World Hails Obama's Victory, Urges Change of Tack
PARIS - World leaders hailed Barack Obama's triumph in the US presidential election as the dawn of a new era and called for the global superpower to change the way it does business.
As
Obama's supporters celebrated around the world, a national holiday was
declared in Kenya -- where his father was born -- and in Sierra Leone,
six newborn babies were even named after the president-elect.
But within hours of Obama's victory speech, Russia announced Wednesday it would be aiming short-range missiles at the US missile shield in Europe, a sharp reminder of the challenges awaiting the first black US president.
But nothing could stop the wave of optimism that spread out from the United States after Obama's triumph over Republican rival John McCain made him the first African-American to win the White House.
South Africa's iconic first black leader Nelson Mandela wrote in a message to Obama: "Your victory has demonstrated that no person anywhere in the world should not dare to dream of wanting to change the world for a better place.
"We wish you strength and fortitude in the challenging days and years that lie ahead," he added.
Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki declared a national holiday on Thursday to mark the victory of Obama, whose late father was from Kenya.
"This is a momentous day not only in the history of the United States of America, but also for us in Kenya," he said.
Pope Benedict XVI sent a telegram of congratulations to Obama to hail the "historic occasion."
French President Nicolas Sarkozy extended his "warmest congratulations" to the 47-year-old Democratic senator. "By choosing you, the American people have chosen change, openness and optimism," added Sarkozy.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown welcomed the victory as a historic moment.
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd referred to US civil right leader Martin Luther King's landmark "I have a dream" speech for equality 45 years ago. "Today what America has done is turn that dream into a reality," he said.
World leaders vowed to work with the man elected to succeed US President George W. Bush.
"In a new historical era, I look forward to ... taking our bilateral relationship of constructive cooperation to a new level," China's President Hu Jintao said in a written message.
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said in a statement: "This is a time for a renewed commitment between Europe and the United States of America."
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso also pledged to work with Obama to strengthen relations, while Indian Premier Manmohan Singh called it an "extraordinary" victory.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who was himself elected president in March, called for "constructive dialogue" in a message to Obama.
Earlier, however, in his first state-of-the-nation address, he announced that short-range Iskander missiles would be based in the western territory of Kaliningrad to "neutralise" US missile defence plans.
With wars in Iraq and Afghanistan heading White House priorities abroad, there were also calls to rethink the US "war on terror" launched by Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
The "'war on terror' cannot be fought in Afghan villages. ... Afghanistan is the victim of terrorism," Afghan President Hamid Karzai said.
In Iraq, Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Obama's election would not lead to a quick US disengagement from the war-torn country.
"We don't think there will be change in policy overnight. There won't be quick disengagement here. A great deal is at stake here," Zebari told AFP.
Israel's outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said he was certain US-Israeli ties would strengthen under Obama.
"Israeli-US relations are a special relationship based on values and common interest, with tight cooperation," he said in a statement.
Jordan's King Abdullah II, a key US ally in the troubled Middle East, sent Obama a cable saying he looked forward to cooperation with Washington to "resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in line with a two-state solution."
After eight years of tense relations with the Bush administration, Washington's archfoes called for a new era of relations under Obama, who has pledged to hold direct talks with US enemies.
Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, whose country is in a standoff with the West over its nuclear program, said the result showed that Americans wanted "basic changes in US foreign and domestic policy."
"We hope the new US government can fulfill its people's demand to distance itself from the present statesmen's wrong approaches," he said, the official IRNA news agency reported.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, a vociferous critic of the Bush administration, called for new relations "between our countries and with our region, on a basis of respect of sovereignty, equality and true cooperation."
Cuba's Foreign Investment Minister Marta Lomas expressed hope that Obama would ease the four-decade-old embargo on the communist state.
"If Obama takes some action to ease the embargo, it would be welcomed and of course it would be of help, but we're prepared for conditions to remain the same," she said.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
22 Comments so far
Show AllI think its great that obama was elected instead of McCain/Palin (what a nightmare that would have been) but like so many people have said, some of the positions of Obama dont differ much than those of McCain. I think what is giving the world the kind of reaction that we are seeing is the realization America has changed enough to elect a President with a Kenyan father who lived abroad and one with a rhetoric of change.
