Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
AP CEO: Military Emphasizes Spin, New Rules Needed
LAWRENCE, Kan. - The Bush administration turned the U.S. military into a global propaganda machine while imposing tough restrictions on journalists seeking to give the public truthful reports about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Associated Press chief executive Tom Curley said Friday.
Tom Curley, president and chief executive of The Associated Press, speaks during the William Allen White Day program at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kan., Friday, Feb. 6, 2009. Curley came to the University of Kansas to receive this year's national citation for journalistic excellence from the William Allen White Foundation. (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner) Curley, speaking to journalists
at the University of Kansas, said the news industry must immediately
negotiate a new set of rules for covering war because "we are the only
force out there to keep the government in check and to hold it
accountable."
Much like in Vietnam, "civilian policymakers and soldiers alike have cracked down on independent reporting from the battlefield" when the news has been unflattering, Curley said. "Top commanders have told me that if I stood and the AP stood by its journalistic principles, the AP and I would be ruined."
Curley said in a brief interview that he didn't take the commanders' words as a threat but as "an expression of anger." Late in 2007, Curley wrote an editorial about the detention of AP photographer Bilal Hussein, held by the military for more than two years.
Eleven of AP's journalists have been detained in Iraq for more than 24 hours since 2003. Last year, according to cases AP is tracking, news organizations had eight employees detained for more than 48 hours.
AP, the world's largest newsgathering operation, is a not-for-profit cooperative that began in 1846 to communicate news from the Mexican War. Curley has been the company's president and CEO since 2003.
Before his speech, Curley met for about a half-hour with Lt. Gen. William Caldwell IV, a former spokesman for the U.S. military in Iraq. Caldwell is commander at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where military doctrines are drafted and a staff college trains both American and foreign officers.
"It's important for us to be very transparent," Caldwell said during an interview after Curley's speech. "If we do those things, ultimately, we're both trying to do the same thing."
Curley came to the University of Kansas to receive this year's national citation for journalistic excellence from the William Allen White Foundation. Curley also won national awards in 2007 and 2008 for his work on First Amendment and open records issues.
Answering questions from his audience of about 160 people, Curley said AP remains concerned about journalists' detentions. He said most appear to occur when someone else, often a competitor, "trashes" the journalist.
"There is a procedure that takes place which sounds an awful lot like torture to us," Curley said. "If people agree to trash other people, they are freed. If they don't immediately agree to trash other people, they are kept for some period of time - two or three weeks - and they are put through additional questioning."
His remarks came a day after an AP investigation disclosed that the Pentagon is spending at least $4.7 billion this year on "influence operations" and has more than 27,000 employees devoted to such activities. At the same time, Curley said, the military has grown more aggressive in withholding information and hindering reporters.
Curley said a military program to embed reporters with battlefield units in Iraq was successful in 2003, the war's first year. But afterward, the military expanded its rules from one to four pages, and Curley said they're now so vague, a journalist can be expelled on a whim if a commander doesn't like what's being reported.
"Americans understand hardships and setbacks," he said. "They expect honest answers about what's happening to their sons and daughters."
Caldwell now requires officers who attend Fort Leavenworth's staff college to blog and "engage" the media. "Not only when it's good stuff, but when it's challenging," Caldwell said.
Curley acknowledged that upon taking office, President Barack Obama rolled back many of the policies instituted by George W. Bush. But he said when the Pentagon faces difficulties again - perhaps in Afghanistan, with the new administration's focus on it - experience has shown, "the military gets tough on the journalists."
"So now is the time to re-negotiate the rules of engagement between the military and the media," he said. "Now is the time to insist that the First Amendment does apply to the battlefield."
He added: "Now is the time to resist the propaganda the Pentagon produces and live up to our obligation to question authority and thereby help protect our democracy."
Curley said examining the Defense Department's spending on its public relations efforts and psychological operations is difficult because many of the budgets are classified.
He said the Pentagon has kept secret some information that used to be available to the public, and its public affairs officers at the Pentagon gather intelligence on reporters' work rather than serve as sources.
Curley traced the propaganda efforts to former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. He cited a 2003 operations "road map" signed by Rumsfeld, declaring that psychological operations had been neglected for too long. Curley also noted that the current secretary, Robert Gates, has defended such efforts, including in a speech at Kansas State University in 2007.
