EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bush: Bank Buyout Needed 'To Preserve Free Market'
The White House plan marks the first such deep government intervention in markets since the Great Depression. Bush noted that he didn't take the aggressive and unusual steps lightly, stressing that "these measures are not intended to take over the free market, but to preserve it."
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (R) and President George W. Bush listen during the evening's entertainment following an official dinner honoring Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi at the White House in Washington October 13, 2008.
(Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) Among the bold moves announced an hour before financial markets opened:
- Nine banks have "volunteered" to sell equity stakes worth a combined $125 billion to the U.S. government. The Treasury will get preferred, nonvoting stock. Other banks have until Nov. 14 to offer equity stakes to the government. The Treasury said that $250 billion of the $700 billion rescue plan that Congress approved last month would be deployed for this confidence-building step.
- The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will temporarily guarantee all new senior debt issued by FDIC-insured banks, thrifts and holding companies. This move addresses the freeze in short-term lending between banks, which threatens to paralyze the broader U.S. economy. Essentially, the FDIC will insure loans between banks until the crisis subsides. It will be paid for by premiums and transaction fees.
- The FDIC will guarantee all non-interest-bearing accounts in banks and thrifts that it insures. This is a new and important wrinkle to help smaller businesses across the United States. The FDIC recently more than doubled the insurance it provides on bank deposits to $250,000. But that figure didn't cover a lot of businesses that maintain accounts for purposes of payroll and cash flow.
All these steps had been signaled late Monday night, and rumors of a change in the original action plan sent U.S. stocks soaring to record single-day point gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 936 points Monday, and soared almost 400 points on opening Tuesday.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson last month pushed a rescue plan that sought to purchase distressed assets from banks and other financial firms, mostly toxic mortgage bonds that no one wanted to buy. It took two tries to get the plan through the House of Representatives, however, and the financial crisis spread globally, aided by Europe's inability to forge a common response in early October.
As the crisis deepened, Europe eventually adopted on Sunday an approach first pushed by Great Britain, namely guaranteeing loans between banks and taking stakes in banks to signal that these institutions won't be allowed to fail. Washington followed suit Tuesday morning.
"Government owning a stake in any private U.S. company is objectionable to most Americans, me included," Paulson said. "Yet the alternative of leaving businesses and consumers without access to financing is totally unacceptable. When financing isn't available, consumers and businesses shrink their spending, which leads to businesses cutting jobs and even closing up shop."
With the recent congressional battle still fresh in mind, Paulson stressed that the new, more comprehensive approach wasn't a giveaway to banks and other lenders.
"Institutions that sell shares to the government will accept restrictions on executive compensation, including a . . . ban on golden parachutes during the period that Treasury holds equity issued through this program," he said. "In addition, taxpayers will not only own shares that should be paid back with a reasonable return but also will receive warrants for common shares in participating institutions. We expect all participating banks to continue and to strengthen their efforts to help struggling homeowners who can afford their homes avoid foreclosure."
Not all nine of the banks that are participating in the government's equity purchase program did so voluntarily. Paulson met with their executives late Monday and let it be known that it was in their interest to participate, calling the move patriotic. One reason for the reluctance was that the Treasury will curtail the lucrative executive compensation and bonuses for top bankers who participate in the program.
The nine initial banks taking part are Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo.
In another important development Tuesday, the Federal Reserve set Oct. 27 as the date to begin purchasing commercial paper from U.S. corporations. This paper is a short-term promissory note that helps corporations fund their day-to-day needs, but the market for this staple of finance has dried up amid the credit crisis. The Fed announced earlier this month that it would bypass banks and lend directly to corporations through the Commercial Paper Funding Facility. The lending will occur only on three-month notes that have the highest rating.
Bush sent a letter Tuesday to the leaders of the House and Senate, informing them of his intent to spend $350 billion to purchase distressed assets from troubled banks and financial firms.
