Gore Pushes for Climate Change Commitment
It's Icy in Washington, but the Nobel Prize-Winner and Former Vice President Has the Dangers of Global Warming on His Mind
With the Washington, D.C. encased in ice from a winter storm, climate change crusader Al Gore argued for President Obama's economic stimulus plan, saying it will help fight global warming.
Despite the deep freeze outside Capitol Hill, the former vice president
urged lawmakers to move quickly to make investments in renewable energy
and clean cars to address the "dangerous and growing threat of the
climate crisis."
The former vice president appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to promote Obama's economic recovery package. "The plan's unprecedented and critical investments in four key areas -- energy efficiency, renewables, a unified national energy smart grid, and the move to clean cars -- represent an important down payment and are long overdue," Gore argued.
It would be a step, he said, in "beginning to solve the climate crisis."
It was unclear whether the endorsement by Gore, who has reached an exalted standing among environmentalists, would affect congressional support for the measure.
The stimulus plan is expected to be passed in the House today, and be debated in the Senate next week. Obama hopes that differences in the bill are worked out in time for him to sign it into law by mid-February.
Gore showed up on Capitol Hill with an updated version of his 2006 documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," including time-lapsed photos of melting glaciers, images of forest fires, diagrams of disappearing polar ice caps and videos of methane bubbling out of Canadian lakes.
He also urged Congress to consider a cap-and-trade system for carbon dioxide emissions, whereby the government caps the amount of carbon that can be emitted by businesses. Those that produce less carbon earn credits that can be sold to businesses that produce more carbon.
Sen. Bob Corker, a Republican who holds the Tennessee Senate seat once held by Gore, suggested that a carbon tax, refunded to companies that produce less carbon, would be a better avenue. Gore said a cap and trade policy is more likely to be enacted on a large scale internationally.
And for the United States, an over-reliance on carbon-based fuels is also a risk to national security and the economy, he said.
"As long as we continue to send hundreds of billions of dollars for foreign oil -- year after year -- to the most dangerous and unstable regions of the world, our national security will continue to be at risk," Gore said.
"As long as we continue to allow our economy to remain shackled to the OPEC roller coaster of rising and falling oil prices, our jobs and our way of life will remain at risk," Gore said.
International Commitment to Combating Climate Change
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairs the Foreign Relations Committee and said the United States should play a leading role in helping draft a new global treaty on climate change at a conference in Copenhagen later this year. President Bush withdrew the United States from the 1997 Kyoto treaty, which a sought a cap-and-trade system. But President Obama seems more likely to support such an international system.
Gore said beyond what this country does within its own borders, an international approach is imperative to address climate change. "Otherwise it's like a bucket with a hole... The United States is the only nation that can lead the world. And this is the worst challenge the world has ever faced," Gore said.
More and more countries understand the need for action, and there should be a worldwide commitment to reduce emissions and other global warming pollutants, Gore said.
"We have arrived at a moment of decision. Our home -- Earth -- is in danger," Gore said. "What is at risk of being destroyed is not the planet itself, of course, but the conditions that have made it hospitable for human beings."
"The Science is screaming at us," said Kerry, who, like Gore is a former Democratic Presidential candidate. Kerry also has his own tome on the threat of global warming.
"To the naysayers and the deniers out there, let me make it clear the little snow in Washington does nothing to diminish the reality of the crisis that we face," Kerry said.
The two former Presidential candidates ignored usual committee rules on time and for more than an hour with their opening statements and a riffing series of question and answer on what should be done.
The treaties and the cap-and-trade policy will have to follow, Gore said.
Nuclear Power, Greening the Economy
Unlike in testimony before Senate Environment Committee in 2007, Gore encountered no doubters as to the existence of climate change.
But there was some skepticism about how to address U.S. reliance on carbon-based fuel.
Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said the United States should encourage more nuclear development.
"If you accept every dire circumstance of climate change and you take a clean and reliable source of energy off the table you make it much more difficult to get where you're going to," Isakson said.
Gore countered that private investors tend to be wary of nuclear development, which requires enormous investment up front. He said nuclear plants in Europe are financed mostly with public money.
Investing in energy efficiency, renewables, a unified national energy grid and clean cars will create millions of jobs, hasten the economic recovery and begin to solve the climate crisis, Gore said.
Gore also pointed to the increase in weather-related disasters -- fires, hurricanes and drought -- occurring due to climate changes that "will increase even more dramatically the longer we delay action on this."
