd grow."
Vincent Cable, the LibDems' Treasury spokesman, said: "Instead of giving clear and consistent leadership, government ministers are oscillating between complacent optimism and this doom laden picture of Armageddon.
"Surely the truth lies between the two? This is a serious crisis but not hopeless."
The news came as the Financial Services Authority, the City watchdog, warned that the UK was at risk of a deeper-than-expected recession.
The authority said that the worst financial meltdown "in more than 70 years" has far from run its course and the British economy was predicted to shrink by 2.2 per cent this year.
It also said that Britain's 'vulnerable' banks need to make huge culture changes to survive the recession.
A spokesman for Ed Balls denied he had been trying to draw parallels with the Far Right.
He said: "The speech was about the difference between Labour and the Tories on the economy. It was not about trying to draw parallels with the Far Right.
"The Tories are completely isolated in their opposition to a fiscal stimulus that is essential to combating what most economists agree is an unprecedented financial sector recession. "He said that this difference between the parties will define this country's politics for many years to come."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

32 Comments so far
Show All"Achtung, Matey!"
(LOL)
Fascism takes hold because people are outraged about the wholesale theft of entire government treasuries by "democratic" governments. That's what happened at the start of Nazi Germany. Yes, the WWI war reparations were a major part of Germany's bankruptcy.
In the Nazi case, there was a considerable difference between a tyrant promising not to rob a country blind and him actually not robbing the country blind. But, people were desperate.
Fascism takes hold because some progressives and liberals try to pander to the fascists.
Most folks on the right are more appalled at the theft of the International banking cartel than those of us on the left or middle.
It takes a left and right wing to fly so we might as well fly together and unite with the Right to end the robbery of world private central banking monetary policy and throw out the fat cats. There could not be a better way for a real revolution to succeed.
Most of the differences between the working class left and right are manufactured as distractions by the profiteering ruling class financial system to keep their asses out of prison. The fight between the left and the right is mainly a manufactured fight since we have the world to heal when we look at what we all have in common... all brothers and sisters in the same sinking boat.
Jim Glover
If you are an open borders advocate, internationalist or support business's "Globalist" facade, please ignore my comment.
"all brothers and sisters in the same sinking boat."
You seem to me to be missing what the article is really about. They are unhappy that they aren't "all brothers and sisters in the same sinking boat.", that business is bringing in foreign labor to undercut their wages and take their jobs. The Brits are losing their jobs in the same way that the American worker are losing theirs and as the economy worsens it brings even more focus to it.
Of course the right is trying to hijack it as an issue because I believe anyone can see its going to become a political hand grenade that they can use to blow up the left if the left is supporting unions and business in taking away their jobs and giving them to non citizens.
"Last week Derek Simpson, the general secretary of Unite, gave warning that far right elements were hijacking a campaign against foreign firms bringing in non-British workers.
He said: "We are deeply concerned that other organisations like the BNP are latching onto the movement for their own racist agenda."
And here is the left making the same tired mistake of accusing someone opposing it as being "racist."
The stirrings in the UK will be reflected in Europe soon enough and it is coming here without a doubt. And if we line up with business and their unions to oppose American workers, we will get our heads handed to us.
"Most of the differences between the working class left and right are manufactured as distractions by the profiteering ruling class financial system to keep their asses out of prison."
You are exactly correct here and big business has been paying for the distraction for years. Simply check the major funding sources for the organizations and Unions that defend bringing in H1B workers and all the other work programs and illegal workers.
Thanks, TM
....................................................................................
And if I just misunderstood your post, just struck me I could have, just tell me to get my head out of my neither regions. (lol)
I was going beyond the boundries of the article to make my main point:
"Most of the differences between the working class left and right are manufactured as distractions by the profiteering ruling class financial system to keep their asses out of prison."
The Globalists are happy to see the domestic workers blame the foreign workers for the inevitable rising debt and destruction of the economy from the International private banking cartel's control of Money.
Oops, I just went beyond the scope of the article again...Sorry
Thanks, Jim
"Oops, I just went beyond the scope of the article again...Sorry"
Ha! Ok Jim, you got me!
Right.
When someone gets his / her head bashed in by a "working class fascists" because of his / her race / sexual identity, it is a "manufactured distraction".
