Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Shoshone Indians Sue to Stop Barrick's Nevada Gold Mine
CRESCENT VALLEY, Nevada - Five tribal and public interest parties filed a lawsuit in Nevada Federal Court on Thursday, seeking an immediate injunction to stop one of the largest open pit cyanide heap leach gold mines in the United States - the Cortez Hills Expansion Project on Mt. Tenabo.
Carrie Dann prays for the Earth. Dann characterizes the "destruction of the water" as "destruction of the blood of the earth" which entails "destroying life of the earth and the people and the wildlife that depend on it. Dewatering is taking the life of future generations." (Photo by Erin Hetherington courtesy Oxfam)
Canadian Barrick Gold, the world's largest gold mining company, plans
to construct and operate the mine in an area that the lawsuit states is
"located entirely within the territory of the Western Shoshone Nation."
The permit was granted on November 12, and the $500 million mine construction project could begin as early as this week
"After years of determined opposition from Western Shoshone, the U.S. Department of Interior, through its Bureau of Land Management approved one of the largest open pit cyanide heap leach gold mines in the United States on the flank of Mount Tenabo," the plaintiffs said in a joint statement.
They described the area as "well-known for its spiritual and cultural importance to the Western Shoshone" and "home to local Shoshone creation stories, spirit life, medicinal, food and ceremonial plants and items" which "continues to be used to this day by Shoshone for spiritual and cultural practices."
The plaintiff groups are - the South Fork Band Council of Western Shoshone of Nevada, the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, the Western Shoshone Defense Project, Great Basin Mine Watch and the nonprofit Western Mining Action Project, which provides free legal services for citizen groups and Native American tribes on hardrock mining issues in the Western U.S. and Alaska. They are asking that the mining permit be revoked.
Kathleen Holly says, "I visit Mt. Tenabo to pray to the Creator and to the life force of the world that resides in the mountain."
"The proposed Cortez Hills mine pit, along with its waste dumps and other mining facilities would be located right where I go to pray," Holly says. "BLM is wrong to limit the importance of Mt. Tenabo to Western Shoshone people to just the top of the mountain," which is owned by Barrick.
The Shoshone maintain that Mt. Tenabo and its environs are part of the ancestral land of the Western Shoshone, which has never been legally ceded to the federal government. Nevertheless, U.S. politicians and multinational corporations ignore the 1863 treaty between the U.S. government and the Western Shoshone, treating sacred land as a public resource to be mined for gold, the tribe says.
Barrick's Director of External Communications Louis Schack declined to comment on the lawsuit.
Gerald Smith, director of the BLM Battle Mountain Field Office, who along with the Department of the Interior and BLM is named in the suit, said Friday, "We complied with all the laws of Congress" and said he believes "all the actions are in compliance with the regulations we have to operate under."
Smith said, "We did appropriate consultation," and stated, "We've done, I think, a very outstanding and thorough job in issuing the best decision we can."
Smith says he knew there was going to be a court challenge once the project was approved. "There's a difference in opinion and we'll proceed from there," he said.
"This is a vitally important achievement for Barrick and for the communities where we do business in Nevada," said Greg Lang, president of Barrick's North America region. "The Cortez Hills project creates new economic development and job opportunities in rural Nevada at a time when other industry projects in Nevada are being shelved and jobs are being lost."
The Cortez property is expected to begin producing in the first half of 2010, with average annual production increasing to about 1.0 million ounces of gold for each of the first full five years of production.
There is a division of opinion also within the Shoshone tribal group over the gold mine.
Barrick recently signed a Collaborative Agreement with leaders of several Western Shoshone communities in Nevada to work together in partnership to improve education, business and employment opportunities for the Western Shoshone, enhance awareness of Native culture and to build greater mutual understanding.
The agreement establishes a Western Shoshone Educational Legacy Fund tied directly to revenues from the Cortez Hills mine. The Fund is expected to provide financial support for generations of Western Shoshone seeking higher education.
Lang said on November 12, "The Cortez Hills Project has been the object of criticism from activists who oppose mining and support failed claims of Native American title to much of Nevada's public lands. These groups are threatening litigation against the BLM's approval of the Cortez Hills EIS. The company will vigorously and expeditiously oppose any challenge."
The planned open pit mine on Mt. Tenabo will cover over 900 acres to a depth of 2,000 feet. New waste disposal and processing facilities are planned, including a cyanide heap-leaching facility, consisting of 1,577 million tons of waste rock, 53 million tons of tailings material, and 112 million tons of spent heap leach material.
