Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
- 'Biggest Act of Civil Disobedience in Canadian History'
Popular content
Today's Top News
Environmental Activists to Stage 48-Hour Protest
Up to 30,000 climate refugees could be created if plans to build a new coal-fired power station go ahead, a report claimed today.
The findings by the World Development Movement were released as environmental activists prepare to stage a 48-hour protest today as part of their ongoing campaign against the new plant at Kingsnorth power station in Kent.
The group's report entitled "Carbon Evictions: the UK's role in the forced migration of climate refugees", claims 30,000 people - the population of Strood, close to the site - would become refugees worldwide as a result of the new plant.
It estimated the UK would be responsible for 5 per cent of global C02 emissions causing a 4C rise in global warming, thus creating 10 million of the predicted 200 million climate refugees by 2050.
Benedict Southworth, director of the World Development Movement said: "The effects that climate change will have on the world include more and worse cyclones; flooding; drought; and sea level rises that will force people to leave their homes.
"The Government must wake up and realise that we can't promise to reduce carbon emissions with one hand and give carbon intensive projects like the Kingsnorth coal power station the thumbs up with the other.
"If emissions aren't reduced significantly in the UK, 10 million of the poorest people in the world will become homeless. Those people have done little to contribute to climate change, but they will suffer the worst consequences."
Camp for Climate Action, who is organising the two-day action, said protests will take place across the country, with supporters planning to target plant owners E.ON and potentially banks that have invested in the company.
The group orchestrated a week-long heavily policed protest at the site near Hoo in August, culminating in a day of direct action, during which campaigners attempted to "shut down" the power station.
Susan Moore, of Camp for Climate Action, said: "E.ON, companies in its supply chain and anyone associated with new coal in the UK are all potential targets. Burning coal is the dirtiest way to produce electricity and we refuse to stand by as the green light is given to a new generation of coal fired power stations."
The current E.ON-owned Kingsnorth plant is due to close in 2015.
However, the company plans to replace it with a new two-unit coal-fired power station, the first for 30 years, which it claims will be 20 per cent cleaner.
Emily Highmore, E.ON spokeswoman, said: "We are respectful of their right to protest. Our concern is that they do it peacefully and lawfully."
- Posted in

4 Comments so far
Show AllI am wondering if by "peacefully and lawfully" they mean ineffective,silent and easily ignored. I don't know if I have ever seen an effective peaceful and lawful protest where government listened (especially over corporates). Even if the rally is peaceful and lawful things often turn ugly because of government/police retaliation or the desire to control its citizens. I will be interested to see how this turns out.
From what I understand, the technology is available to make damn near as clean
as natural gas.
Nuclear power and clean coal (plus solar and wind etc...) are the future.
Joe Hopeless,
Nuclear is so clean you've been volunteered to be the recipient of the wastes produced, and to bear the costs of new plants, and to live for the rest of your useless life to the lands impoverished and environmentally decimated by uranium extraction. Then we'll also make you responsible for local and national security to make sure that weapon-making materials aren't pirated away for weapons production. The water you drink can come from the cooling ponds, or perhaps you'd prefer fresh water from the upper Columbia River, already contaminated with nuclear waste. You and your descendants will also get to pay the vast increases in rates for delivery of electricity via a deterioriating energy grid.
Coal is so clean you get to mine it for the rest of your miserable existence, and you get to live next-door to a coal-burning plant, "clean" or "less clean." You get to pay for the health care for the thousands of families that suffer from poisoning and cancers from coal. The air you breathe will come directly from the emissions associated with burning coal.
You've stated here that you're an "environmentalist." You only qualify because you live in the environment. Every other statement you've made concerning the earth's environment demonstrates that you're a liar and a fraud. Did anyone ever tell you that you're also a complete moron?