"But does America need to resort to al-Qaida tactics?" Curley said. "Should the U.S. government be running Web sites that appear to be independent news organizations?" Should the military be planting stories in foreign newspapers? Should the United States be trying to influence public opinion through subterfuge, both here and abroad?"
He also said the Bush administration had stripped hundreds of people, including reporters, of their human rights. He noted that when an Iraqi judicial panel reviewed the evidence gathered by the military against Hussein, the AP photographer, it ordered his release. He declined in an interview to say who said AP could be "ruined" for sticking to its principles, but "I knew that they were angry."
"This is how you improve the standing of America around the world, by taking the universal human rights we enjoy as Americans and ensuring them for everyone," Curley said in his speech.
Both the award Curley received at the University of Kansas and its journalism school are named for White, who was publisher of the Emporia Gazette until 1944. A Pulitzer Prize winning editorial writer, White's commentary and friendships with prominent Americans made him a national figure.
"There's no doubt that White would have been angered by the last eight years," Curley said. "The right to access information and the ability to know the source of that information were diminished."
Associated Press Writer John Milburn also contributed to this report.
On the Net:- The Associated Press: http://www.ap.org
- U.S. Defense Department: http://www.defenselink.mil/
- William Allen White Foundation: http://www.journalism.ku.edu/school/waw/memorials/foundation/foundation.html

56 Comments so far
Show AllAnd where were the indignant exposés expected from a truly American free press during Herr Bush's reign?
Bush SR's first task when he became CIA director in early 76 was to defend the CIA's control of reporters and media.
This was how the JFK cover up and all war crimes since then have been executed.
This military control is just an extension of what has always been the case... since I can remember anyway.
Jim Glover
You make some good points.
From Michael Hasty's recent, thought-provoking article:
"...just as there is a secret government within the US government, there is a CIA within the CIA - still intertwined with ruling class good ol' boys, and involving the same nexus of oil, drugs, Mafias of every sort, terrorists, arms dealers and Cuban exiles - but more military. More corporate. More 21st century. ...
The generals never liked Kennedy. And neither did the organizers of the Bay of Pigs, who despised him for their embarrassment. ...
George Herbert Walker Bush, the namesake of CIA headquarters, was in Dallas on November 22, 1963, the day Jack Kennedy was murdered. ...
the Bushes have the media, thanks to George Senior, as CIA director, refusing to give the Church Committee the names of hundreds of CIA asset journalists."
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4308.shtml
"Curley said examining the Defense Department's spending on its public relations efforts and psychological operations is difficult because many of the budgets are classified."
Try the military "Talon" psyops programs as public relations.
Oh , sure , they were supposed to stop this program in 2005.
Bull. Try living near Tampa FL, home of Central Command. Believe me, 24/7 gang stalking torture by the military is alive and well.
If you are a friends with anyone who's family is from Lebanon,Iraq, Iran, you are on a watch list.
And it does not matter if everyone involved was born here or has legally become an American citizen. The stazi police have lots of money and pay people and corporations to employ people for 24/7 surveillance.
Our National media better step up, and start reporting on all illegal warrant less surveillance.
These people are ruthless and wanted to keep control and the money flowing. Its not about national security its about ultimate control of our country by the extreme religious right lunatic fringe that happen to believe that Christianity is under attack by Islamic Fascism.
Anyway you slice this, fear mongering has turned most of America into frightened sheep, and the major media has been complicit.
But now that Russ Tice, x- NSA analyst has come forward and told everyone that reporters from major media network have been under 24/7 surviellance for 2 years, for no apparent reason other than the obvious, maybe the protection of the Constitution is where real National Security begins.
Cut off all military funding, and make them accountable.
BornFreeMen
Gang Stalking warrant less surviellance torture victim 2 years and running,Tampa FL.
BornfreeMen,
First I want to say that I love your posts.
Next, I want to remind you, that no matter how bad they abuse you, (and I have have been abused mightily for just wearing a ponytail and opposing the Bushmonkey), that even if they resort to underhanded hounding (which neocons always will) that you sir, are the very embodyment of the true American patriot and will not be soon forgotten by those of us on CD.
Get tough. Hang in there. You're the best.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Ever since Vietnam, the government has tried to keep an extremely short leash on the press. In Saigon, MACV held the 'Five O'Clock Follies' -press briefings that painted an overly optamistic picture of the war which bore NO sembelence of the realities out in the field.
The reporters went out into the field and told it like it is, Neil Sheehan comes to mind here. Thus, the Pentagon and US Government still resents and blame an independent press for "losing" that war.