You might want to look up the progressives and liberals who tried to pander to Adolph Hitler.
Gentlemen, the "British jobs for British workers" is just a rallying cry that misdirects the basis for the economic problems onto the convenient scapegoat of foreign workers. You USans may not realize that within the EU not only is capital mobile but workers also have rights to freely move within the community seeking jobs. This works best when there is no huge income disparity among member nations, which has led to enormous EU capital inputs for infrastructure in some poorer Southern members attempting to level their economies.
Globalization is a reality and any attempts to look inward and limit trade would be a devastating blow to national and world economies. To those here who decry free trade agreements (including NAFTA) these agreements would be improved by new global monetary structures that would prevent (or limit within a few %) balance of payments deficits/surpluses. These monetary changes would force each nation state to live within its means of production.
Today two of Canada's largest unions, the Canadian Autoworkers and the United Steelworkers, have called for the government to adopt a buy Canadian policy. This might sound good to the rank and file who are losing their jobs but is bizarre within the context of both industries consisting only of companies that are entirely under foreign control.
Yup.
The "problem" despite what Thomas More claims is NOT globalisation. At least not as practiced in the EU. Yes, non UK EU citizens can openly go to the EU to work. And UK citizens can go to the other EU countries to work too.
In fact, there are more holders of UK passports working in the rest of the EU, than there are non UK EU citizens working in the UK.
If Britain were to kick out all the EU citizens working in the UK, and the EU kicks back to Britain all the British working in the EU, there would be more workers competing for fewer jobs in Britain.
The liberals / progressives like Brown are disgracefully pandering to the fascists. If the far right rises to power, people like Brown, for his policies of coddling the cheating bankers, and then for trying to pander to the far right, are to blame. Many of Brown's key economic advisers ran the British banks into the ground. After which Brown funneled huge amounts of money to them. After which the bankers got big bonuses.
You are forgetting, that the British workers can also work in the EU countries. In fact, there are MORE holders of British passports working in the other EU countries than there are EU workers working in Britain.
I repeat: there are MORE holders of British passports working in the other EU countries than there are EU workers working in Britain.
And one more time: there are MORE holders of British passports working in the other EU countries than there are EU workers working in Britain
Again: there are MORE holders of British passports working in the other EU countries than there are EU workers working in Britain
It is because of progressives and liberals like you that fascists, and racists and nazis can come to power.
Without progressives and liberals pandering to and defending the fascists and racists, instead of pointing them out as the scum they are, their racist views have far less chance of being given credibility.
And no, when someone on the far right wants to bash in the head of a black / muslim / asian / GLBT person, it is not a "manufactured fight". No matter how many times you self deluded marxists claim that it is.
Wow...
Five repetitive posts in thirteen minutes... A new record!!!!
Dude... If you can't tell the difference between a liberal and a progressive, you are probably a fascist...
Or too ignorant to tell the difference between a conservative and a fascist...
Dude,
how about addressing my posts? The fact is that if Britain were to kick out all the EU citizens who are working there, and the EU were to kick out all the British citizens from the EU who are working in the EU, there would be more people competing for fewer jobs in Britain.
Or are you too ignorant to understand basic math?
Dude... Learn the difference between neoliberals like Clinton and progressives like mckinney...
And their equivalent in the UK...
I got your point on the first post...
All five of your posts repeated the same thing, some times repeating it four times in the same post...
It is pedantic and condecending...
Great posts Gentlemen.
Infiltrating Unions and discrediting them as the "cause" of downturns (as opposed to the truth of: overseas outsourcing to Union-free sweat shop countries) has become an artform. Apparently all you have to do is reverse-label an act or policy and the population will fall for it. "Free-Trade", and "Clear Skies" acts come to mind. The actual intent of these acts were to monopolize world trade and to blow mercury coal dust into the air in such quantities that eating fish is now unsafe from all the mercury fallout.
I know it sounds crazy.... but that's what doctors tell me; to limit my intake of fish so I don't become a mad hatter.... (Historical note: felt hatmakers in Old England were known to act crazy for some reason... the result of contact with mercury in the dyes used to soak color into felt.)
