Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Israeli Elections: Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid
Israel's Foreign Minister, Tzipi Livni, last night launched a concerted final effort to become her nation's first woman leader since Golda Meir, despite the rightwards shift in public opinion that has threatened to propel Benjamin Netanyahu back into the premiership.
The
leader of the centrist Kadima party, who began the closing stages of
her campaign with a rally for Druze Arab voters in Galilee last night,
issued a direct personal challenge to Mr Netanyahu to agree to the
television debate which he has consistently refused.
As polls showing the lead of Mr Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party has narrowed to only two seats ahead of Kadima, Ms Livni's campaign team believes she can overtake her rival by the time Israel goes to the polls on Tuesday.
Mr Netanyahu has emphasised the threats from Hamas and a nuclear Iran in his campaign.
Ms Livni, who strongly supported the recent invasion of Gaza, but has pledged to continue talks on a two-state solution with the moderate West Bank Palestinian leadership, said there was a public demand from potential leaders "to specify with which policies they plan to cope with the threats, and lead [Israel] to a better future of peace and quiet". Meanwhile the outgoing Kadima premier, Ehud Olmert, was making what the Defence Minister, Ehud Barak, said were "supreme efforts" to leave a positive legacy by securing the release of Gilad Shalit, the army corporal seized by Gaza militants in 2006, before polling day.
Turkish TV reported on Friday that Turkish officials were holding talks in Damascus with exiled leaders of Hamas, which has been seeking a large-scale release of Palestinian prisoners in return.
At the same time Mr Barak, Labour's prime ministerial candidate, told Channel 1 TV that Cpl Shalit was known to be "well, alive, breathing and OK".
He added: "You know that I am a fierce critic of the Prime Minister, but in these matters, in these days, he is making a great effort, as am I ... in order to expedite the process." Whether the formidable obstacles to securing the release can be overcome remains to be seen, however.
A Hamas official, Osama al-Muzaini, said talks on the issue had so far made little progress because Israel "remained unwilling to pay the price".
While Mr Barak warned the release of Cpl Shalit would require "painful decisions" - presumably on a prisoner exchange - the electoral effect, if it happened, would probably be to help Labour and Kadima at the expense of Likud and the increasingly popular Yisrael Beiteinu, led by the hard-right Avigdor Lieberman.
According to the polls, the main features of a relatively lacklustre election so far have been the Likud comeback under Mr Netanyahu from its three-decade low of just 12 Knesset seats in the 2006 election, and the seemingly relentless rise of Mr Lieberman, who could yet prove the kingmaker in forming a coalition after Tuesday.
Polls published on Friday - the last allowed before election day - showed Likud with 25 to 27 seats, just ahead of Kadima, with 23 to 25. Mr Lieberman's party with 18 or 19, which, if fulfilled in actual voting, would push the once-dominant Labour Party into fourth place.
Most analysts think the rightward shift has resulted from a combination of two factors. One is Hamas's continued control of Gaza. The other is the stillbirth of the centrist programme under Mr Olmert of withdrawing from settlements and negotiating a peace deal with the moderate Palestinian leadership. This was envisaged at the international Annapolis summit sponsored by President George Bush at the end of 2007.
The change also reflects the widespread popularity among mainstream Israelis - despite the Palestinian death toll of more than 1,200 - of the three-week onslaught on Gaza. This had long been urged by Mr Netanyahu.
Mr Lieberman, a harshly right-wing West Bank settler who wants Israeli Arabs to forfeit their citizenship rights if they fail to pledge loyalty to the Jewish state, was characterised on Friday by a leading Israeli columnist, Nahum Barnea, as "the scarecrow that panic-stricken Israelis want to place in the political cornfield in the hope that the Arabs are crows... and take fright".
At least in theory, Ms Livni could be asked by President Shimon Peres to try to form a coalition even if Kadima does not emerge as the biggest single party, especially if Ms Livni secures the support of Mr Lieberman as a potential coalition partner. Like Ms Livni, Mr Lieberman is secular, and could baulk at a Netanyahu-led government which included ultra-orthodox parties such as Shas.
Nevertheless such a move by President Peres - while constitutional - would be unprecedented. It would provoke furious charges from Likud, if it is the single biggest party, of being undemocratic. For now Ms Livni will go all out to persuade the still-undecided fifth of the Israeli electorate that she is the only candidate to stop the polarising Mr Netanyahu.
Over coffee in one of the few downtown Jerusalem cafes open on the Jewish sabbath, Maya Ayvo, 35, and her husband Ezer, 38, described yesterday how 15 of their mainstream middle-class family members had discussed their "confusion" over how to vote at the traditional Friday night meal the previous evening.