Steps were taken to remedy that. NO reporters were allowed to see what was going on in Grenada, tightly controlled press for Gulf War I and "embedded" journalists in this current debacle. Rather than protest this arrangement, the media became lapdogs in order to have "access".
We need more Neil Sheehans, Walter Cronkites, TIm Pages to step up and tell the truth.
Don't forget David Halberstam (RIP).
Poet
my apologies, an oversight.
Tom Curley is just covering his ass after the likes of Democracy Now, writer Ron Susskind, and reporter Sy Hersch exposed this "problem" years ago. Tom Curley as head of the AP reminds me of some unlucky prostitute who finds out she has gotten a nasty STD from one of her customers and whines that there should be a rule that all her patrons need to use "protection".
Hey, Tom, you of all people have the resources and your "journalists" ("stenopgraphers" would be a more accurate term) have all the training needed to fix this problem because lying government agencies need your reporting every bit as much as you need their access. You need to go to your readers a little sooner than years after the fact to report on government propaganda disguised as "news".
Poet
I second that, poet. Curley also neglects to mention two important and distressing facts that have characterized the US military's behavior towards journalists in the Iraq war: First and foremost, the apparently targeted killing and/or potentially lethal intimidation of journalists by military personnel (remember the Palestine hotel, though it's not the only case); and second, that the information that the military is trying to censor and control in Iraq concerns not a just war fought for rightful reasons, but an illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign country that posed no threat to the United States and during the course of which occupation "our" forces have resorted to further illegal behavior such as torture, random killing of civilians, and kidnapping. Oftentimes it is precisely this illegal behavior that the military are trying to cover up. We cannot treat Iraq as if it was World War II. It should be the journalist's duty to abide by the truth and to point out when the actions of his own country's military violate all principles of international law and common decency. Instead in most cases we have seen just the opposite, and it is a disgrace.
Good points, Poet.
Too late for the mea culpas. Time for the likes of Tom Curley to retire to Disney World Estates where he's been reporting from the last 8 years.
double post
If you go to a the site of real journalists like the folks at Propublica who compile investigative reports from newspapers all over the country finding something worthwhile from AP is a great rarity. I doubt they put much pressure on their subscribers like Gannett to publish the ones they do produce. Meanwhile they provide plenty of half-concocted fluff: the usual home town stories and dear-mom war.
"Unsupplied with statesmen capable of building him an enduring peace consonant with his own sacrifices. the American turns by reductio ad absurdum to an emotional apprehension of war. If you cannot think about the war, can you not at least feel about it? Besides the escapism away from the war there is in the United States a unique escapism into war , into atrocity stories, into magic-weapon stories, into hero stories, into sex-and-war stories, that defeats the political teacher...
The American people have been politically bewildered about their foreign policy for fifty years. In war they are alternately drugged about the promise of bloodless and easy victory, then whipped up with official warnings that peace will be expensive and far off...Politically this new American is not only ignorant; he is indifferent. There is the United States, or Home. And there are all the other places...
The key to the political life of the American abroad is...he must be loved, or at least liked, or he withers. His foreign policy, therefore, represents an attempt to become popular by being benevolent, rather than to be respected by being responsible.."
( from First Into Nagasaki by George Weller, edited and with an Essay by Anthony Weller; The censored eyewitness dispatches in post-atomic Japan and its prisoners of War)
Another good book on the subject is George Lipsitz's "The Posessive Investment in Whiteness" especially the chapter "Whiteness and War" e.g.
:"The denial of the political in combat films and fiction no less than in public patriotic rhetoric connects the new patriotism to the narcissism of consumer desire as the unifying national narrative"
or,
"Reagan left the nation with a better developed taste for spectatorship of the the kind described long ago by J.S. Hobson- gloating "over perils, pains, and slaughter of fellow-men whom he does not know, but whose destruction he desires in a blind and artificially stimulated passion of hatred and revenge"
Probably the most significant factor which prevents AP from properly covering the war is its own risk aversion, political toadism and unwillingness to underwrite the costs of worthwhile coverage.
When stories makes it to the AP, they are by design, either false, old or trivial. Extrapolating only a little... 1)They are propaganda designed to let you know what the corporate brigands want you to believe. 2) They confirm that the shitstream media must acknowledge what independent media sources have long since established, and that the public already recognizes as irrefutable fact. 3) They provide some lurid or distracting accounts that are of no particular concern to a mass audience.