Kerry said he would provide Gore's testimony to every member of the Senate.
"If ever there was an underscoring of the urgency, I think you've given it to us," Kerry said.

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
20 Comments so far
Show Allsnydly
Obtain and decipher the IPCC ice core temp/CO2 data chart from the book, "An Inconv Truth".
Boy, I don't know where you global cooling deniers went to school, but by your posts you just support how utterly worthless your teachers were.
Do you even read or think? OR just suck in what someone else tells you to think?
STOP THE BOMBING IN APPALACHIA. We can't stand more of the Bush Legacy of progress and prosperity, we've been blasted and bulldozed right into Third World America. http://www.wisecountyissues.com Our water is tainted with disease and heavy metals, our schools are infested with MRSA, but as long as the politicians and profit machines are raking it in, so what ?
Soon we will be forced to act on the fact that the architectural pattern of suburbia (which includes most of our so-called "cities") is unsustainable. This is the first baby step in addressing global heating and accompanying environmental degradation. Producing "clean cars" temporarily perpetuates the myth of Al Gore and the usual Gang-Green blowhards who's single daily carbon ass-print through jet travel is larger than most people's yearly carbon footprint. "Clean cars" wantonly promote the far-flung dissipation of all unrenewable resources. The cheaper and cleaner the fuel for cars, the more the built environment sprawls out over vast landscapes, the more demand there is for cars and freeways and the more cars are needed to service the metastasizing design. We once thought fossil fuel energy WAS efficient for cars and that is what produced the energy inefficient city. Further sanitization of "clean cars" means continued waste in building infrastructure that will go on damaging the world until we reverse it or mother earth simply reverses us. Far more energy is lost forever, and far more of the environment is destroyed through trying to maintain scattered small building development than even the compounded transportation waste required to service it. Trying to fix it isn't even a better kind of wrongness. We will condense into sanely built environments by salvaging what we can and abandoning the rest to nature.
The urban planner Kenneth Schneider adds depth to this line of reasoning by saying straightforwardly that dealing with all of the major issues rather than our systemic disease precludes attaining the required results.
"Despite the statements of many urbanists and environmentalists to the contrary, the central issues are not clean air and water, endangered species or environments, more money for housing and urban renewal, or even energy, certainly not in their separate capacities. These issues are relevant, perhaps necessary, but not basic. What is basic is the structure of the human environment, the city. Building a good city - a framework for all separate things to work harmoniously - is essential in order to alleviate each of the separate issues of development. Separate concerns considered separately merely trap us into building an even larger environmental destructiveness."
Some of the comments here I will simply relegate to paid hacks whose jobs are to surf the net and counter whatever they are paid to counter. This makes more sense then actually believe some of these people could actually be this stupid. Global Warming can no longer be denied and we know that since even GWs White House acknowledged the planet is getting warming (oh, and then there are all the scientific reports). Having just returned from Peru and hiking the 28 miles of the Inca trail two miles up in the clouds, I was witness to the beautiful mountains and glaciers of the region. All looked so beautiful yet the locals will tell you things are not well. The glaciers in the Andes have been retreating for years which bodes ill for those in the region who rely on the summer melt to keep water flowing. This is particularly upsetting considering that many people live in these mountains with little to no contact with the modern world except us touristas traversing the stone trail. The fact that the world economy is in free fall to these pockets of folks here and in other remote regions of the world could careless about the DOW. Yet our lifestyle is now having an impact on even these remote areas. What a shame.
You make a reasonable case, assuming of course that you also enjoyed your walk to and from Peru, and did not squash the locals and the rest of us with a huge "tourista" (sic) jet-fueled carbon footprint.
"Huge" footprint? Driving a car would have delivered a larger foot print than flying a plane. Motor vehicles are the largest contributors of CO2 to the atmosphere. Planes are like public transport carrying hundreds of people at a time (some planes carry over 400 passengers). And these days, believe me, those planes are full.
Al...
No amount of offsetting your carbon footprint by creating a global carbon tax ponzi scheme will appease your own internal conflicts of being a world class hypocrite... Sell your shares in Occidental Petroleum and invest those millions $$$ in alternative energy...
Or shut the fuck up...!