While most did not want to vote for Mr Netanyahu or Mr Lieberman, said Mrs Ayvo, "they like Tzipi Livni, but are not sure about her party; others like the Labour Party, but are not sure about Barak".
Mrs Ayvo said she had been toying with voting Green, as she did in 2006, or the left-wing Zionist party Meretz, but that she had now come down in favour of Ms Livni. This was partly because she was a woman, but "I feel that this time I have to be responsible and not vote for a smaller party, because this election is so important". She said that she would be very disappointed if Ms Livni included Mr Lieberman in a coalition.
Her husband, who voted for the small Pensioners' Party in the last election because he was fed up with the larger parties, said he had not yet made up his mind, but might vote for Ms Livni. Like his wife, he supported the war in Gaza. "I wasn't happy about it, but I think it was very necessary," he said.
Meanwhile, over bacon, beer and coffee at another cafe, in the city's German Colony district, what was for Jerusalem an unusually leftist and secular group was debating the respective merits of the left-of-centre parties. Most were Jewish, but the group included a Christian Palestinian lawyer, Daoud Khoury. He and a Jewish friend, Moshe Simchovich, supported the communist Arab-Jewish party Hadash.
But Rachel, a 58-year-old teacher who asked for her family name not to be used because of her public servant status, said she would be voting for the newly combined Greens and Meimad party, led by the liberal and popular Knesset education committee chairman, Rabbi Michael Melchior. "The reason that Lieberman is doing so well is because of the one-sided media coverage of the war in Gaza,"she said.
Israel's four contenders for power
Tzipi Livni, 50
Foreign Minister and Kadima leader. Protégée of Ariel Sharon who was briefly a Mossad agent in her youth. Has staked her appeal on a cleaner politics and talks with the moderate West Bank Palestinian leadership over a two-state solution. Like Barak, has not ruled out military option on Iran. A hawk on Gaza, publicly opposed to idea of a negotiated end to the Gaza war, saying Israel's role is to "fight terror" not to talk to its perpetrators.
Ehud Barak, 66
Defence Minister and Labour leader. Prime Minister 1999-2001 and a much-decorated ex-military chief of staff. He went further than predecessors towards a two-state solution but blamed Yasser Arafat for the collapse of the Camp David talks. Favours an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire with Hamas if possible and was quicker than PM Ehud Olmert and Livni in seeking halt to Gaza operation. More sceptical than either about negotiations with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
Benjamin Netanyahu, 59
Leader of main right- wing opposition, Likud. Prime Minister 1996-99. Strong opponent of Oslo accords and 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, over which he resigned from Sharon government. Says Gaza military operation not complete and that Hamas regime must be ended. Against territorial concessions to Palestinians and says Iran must "not be armed with a nuclear weapon". Says options "include everything that is necessary to make this statement come true".
Avigdor Lieberman, 50
Leader of Yisrael Beiteinu, secular hard-right party. Moldovan-born immigrant who wants Israeli Arabs to pledge loyalty to the Jewish state or lose the vote. Wants borders redrawn - unacceptable even to moderate Palestinians - to put more than 100,000 Israeli Arabs in future Palestinian state. Has faced corruption allegations. Israel may have to act militarily alone in Iran "in worst-case scenario". Has suggested treating Gaza as Russia did Chechnya.
- Posted in

82 Comments so far
Show AllWow. Israel has a choice of four right wing hawks who favor killing innocent Palestinians instead of seeking any hope for peace.
No matter who wins the Israeli elections, the children of Gaza, and the peace of the wider Middle East, will lose.
Walk in peace.
Any one of these candidate would be far-left by Arab standards.
All these candidates do have one thing in common -- they all suck.
In many ways the extreme of the left meets the extreme of the right. Both sorts of extremists seek to impose their worldview by killing those with whom they disagree. Both sorts end up destroying rather than building. Both sorts impoverish rather than enrich.
As usual for your posts veggie, you contribute nothing but bile.
Four Arab candidates, one woman---their heads would explode, all 300 million of them (except Wafa Sultan); one who thinks that war holds the most likely solution to the Arab-Israeli impasse---all Arabs think so; one who wants to expel the Other from Palestine---all Arabs want to expel the Isrelis from Palestine; one general---let's see, has any Arab country ever been led by a general....
There are only two parties in any/all Arab/Muslim country: the nationalist dictatorship-and-war party, and the Islamist dictatorship-and-war party.