The Treasury's point man on the rescue plan, Neel Kashkari, on Monday unveiled a number of appointments and hires designed to move on the purchases in coming weeks. He noted that he won't buy only complex mortgage-backed securities, which involve pools of thousands of mortgages, but also whole loans. These are individual mortgages held by banks, many of them community or regional banks. The distinction means that the Treasury will aim to remove bad assets from banks both big and small in an effort to remove obstacles to lending.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



125 Comments so far
Show AllThis will make easier for the US government to freeze ordinary people's assets after they squander what's left of the treasury.
THEY have that right.....check out Argentina's plight
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/445.html
Thank you for the video. I have distant family in Argentina and this is very nostalgic.
And let us hope that we as Americans will not be nostalgic 10 years from now! America MUST WAKE UP NOW!
Too late, Americans have been nostalgic for Carter, hell, even Nixon, even since Reagan took office in 1981.
Nixon was Mother Teresa compared to the THING(S) in office today!...Alien/Nazi/Fascist/Klingon goat people....and that's being generous! Apologies to my creature friends, the goats...I got carried away. You are on a much higher evolutionary scale and will not eat your own!
,
Tuesday Today > ON TV < Nader
Ralph will be on CNBC with John Harwood between 2 and 3 p.m. EST.
He will be on CNN with Rick Sanchez at 3:30 p.m. EST.
He will be on the NewsHour on PBS between 6 and 7 p.m. EST.
And he’ll be on Fox with Shepherd Smith at 7:30 p.m. EST.
So, grab your remote, and look out for Ralph.
.
Yeah ... Ralph will also be with Ron Paul in a major make-out session at approximately 10pm. Apparently any third-party is better than the Dems ... even if the third party is to the right of the Dems. Ralph will sleep with anyone and everyone as long as his fixation with defeating the Dems is realized. That makes him an egotistical prick who cannot effectively formulate a viable alternative to the established One-Party system we currently have.
Nannie's just spamming the boards with her Nader promo. No need to reply.
Any effort to defeat the Dems and save America is welcome, even if it involves spam or Republicans.
This sounds more like a personal grievance. Whats the matter ? Did they decline you an endorsement or something ? You should take it up with the dem party leadership rather than puking on the board. Yeah we get it ... you hate Dems ... we do too. There is no revolution in sight. Trying to 'vote your conscience' suggests you have a conscience, which is highly unlikely given your rants. Like someone earlier said ... LesserEvilism vs HolierThanThouism is what we are left with ... and im a LesserEvilist since I dont have a Ralph-sized ego.
"Any effort to defeat the Dems and save America is welcome, even if it involves spam or Republicans."
So, you finally admit you want Republicans to defeat Democrats. Since McCain defeating Obama can in no way "save America" this confirms my suspicion that you are one of two kinds of nut cases: An ordinary garden variety nut case, or a Republican nut case ritually spraying your hate on CD to mark your territory.
Dems are the cancer of today's political landscape.
.
If Democrats cannot beat the Republicans without the votes of the folks who vote Independent,
That is the Democrats fault, not the fault of the people who chose not to vote for them.
http://www.votenader.org/index.html
.
.Nice way to show a lot about you and nothing about Nader or his motivation...Congratulations, most people would hesitate to show their ignorance while you just plunge right in!
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Hey, I like Ralph too, but I'm not going to waste my vote on a useless cause. Are you a Republican operative, by the way?
OBAMA for President!
Are you???
Bush: Bank Buyout Needed 'To Destroy Free Market in Order to Save It'
__________________________________________
Fixed the typos.
.
Bush playing '' GOTCHA" again...
What say you America ?????
VOTE NADER/GONZALEZ 2008… You’ll be glad you did and so will I…
http://www.votenader.org/index.html
.
Can't you even change your spam once in a while? For a marginal and marginalized group, you piddling few Nader-lovers sure can shout a lot. Ralph fooled some of us once; never again.
.Perhaps, if you can hear me way up there on your high horse, you might tell me how Nader fooled you once. Sounds to me like you havent a clue about what he stands for, or for that matter what the Democrats fail to stand for either.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
They listened to England's Gordon Brown and Nobel winner Paul Krugman, and others. This is good news in what will be a difficult time for America.
