Forty Years on, Laos Reaps Bitter Harvest of The Secret War
More than 100 countries will today sign a convention banning the use of cluster bombs. In Laos, the most bombed nation on earth, their lethal legacy is a part of daily life.
Phonsavanh, Laos - The entrance to Craters restaurant is guarded by a phalanx of bombshells, each as big as a man. Opposite, the Dokkhoune hotel boasts an even finer warhead collection. For tourists who have not cottoned on, the Lao town of Phonsavanh lies at the heart of the most cluster-bombed province of the most bombed country on earth.
The haul of unexploded ordnance (UXO) is just a taster of
that littering the countryside, or sitting in vast piles around homes
and scrapyards. The deadly harvest from the US bombing of this
landlocked country 30 years ago in the so-called "secret war" as the
real battle raged in next-door Vietnam has become big business. Steel
prices that surged on the back of soaring demand from China's go-go
economy drove up scrap prices five-fold in eight years in impoverished
Laos. It sent subsistence rice farmers, struggling make to ends meet
amid spiralling food and fuel prices, scurrying into their fields in
search of the new "cash crop".
But it comes at a high price. At least 13,000 people have been killed or maimed, either digging in fields contaminated with live bombs or, increasingly, in their quest for lucrative scrap metal. Half the casualties are young boys, most killed by exploding tennis-ball-sized cluster bomblets - christened "bombies" locally - that are everywhere.
The scale of the contamination is mind-boggling. Laos was hit by an average of one B-52 bomb-load every eight minutes, 24 hours a day, between 1964 and 1973. US bombers dropped more ordnance on Laos in this period than was dropped during the whole of the second world war. Of the 260m "bombies" that rained down, particularly on Xieng Khouang province, 80m failed to explode, leaving a deadly legacy.
Overwhelmed by the immensity of the clear-up, Laos - which has dealt with just 400,000 unexploded munitions - had resisted the signing today in Oslo of a treaty banning cluster bombs and demanding that remnants be cleared within 10 years. But the country has had a rethink and will now be a key player in the ceremony.
For Laos it could be a godsend, focusing world attention on its plight and bringing international resources to tackle the problem. With 37% of agricultural ground made unsafe by unexploded munitions in a nation where four-fifths of people farm the land, the scourge has stifled development.
Yet farmers eking out a living below the dollar-a-day poverty line have no choice. Bombs unearthed as they gingerly peck at the soil are planted around, or moved to the side of the field.
"In the end the Lao people regard lack of food as much greater threat than unexploded bombs," said David Hayter, the Lao country director of British-based Mines Advisory Group (MAG). "It's just that each UXO death is marked by a big bang, but deaths from lack of food or poor water are less noticeable."
Fatalistic acceptance of the danger is fostered by familiarity. Bomb remains are fashioned into everyday items: cluster-bomb casings become fencing; houses perch on stilts crafted from 500lb bombs; mortars with fins are used as table lamps. "People's familiarity is the most striking thing for me," said Jo Pereira, an occupational therapist with the Lao charity Cope, which fits UXO victims with prosthetic limbs. "They've lived with it for so long. Much of it is in their houses. Children think 'we've got those at home' and don't see the risks."
So when scrap metal prices rocketed many saw it as a heaven-sent opportunity to boost meagre incomes. For those unable to grow enough rice to feed their families throughout the year, there is little choice but to collect UXO scrap despite the dangers.
"People have lived with this for two generations," said Gregory Cathcart, an MAG programme officer. "They don't view it as risky. It's simply a cash crop. The problem is the main scrap on the surface is gone, so they've to dig it up which is extremely dangerous."
Cheap Vietnamese metal detectors costing as little as £7.36 boost the business. Landless families have turned full-time scrap collectors, earning up to £2.70 a day if they unearth six or seven kilos. Stumble on half a cluster bomb casing of "best Detroit steel" and they hit pay-dirt, worth £20 to £27.
No such luck for Sher Ya, 25. He plonks a plastic bag of bullet casings on the scrap dealer's scales and anxiously eyes the needle. His teenage brother dredged the shells from their village rice field. It earns a welcome 40p. "My family grows only enough rice for six months," he said. "So when we're not planting or harvesting we collect bomb scraps. It's scary, but we've no choice."
The trade is so lucrative that scrap dealers ferry collectors by truck to virgin forests every day. Sypha Phommachan, 45, need not to go to such lengths. Farmers around Thajok village beat a path to the scrap dealer's door. A pile of fragments, casings, and mortars is all she had left after the foundry took away nearly eight tonnes a few days before.