'There are only two parties in any/all Arab/Muslim country: the nationalist dictatorship-and-war party, and the Islamist dictatorship-and-war party.'
Now now, if someone said that about the leading parties of Isreal you'd be howling in indignation. You really are a bit of a loon, do you not see any colour in the world? Are you not yet tired of the black and white version of existance?
Which country was it that overthrew a democracy in the Islamic country of Iran 60 years ago? Aren't there a couple of 'democracies' who provoke wars in the mideast on a regular basis? Haven't there been more females in charge of Muslim countries than have been in charge of Isreal or the USA?
Veggie bit, you're overdue for being chucked into a compost pit.
And you base this statement on your vast knowledge I am sure.
Peggy
All candidates from hell (literally). But Liebierman and Netanyahu are THE devils incarnate. They might as well have 666 marked on their forehead.
Obama, what will you do if Israel attacks Iran?
Perhaps he will remind Iran of their "right of self defence". Oh that's right the attack will be using US made aircraft with US made adaptations for long range bombing, and the bombs will be "made in USA" and paid for by US taxes. Plus, Obama has already committed to "defend Israel".
So I guess when the Nazi-styled-Zionists Lieberman and Netanyahu get together and start making decisions, the Israel and American regimes can kiss their asses good-bye to the Armageddon which would follow.
And for the two Zionist Trolls that hang on each article and posting on these subjects. Please understand it is not the Arabs only who want to defeat this Fascist Regime of Israel..
Their are about 7 Million Israelis 20-30% are Arab and others, and an important number are equally appalled by what is happening. There are only a few million Americans idiotic enough to support Zionism, add to that a million or two in the rest of the world, then there are a few billion who would like to see Israel behaving like a civilised nation, within its own borders, and above all non-belligerent and disarmed from WMD.
Anybody who thinks after the lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan, that another war now against a major population and power like Iran is "winnable" and then calls me crazy : because I say that if Israel supported by the US were responsible for such an folly attack on Iran the people of those countries, will themselves tare down their own governments once the blow-back occurs,.... needs help
Such an attack would obviously escalate to a world war, and for what? To allow Israel to carry on its avoidance of growing up and facing its responsibilities to the Palestinians it has displaced.
Sorry, Holocaust or not, Jew or whatever, I don't think Israel is worth it, and the rest of the world can hardly afford another war for these Zionist nuts. And if they elect Nazi-style Zionist aggressors and stirrers like Netanyahu or Lieberman, the international community should quickly re-evaluate their relations with a rouge terrorist state, where even the present regime members are expected to face charges as war criminals from European.
Well of course Obama will say: "Israel has the right to defend itself".
Facts won't matter. It could quite possibly be a nuclear attack to.
Obama has already taken an even more supportive approach then even Bush if thats possible. He stated during his campaigning that he doesn't believe Jerusalem should be divided. Bush hadn't even gone that far. Each consecutive president goes a little farther.
Then we have Joe-"I'm a zionist"-Biden as VP, so no "hope and change" on the Mideast front.
I believe the Obama "team" has more dual citizens then any other prior administration.
"There is no greater threat to Israel — or to the peace and stability of the region — than Iran. Now this audience is made up of both Republicans and Democrats, and the enemies of Israel should have no doubt that, regardless of party, Americans stand shoulder to shoulder in our commitment to Israel's security. So while I don't want to strike too partisan a note here today, I do want to address some willful mischaracterizations of my positions.
The Iranian regime supports violent extremists and challenges us across the region. It pursues a nuclear capability that could spark a dangerous arms race and raise the prospect of a transfer of nuclear know-how to terrorists. Its president denies the Holocaust and threatens to wipe Israel off the map. The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.
But just as we are cleareyed about the threat, we must be clear about the failure of today's policy. We knew, in 2002, that Iran supported terrorism. We knew Iran had an illicit nuclear program. We knew Iran posed a grave threat to Israel. But instead of pursuing a strategy to address this threat, we ignored it and instead invaded and occupied Iraq. When I opposed the war, I warned that it would fan the flames of extremism in the Middle East. That is precisely what happened in Iran — the hard-liners tightened their grip, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected president in 2005. And the United States and Israel are less secure. "
Obama June 4, 2008
Is there a special school where you learn such bollocks? Iran a nuclear threat? Does Iran have the hundred or so nuclear weapons that Israel has? Iran doesn't even have ONE nuclear weapon. Not one! And you have the nerve to keep repeating that fairy tale that Iran is the threat? Talk about Alice in Wonderland logic. Iran a grave threat to Israel? What a laugh!
