EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
How the Call for Aid to Gaza Left the BBC in the Thick of Battle
Plea from Disasters Emergency Committee broadcast without corporation's support for the first time in 46 years
A televised appeal for victims of the humanitarian disasters in Gaza has been broadcast on all terrestrial channels except the BBC, which refused to back down on its decision not to show the film.
It was the first time in the 46-year history of the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) that one of its humanitarian appeals was broadcast without the backing of the BBC, which claimed that doing so would compromise its impartiality.
The two-minute film, broadcast on ITV1 at 6.25pm last night just before the main evening news, began with images of Gaza's child victims. "The children of Gaza are suffering. Many are struggling to survive. Homeless and in need of food and water," the narrator said. "Today, this is not about the rights and wrongs of the conflict. These people simply need your help." Before the broadcast, the DEC had already raised £600,000.
The appeal was shown later on Channel 4 and Five. It quoted UN reports that 40% of Gaza is without electricity, with thousands homeless. "Aid workers on the ground say that temporary shelters are finding it difficult to cope with the number of people now living on the streets."
Many BBC staff are reportedly livid at the corporation's refusal to broadcast an emergency humanitarian appeal on behalf of the people of Gaza Link to this audio
The appeal made no mention of the word "Israel", sticking to a description of the humanitarian need in the Palestinian territory. "This is why the DEC has launched this appeal on behalf of its members. They just want to help save lives."
Earlier yesterday, Sky News announced it would not broadcast the appeal either. But it was the BBC's refusal to broadcast which made headlines across the Middle East, and by last night had led to more than 15,500 complaints.
Shortly before the appeal aired, in London protesters burned their TV licences in front of a line of police outside the BBC's Broadcasting House.
More than 110 MPs had signed an early day motion urging the corporation to reverse its decision. The BBC is also facing a growing revolt from its journalists, who have been told they could be sacked if they speak out on the issue.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said after last night's broadcast that it was "inclined not to comment", but added: "There is no doubt that any appeal which simply seeks to raise money for innocent civilians should be applauded."
Last night's broadcasts were the culmination of a saga which began at 3.42pm on Tuesday when an email dropped into the inbox of Diane Reid, a BBC official working in the office of the director general. The message from DEC chief executive Brendan Gormley was urgent, informing the corporation that all criteria had been met to authorise an emergency appeal for humanitarian assistance in Gaza.
The DEC, an umbrella group of 13 charities including the Red Cross and Oxfam, has broadcast dozens of humanitarian appeals since the mid-1960s.
Reid, the BBC's charitable appeals adviser, quickly forwarded the request to senior executives. The decision not to broadcast the appeal was reached in just over 24 hours. The DEC received a reply to its email at 5.47pm on Wednesday; it said the BBC, ITV and Sky - members of the broadcasters' steering committee - "could not reach consensus" on whether the appeal was suitable.
The reality was that the decision not to broadcast lay squarely at the door of the BBC, and specifically its director general, Mark Thompson, who had been considering the stance he would take. Thompson had told Sky, ITV, and the BBC Trust of his decision that morning.
He had in fact been in discussions for over a week. With signals emerging from Israel that its military offensive in Gaza was drawing to a close, the DEC made it clear that if agencies were allowed into the territory it would seek to raise emergency funds to distribute medical equipment, food, blankets and clean water.
Anticipating that request, Thompson consulted the corporation's charity appeals advisory committee - made up of representatives of NGOs and international charities - about whether an appeal should be broadcast. They raised concerns that once the conflict had ended aid agencies could potentially have difficulties distributing supplies in Gaza. But by the time the DEC made its formal request on Tuesday, it was clear that humanitarian agencies were able to operate on the ground.
BBC sources said that as soon as the email was forwarded from Reid to Thompson he convened a meeting with six senior colleagues, including the deputy director general, Mark Byford, and executives from the global and domestic news divisions. Insiders say it was decided unanimously to reject the DEC appeal on the basis that it would harm the corporation's impartiality. However, in an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme yesterday Thompson left no doubt as to who took the decision. "It's my decision as editor in chief of the BBC," he said. "Definitely."
It was a decision clearly opposed by senior figures in government, including the international development secretary, Douglas Alexander. By the weekend ITV, Channel 4 and Five had agreed to carry the appeal. Sky announced yesterday that, like the BBC, it would not because doing so could jeopardise its "balanced and objective" reporting. The BBC resisted growing pressure to overturn its decision.
