Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Guantanamo Detainee 'Was Tortured', Pentagon Official Admits
A Guantanamo prisoner often described as the '20 hijacker' in the September 11 attacks was tortured by his American interrogators, a senior official at the Pentagon has admitted.
Al-Qaeda suspect Mohammed al-Qahtani during his 2006 trial in Sanaa, Yemen. Qahtani -- a Saudi suspected of involvement in the September 11 terror attacks -- was tortured in Guantanamo Bay, the official overseeing trials at the detention site has told the Washington Post. (AFP/File/Khaled Fazaa) Mohammed Al-Qahtani's interrogations at Guantanamo in 2002 and 2003, which included sleep deprivation and exposure to cold had been described by officials as abusive.
But the Pentagon has always refused to acknowledge that the treatment of the Saudi national amounted to torture.
However Susan J Crawfod, the senior official at the Pentagon responsible for prosecuting detainees has told The Washington Post that she decided last May not to refer his case for trial because she had concluded that he had been tortured.
"His treatment met the legal definition of torture. And that's why I did not refer the case" Ms. Crawford, a retired military judge, told Bob Woodward of the Washington Post.
She said she came to the conclusion after studying the combination of techniques used on him which she said had a 'medical impact.'
"The techniques they used were all authorized, but the manner in which they applied them was overly aggressive and too persistent," she said.
"You think of torture, you think of some horrendous physical act done to an individual. This was not any one particular act; this was just a combination of things that had a medical impact on him, that hurt his health. It was abusive and uncalled for. And coercive. Clearly coercive. It was that medical impact that pushed me over the edge" to call it torture, she added.
Military documents show that Mr. al-Qahtani's repeated interrogations included prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation, forced nudity and exposure to cold. He was forced to dance with a male interrogator and to act like a dog, obeying such commands as "stay," "come" and "bark."
A Pentagon inquiry in 2005 found that the methods were "degrading and abusive." Mr. Qahtani's lawyers at the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York said they left him a broken man who has attempted suicide.
He had been denied entry to the US in August 2001, a month before the attacks on the Twin Towers. He was later captured in Afghanistan and taken to Guantanamo in 2002 where he was accused of plotting the attacks, alongside five other Guantanamo detainees.
Military prosecutors sought the death penalty but in May, Ms Crawford decided not to refer his case for trial. At the time she refused to offer an explanation.
Today she defended his continued detention, describing him as a "muscle hijacker".
"There's no doubt in my mind he would've been on one of those planes had he gained access to the country," Ms. Crawford said in the interview. "What do you do with him now if you don't charge him and try him? I would be hesitant to say, ‘Let him go,' " she added
Ms Crawford,who served as general counsel for the Army during the Reagan administration, and was the Pentagon's inspector general when Dick Cheney was secretary of defense, is the first senior Bush administration official responsible for reviewing practices at Guantanamo to publicly state that a detainee was tortured.
In a statement on Tuesday, the Pentagon said that more than a dozen investigations into Mr al-Qahtani's treatment had concluded that the interrogations were lawful.
"However, subsequent to those reviews," the statement said, "the department adopted new and more restrictive policies and improved oversight procedures for interrogation and detention operations.
"Some of the aggressive questioning techniques used on al-Qahtani, although permissible at the time, are no longer allowed in the updated Army field manual," the statement said.
In November, military prosecutors indicated they would file new charges with Ms Crawford, based on subsequent interrogations that did not employ harsh techniques.
But Ms Crawford, who dismissed war crimes charges against him in May 2008, told Mr Woodward she would not allow the prosecution to go forward.
- Posted in

24 Comments so far
Show AllNow what do we do? And, "muscle hijacker"...another new language "what?" from the Bush Era.
We have all the preparatory legal work, cases already ongoing, some legal decisions, and suggestions done by ACLU, Center for Constitutional Rights, Marjorie Cohn and others on torture and holding prisoners illegally. What's your priority list? Can the various steps be done simultaneously:stopping torture (is it really stopped now?), closing Guantanamo, Abu Gharib, not replacing them, stopping "renditions"(kidnapping and detention), getting people charged, tried or released on day l/week l. Then independent prosecutors, looking at DOJ, military, your favorite list of Bush administration folks....charging US government individuals from the top and trials...........for torture, and war crimes (breaking US and international law). Lots on CD on it.
"You think of torture, you think of some horrendous physical act done to an individual."