If Obama hits Afghanistan even more and adds Pakistan and Iran to the list, we'll be starting the Great Depression II with $10/gallon gas on national average. TX, OK, AK, and your state of LA will have to magically deliver plenty of oil at this rate to make up for Iran cutting their supplies assuming the refineries are steady and that peak oil doesn't hit hard.
The Iranian president never threatened to "wipe Israel off the map". That is a lie, and you know it.
He quoted Khomeini in in saying that some day, the government currently occupying Jerusalem will be gone, in the same way that the a government called the "USSR" is now gone.
---USAn---
You both seem confused. I didn't say this. Obama did. (and he's right)
hey, hopeless? Did you find the WMD in Iraq? Lets you go find the invisible WMD there first before you go start looking for non-existent ones in Iran or any other country you fellow zionists in Israel tells you to. Obama, like all his predecessors cannot be in that position without selling their should to the devils (Israeli devils that is).
But you are a comp-lete buffoon so what does it matter what you think anyways...
Iraq always was a distraction from the real threats in Iran and Pakistan.
Israel's days are numbered which is why these Hitler wannabes are lined up to imitate the past with their own Holocaust on the people they are displacing. However, it does no one here in California any good to try to get our officials to stop funding this Holocaust, since they are Jews and committed to growing Israel even at the expense of our country.
This is the Holocaust, and the only one right now that really matters. Remind Obama and Panetta that he is acting like a "Nuremberg Denier" by refusing to end Israeli sponsored torture, and refusing to hold the actual torturers responsible. No more scapegoating!
thong-girl
Darell Issa is Arab American and yet no word from him. Also, both your state and mine (TX) have plenty of non-Jews in Congress and they're siding with Israel, or at least the zionists and militants dead set against Palestinians. If you think that Obama and his minions are gonna listen, don't hold your breath. At least in CA, you have a better chance of electing Independent candidates to office while our state of TX is hostile to 3rd parties running for office even though some of us are trying to reverse that.
You're a Texan! Now I get it.
You do remember Ross Perot, the most successful 3rd party candidate ever don't you?
He was from Texas.
The hand-wringing that happens before each Israeli election among liberals when a quasi-Fascist thug like Avigdor Lieberman or a white-coated carnicero like Netenyahu comes close to the levers of power in the Zionist society reminds me of something Brecht wrote in his diary once:
The bourgeoisie, and not only in Germany, now speaks of these special measures as the *Nazis' excesses*. What ungrateful cheek! Making this growth out to be a tumor! They ordered a fillet, and the inhuman butcher murdered a calf.
The Holocaust is not over with the Nazis in Israel.
As a Jew the only thing I see which makes me wonder is if just being scared... you know, paranoid that your neighbors are waiting to push you in the sea... that paranoia is being used by the War economy and arms and security industries that are still big business and with the help of the world drug trade because it is criminalized the multibillions with the biggest cash crop and drugs used to support both sides in all the wars goin on now... well, it makes me wonder because
If putting a dollar tax on a pack of cigs will give our kids Health care, then it is time for a dollar a joint tax and we can give every American citizen Health Care!
This land was made for you and me....
Jim the Wise Guy
It doesn't appear any of the 4 candidates will change Israel's zionistic policies resulting in Palestinians living in sealed areas (essentially prisons) where they will have to be totally dependent on the occupiers for food, water, and other necessities of life.
See link of Feb 5, 2009 video of Israel shooting at Palestinian farmers in Gaza . Why doesn't the media report this? At the time of this writing about 660 people viewed this on Youtube. It should be tens of thousands.
http://www.freegaza.org/
Take action, distribute widely and circumvent the press.
What a nightmare. It sounds like the left is fragmented, and the media is a right-wing propaganda tool. If Benjamin Netanyahu wins and reverses the meagre gains in the recent peace process---all hell will break loose and the militant islamic faction will go nuts. He has no plan for peace. Just more war, more settlements, and a unilateral attack on Iran. A disaster!
But isn't this also the "Biblical" plan of the Christian Zionists?.... Jesus will finally return to see this... He ain't gonna miss this Baby!
But those stubborn Jews, Moslems and Commies who won't convert.... You get the picture?
The End times! God Gave it and he taketh AWAY. Remember the Bible and word of God gives the Zionists the right to take what they have righteously stolen.
By Deception we will wage War... the Mossad
They know the world is worried about the Samson option which the New Nazis like to have in their arsenal of nuclear Blackmail. They want you to think they will bomb Iran, but they are bluffing (suicide) and they have no intension of allowing for a Palistinian peace right now and maybe never.... I don't think it matters who wins in Israel if they do not kick the Nazis out!