If my former neo-con self of 1980 could hear my enlightened educated self of today proclaim these little-known nuances, my 1980 counterpart would scoff.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Hurray for recovering neo-cons. :)
I think Benito Mussolini the Fascist said :
"THE Proper definition of Fascism is really Corporatism..for it is the marriage between Corporations and the Institutions of the State to advance the interests of the Right" .
I think he also elaborated that : it also Emphasizes Patriotism, coupled with using Religion to enhance its power aided by the Media as an instrument of the Fascist State.
Hitler of course said something like this:
"THE State should think of the MEdia as a giant Typewriter on which the state can write anything it pleases".
and of course the famous line by Hitler's propagandist, Goebbels:
"IT IS NOT A GREAT ACHIEVMENT ...to make the People do your bidding...all you have to do is take a Lie...reduce it to the understanding of the lowest intelligence among the people...repeat and repeat it until it is accepted as Truth...tell the people 'we are being attacked', denounce the opposition as being Unpatriotic and aiding the enemy...it doesn't matter whether it is under communism, socialism, rightwing dictatorship or democracy....it works anywhere".
"THE Proper definition of Fascism is really Corporatism..for it is the marriage between Corporations and the Institutions of the State to advance the interests of the Right".
That's right. So, in effect, we have been laying the road for a fascist state for many years. The means of repression may have been quieter, but the effects the same.
And now, with the media almost sewn up and our money worthless...
If fascism shows up again in the UK, imagine what it will be like here. And we thought George Wanker Bush was definitely the end of the nightmare.
I have believed for years that the Wanker was the beginning of the nightmare, not the end. He, along with Demon Dick Cheney, opened the Gates of Hell, and there will be no going back.
"Remember, remember the fifth of November, the Gunpowder Treason and plot.
I can think of no reason the Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot." - V, 'V For Vendetta'
Walk in peace.
Actually, it is an old nursery rhyme....the movie came hundreds of years later.
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in their moccasins - Native American proverb.
I know. *grin*
But it is the source that most of the techno-pop culture literate will identify.
Walk in peace.
These days, you are not likely to see those moccasins come back.
When the government runs the corporations, you have socialism.
When the corporations run the government, you have fascism.
I think what we are and will be seeing is the fall of Fascism. After years of building to a totally ignorant crescendo, with the virulence imbedding itself with Reagan/Lawrence Summers, rising quietly, but insidiously with Clinton/Lawrence Summers and slapping us all down so hard and so blatantly with Dick Halliburton and WarBush and his Nazional Legions of Private Bushitlers.
What we are and will be experiencing is the death of Capitalism (hooray!!!) and with it its top-heavy and industrial military arm (robotic genocidal, ecocidal, suicidal fairy patrols)of Fascism.
What we replace it with will hopefully be up to us, E
Ed Balls, come on that ain't his real name ;-0
Mike Morin (my real name)
www.peoplesequityunion.blogspot.com
The US has a larger military budget than the next 15 countries *combined.*
There is, moreover, a far greater polarization of wealth in the US than in any other advanced industrial country.
The US has military bases in 131 different countries.
This is fascism. Not the Hitler-Mussolini brand, but fascism just the same. Fascism with a smiling, Madison Avenue face.
People seem to neglect the reality that Britain and plenty, if not all, other European countries, Canada, and the U.S. all provide examples of contemporary fascist govts. They're all fascist. The extent of the fascism of each surely varies, but they're all fascist to some serious enough extent, while some are very fascist. They are also corporatist, and the fascism probably does usually operate or get applied for the sake of the corporatism; hence, corporate fascist govts.
As for members of the EU countries being able to move around for jobs, there's evidently no problem with this. If the article had been about the U.S., however, then there'd be a big problem, as there has been since the early 1990s, slowing starting when Pres. GHW Bush established the H-1B foreign high tech. worker importation visa program, which was used for not filling a shortfall of skilled and adequately qualified people in the U.S., citizens, residents who're not yet citizens, and foreign students who went through years of higher ed. in U.S. schools in the U.S., but for [replacing] all or certainly very many of these people. This has been related to globalization and illustrates one very wrong thing about it, but it's not that globalization couldn't be conducted correctly, it's just that it isn't conducted correctly. It's conducted in corporate-fascist ways.