Can you tell me how you see this as a plus for the average American to have his bank accounts taken over by the most corrupt administration in the history of the US?
We will now have some oversight, a limit on the bank CEO's humungous paychecks to themselves, and a possibility for the taxpayers to make a couple of bucks instead of just throwing money at the problem and hoping. I like the idea of a little capitalism for the taxpayer as oppossed to socialism for the rich. Hey, we're looking at a lot of difficulties in America for many years, more than likely. If the correct decisions are made now and in the coming months, then things may not have to hit rock bottom. It's easy to imagine a terrible situation down the road. Let's hope and try to encourage the best efforts to muddle us through.
Explain please how this oversight is going to work. Who is going to make these correct decisions? Have you looked at your September fund statements yet? You've just been mugged by a gang of capitalists my friend, and now you're ready to buy a $20 Rolex from the same people.
If you have a pile of lemons and their going bad, you might still try for lemonade if you're desperate. Believe me, I don't bet a penny on anything Bush and his buddies say, but this time I think they're giving us the pure, unadulterated shit-on-a-stick. We got shit on and shoved in it (thanks C. Cooper). I believe the bankers will want to do well if this is possible. Then they can get back to bigger paychecks. I believe congressional committees will pay more attention. If they don't we're gonna pay attention to them, right?
.Read the news, this is exactly what several European nations have done and that is where the Bush administration got the idea in the first place. You didnt think they had suddenly grown a brain did you?
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
I'm not against nationalizing the banks, I'm just afraid of our current government. Hopefully we can put in a more efficient government so that we can benefit from the nationalization.
It's an oximoron,he's full of shit-always.Tony
"In another important development Tuesday, the Federal Reserve set Oct. 27 as the date to begin purchasing commercial paper from U.S. corporations."
The greedy bastards got everything they wanted and more... on a silver platter. If you awakened this morning with the feeling that "someone" unexpectedly has their hand deep in your pocket... well, it's NOT paranoia. We are now all corporate slaves.
I have an idea, let's fund GM and all other corporations that refuse to compete with products we both need and want. Let's just call capitalism quits and openly admit to how this country is now run: a totalitarian government... of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation... funded by taxation without representation.
So help me Cheney.
Ten trillion and counting. We are fettered by shackles which we have been forced to construct with our own hands... and led to believe that our bondage is for our best interest. Slaves to greed.
I totally agree. As I've mentioned in other posts, until there's a fundamental change in human nature, or at least rejection of the "greed is good" philosophy, then the "invisible hand" of the market will continue to function primarily as a pickpocket.
Yes, yes. The only hope is gov't regulation. Of course it's difficult to keep up with the sharpest thieves, but with sharp gov't, perhaps we can avoid losing the odd $trillion or 2, and only suffer modestly.
It's over 11 Trillion now. But what's a few trillion of taxpayer dollars (according to the greedy bankers, CEOs, and the politicians).
I have some "commercial paper". It's in a greasy brown bag under the kitchen sink. On Wednesday, it'll be on its way to the Landfill National Bank which currently has more credibility than George Wanker Bush or Henry Pallbearer.
Deduct from your taxes all interest payments made to banks and businesses that accept our tax monies and to all state owned banks and corporations. Double taxation no one should pay.
Withdraw all savings from all banks and deposit them into your local non-profit community credit union. That is real ownership. Do not use debt to purchase anything.
This person has a strong point about the credit unions. The Canadian coop movement should be emulated in the U.S. as well. I was overdrawn at the bank (one of those recently revealed to be in deep doo-doo right now for investing in predatory lending) .78 cents the other day and they hit me with a $40 fee. Fuck 'em.
.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec08/nader_10-14.html
Ralph Nader PBS Interview:
If you make the speculators pay for their own bailout, then there's a relief throughout America that there's some fairness coming out of Washington.
A 0.1 percent tax on security derivative transactions in one year -- it's going to be $500 trillion of transactions in one year -- is $500 billion. So that alone would make a sense of equity. And you wouldn't put it on the backs of the taxpayer.
