Florida Gay Adoption Ban Is Ruled Unconstitutional
MIAMI - A Florida law that has banned adoptions by gay men and lesbians for over three decades is unconstitutional, a judge here ruled on Tuesday.
"The best interests of children are not preserved by prohibiting homosexual adoption," the judge, Cindy S. Lederman of Miami-Dade Circuit Court, said in a 53-page decision. She said the law violated equal protection rights for children and their prospective parents.
A spokeswoman for the attorney general's office said the state would appeal, and the case is likely to end up before the State Supreme Court.
Florida is the only state with a law prohibiting gay men and lesbians - couples and individuals - from adopting children. The Legislature voted to prohibit adoptions by gay men and lesbians in 1977, in the midst of a campaign led by the entertainer Anita Bryant to repeal a gay rights ordinance adopted by Dade County.
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to the Florida law.
Some states, like Mississippi and Utah, effectively bar adoptions by same-sex couples through laws that prohibit adoption by unmarried couples. Arkansas voters passed a similar measure this month.
The ruling on Tuesday will allow Frank Martin Gill, 47, a gay man from North Miami, to adopt two foster children whom he has raised since 2004. "Our family just got a lot more to be thankful for this Thanksgiving," Mr. Gill said in a news release issued by the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented him.
Robert Rosenwald, director of the LGBT Advocacy Project of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and one of the lawyers on the case, said, "The case means that these two boys won't be torn from the only home that they've ever known," said.
The state presented experts who argued that there was a higher incidence of drug and alcohol abuse among same-sex couples, that their relationships were less stable than those of heterosexuals, and that their children suffered a societal stigma.
But lawyers for Mr. Gill presented evidence contradicting those contentions, which Judge Lederman found persuasive.
"It is clear that sexual orientation is not a predictor of a person's ability to parent," she wrote.
Mr. Rosenwald called the decision a huge victory for gay and lesbian parents and for almost 1,000 children in Florida waiting to be adopted.
"The court for the first time after hearing all of the evidence determined that the scientific evidence is crystal clear," he said. "There is no dispute that children raised by gay parents fare just as well or better than children raised by straight parents."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllThis obsession with other people's sex lives can only be the product of mental illness.
Anybody who believes that what others are doing in their private lives is a threat to them and to the institutions they consider their property are still mental infants who have no concept of their physical boundaries.
"The best lack all conviction while the worst are full of passionate intensity." -Yeats
Until that changes there is no point in trying civilization. You have nothing to start with.
Ex Nihilo may be just great for gods. We ain't gods.
This is wonderful news - something positive for gay people, for civilized values and tolerance, for American's moral health! How I hope the decision stands, and that the state Supreme Court does not overturn it!
Let history be our teacher. Where does acceptable homosexual behavior show up in the past?
In various societies, but always at the end of those countries, kingdoms and empires; Roman Empire included. Acceptable homosexuality is a clear indicator that a society is in decline.
History teaches those capable of learning, that the building block of all successful societies is the committed union of one man with one woman.
This is classic homophobia, as well as historically inaccurate.
Sounds like the churchs' teaching of history to me. I haven't found anything to indicate what you say in any of the history books in my library, or anything I've read over the past fifty years regarding history.
The committed union of one man with one woman is a crock. In any generation you could probably find one committed union that stayed committed, with both participants happy, in a thousand, if not thousands. You'd also find thousands of physically and sexually abused children in those "committed unions," physically abused wives, and an unbelieveable amount of infidelity.
Naturally, as so many good christians do, you have to slip in the typical little zinger - that if we belive otherwise from what you say - we're incapable of learning. So I'm incapable of learning. Truth is, I was incapable of being programmed by the church, and left it to think for myself, and learn, not what was they were trying to make me believe, but what I used my own brain, studies, and observations to find out for myself.
"The state presented experts who argued that there was a higher incidence of drug and alcohol abuse among same-sex couples, that their relationships were less stable than those of heterosexuals, and that their children suffered a societal stigma"
Yeah, tell that to Betty-Lou and Bobby-Joe Buttfuck, living in their trailer in the panhandle, snorting meth, having drunken fistfights, and pumping out 20 inbreed little brats.
If I were an orphan, give me to two Gap wearing gays in Miami as parents anyday...
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
Rock on!
I've often wondered if Anita Bryant lived the full and happy life she worked so hard to keep others from having.
I doubt it. Anita Bryant was a frustrated, sexual repressed fundamentalist with few brains. Evidently that is just the kind of person that Florida cherished in the 70s. If you want a modern counterpart, look no further than Alaska.
So true. That's exactly what I saw there.