Many Glaciers Will Disappear by Middle of Century and Add to Rising Sea Levels, Expert Warns
• Melt rates for 2007 fall but still third worst on record • Threat to livelihoods of 2bn dependent on rivers
Most of the planet's glaciers are melting so fast that many will disappear by the middle of the century, a leading expert has warned. Figures from the World Glacier Monitoring Service show that although melt rates for 2007 fell substantially from record levels the previous year, the loss of ice was still the third worst on record.
The total mass left in the glaciers is now thought to be at the lowest level for "thousands of years".
Even under moderate predictions of global warming, the small glaciers, which make up the majority by number, will not recover, said Prof Wilfried Haeberli, the organisation's director.
The warning will raise concern among those who say that glacier melting is one of the greatest threats of climate change because it raises the risk of sudden avalanches of rocks and soil released from the ice, threatening the livelihoods of more than 2 billion people who depend on melt-water to feed rivers in summer. Glacier melting will also add to rising global sea levels.
"If the climate is not really cooling dramatically, they'll retreat and disintegrate," said Haeberli. "This means many will simply be lost in the next decades - 10, 20, 30, 40 years.
"If you have a realistic, mid-warming scenario, then there's no hope for the small glaciers - in the Pyrenees, in Africa, in the Andes or Rocky mountains. The large glaciers in Alaska and the Himalayas will take longer, but even those very large glaciers will change completely; they will be much, much smaller, and many of them will disintegrate, forming lakes in many cases."
The WGMS, whose backers include UN agencies and scientific bodies, collects annual data for up to 100 glaciers around the world, including 30 "reference" glaciers in nine different mountain ranges on four continents, for which data goes back nearly three decades.
Figures for 2005-06 showed the biggest loss of ice in a single year since those records began, and based on historic reconstructions, it was thought to be the worst year for 5,000 years.
The latest data for 2006-07 shows that 22 of the 27 reference glaciers for which data has been supplied lost mass, as did 55 of a longer list of 74 glaciers. The total losses were half that of the previous year, but still the third largest on record. In Europe it is thought glaciers have lost one quarter of their mass in the last eight years alone, said Haeberli.
Although the mass balance of glaciers would fluctuate with natural changes in temperatures and snowfall, climate scientists believe the sustained losses of recent decades are partly due to man-made global warming, with the 10 hottest years on record coming in the last 11 years.
"The general trend to increased loss rates is continuing," Haeberli said. "The year was a little bit less terrible than [the previous] year ... but still a very heavy loss. It's still two times the average loss rate of the 20th century."
Although the data only covers some of the world's glaciers, its figures are mirrored by reports from experts from around the globe.
Two years ago the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change forecast that if current trends continue, 80% of Himalayan glaciers will be gone in 30 years, although more recent estimates have suggested the 2060s or later.
Last year the UN environment programme and the WGMS jointly published data for 1,800 glaciers on all seven continents, which warned losses had been accelerating globally since the mid-1980s, so that the annual average decline for 1996-2005 was double that of the previous decade, and four times that of the decade before. Last week China Dialogue, a London-based organisation dedicated to debate on China's environment issues, launched a campaign to highlight the same trends in melting in the Himalayas and on the Tibetan plateau.
Those glaciers feed all the main river systems in Asia, depended on by the estimated 40% of the world's population that lives in northern India, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, China, Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam, said Isabel Hilton, China Dialogue's editor.
"In a region that is already fractured and unstable, the melting of the 'third pole' glaciers is one of the most important challenges facing humanity in the 21st century," she said.
In December the US Geological Survey also warned that sea-level rise could be even worse than feared, as much as 1.5 metres by the end of this century, partly due to increased melting of the volume of water stored in glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland.
Nick Nuttall, a spokesman for UNEP, said the latest findings should encourage more governments to follow moves by some politicians to invest billions of dollars in clean energy and efficiency as a way of curbing greenhouse gases.
He urged world leaders to agree a treaty to cut emissions. Water experts have also called for more investment in better water management.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
4 Comments so far
Show AllThe image of mother Earth , with the rivers her veins and arteries, the rainforests her lungs, the aquifers like kidneys, the magnetic poles, from microscopic to macroscopic, - how can we not see ourselves as part of a living being? Right down to being mostly ... water...
thank you, old goat...every spirit that wishes to incarnate here takes up residence inside their mother's womb, a necessary haven in which to undertake the construction of their bodies per DNA code...they are completely reliant upon the very molecules of this very planet, delivered through their mother's body, as the building blocks with which to work on their own...seen from this perspective, polluting and toxifying the molecules that this planet contains forces each spirit to unavoidably incorporate said altered molecules into their developing bodies, which can cause all kinds of horrific deviations, some known, others yet to be...this is why I am against industrialization...not only are we destroying the only planet we have to live upon, but we are, in a very real, physical sense, preventing future souls from the opportunity to enjoy a healthily-constructed brain and body with which to begin the ever-more difficult experience of living here...in fact, if one understands that the number of molecules that make up our very real mother planet (in every sense of the word) is finite, it quickly becomes clear that every molecule we alter to the point that it is no longer part of the living cycle is one less that is even available for incarnation...we are actually reducing the number of living things the planet can create and support...when does this activity become immoral? when do comfort, commerce and entertainment cease to be legitimate reasons for the destruction of the mother of all? what right do those spirits already incarnated here have to deny others the same?
A lot of people in Asia, India, Asia Minor are unhappy now. If they run out of clean water they will be in a very ugly mood. They know the difference between how they live and how we live. Anybody who thinks they will sit over there and quietly starve is a fool.
This is the kind of scenario(s) that are just not possible to predict with much accuracy most especially because humans have not experienced the coming and going of ice ages and now with the stupid human idea that there can never be too many people on this planet and with the advent of the agricultural and industrial societies that are at best piss poorly managed, creates something that this planet has not experienced in the ice age cycles that of the past millions of years(10s or 100s, I don't know)that are about 100k years from beginning to end will differ how, nobody knows. What is sure is that the next ice should be coming up in the next couple of thousand years and none of us will be around to witness it. As a matter of almost sure fact, it will be undetectable until maybe one day if there are any humans left alive, they will look out their back doors and see not just glaciers but the vastly larger ice sheets that will cover those people up if they don't move to the equator and that may not even help. Right now, the rise in sea level will continue slowly unless part of the antartic ice sheet falls off the continent into the ocean. And unfortunately, the sources of clean water may decrease to a point that will create interesting times ahead, for sure.