So, hats off to crackerjack "reporting" by John Hanna and John Milburn for a story that nails the AP criteria for all three.
As for Curley's after-the-fact whining about military spin, his "nyuk-nyuk-nyuk!" and "woo-woo-woo!" schtick at the Univ. of Kansas was, as usual, not nearly as amusing nor as important to the journalistic profession as the contributions made by his brothers, Larry and Moe.
Tom Curley is clearly a coward and a shill of the highest magnitude. If he had any integrity at all, he'd have been all over this incessantly from the moment we first heard the word "embedded." Guess what, Mr. Curley? We all know the AP is a propaganda machine. Your mealy-mouthed, way-too-late, feable objections are pathetic and insulting to those journalists who managed to decipher what was going on "over there" and get some truth out to us. Resign in shame, fool!
Most, if not all, of the commentators here have a keener eye for the history of media then me, so I'm wondering, to expand on the one applause line for Hanna and AP WRITER Milburn, as opposed to the "trashing" of Curley(nyuk, nuyk), what are the most important points or arguments I can carry forward from this piece? Where to and how can I carry them?
I'll start! Democracy requires a free and independent media, not corporate controlled media. OK, so that's bloody obvious. What else? Here's a dire statement from the conclusion of Robert McChesney's RICH MEDIA, POOR DEMOCRACY: COMMUNICATION POLITICS IN DUBIOUS TIMES (The New Press, New York, 1999):
"... U.S. democracy is in a decrepit state--exemplified by a depoliticization that would make a tyrant envious--and ... the corporate commercial media system is an important factor, though not the only or even the most important factor, in understanding how this sorry state came to be.
"At present, however, and for generations, the control and structure of the media industries has been decidedly off-limits as a subject in U.S. political debate. So long as that holds true, it is difficult to imagine any permanent qualitative change for the better in the U.S. media system. And without media reform, the prospects for making the United States a more egalitarian, self-governing, and humane society seem dim to the point of nonexistence."
Anyone else?
I'll go one further: This country is in the mess we're in largely because of the media. They have allowed themselves to follow money and ease instead of the truth, and we are all suffering for it.
As FastEddie said, "Democracy requires a free and independent media..." We have no free and independent media, therefore, we have no Democracy.
Our founders new this...and now we do too.
AP stories covering Israel/Palestine are especially bad. Most of them appear to be rewritten IDF press releases. My local paper also prints McClatchey news service stories which are consistently better. In fact I think it would be good to have an expose showing just how completely biased and distorted the AP stories are.
Too late.
Joe
The military is by design, if not necessity, an authoritarian, reactionary, predatory, jingoistic, superstitious, fear-mongering, warmongering, cruel, destructive and often criminal organization, as conservatives and their organizations prove to be.
Mercenary volunteer armies and private contractors are growth industries that feed on blood, taxpayer money, Wall Street Casino gambler bets and war booty. As long as we need a military and if we want world peace, we have to follow the rule of not voting or appointing conservatives into office, particularly into the office of Commander in Chief.
Bush was successful in achieving his evil ends because he stayed true to his plutocrat base and appointed conservatives throughout.
Obama may be justly afraid he will be assassinated by conservatives if he doesn't bend over. If he is sincere in changing the status quo and staying alive, his best option may be to adopt Senator Gravel's National Initiative for Democracy and let We the People decide the important things via referendum. As a constitutional law professor, he is familiar with the right to "petition the government" statute and can put it to good use.
"This is how you improve the standing of America around the world, by taking the universal human rights we enjoy as Americans and ensuring them for everyone," Curley said in his speech.
This statement alone shows how deluded this guy Curley is.
We have the right to be ignored by our elected representatives.
We have the right to sleep on a heating grate on the sidewalk.
We have the right to support every government that buys our weapons.
We have the right to work our asses off to give money to bankers.
We have the right to be sick, sick, sick.
I'm sure the rest of the world would just love to share in these American rights in order to help us improve our standing.
I agree with many of the comments made here about AP News embedded with the MSM-military propaganda machine.
The situation is extremely bad and it explains much of the reason why the majority of Americans are so damn stupid. They rely on Pentagon-promoted news to make their decisions.
But this AP investigation has some real facts that gullible Americans would do well to absorb.