I think it comes now to the american people to make Obama take the right direction, and if some of his election talk was just posturing not to get nailed on some progressive direction he wants to take america, he then needs a base of support to make these changes happen. If it was not posturing, the same kind of wave of sympathy that we had seen after 9-11 will die soon enough, it will be back to business as usual and another opportunity to build bridges will be lost. If that is the case, Obama must feel some pressure to walk the walk after having talked the talk from americans.
With the world responding positively the U.S. has a chance now to talk to other countries, especially ones we have traditionally "disagreed" with, in a constructive way. We could have done that after 9/11 but the Bushite neocons took the very wrong path. I hope against hope that we will begin to heal the wounds. Everyone's worried about the economy== it was supposedly the #1 issue this election. If we take some of the money that goes into the rathole of the Pentagon and put it into domestic programs, it will do a lot to heal our economy. Are people too stupid to see that? I can dream, can't I?
Let's get our missiles out of Poland. There's no need for them in the age of nuclear subs, and they're there just for two reasons: to rattle sabers (same as "pound our chests"), and line the pockets of the death merchants. Why provoke when we might cooperate? Missiles don't build bridges, feed kids, provide health care, create art or produce anything. The best thing they can do is rust from disuse.
The chest pounders are lying about "appeasement", the threat is what will be done in reaction to their being there -- what we'd do if they were in Cuba.
Finally, maybe, we have a leader who doesn't have to make political capital by shouting threats. Honey is much more effective than vinegar.
The US missile shield in Europe has only ever existed in support of a first strike policy. It is so small and of limited effectiveness that it can only be considered to work against the few remaining Russian missiles left after a US devastating first strike.
So its presence and the Russian response is merely political posturing. I hope Obama is a much better chess player than Bush.
Interesting, but I don't agree that it is so small. Last night I found the facts: missile defense missiles equals 130 sea based, 10 Poland and Czech, unknown quantity in Britain, unknown quantity in Alaska, and unknown quantity in California. So we're easily looking at at least 200 missile defense missiles in this program... obviously with more down the road tied into some sweet military industrial contracts.
If I were Medvedev, I'd be pissed too. Under the MAD doctrine.... which has so far kept us from going mad, under that doctrine it was agreed that an attempt by either side to build missile defense would be interpreted as a first strike move. Allowing the attacking of the other side with little fear of retribution. Therefor it was agreeably mutually banned.
There is only one position for Obama to take. END THESE WARS NOW. And cancel the deployment of the missile defense program. DO NOT RESTART THE COLD WAR.
PEACE, or FAKEDEMOCRACY!!
HOOORAY!
Well, America finally came good! Now having made a start the hard work comes.
Obama can't do it on his own. He needs a new breed of Americans to help him, ones who forget all this nonsense about them being the master race, the world's policeman, the ones who were born to lead the world. What crap!
America needs to put its own house in order first: change its Constitution to stop Presidents becoming dictators, change its political system to stop it being run by pressure groups, change its economic system from being greed-driven, get religion out of its government, think peace not war. That'll do for starters.
My blog has a few helpful ideas.
www.dangerouscreation.com
I was at work on Tuesday night, and I had cnn's live feed in the corner of my charting computer. When it was announced that Ohio and then Iowa went for Obama, I danced a little jig in front of the nurse's station.
Right on, translucent. There'll be time later to press President Obama on a progressive agenda, but for GOD'S SAKE LET'S REJOICE at what just happened!
I never thought I'd see it in my lifetime. I'm 42, and I've been of voting age since 84, and have felt cynicism and despair lo these many years. This is the first time I've felt genuinely proud of my country in all that time. I'm allowing myself the indulgence of hope right now, and it does feel like a weight has been lifted from my heart. I was crying later on when I got home in time to see his acceptance speech in C'go. I was weeping by the end, and it felt so good, it felt so right. When his family came on stage at the end, my wife and I looked at each other and we we're just beaming through our tears. There was a black first family who'll soon live in the White House!
REJOICE!
Damnit, REJOICE! Everyone here. Just for today, let go of your ideological purity, and your conviction that you know you're right, and celebrate this moment. It is ripe with possibility and progress. We just elected a person of color to be OUR president. Barack Hussein Obama, who is 1/2 African and 1/2 Anglo American, whose father was Muslim is now representing ALL of us to the world. If someone had told you in the dark days after 9-11 that this would happen in 2008, would you have believed it?
You have a point drift. My suspicion and political cynicism runs deep so it's difficult for me to celebrate, especially considering who Obama is beginning to surround himself with, not to mention his voting record.