No! You think that way. I don't! You can torture someone without ever laying a hand on them, you disingenuous, Cheney-pet.
Take for instance "prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation, forced nudity and exposure to cold..."
"He was forced to dance with a male interrogator and to act like a dog, obeying such commands as "stay," "come" and "bark."
These are NOT interrogation techniques. These are to humiliate and degrade. I wonder who the bullet-headed morons are carrying out these procedures and how they can live with themselves.
.What do we do?
The optimum question.
First one must ask oneself how do I feel about this? I know for a fact that there are those who post here who would care not one bit that this human being, a man whose guilt was never proven in court of law, was subjected to such treatment. Do I care that there are hundreds of others still enduring this sort of thing?
Then one must , if the answers to the above questions prove you a compassionate human being and one who cares about the actions of her nation, decide how best to end this horror done in our names. Will our elected officials end these criminal acts? Can we assure ourselves that they care?
I have read and thought about the words of President Elect Obama who has stated that closing Guantanemo is a "complicated " matter, that we must not look back but look forward. That this will all take time after all. Now I am not as smart as that Harvard graduate but , to me, torture and false imprisonment are issues not for the back burner. I have written (OK emailed) to my Senators, my Congressperson and to the President Elect as well. I wish there was more that could be done. Whatever happened to demonstrations?
"I wish I could love my country and justice too." Albert Camus
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
ardee:I do like your comment. I like the Camus quote,too. Do you have any quotes from kafka? I think you shouldn't Leap to the conclusion that you are "not as smart as that Harvard graduate". Don't stop at "I wish there was more that could be done.". I predict that there will be demonstrations....(I hate to make predictions, but ...).
I think it's good to support the ACLU, National Lawyers Guild (Marjorie Cohn is the president and a law professor, www.marjoriecohn.com), Center for Constitutional Rights CCR and activist groups you like. (I can no longer do demonstrations.)
"There's no doubt in my mind he would've been on one of those planes had he gained access to the country," Ms. Crawford said in the interview. "What do you do with him now if you don't charge him and try him? I would be hesitant to say, ‘Let him go,' " she added.
Before the criminal enterprise of Bush/Cheney occupied the White House people were presumed innocent unless prosecutors proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was guilty of a crime. But now the judge says she hesitates letting the prisoner go.
If this judge's standard is to be used, then why don't we round up Bush, Cheney, et al and throw them into dungeons and torture them until they confess to whatever crime we think they should.
Amerikkka: It's in "its last throes."
Cheney sez: "So?"
Now what do we do you ask?
We investigate and bring charges against the current members of the Administration who approved these policies. Obviously these actions will have an impact on the future, so it is necessary to hold criminals accountable in order to recommit this country to the basic principles of law.
It is impossible to just forget the past and "start fresh" from this point on, as Obama wants to do.
For more independent views you can visit:
http://www.cincinnatibeacon.com
http://chriscommons.blogspot.com
So lemme see if i have this straight... Amerika now has a full fledged pre-crime system, to lock people up forever for something they MAY have tried to do in the future - a.k.a. Philip K. Dick's "The Minority Report". Additionaly, Mr al-Qahtani will be imprisoned forever - after being tortured into insanity - for something that never happened, buy that he MAY have done in the PAST if everything had been different.
Even Philip K never got that twisted.
What a country.
How many “20th Hijackers” were there? Mousouai (sp?) was alleged to have been one also. I seem to remember reading about one other some time ago. As for being a dangerous person, how can that be? After reading of some of the treatment that others have suffered, how can any person who had the “pleasure” of staying in the military's wonderful accommodations, the best that can be hoped for is that he doesn't come away completely broken and raving psychotic. And the “coerced testimony”? Translation: the government forced him to say what they wanted to hear. If he could have a REAL and FAIR trial, would the government allow character witnesses that might refute their “dangerous” assessment? Obviously the answer is yes, if it were fair. But after what he's gone through, after what all of them have gone through at the hands of the Bush administration, there could NEVER BE a fair trial and so all we would ever have is the government's assessment of the person's dangerousness. It's a catch 22. If this were a real democracy, we would, indeed, all of us, have to wrestle with this issue. But it long ceased to be a democratic republic and so all we can do is gripe and moan and rely on the government ultimately to make things worse. My solution is give them a very large bag of money and pay for their psychiatric treatment/rehabilitation in what ever city in the world they choose to live in. And if that place they choose doesn't have therapists, bus one or several in.