The mine through an extensive groundwater pumping system will dewater Mt. Tenabo and "permanently destroy approximately 6,800 acres of land on and around Mt. Tenabo, over 90 percent of which is classified as federal 'public' land."
Larson Bill, vice-chairman of the South Fork Band Council, asks, "How are we, as a nation, showing our values, if we allow a transnational corporation to destroy this 'church' for all time, just to get 10 years worth of gold."
Bill said that while Barrick has tried "to cloud the real issues with gifts and money, we continue to oppose this project."
"They have not bought our people, the traditions nor the lands of the Shoshone," he said.
Carrie Dann of the Western Shoshone Defense Project, a recipient of the prestigious Right Livelihood Award, warned, "This mine will drain the water from Mount Tenabo" and will suck "the water out of the mountain forever."
Dann characterizes the "destruction of the water" as "destruction of the blood of the earth" which entails "destroying life of the earth and the people and the wildlife that depend on it. Dewatering is taking the life of future generations."
Julie Cavanaugh-Bill of the Western Shoshone Defense Project said, "The question that the courts and the people of this country need to ask themselves is will we continue to tolerate these violations against the First People of this land or will we finally turn the tide of injustice and protect these sacred areas?"
Dan Randolph, executive director of Great Basin Resource Watch, said, "This is an example of how the Bush administration is rushing to protect their corporate friends in their last few months of power" as the "BLM denied requests to extend the comment period on the EIS not only from us, but also from several Western Shoshone tribal governments."
Randolph believes "Barrick will begin work on the mine as soon as they can, to cause enough harm in an attempt to make a religious rights argument moot, and the BLM and Bush administration appear to be more than willing to help them in every way possible."
The lawsuit claims the "Western Shoshone religious and cultural uses of the Mine site will be permanently eliminated."
The plaintiffs argue that "the BLM failed to adequately protect public and private resources, including the religious, cultural and environmental resources and uses at and around the Project site - the Trust Responsibility owed to Native Americans."
By failing in this protection, the governments have violated the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the plaintiff groups claim.
In addition, the lawsuit alleges the BLM "failed to fully evaluate the project's impacts as required by the National Environmental Policy Act.
The BLM acknowledged in its 2004 Ethnographic Report that the "entire Mountain and pediment area, not just the top, was part of a Native American Traditional Cultural Property."
Yet, the agency stated in its both in its final environmental impact statement, FEIS, and in its record of decsion that the "BLM knows of no Western Shoshone uses that would be prevented or uses or resources that would be destroyed by the proposed project."
But the plaintiff groups point out that the "FEIS predicts that at least 22 springs or seeps, and at least one perennial stream, will suffer the loss or complete elimination of their flows." They maintain that these are waters that "are sacred to Western Shoshone people and are an integral part of their exercise of their religion."
The plaintiffs also complain that the air pollution from the mine would violate legal standards when it comes to fine particle emissions. Health effects associated with exposure to PM25 fine particle emissions "include premature death, aggravation of heart and lung disease and asthma attacks," the point out.
They claim that the gold mine violates the BLM'S own Visual Resource Management requirements to identify and protect scenic values on public lands set forth under two different laws and particularly would "constitute a severe visual intrusion into Western Shoshone religious/ceremonial sites."
The plaintiffs point out to the court that the BLM received 14,631 individual comments in opposition to the project from people around the world.
The lawsuit mentions that the United Nations recently found the United States and BLM in violation of the Western Shoshone's rights "due to the ongoing and proposed Cortez/Barrick operations on Mt. Tenabo."
- Posted in



24 Comments so far
Show AllNot only are our nation's 'Power Elites' hell bent on draining this country of it's jobs and resources, they are content and lazy enough to sell LEASES to foreign corporations so that THEY can come in and invade us legally and help themselves to our precious GOLD!!
Dammit!
Not surprising, considering that Canada and the USA are some of the few nations who refused to recognise the Indigenous Peoples Human Rights Declaration
bligh4
The government should leave the Shoshone in peace. Not only were they driven out of their tribal homeland (including the part of Colorado I am from) by the Arapaho and Commanche tribes about the time of the Revolutionary War, now they are being harassed out of where they ended up. Give them a break.
bligh4
What? Someone who admits that all the Tribes weren't living in harmony and the lands they are on today wren't all originally theirs? This is a first.
This seems simple to me, the Shoshone should win their lawsuit if the land is theirs by treaty right. Even if mining were allowed, the original intent should rule. And the original intent was obviously not to materially alter the landscape. And I believe at the time it was signed, open pit mining on this scale wasn't even envisaged.