"That took me about three weeks to collect," she said. "That's quite slow because it's the rice harvest season and people are busy farming. In a couple of months they'll be out furiously collecting to raise cash for the Hmong festival." Yet she carefully inspects the bomb harvest, rejecting live munitions. She knows the risks. In the six years she has lived in the village, 10 people have been killed collecting scrap. One 50-year-old man died three months ago when he tossed half a "bombie" he believed safe into the wicker basket on his back. It exploded and the ball-bearings it threw out went clean through his chest, killing him instantly.
Today's treaty banning the stockpile and use of cluster munitions is due to be signed by 107 countries - including the UK, which has been the third biggest user. Those holding out include the US, China, Russia and Israel.
But Richard Moyes, co-chair of the Cluster Munition Coalition, is confident that the convention will change the climate. "We sense we'll see a dramatic decline in cluster munitions use even among states that don't sign."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
10 Comments so far
Show AllTelling the truth and exposing war crimes is now considered "anti-American."
I'd laugh it it weren't so tragic.
One more comment - I think the Guardian is very courageous to have published an article that exposes the appalling human cost of the US military interventions in Indochina. The Guardian has been accused of anti American bias in the past. But anti American is usually an epithet to delegitimize the point of view of those people and news organizations who are willing to speak about the suffering caused by the US's criminal foreign policy. I remember Bill O Reilly saying once the Guardian was so anti American anyone would think it was edited by Osama bin Laden himself.
In the light of the above article, I would say that should be considered something of a compliment !
Excellent argument for banning cluster munitions -- the bitter experience of Laos.
I have seen right wing types wearing tee shirts that say: "Freedom isn't free." There right, people like the Laotians pay for our hedonistic "Freedom."
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY.
This means that the US military dropped thousands of bombs on a country they were not even at war with. Such a travesty.
Where is the outrage ? Where is the compensation for these poor Laotian farmers whose lives are destroyed by the cluster bombs. Where are the media reports on CNN, FOX News, MSNBC about the human toll of the Vietnam war ? Where are the conscience - stricken Americans raising funds for the innocent victims of a war that should never had been waged against a country that never attacked anyone ? Where are the investigations by the military asking why all this violence against a peaceful, impoverished little nation ?
Why have we not been told about this ? Why are people in Laos still suffering so far away from the gaze and the attention and the conscience - if there is any conscience left - of the world ?
Hello suhail_shafi
The US bombed parts of Laos due to the Democratic Republic of Vietnam using Laos as a logistics pathway (see Ho Chi Minh trail for more details) to supply munitions, man power and other sundry supplies to the National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam during the Vietnam War. The government of Laos did not stop the DRV from doing this so the US bombed the areas in an attempt to achieve victory / slow its own loss.
Right or wrong, that is why.
Americans have been aware that they conducted military operations in Laos for decades. The majority have either forgotten (it WAS 30 years ago) or just don't care.
My point is that while I find the use of cluster munitions abhorrent and the loss of any human life as tragic, this is the nature of war. Never be surprised at the barbarity that you will find at its depths. In addition, civilians always pay the highest price in any war. They always have.
Personally I am just as outraged by the overwhelming incompetence and greed of the Laotian government. It upsets me that the Laotian government does nothing to improve the living condition and liberties of the Laotian people. From monarchy to communist oligarchy the past 600 years are a manual on how to oppress a people.
Regards,
Alfarinn
No, I do not agree.
I do not care if Laos was a logistics pathway for the Viet Cong. The fact is, the country was NOT at war with the United States and was in any case not a threat to the military, let alone the American people.
For the US military to use its air power on a small defenseless nation that caused death and havoc on a massive scale is morally reprehensible.
I am unsure on what basis you condemn the Laotian government. The fact is, Laos is a poor, landlocked country with few resources and the country does not seem to have much in the way of outside help in the face of the huge challenges caused by the US's military's merciless bombardment. If there was any justice in that area of the world US taxpayers would be bailing out the millions of Vietnamese and Laotians whose lives were destroyed by the US intervention, not Israeli human rights abuses against Palestinian civilians.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. I live in the United States and I say no more killings of innocent people in other countries in our name !
Laos was supporting the country that the US was at war with thereby making itself a target for military reprisal. You asked why. That is why.
I am generally not in favor of war though I do think it is, at times, a necessary evil. The Vietnam War was not one of those times.
Best regards,
Alfarinn
As long as we all realize that
- War terrorizes those in its path
- There is no such thing as a moral war, only unavoidable immorality
- There has been no unavoidable war that the US has been involved in since 1945
Leave Small Footprints
Agreed.
Regards,
Alfarinn