If Netanyahu had been in charge the Israeli would not have withdrawn from Gaza. I believe they would have taken it to conclusion. So I would say this is the one man the Arabs or the Palestinians (who are not Arabs I hear) do not want in charge.
They can't wait to go back into Gaza and demonstrate for history what the New Nazis can do to a ghetto.
The choice between these 4 great Zionist leaders is like chosing between Hitler and Hess. I would chose Hitler because he was so obviously Nazi and off putting to any decent person. For the same reason I would favor 'Nathan Yahoo', in the hope that Obama is decent enough to be appalled by him. To the Palestinians it does not matter, in the short perspective, who wins as they are all after their blood and their land.
Gore Vidal has characterized the United States as a country which has one political party with two right wings. Israel has gone two steps further: it has one political party with four right wings.
No mater who they vote for all they can elect is a genocidal gangster.
All any American citizen can do is to vote against Israel's supporters.
I agree with you urdog! None of the candidates for the PM spot bring any great joy in my heart for a lasting peace....just more of the same violence and death that has become a running scene for the Israeli government.
I hope Lieberman wins it. If the Israelis wanna act like Nazis, let 'em have a fascist PM and see what it's like to go all the way. With Lieberman at the helm, maybe more nations will seriously consider divestment and boycott.
The unfortunate thing is that the spineless Europeans and the bought-off Americans would find a way to rationalize their support of Lieberman as well. They certainly had no problem doing the same for the Jackboot Jezebel, Tzipi Livni, who in her role as defense minister oversaw the slaughter in Lebanon and Gaza.
Wow! Mr. Netanyahu sure has a perfectly shaped nose.
And who does his hair?
Benjamin "Bugsy" Net On Yahoo will assure the continuing national suicide of the nation of Israel. They should import George Wanker Bush and get it over with. I think The Wanker would enjoy that better than being a greeter at a hardware store.
Mord 3:04 ------- YES! the W option as a leader there is no defense; instant self - anihilation for the nation.
NPR did a story this morning about this election, focusing a lot on Lieberman. Apparently his party is expected to make some relatively big gains - small by most standards but big enough to swing the direction of the Knesset way right and more hardline. So even if Netanyahu doesn't win (which I sure as hell hope doesn't happen), one of the others may need this Lieberman joker for a majority. Not looking good.
A funny thing about the Israel haters. They've long advocated doing to Israel exactly what happened to the PA when Hamas was voted in. 'Stop all aid to Israel!" Israel haters have been screaming for years. However, if we remember, the big mess with Hamas and Gaza all happened when the West stopped giving aid to the PA b/c its new Hamas government refused to honor past agreements, amongst other things. No aid meant the Hamas led PA couldn't pay its civil servants. Remember? And that is when Hamas launched its violent takeover of Gaza.
Do you think by giving yourself an Arab-sounding tag that we don't know you're a Zionist troll? And that we don't know that it was the Israel and especially the U.S. (under the knowing machinations of Eliot "Central America" Abrams) who armed Fatah against Hamas and instigated the internecine strife? Save your disinformation for your brainwashed fellow-citizens and other fools you think might believe such obvious tripe. I, for one, and most CD readers, are too savvy for your puerile attempts at propaganda.
BTW the latest reports have Groups linked to FATAH launching the rockets from Gaza against Israel.
FATAH is not hamas. They have openly admitted doing so in order to have the Government of Israel help destroy Hamas.
That the Government of ther State of Israel is playing along with this suggests to me they fully support the ongoing rocket attacks.
No one truly gives a damn, over what color hat the missile launchers are wearing.
>>No one truly gives a damn, over what color hat the missile launchers are wearing.
No only YOU dont give a time because YOU have no interest in guilt or innocence. Your agenda is very clear and that the support of Ethnic Cleansing in Palestine.
Adolf Hitler did not give a damn either as to who burned down the Reichstag. He needed a reason to blame "jews and Communists" and found one there.
Your own words show you operate under the exact same mindset.
Dear zionist agents where were your guns when millions of European Jews were being exterminated? Too dangerous? No real estate involved?
European jews didn't *have* guns.
Why not?
Seriously, I don't know the answer, but am interested in your answer.
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in their moccasins - Native American proverb.
Mossad 4:11 --------- The question was referring to the guns of Stern and Irgun; why did not the violent zionists resist the extermination?
Massud advocates aid to Hamas and the PA. You read it here on Common Dreams!