This AP investigation revealed:
"On an abandoned Air Force base in San Antonio, Texas, editors for the Joint Hometown News Service point proudly to a dozen clippings on a table as examples of success in getting stories into newspapers.
What readers are not told: Each of these glowing stories was written by Pentagon staff. Under the free service, stories go out with authors' names but not their titles, and do not mention Hometown News anywhere. In 2009, Hometown News plans to put out 5,400 press releases, 3,000 television releases and 1,600 radio interviews, among other work — 50 percent more than in 2007.
The service is just a tiny piece of the Pentagon's rapidly expanding media empire, which is now bigger in size, money and power than many media companies. ..."
"Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, director of strategic communications for the U.S. Central Command, says psychological operations must be secret to be effective. He says that in the 21st century, it is probably not possible to win the information battle with insurgents without exposing American citizens to secret U.S. propaganda."
----------------
AP Impact: Pentagon ups public relations spending by Chris Tomlinson of AP News can be found here:
http://wire.antiwar.com/2009/02/05/ap-impact-pentagon-ups-public-relations-spending/
Amazing. Not surprising, but amazing.
This backs up my belief that if we can imagine it, the military is already doing it.
This is a good article, with some original investigation, and well worth reading. But note that the AP is still following suit, and verifying with a few more details what is already established in fact and widely known. The ongoing story of the Pentagon planting "news" and operating an expensive propaganda unit with virtually unlimited and unaccounted funds has been reported for years in the unbedded media, including Democracy Now, the democraticunderground.com, Global Issues, Raw Story, etc.. Some of those investigations have been re-published here on CD.
There's lots of bs news out there.
Look at this about a couple of dogs that killed a baby.
Another neighbour, Heather Organ, 47, said she was watching television when she heard "screaming".
"It seemed as if somebody was very distressed or being attacked," she said.
"I came out and saw my neighbour and he knocked on the door and asked her to open the door.
"When the door opened, two dogs ran out.
"At the time I didn't realise what had happened so, rather than let the dogs get hurt, I picked up the Jack Russell and ushered the other one (Staffordshire bull terrier) off the road.
"I know people can't prove anything but at this moment in time it does suggest that it was the dog."
Ms Organ said she believed the neighbour was minding her grandson for the weekend.
**so let's get this straight. If the neighbour had known that the dogs were responsible for killing the baby, she would have let them get hurt.
Boy oh boy-I am so glad the UK has the death penalty so victims of human violence can also get their revenge.
Wait-what's that?
It doesnt have it?
Oh I get it. So when captive dogs do what they do naturally because some idiots let them unsupervised with a baby, they should be punished by death, but when humans do far far worse, they should be treated compassionately.
Humans are sick hypocrites.
The family should never be allowed to have dogs again.
Magarulian, Thanks for the quote that sums it up "Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, director of strategic communications for the U.S. Central Command, says psychological operations must be secret to be effective. He says that in the 21st century, it is probably not possible to win the information battle with insurgents without exposing American citizens to secret U.S. propaganda."
Someday the world will learn that the information battle will be won only with the true facts, not propaganda by the those who make a living off war making.
Here's the full story.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7876508.stm
And they use nice euphemisms like "put down" and "destroy."
As if you are talking about pieces of furniture.
Humans are truly pathetic.
Before I saw this i was thinking about the thief who broke into a house and placed one of two dogs in the oven, turned it on and left.
He was eventually caught-I just hope he is getting gang raped in prison.
"To be humane is to be cruel, vicious and unrestrained, like humans.
To be inhumane is to be compassionate, restrained, moderate, like non humans."
Webber:
Humans can be cruel and vicious, and they can be compassionate and caring. Those who are cruel, crooked, and generally selfish tend to be more conspicuous than the kind, caring types, because they naturally gravitate toward positions of power and wealth. This makes it easy to see nothing but blackness in the heart of humanity. But it's as much of a mistake to see only the dark as it is to see only the light.
Could not agree more, W.
Well put. Humans treat morality like some sort of law of the universe. They forget it's completely made up, as priests who regularly stick their *&$^s in young boys asses prove.
Cheers
Friends, we the proletariat are being treated like sheeple. We are constantly lied to, tricked, manipulated and conned by our masters who play games with our world for their exclusive benefit.
The only way to become non-sheeple is to believe nothing and question everything and I mean EVERYTHING.
That includes religion, ideas of patriotism, materialism, elitism, racism, capitalism, the whole box and dice!