But in any case, as you say, "Give them a break"
bligh4
Thomas, yea-weird. Seems people of all nations and races have been fighting since God-knows-when. The other tribe in our area- the Kiowas- were driven out of THEIR homeland-the Black Hills- by the Souix in about 1740.
Anyway, the price of gold is going to hell- and will probably make this low yielding ore uneconomical anyway. Again, give them a break.
"Anyway, the price of gold is going to hell- and will probably make this low yielding ore uneconomical anyway. Again, give them a break."
Now there's a happy thought! Do you know where the Kiowa ended up?
bligh4
Thomas,
A few of the Kiowa were still local (Kiowa Co.), I believe most of them ended up in Oklahoma.
bligh4
Thanks very much.
You do know what "tribe" means? Tribes had skirmishes about land for subsistence hunting and for fishing in lakes and rivers. It was a tribal thing and also went on in Canada. No one claimed they were saints. They didn't commit genocide on each other, however. The invading imperialists took care of that.
"They didn't commit genocide on each other, however. The invading imperialists took care of that."
I would suggest you go back and check the historical records on that. Most were killed by disease, not settlers.
That said, I would't disagree that they got a raw deal. When a civilized society meets a less civilized society, the lesser always gets the short end of the stick. And they certainly got that.
That's a superior racist attitude if I ever heard one. The tribal people were "less civilized?" LOL I know a few and believe me, they are not out to cheat, steal, or financially exploit anyone.
They didn't kill animals for sport for fun, for one thing. They looked out for each other, and if someone was sick and couldn't hunt and gather food for themselves or was unlucky in hunting, they were given what they needed by other tribal members. They were socialists, in other words. They never took more than they needed. What is so "uncivilized" about that?
If the invaders wanted to develop the land, I have no problem with that. What I have a problem with is killing people to get the resources/land and herding them like cattle and putting them on the worst land available in concentration camp i.e. apartheid followed by years of racism, underfunded schools, underfunded health care, etc. How could anyone pull themselves up by their bootstraps if they had no boots?
How come all we hear about is the Jewish Holocaust and never about the home-grown American Holocaust against the native people? I'm curious. Don't they count? Let's remember, if we can, our indigenous people who were kind and generous and brought food to the first Thanksgiving and shared it with the Pilgrims.
That said, have a good Thanksgiving.
Well said!! Right on!!!
"That's a superior racist attitude if I ever heard one."
Well I certainly didn't mean it that way. I would simply say that there is no way you could call the tribes back then as civilized...perhaps organized would be a better word, as the Europeans that immigrated here.
The history of many of the tribes suggest that everything you say is correct but also that there were many other methods of organization used. Military, religious, etc. Many treated their slaves well, some did not.
Most of the deaths were from disease, not from killing by immigrants.
"Let's remember, if we can, our indigenous people who were kind and generous and brought food to the first Thanksgiving and shared it with the Pilgrims."
That is no problem. We owe many things to the first immigrants. More than many realize. When you start looking you find language, customs, etc all over our society.
Happy Thanksgiving to you too.
And the blankets they gave the Indians only made them die....(Michael Franks, Antonio's Song)
The diseases that killed the Natives were brought by Europeans. No groups in the Americas had any immunity to European disease such as smallpox, chicken pox, measles, ALCOHOLISM, etc.
I am afraid this will be my last post to Thomas More as I am simply appalled by his ignorance and racism.
On this of all days--when the settlers began their betrayal of Native Americans.
Scratch a scandal and find a Bush. The Bush family are Barrick investors.
This project, along with the 300 plus mile railroad that will soon be constructed to deliver nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain should render most of the State of Nevada uninhabitable.
The point should be that according to the Treaty of Ruby Valley signed by the US Guv and the Shoshone Tribe, the US of A recognized the ownership of most of what is now the state of Nevada to the Western Shoshone Tribe. It is the ONLY treaty with native Americans that so specified - whether by intent or mistake is immaterial. The lawsuit is still ongoing but Bush and his buddies continue their looting of even more resources before they abscond on Jan 20.
But I could be wrong !
In this case I am most definitely not!!!! I grew up in the area and as a lad wondered if the US would give in. 60 years later, there is still a lawsuit, thwarted by the US leaders at every turn to avoid a public trial over the US policy of ignoring the treaty.
This article makes me sad to hear what's happening to the Shoshone, but at the same time, it makes me even sadder to know that nothing will be resolved with a lawsuit and the destruction will continue.