Be that as it may, it is a symbolic victory, my kids are ecstatic, but frustrated with their dad at the moment. I don't see myself as one who is "ideologically pure", nor do I "know I am right". Far from it, I sincerely hope I'm wrong in my suspicion. We'll have plenty of time to debate the matter in the future. For now, a toast, to a new beginning. Salud.
ALRIGHT! Salud! Cheers!
Surely we'll hold his feet to the fire in days to come, but today, SALUD!
Once when I was talking about how Mother Theresa's policies against family planning did more harm than all her charitable work did good, our son looked at me and said "Wow - even Mother Theresa isn't good enough for you!" A person can get too intellectualized and sour.
So yes, let us rejoice a bit! What if we had awoken to find McCain Palin as our leaders?
Joe
Obama; The World Rejoices as CD bitches.
Must be nice to be smarter than everybody on the planet;
GreenIs: I suspect you are right about a confontation with Iran. Obama will be pulled in and manipulated, he won't be on point, but what difference?
Look for an American Naval Vessel to be "attacked' by the Iranian Terrorists.
Even Sunk. By Israel.
Under a Black Flag.
Signed, The Gulf of Tonkin.
The Gulf of Tonkin,
HA HA! YOU LOOSE!
I'm tired of people like you having these brainless bible based/military based ridiculous beliefs. This is one for "us"; educated, rational, respectful and stern Constitution believing Americans!
I think you should stick to your Fox News, they'll keep you nice an cozy.
Bottom Line: If Iran is found to have or (EVEN PROVIDES) WMD's to any terrorist organizations (BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, NOT THE CHENEY CIA); Obama will have no mercy. I trust Iran isn't that stupid.
Cheney and Bush simply want Iran's oil too. They realize people like you are easily manipulated (with the assistance of Fox News and CNN) to think they are actually "terrorists" or whatever.
I'm sure you were all gung-ho when it came to attacking Iraq for it's WMD's....how did that turn out?...so sad
Hay, I'm not loose! Really!
Yeah...Hate to break it to you, but the talk is all over town...and it's bad. Really, really loose according to what I've heard.
The word is that you WIN...obviously you're a winner, but so loose.
Shucks, the cat's out of the bag, and on my lap purring actually.
I don't know, translucent. The talk around town...
Hello Arry, how are you? How is your dog?
Life is good; Obama.
Nice front page article in NYT's detailing Iraqi Shi'ite's plan's to consolidate the withdrawal of forces now that O is President. They said had Republicans been elected, they would not have moved forward, they'd have had no Faith in the process.
Nice.
To Faith, Hope and Love.
"If Iran is found to have WMD Obama will have no mercy."
What is your point.
Obama. Yes.
Listening to John Pilger and others today on www.democracynow.org should help sober up the irrationally exuberant Obama hopefuls.
"World urges a Change of Tack", says the headline above. A change of tack is encouraged but a change in tack (if they're using a sailing metaphor), though seeming to change direction, does not change the goal or the desired destination, it merely facilitates reaching the goal faster. It's not the tack that needs to change but a serious reassessment and analysis of what the goals are and where we want to be going. Otherwise it's just business as usual, with smiley faces.
"a serious reassessment and analysis of what the goals are and where we are going. Otherwise it's just business as usual, with smiley faces."
This is an astute, thoughtful assessment. Thanks.
Yes, we need to celebrate the defeat of McCain/Palin and so many Republicans. But how long should we celebrate before our "serious reassessment and analysis" takes place?
I'd add to the smiley faces metaphor the risk of the Obama administration and the (corporate) Democratic Congress being a progressive-looking Trojan Horse, with a hidden agenda of shoring up, preserving and extending the corporate regime of the last 30 years. (See Charles Derber's book Hidden Power for the Corporate Regime concept.)
Nader's recent comments on Democracy Now also (along with Pilger and others this morning) are fabulous:
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/11/5/independent_presidential_candidate_ralph_nader_discusses
For the full scoop on Obama, his agenda, and his policies, from a progressive perspective, see Paul Street's new book Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics. It is extraordinary. Part of Rebelnow's call for reassessment and analysis is to do our reading. There is no short cut. We cannot know what our goals our, nor our tactics, nor our strategies, without hard analytical work and study.
Thank you Rebelnow!!!
US elecctions are only about tack; the goals are set by the "owners" of society.