I'm sorry but although I switched my party voting from Rep to Dem, I still don't buy Algore's crap. That rascal praised the DEA for bombing out a hemp farm in Lakota which further angered me and I went out of my way going door to door convincing quite a lot of voters that the government bombing Lakota means that government is way too intrusive. As I learned more information about hemp and its environmental benefits, I was even angrier at Gore and was then proud to have voted for Dubya. I hope to God Obama carries out with his plan to legalize Cannabis which will save the environment and bring peace on earth. Plus, with hemp, like Henry Ford, we can create plastic fiber cars that are bulletproof and yet great for the environment. Gore should shut up and support hemp for the environment and apologize to Lakota.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
laguy:
Look up Had/crut data......from 1998 thru 2008 the trend is down.....period.
Fool yourself sometimes???
And if you don't believe Had/crut.....look to the RSS. You might surprise yourself.
And when you are looking at a NOAA graph....why don't you actually use climate rather than weather? Stretch that graph out ohhhhhhh.....8,000 years.....and then tell me we are warm now???.....
Sitting here laughing.....as 7-8,000 years ago we were 1.0C+ warmer than we are right now. And you call this warming???????....heck......we aren't even CLOSE to warm in this climate cycle. We have been cooling every since that time frame.
So please......get a grip and read and study will you?
Sorry, laguy sited correct data sources and you choose to site the lowest estimate of the HadCRUTv3 as if it were the average. This data set actually still shows warming so you are still wrong but this set had data gaps because it leaves out the arctic where the most and fastest changes are occurring. This is a classic example of cherry picking data. You can't ignore all the other data sets that are more complete and accurate and expect anyone to listen to you. I'm actually surprised I wasted my time trying to explain this to someone like you... maybe out of my general feelings that when confronted with all the facts you may see that you have made an honest mistake by reading too much crap from sites sponsored by the worlds biggest polluters.
Yeah, this old Indian is trying to figure out how human beings would have to live upon the earth without destroying the earth through their own pollution?
Maybe I'll figure it out someday?
Its too bad the Native American peoples were not left in charge...it would be a far better world if they were in charge.
Mr Gore has no credibility when it comes to science. He started the carbon cap and trade scheme...is making quit a killing on it.
When it comes to climate, there are a few things that he needs to "brush up" on.
1. The PDO switching to the cool phase
2. Looks like the ADO is switching to the cool phase.
3. The sun can't seem to get cycle 24 going, and the solar winds have lost 23% of their strength.
4. Had/crut data shows that since 1998 we have been cooling. 2007 climate year was .7C cooler, and 2008 climate year is .4C cooler. WE have lost a lottttt of heat in the past two years.
Antarctica is calving as normal, but the total ice has increaed the past 10 years. The Arctic ice is now back to 79 levels....and prob closer to mid 60 levels.
Yes, the climate is changing.....1998 to 2008 has seen a preciptious drop in global temps. Let's just hope this doesn't continue!!!!
"The arctic is now back to 79 levels"
No. The National Snow and Ice Center has information that is updated daily. This year is paralleling last year's record low for ice. Please see the site below for accurate information.
http://www.nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html
Total ice in the antarctic is not increasing. There are two ice sheets. The east antarctic ice sheet seems to be OK. The west antarctic ice sheet is not calving as normal. Several years ago, the Larsen ice shelves quickly disappeared. The Wilkins ice shelf started breaking up last year.
Where are you getting your information?
Sigurdur_11
So Greenpeace is wrong? Gore? The World? All-ways lying. Thanks for the heads up! azjoe.
Personally, even if I don't drive, I start my pick-up truck EVERY day with it's ez rider rifle rack in the window and let it idle for a few hours to help the environment and the atmosphere.
righton.
"1998 to 2008 has seen a preciptious drop in global temps."
This is patently false. Check out the statistics from the NOAA website:
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html#q3
QUOTE:
"Lastly, seven of the eight warmest years on record have occurred since 2001 and the 10 warmest years have all occurred since 1995."
Next time you decide to post about unicorns and leprechauns, could you please go to another website? Thanks!
Oh shut up Al--go back to one of your energy hog McMansions and polish up your Oscar and slide show presentation. Why am I not surprised that fellow political wimp John Kerry is supporting his proposals. Al, you had your chance and you went into the corner like some whimpering toy poodle and peed a puddle when James Baker and his band of goons said "boo!".
Poet
Gore has done more to save the environment than possibly anyone else on earth.
What have you accomplished?
Gore has done more to further the corporate control of environmental policies than anyone else on earth.
He is a blowhard and a hypocrite of the highest order.