The idea of the bloody death-squad loving, worker-murdering, Uribe getting the "Medal of Freedom" is indeed phantasmgoric and vile.
---USAn---
Quite frankly it an insult to anyone who has ever been awarded a medal of freedom.
Not that I would EVER expect this to happen, but given the past recipients of "The Medal of Freedom" I would first indicate my gratefulness. Insist on a press conference and the opportunity to 'thank' everyone.
And then, in full view of the live press. Expose all the atrocities of past recipients of this 'medal' and reject it.
All very embarassing....but we need a lot more of this.
We lost the opportunity to end torture and redeem ourselves when Conyers refused to pursue impeachment.
Now he has even voted to support Zionist barbarism.
Aside from a few lone voices in the wilderness, the wholesale flight of Democrats from any kind of moral principles is positively stunning. They can all go to hell.
---USAn---
>>These are NOT interrogation techniques. These are to humiliate and degrade. I wonder who the bullet-headed morons are carrying out these procedures and how they can live with themselves.
They do not have to live with themselves. They live in your neighborhood. They live in that community called "America".
Let's face it, if a Democratic President had been caught committing any of these atrocities, there would be no debate about whether it was torture. It's amazing how bent to the right our public discourse is.
Read it and weep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Paq_fIxPCM
What a travesty for the country we love and the government that is one of terror,violence and lawlessness. One of the most most violent in the world. To paraphrase Pogo: We have found the enemy and he is us! We are the bad guys too. Let me ask you: What happens if my relatives who are in the military, are captured and interrogated by the other terrorists? It is imperative that all these people from Bush,Cheney,Condi on down are brought to justice for these most egregious acts and violation of the Geneva Conventions and International Law!
Hang Rumsfeld, bush and cheney. More post election fun.
"The Washington Post reported Wednesday that Susan J Crawford, a judge tasked with deciding on whether Guantanamo detainees should be brought to trial, told the newspaper that she decided against prosecuting Saudi national Mohammed al-Qahtani because his interrogation met the legal definition of torture.
Crawford said that the harsh techniques used against al-Qahtani were approved by the then defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
"A lot of this happened on his watch," she said.
The paper quoted the judge as saying that al-Qahtani, who allegedly planned to participate in the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US but was denied entry into the country, was subjected to prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation, nudity and exposure to cold that placed him in a "life threatening condition."
"The techniques they used were all authorized, but the manner in which they applied them was overly aggressive and too persistent," said Crawford, a former inspector general of the Pentagon.
"You think of torture, you think of some horrendous physical act done to an individual. This was not any one particular act; this was just a combination of things that had a medical impact on him, that hurt his health. It was abusive and uncalled for and coercive. Clearly coercive," she added.
The report came out amid growing certainty that President-elect Barack Obama will issue an executive order to close the notorious prison camp as one of his first moves.
Obama is under huge pressure from human rights groups to close Guantanamo, but has also conceded that closing it is quite complicated and will take some time".
Keep spreading word people about the criminal actions of our government to these people. We need whistle blowers!
"Change in the government starts with the individual."
I just love her last comment.
Something like:
"We tortured him so we cannot try him because all the evidence is tainted and we have no credible case."
"But we cannot release him."
What???
The fact that such a statement even gets press shows just how badly screwed up our legal system is by the people who practice law!
"These are to humiliate and degrade"
No sh!t Sherlock. But they aren't torture. If those A-holes in Gitmo can lift their arms higher than John McCain they can kiss my ass.
I didn't know that Dick Cheney took the time out to comment on Common Dreams. That is you, eh Dick?
Harper's Magazine:
We Now Live in a Fascist State
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:34:38 -0700
The article below appears in the current issue of Harpers and was written
by Lewis H. Lapham
www.harpers.org/LewisLapham.html
Knowing the source of this piece makes it all the more disturbing. It is not every day that the editor of a respected national magazine publishes an essay claiming that America is not on the road to becoming, but ALREADY IS, a fascist state.... or words to that affect.
To help prepare you for what follows, here is the final sentence from this piece.... [I think we can look forward with confidence to character-building bankruptcies, picturesque bread riots, thrilling cavalcades of splendidly costumed motorcycle police.]
On message By Lewis H. Lapham Harper's Magazine, October 2005, pps. 7-9 "But I venture the challenging statement that if American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, then Fascism and Communism, aided, unconsciously perhaps, by old-line Tory Republicanism, will grow in strength in our land." -Franklin D. Roosevelt, November 4, 1938