Take away all of the pandering of govt leaders to corporate greed-heads and we'd be able to work on establishing a [fair] system, but the greed is killer, destroyer, and here to stay, surely anyway.
Some basic rules that would need to be abided by are, f.e.:
*) NO allowance and no tolerance for importing foreign workers when they're really not needed, only being used to replace citizens and legal residents, instead; and when there's a breach, then there's a sufficiently severe financial penalty to the guilty corporations or businesses.
*) NO more govt assisting corporations to guarantee, f.e., a 4% unemployment rate, as is taught in university and college economics courses, about society supposedly needing to ensure at least 4% unemployment, which really only helps to provide corporations or businesses with a mechanism for keeping wages or compensations down. There's nothing at all fair about such rules and everything that isn't fair must not be tolerated.
*) Free market must be fair market, else the market can't really be free. Corporations or businesses can't be given more rights than workers, or simply persons, have! Otherwise what we end up with again is corporate fascism, aka corporatism, and when we have this, then we can definitely realise that we do [not] have any real democracy at all, really. If you want democracy, then you cannot support corporate fascism; you pick one or the other, but can not have both at the same time, for all forms of fascism are enemies of democracy, as well as justice.
Etc.
Do it right; define it so that it is really integral in terms of ethics; make it just; and then globalization can be fine. Otherwise it's a killer, destroying local economies. It's then predatory in nature, instead of being illustrative of symbiosis, which is needed for a society to be healthy. We are symbiotic, or we are destructive parasites.
Of course consumers have power too and this mustn't be neglected in the overall consideration. F.e., when I do groceries, I seek to purchase all I can from local, regional, provincial, and national producers, in this order. I'd make an exception if these producers all did finely enough and people elsewhere in the same business were doing poorly, in which case I would switch my priority to trying to help them. But local and regional producers have been hurting plenty for long enough and this consumer will do what he can to try to help these people first. This would cover production of foods, clothing, recreational equipment, etc. Another exception I also make when having enough money to buy anything produced locally, regionally, ..., as well as internationally is based on quality and the quality-to-cost or cost-quality ratio. That's why I did not care to buy U.S. automobiles, because the corporations deliberately did not produce adequately qualitative vehicles and have been holding out on consumers since the 1960s over the ability that existed back then to make carburetored cars provide not 15, 20, 25, or 30 mpg, but 60 mpg; a technological method that's been known of since at least that second half of the 1960s. So they hold out on that fuel efficiency and on quality in other respects; therefore, my priority will not be to spend money on their vehicles. However, when a U.S. auto-manufacturer does provide a qualitative vehicle for a price that's at least not more, or is very little more, than foreign alternatives, then I'd buy the U.S.-made vehicle.
That is, I'm flexible, but will prioritise local, regional, ... producers and service providers first, as a general rule.
Consumers definitely have power, but most are just too greedy to care. Instead of paying 25 or 50 cents or even $1 more for purchasing products and services from local, regional, ... producers and providers (respectively), they want to buy from foreign multinationals and when the little more it'd cost to do the opposite would certainly be bearable, without a problem. People have allowed themselves to become brainwashed consumers by neglecting to keep their "thinking caps" on and ... like constantly. They became [lazy] citizens, mentally. They want good incomes but are cheap. They're brats and otherwise pitifully ignorant. Rotten little non-symbiotic sh*ts, i.e., parasites.
Heil Balls!
"Last week Derek Simpson, the general secretary of Unite, gave warning that far right elements were hijacking a campaign against foreign firms bringing in non-British workers.....We are deeply concerned that other organisations like the BNP are latching onto the movement for their own racist agenda."
Here's the "racist" rhetoric again in defense of corporate profits.
Of course, organizing for the benefit and survival of British taxpaying citizens has absolutely nothing to do with this movement.
There are just some excuses that will never pass the snuff test!
This British cabinet official is either right on or really close to right on the mark about how bad the times are we live in and how the fascist jerks will seek to benefit from same. A crisis whether economic or otherwise is always an opportunity for them to scapegoat. They will surely do it. They're already doing it on the continent. It will take strong leadership to defeat them completely as should be the case.
AD