Break the indoctrination. Become a thinker. Join the move to make the world a better place for everyone.
The RED FROG GOD may help you! Check:
www.dangerouscreation.com
I respectfully disagree. The master is no altruist, and all the protesting and thinking common folk have done, has gotten them shit. Gut the master, in front of other masters....
Cheers
These are some good comments. I need to add that not only is the AP covering up for itself, but that military influence only applies to stories that involve them. How do we explain the AP's bias on all the other stories? As I've commented before, think the opposite of what the AP wrote, and you'll be close to the truth! Perhaps a bit of an exaggeration, but still, some AP stories are absurd.
Take note of the officiers being required to blog.
Not making any excuses for accuracy of AP stories, however, this may be
a time of a small space opening as Bush/Cheney leave office and while
AP may be dreaming of a little less military pressure on at least their
journalists ---
I think this is the understatement of the decade . . .
"the military gets tough on the journalists."
since journalists rather look like they have been under murderous attack
by this administration over the last eight years!
And I emphasize .... MURDEROUS.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
So the AP finally acknowledges that which the rest of of have been saying for years. And I do mean years. While I agree with the premise of the first paragraph, it is ridiculous to suggest this began in the Bush Administration. It has been going on for decades (centuries, if you really want to get technical). The propaganda machine has always rolled forward, especially in times of war - it is essential to the workings of government and in herding the sheeple towards its agenda. This is NOT something eight years old. As Chomsky said, "Propaganda is to a democracy what violence is to a dictatorship".
And I'm sorry, but every time they mention just this guy's last name, I can't help but think . . . what about Moe and Larry?
curley is a true american hero.
Thank You, Tom Curely,
I will ensure my children and their childern's children will always know your honerable American Name Sir!
Thank You, Great American Patriot!!!!!
TJ
P.S. Better late than never. Far be it from me to alienate reporters who finally come to their ethical senses. I just wish we had more 1967 Walter Concrites, who were unafraid of their own nesteggs, and only concerned with the wellfare of the USA, and would have opposed this insanity eight years ago.
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
For all their differences with Bush's first-term neo-cons, here's what the Obama team still has in common with them - and it's no small thing: they still think the US won the Cold War. They still haven't accepted that they can't, even if in a subtler fashion than the Busheviks, control how this world spins; they still can't imagine that the United States of America, as an imperial power, could possibly be heading for the exits.
Whistling past the graveyard
Back in 1979, national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, plotting to draw the Soviets into a quagmire in Afghanistan, wrote president Jimmy Carter: "We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War."
In fact, the CIA-backed anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan that lasted through the 1980s would give the Soviets far worse. After all, while the Vietnam War was a defeat for the US, it was by no means a bankrupting one.
In 1986, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev vividly described the Afghan War as a "bleeding wound". Three years later, by which time it had long been obvious that transfusions were hopeless, the Soviets withdrew. It turned out, however, that the bleeding still couldn't be staunched, and so the Soviet Union, with its sclerotic economy collapsing and "people power" rising on its peripheries, went down the tubes.
Hand it to the Bush administration, in the last seven-plus years the US has essentially inflicted a version of the Soviets' "Afghanistan" on itself. Now the Obama team is attempting to remedy this disaster, but what new thinking there is remains, as far as we can tell, essentially tactical. Whether the new team's plans are more or less "successful" in Afghanistan and on the Pakistani border may, in the end, prove somewhat beside the point. The term Pyrrhic victory, meaning a triumph more costly than a loss, was made for just such moments.
After all, more than a trillion dollars later, with essentially nothing to show except an unbroken record of destruction, corruption, and an inability to build anything of value, the US is only slowly drawing down its 140,000-plus troops in Iraq to a "mere" 40,000 or so, while surging yet more troops into Afghanistan to fight a counter-insurgency war, possibly for years to come. At the same time, the US continues to expand its armed forces and to garrison the globe, even as it attempts to bail out an economy and banking system evidently at the edge of collapse. This is a sure-fire formula for further disaster - unless the new administration took the unlikely decision to downsize the US global mission in a major way.
Right now, Washington is whistling past the graveyard. In Afghanistan and Pakistan the question is no longer whether the US is in command, but whether it can get out in time. If not, when the moment for a bailout comes, don't expect the other pressed powers of the planet to do for Washington what it has been willing to do for the John Thains of our world. The Europeans are already itching to get out of town. The Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, the Indians ... who exactly will ride to our rescue?