"After looking at all of the circumstances, and in particular after seeking advice from senior leaders in BBC Journalism, we concluded that we could not broadcast a free-standing appeal, no matter how carefully constructed, without running the risk of reducing public confidence in the BBC's impartiality in its wider coverage of the story," Thompson wrote in his blog.
Richard Burden, the Labour MP who tabled the Commons motion criticising the BBC and Sky's refusals, said last night he had the backing of 112 MPs. "Viewers and listeners can see the difference between a humanitarian appeal and politics - even if the BBC and Sky management cannot." His motion rejects the "unconvincing and incoherent" justifications given.
The BBC's refusal to give in to public pressure has angered some senior BBC journalists. Editors responsible for Middle East output have said privately that (contrary to public statements by the BBC) they were never consulted. "Feelings are extremely high and there is widespread disgust at the BBC's top management," one source said. BBC members of the National Union of Journalists meet today.
One emerging issue is Thompson's claim that the BBC's stance on humanitarian appeals was "not a new policy" and was consistent with previous such emergencies. Yesterday, he said the BBC had always taken a strong stance on stories "as complex and contentious as Gaza".
However, the BBC broadcast DEC appeals after the 1999 Kosovo war and 1990 Gulf conflict. In 1968 it broadcast an appeal for victims of the Vietnam war. Over the last two years it has broadcast appeals for aid for crises in Burma, Bangladesh, Sudan, Chad and the Congo. Neither has it previously shunned humanitarian appeals in the Middle East. The second DEC appeal ever to be broadcast on the BBC, in June 1967, was a film seeking help for Palestinian and Syrian refugees displaced by the Six Day War. In 1982, the BBC helped raise £1m by broadcasting a DEC appeal for victims of Israel's invasion of Lebanon.
Under guidelines agreed between the DEC and broadcasters, three criteria warrant a nationwide appeal: substantial, urgent need in a humanitarian crisis; evidence that aid agencies can guarantee effective assistance on the ground; and sufficient "public awareness, and sympathy for" the humanitarian crisis.
Senior sources from DEC member charities are privately concerned that, since Thompson's arrival as director general, the BBC has "adopted a fourth criterion": an appeal must not compromise impartiality. It first used this in 2006 to reject a DEC appeal for victims of the Lebanon war.
Asked if its position had changed, the BBC said: "Preserving our impartiality is the BBC's main criterion when deciding whether to broadcast an appeal. Each case is judged on its merits. Our position on impartiality has not changed."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

12 Comments so far
Show AllBBC is impartial? Yeah maybe when Lorne Greene was reading the news, not since then.
Sophie Scholl-The Final Days
The BBC has been co-opted by the Blairites long ago. Its just another fascist shill for the remnants of the british empire.
The stupidity of the "logic" here is that to not air the appeal for humanitarian aid shows bias.
Jonathan Arthur
The BBC can take credit for causing the government to adopt terrorism laws against eco-activists.
It was in 97 they aired undercover video footage of animals being tortured at Huntingdon Life Sciences which led to the creation of SHAC and eventually forced the government to step in to save HLS.
You can bet they arent going to show undercover videos again.
The BBC coverage on Israel is a complete farce.
Does AIPAC control Britain like they control the USA?
"Give me liberty or at least two shoes to hurl"
This is an outrage. I saw the video yesterday, you would'nt even know how the disaster happened if you didn't read the news, Israel isn't even mentioned.
What is so distasteful is that this attack was planned from before the truce, executed while ever compliant Bush was still in office and ended, to disappear in the Obama inauguration hoopla.
Israel has already stopped the aid from coming into Gaza, on some lame pretext or other. I believe nothing they say, they are masters of propaganda, false flag ops, disinformation and out-right lies, "By Deceit we will wage war" is the paraphrased Mossad motto.
Their goal is no secret - *eretz israel* (greater Israel). This would encroach on Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan.
Using the Bible as a real estate document is especially hypocritical, as 60% of Israelis claim to be atheists, according to a Ha'retz poll.
And don't think the cleansing of Palestine is only against Muslims, Palestinians were 20% Christian, Christians, especially from Bethlehem, have been leaving in droves since the insidious apartheid wall. The Christians from Bethlehem make it clear it is the Israeli occupation that is the cause of their diaspora, as they've lived in peace with the Muslims and Jews for over 900 years.