England has that kind of tax, by the way, for years. FDR had it. We helped finance the Civil War with it. But after World War II, it was scrapped.
So people go into a store in all your areas where your show shows, and they buy necessities of life, and they pay 6 percent or 7 percent sales tax. Tomorrow, someone in Wall Street can buy a billion dollars of Exxon derivatives, pay no sales tax. That's where the fairness has to go.
.
Any which way but real.
What's needed at minimum is: strictly and democratically regulated banks, capital markets, hedge funds, & other financial institutions.
This bailout charade fails to create even one fig of progressive reform.
Instead, it socializes with scant re-regulation the private losses of corrupt institutions and individuals, while -- so far --doing nothing to assist homeowners who've beccome victims of predatory lenders.
If there was a viable/visible/honest/progressive political party in the US, interpreting this blackmail payoff by the average citizen - to the average citizen- the 'rescue deal' would look far different.
Of course, there'd also have to be an honest, decentralized MSM to report it all.
If If If.
This is why I keep working to build a vigorous Green Party in my state.
Note the line: "The Treasury will get ... nonvoting stock."
In other words, the government, us, will have no control over how the banksters spend our money.
Also note the line from the AP article on this: "The advantage to the taxpayer is that if the rescue plan works, then the shares can be sold for more than the government initially paid..."
Of course, if it doesn't work (and why should it if it introduces no reforms in the system?), then we're left holding the bag.
Over the past third of a century, the rich have taken all the profits created in the US economy. Their justification was that they were "investing" the money. In reality, they were gambling with it -- in the stock market, derivatives, and all kinds of financial games. Now they're reaching the bottom of the barrel. With this "bailout", they're taking even the dregs, leaving the US economy with nothing but an Everest of debt.
The government is being run by free market fundamentalists. They're trying to convince you what happened was the fault of government, or the 1960s hippies. If you believe that victory in Iraq and Afghanistan is just around the corner and that the world was created in 7 days, 8,000 years ago, then you're gunna love this plan.
When Palin becomes president, and the stock market crashes, it will be "the work of the devil," and we will all be required to pay certified preachers to exorcise our demons and protect us from witches.
Ah, kivals, I always love your posts.
"In other words, the government, us, will have no control over how the banksters spend our money."
__________________________________
Well not exactly-- they solved that problem by putting so many banksters INTO the government. So, in a way, the banksters ARE the government, and vice-versa. It's still another win-win outcome!
Dontcha SEE?
Back in the 60s we called this "F*&^$ing for chasitity".
MichaelC
This idea of Bush's, that "nationalizing" the banks... somehow "preserves" the free market... is extremely fascinating.
It's indicative of Bush double-speak that's been rampant for the past 8 years.
Certainly most Americans will take this at face value, but what it's really saying is that making the market more socialized will preserve the idea of unfettered free-market capitalism that Bush has always championed.
Unfortunately when the government controls the market, it is no longer free. Unfortunately for the idealogues who created this rampaging, unethical free market, that is.
Now, I agree with socialism. Unfortunately, this is not socialism - it's government collusion with corporate interest - giving social programs away to support the interests of rich bankers - effectively fascism. Which is what Bush/Cheney and their rich pals want anyway. So it's lose-lose for us AND the "free market".
If we nationalized the oil companies, we might have the money to pay for the banks.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Good one.
Wow, I wish I had $250,000 or more in a bank account.
If I did, not only would life be much sweeter. But then my government might actually give a damn about me.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Government moves again to unclog credit lines by flushing good money after bad.
Egad! This is like draging a dead dog to the vet, over and over again.
Bush's effort to nationalize banks is nothing more than his government filing for bankruptcy. It needs to do something to get cash and quick! People's entire life savings will soon be blocked and swindled.
Bush, the new FDR? The new kid on the block that will save Capitalism?
Probably a "no." W destroyed everything that came his way from the failed oil companies, to the baseball team to Katrina relief, to Iraq and now to this, his latest fiasco: Wall Street and the Lost Empire.
WMD --you are it, "W" !
Dr Wu, the last of the big-time thinkers