Perhaps it would be more prudent to stop hanging out in graveyards. They are, after all, meant for burials, not resurrections.
====
excerpt from Tom Engelhardt's article.
what the USA is having IN iraq and Afghanistan "on the road to victory" is of course a POTEMKIN VILLAGE;
Somebody who knew it from the inside needs to write a history of the Associated Press of the past couple of decades. It has poorly served its role in The Fourth Estate. AP CEO Hanna knows that reporters write "the first draft of history," while here he seems to seek to write the second draft as a mea culpa.
As for being an "award-winning" journalist, we need to ask who gives out the awards and for what. Just look at who got the Medal of Freedom from Dubya. George "slam dunk" Tenet for one.
Jack Nicholson: "You want the truth? You can't handle the truth."
Back in the mid 60s when I worked as an investigative reporter for an ethically driven urban newspaper ("The Bill of Rights and The Ten Commandments") they hired me because I had APPRENTICED into journalism through hard knocks after dropping out of college a few times.
They also hired a very opinionated older guy who couldn't spell and had lousy grammar and typed with two fingers but he had grown up there and could tap into the maple trees of the community: the editors cleaned up his language for publication and it worked just fine. They also hired black people off the street if they thought there was potential (and there was).
I suspect that such free-wheeling journalism came to an end around the Watergate Era, with Woodward & Bernstein and the realization among the Power Elite that The Fourth Estate had to be reigned in, so they "rationalized" it and made it a college major and neutered it. Academic journalism is an oxymoron. National Public Radio is a branch of the Council on Foreign Relations.
I.F. Stone is dead. The "Minority of One" is dead. Today, with perhaps a couple of exceptions, the only "free press" we have in the United States is to be found on the internet. But not to worry. After they figure out how to manipulate this new medium---and Obama did!---welcome to the new universe of the END OF ANALOGUE and the total digital control by the NSA.
Finally, the "Psyops" budgets of the various federal agencies of control---paid for by you and me---are in the agre(e)gate far higher than all the "free market" investigative budgets of all the television, radio, and print media combined.
I apologize to anyone discouraged by this report from the field. Journalism can be a really noble profession in which a practical idealist can make a difference. It's just really really hard to do that these days.
Also, one caveat on the earlier poster above who referred to the evil people as "conservative(s)." They are NOT Conservatives. For example, see any of the recent writings of former CIA force Majeur Ray McGovern. Traditionally, Conservatives were fiscally responsible. Dubya and the neo-Conservatives were fiscally profligate and bankrupted the United States of America. Most old-line Republican Conservatives based their economic views on experience in producing goods and services. Most neo-cons have no experience with experience. They are nihilists.
Nihilism in the military? Chalmers Johnson please!
-30-
Thank you, Old Man River,
For that great peice of essay.
I shall not soon forget it.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Mr Curley is one of the most respected journalists in this country. He has honor and patriotism in his character. God Bless you Mr. Curley for telling the truth about the NeoCon regeim that has taken over our country and it's military.
George Bush and his group of dishonest, treasonous losers. The GOP have systematically dismantled the constitution and destroyed everything in America that stood in the way of them securing control over an uninformed civilian population in America. We have been shafted by the biggest group of power seeking criminals on the planet.
From the day George Bush took office I do not think that there was one thing that he said that was not a lie. To give him or any of his supporters any respect is a mistake. The GOP stands for Empowering it self, and the richest 1% of the elites that support them. They control the media, they control the financial system that they single handedly, with deregulation, crashed our financial market. They Sole everything every honest American saved for years and then they have the nerve to question the stimulus plan. The Republican Party should be shown for what it really is, A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION. They are the ones who are the biggest threat to every American family and their health care, their children's education and the future of our environment. They have already made America a 3rd world nation financially. With their support for blatant war crimes they have made every American less safe. They and they along with the The Joe Liebermans of the world, have made the world a much more dangerous place for us all.
The airwaves belong to the people, Every major network should have it's licenses removed due to the lies and propaganda they have been pushing for some time. They are out to do one thing, to stay in power. While absolute power corrupts absolutley. Socrates was right.
Obama you have my respect and you have my prayers that you may put this criminal group under the light of honest scrutiny. So you can prosecute the criminals and bring justice back into the American System like it was when our country was formed.
God bless America,
He's the only one who can bring us what we need to clean up this mess we are in.