Same old story. If genocide didn't get rid of all the indigenous peoples, a big blast of cyancide should.
This is most likely my last posting.
The Kiowa, who speak an "isolate" language are still around, and thriving. One of their "sons" won a Pulitzer for literature (1969) for the book, "House Made of Dawn"---Thomas Moore might enjoy reading it.
The Shosone, related to the Comanche of Okla, and the Aztec of Mexico by the "Uto Aztecan Language" will eventually prevail, and their wealth, being stolen now as in the past--- will be returned with interest. When the USA is defeated in the next great war they start* or/and the true "rule of Law" prevails and the world will step in. This will make the USA so poor from paying reparations to the many thousands of millions of people they have negatively impacted World Wide that they will never make war on anyone else again-----------ever.
Or when the USA falls apart from its own corruption, malfeasance, greed, ignorance, arrogance and--------------stupidity------
Or when the Native American People finally unite, rise up, and win the war they have been fighting for 516 years----after having won it first---they foolishly accepted treaty conditions that have been ignored. They can win it again, and next time---their only choice will be---Unconditional Surrender---
They should have killed all of us off------instead, they created people like me-- who works to create others and we will live forever------------
They will learn to regret that----someday.
I am sure that many readers are laughing this very moment----but, it could happen, and now would be the perfect time to start--the USA has never been at its weakest, most vulnerable and self inflicted condition.
I will volunteer, as a private or as an officer, or I would be happy beyond words even to sweep the floors---just to be part of that.
* With the exception of the Revolutionary War the War of 1812, and WW I&II, the USA has not own any other wars---and the present violations of international law show that the USA will not abide by even its own conditions.
The Iraq and Afghanistan wars will never be won---because they can never defeat those who will not accept defeat----like me and others. In the 19th century when they could not defeat us, they "made peace"---and the above article along with thousands of other similar stories make my point for me-----the USA is not an honorable nation, and they cannot be trusted to keep their word. On a legal base, the Nations are still at War with the USA-----the treaties that stopped the wars in the 19th century have been broken----reestablishing the conditions of war, and revealing the fact that the USA----is not worthy of trust.
Like the habitual criminal convict, they do not deserve to remain a free nation, or for that matter, they have never "earned" the right to exist in their present state.
They cannot rehabilitate themselves, and they cannot be rehabilitated, so they must be "taken into custody" by the world---so as not to be a threat in the present or to the future.
Good Luck America, you really need it.
Nanoo
I can understand if you don't post a comment anymore. I have always special attention to yours. This news just in time for Thanksgiving and I wonder how the readers here react. This country is shot. Amazing on Lou Dobbs program last night he had a map of the future breakup of the US empire. Perhaps with smaller individual regions the native populations will finally have some justice and peace.
If even people that hate us wish us good luck, then we may avoid the future you wish for us.
I wish you would reconsider making this your last posting. You and I don't agree on America of course or even about the Indians who were our first immigrants, but your voice gives a different point of view thats needed. You aren't always right, but neither are the rest of us.
I know that a couple of your postings led me to research that changed my mind about a couple of things. Thats too valuable a thing to lose. Selfishly I ask you to reconsider your thought to quit posting. And I'm quite sure there are many others that don't want to see you go.
Remember, if everbody in the choir is singing the same note, there is something wrong with the choir.
The following isn't specifically related to the Shoshone, but certainly is related to them, past, present, and future, as well as being this for [all] American Indians; similarly, too, for the indigenous populations of Canada. As the article indicates, the indigenous of So. America are also similar victims ... of Euro-colonialism, ... GREED, blood lust, and so on.
It's an excellent and important article, and statement.
"Poverty and Despair: The Failed Policies & Human Rights Violations directed against Native Americans
Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies
by Stephen Lendman
Global Research, November 21, 2008"
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11085
I spent some time with this lady and her sister, living on their ranch in Crescent Valley back in 1995, helping out with chores, etc. They have been harassed by the BLM for grazing their cattle on Shoshone lands now claimed by the BLM. Their cattle have been rounded up by helicopters...
I could go on and on describing the atrocities that Carrie Dann and her sister Mary and their family has gone through over the years. They are strong, but have to constantly defend their traditional way of life.
Now this mine expansion will put them out of business. There are springs on their land that will go dry. It's their only source of water in the dry sage brush hills. Please go to the Western Shoshone Defense Project website to learn how you can help.
http://www.wsdp.org/
THANKS!