Who put the pressure on the BBC, Zionists from Britain, Israel or USA?
No aid for war victims is heartless and add the blockade that has been in place since the Hamas election and you have a calamity = to genocide.
Israel wants to make Palestine a nation of maimed, limbless, handicapped, cripples. That way no one can ever forget the damage that Israel can do at any time, for any whim. Even those who are yet to be born will see the results and ravages of the military might of rabid zionists with USA support.
Since the Brits were responsible for the Balfour declaration (1917) they are especially culpable. They promised a homeland to the Arabs for their help in overthrowing the Ottomans and to the zionists for what reason I don't know.
They have only kept their word to the Jews and it seems to be continuing to the present day.
I got a reply from the BBC complaint dept. regarding this appeal today. Nothing new in their response, inane excuse about impartiality.
Unless someone has a gun to their collective heads, there is no excuse for this prejudiced, irrational slap in the face of innocent, Palestinian survivors.
The BBC was always an Imperialist tool, and this recent episode proves it still is. I'm sending them some old shoes.
The tube is dead, a numbing eye of fascist zombie propaganda. THE TUBE IS DEAD. soon the advertisers will lack even the funds to flog their useless crap THE TUBE IS DEAD tear your children away from the darkness that travels at the speed of light THE TUBE IS DEAD read them fairy tales in the fading light. THE TUBE! THE TUBE! whatever goes in through the tube comes out through the tube and the tube is death.
Let the tube bury the tube.
We also get the BBC "impartiality" excuse in the following video, which is by Jon Snow of Channel 4, which I in turn think is of BBC, if I understood correctly elsewhere over the past few days anyway, and the chief editor or editor-in-chief, whatever the position's title is, and another exec., or else journalist, of BBC are interviewed; besides people of other news agencies, including Al Jazeera (very good is this part), Haaretz (some or most, if not wholly good is this part, also), NYT, Sky News, and Reuters, among others. Anyway, I think it's the BBC chief editor who talks the "impartiality" excuse line and with respect to news coverage of this most recent war by Israel on Gaza or Palestine. I believe he did or spoke of this in two or more of the six clips for this video,
"Unseen Gaza High Quality: Part 1 of 6" (9:46), posted by TheWayToJunnah, Jan 23 2009
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=UeezoWRu1FU
I'm not sure which of the clips has interviews people of BBC, but based on a few notes that I took, clips 3 through 6 all do; or maybe one of those four doesn't, but ... anyway. The six clips provide a total of roughly 48 minutes for the investigative report on news media coverage of this Dec. 27 2008 through to last week war on Gaza.
When choosing to view the other five clips created and posted by the same person at Youtube, make sure to view the ones with "High Quality" in the link titles, like the above shows; because there's another set of clips from someone else and I think only titled, "Unseen Gaza: Part ... of ..."
=================
People reading this post and who want more related information regarding BBC, and possibly other UK news media, should check the reader comments in the original page for the Guardian's article. CD linked to and evidently copied the wrong page, the print page, but removing 'print' from the end of the url and then reloading the original page works just fine. Doing this will provide the embedded video again, but also the LINK to the audio the CD copy of the article refers to as having a link but without providing the link. The link's in the non-print original copy of the piece.
==================
Lastly, the BBC is not a good news media; it pumps out en masse bogus propaganda. Certainly did enough of that with the war on Iraq, and most surely has also done the same with problems elsewhere.
CBC, Canada, is also not very good; while it has some qualitative people on its team, it has damn war propagandists too, certainly one or two, and ... damn, they're sickening.
How do i cancel my online bbc membership? I no longer want to belong to an "impartial" news outlet.
SHAME ON BBC. YOU HAVE LOST YOUR OBJECTIVITY AND YOUR HUMANITY. DO YOU NOT HAVE A CONSCIENCE? YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO AID THE SUFFERING IN GAZA AND SAID NO. ONE CAN ONLY SURMISE THAT YOU COWERED UNDER FEAR OF A LOUD, ISRAELI BACKLASH. YOUR BEHAVIOR HAS PROMPTED ME TO MAKE AN EXTRA CONTRIBUTION TO AID THE VICTIMS IN GAZA.
Eleanor Oakley