Mik
Epic post MIK,
But don't put your faith in a man. Put your faith in the American Ideal (however elusive it may be for most of us.) Everything in your post, I must say, rings true.
But I would emplore you to correct your perceptions on the power elite:
They are in fact not simply terrorists, they are more correctly, more ominously: Constitutional Terroists.
If you review the first ten amendments to the constitution you will see there is not a supreme law of the land that they have not violated.
Best wishes in your quest for truth.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
To teddy---
Between my writing and your posting you wrote. Genuine scholarship.
I would like to posit a suggestion here which has been on my mind for many years...
Gorbachev saw the uselessness of the Soviet Union AND the uselessness of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) and said, Let there be Light. And there was Light. Some in the West think it was Reagan who "destroyed" the USSR, but it was Gorbachev who understood "Creative Destruction." Since then our Media have painted the United States as the Last Superpower, and look where we are today! Morally, ethically, and financially bankrupt, and we have elected a black man to save us? So we can blame him later?
Heard from Greider lately?
First Order: De-nuke the nukes. Second Order: Tell Joe Biden to stop bloviating about Iran's alleged nuclear "weapons" program based on his knowledge that the average American has no idea of the details here. Third Order: Make sure Joe Biden cannot assassinate his boss.
-30-
It takes an empire of lies to maintain an empire of force and complicity. Just ask Stan D. Garde, Official Sloganeer - the military mouths the propaganda of the presidency:
Indeed, in deed, the distance, insofar as it is detectible, between being the next great President of the United States and the Official Sloganeer is unimaginably small.
As that greatest of all Presidents once said, the job of the Presidency is basically to “catapult the propaganda.” It can’t be writ any better. I challenge any sloganeer.
Think about it – a catapult is an ancient device for firing missiles and comes from the Greek words hurl and down. Meanwhile slogan comes from the Scottish Gaelic words meaning army and cry, or war cry. Thus to “catapult the propaganda” – or slogans – that is, to be the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, a Chief Executive Officer, or the Official Sloganeer – is to hurl down war cries, upon the country and world, to throw down, to cry out in battle – O thrilling and blessed state of affairs.
“‘Do Less with More’ – How’s that for a great terministration, excuse me, I mean, administration and campaign slogan?”
The first definition of campaign is “a connected series of military operations forming a distinct phase of a war,” and the word is derived from the Latin word for level country, if not a country that has been leveled into perfect uniformity by the determined catapulting of inspired campaign slogans – the propaganda.
http://apragmaticpolicy.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/tropetopia-vi-hurl-on/
"Now is the time to resist the propaganda the Pentagon produces and live up to our obligation to question authority and thereby help protect our democracy."
It happened just now. Didn't everyone just now sense it? NOW is the time to resist. Thanks for showing up, Curley-come-lately. So nice of you to join us.
"We are the only force out there to keep the government in check and to hold it accountable."
Translation: WE ARE FUCKED.
Having grown up in Kansas, I'm somewhat troubled that this article takes place in my "HOMELAND". I mean, try to teach evolution there and see what happens. However, we still have JOHN BROWN...
"I, John Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood. I had, as I now think, vainly flattered myself that without very much bloodshed it might be done."
Great post EBlair,
By the way,
didn't you know that the world is only 6,000 years old? That's what the prostrate church and GWB says....
Thank goodness, men of learning still populate the heartland.
Best Wishes,
TJ
"If you ask me, ALL religion is a mental disorder." - Bill Mayer
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
"So now is the time to re-negotiate the rules of engagement between the military and the media," he said. "Now is the time to insist that the First Amendment does apply to the battlefield."
Thank you, Mr. Curley. NOW is the time for Democrats to walk-the-talk.
If Democrats refuse to defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights with a majority in the House and Senate, we will know beyond any reasonable doubt that they too are guilty of the obvious and perpetual usurpation of the rights and freedoms of "We the People".
“I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.” -James Madison
Keep your eye on Mark McKinnon, Bush's lead media guy, and Rove sidekick, and ex-cocaine dealer. Good old Mark, and his lovely family down Austin Texas way, is the man who knows exactly what strings to pull to control all the media and stay on message, regardless if the message is to destroy our Constitution. Mark's ability to get along with all sorts, from "Hole-in-the-Wall" druggies to world leaders, gave him the yank to rise to the top quickly by selling out our country. I only wish I knew why he is still going strong, teaching at Harvard actually.
thong-girl