Global Crises Compound Refugees' Woes: UN
WASHINGTON, Oct 8 (OneWorld) - The global financial, food, and fuel crises and the negative impacts of climate change pose a severe threat to the world's 37 million uprooted people, and will likely increase their numbers, warned the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Monday.
"Competition for scarce resources has become an increasingly important factor in provoking and perpetuating violence," said Antonio Guterres,
addressing delegates from the UNHCR's 76-nation governing committee. As
a result, the number of people forced to flee their homes is on the
rise.
At the end of 2007, 11.4 million people were living as refugees and 26 million were displaced within their own country -- known as internally displaced people, or IDPs.
These latest figures mark the second straight year of increases after a five-year decline in the number of uprooted people around the world.
The underlying causes for the alarming trend in displacement range "from multiple new conflict-related emergencies in world hotspots to bad governance, climate-induced environmental degradation that increases competition for scarce resources, and extreme price hikes that have hit the poor the hardest and are generating instability in many places," said Guterres.
A doubling of world prices of staple foods such as rice and wheat has had a particular impact on refugees and IDPs, who leave behind most of their material possessions but also farms, small businesses, or jobs when they flee conflict or environmental disasters.
This July, hundreds of refugees from Cote d'Ivoire living in Guinea's capital asked to relocate to a United Nations-run refugee camp "to escape their precarious situation in Conakry, where they found serious difficulties in feeding themselves and finding accommodation," according to the UNHCR's spokesperson in Guinea.
"We are confronted with a series of interlinked conflicts in an arc of crisis that stretches from Southwest Asia to the Middle East and the Horn of Africa. Some of them are deepening, with important implications for global security," said Guterres.
Indeed, this new and complex constellation of violence has directly affected the United Nations' work with refugees and displaced people.
UNHCR funds used to address emergencies more than doubled from 2006 to 2007, and this year's expected $150 million budget for emergencies marks another significant leap from last year's $87 million.
The Democratic Republic of Congo has one of the highest numbers of IDPs in the world and it is also the site of one of the worst and least recognized humanitarian crises.
A group of 83 aid agencies and human rights groups recently called for immediate action to improve security and humanitarian assistance for civilians in Congo after renewed fighting displaced an additional 100,000 people in the eastern part of the country.
An estimated 1.2 million Congolese have been uprooted by the conflict, which the nonprofit International Rescue Committee has classified "the world's deadliest documented conflict since World War II."
However, financial constraints and safety precautions preclude sometimes even the most basic of humanitarian aid from reaching many of those who've fled their homes.
This has also been the case in Somalia, where 1.1 million people are displaced and almost half the population requires urgent assistance due to ongoing conflict and resource shortages.
In July, the Germany-based charity Bread for the World cut back operations in Somalia and the United Nations Development Program withdrew staff from the country amid rising safety concerns for their employees.
Concluding that "a hungry man is an angry man," Guterres cautioned the international community can either meet the basic needs of the world's poor -- many of whom are refugees or IDPs -- or "expect more social and political turmoil in the years to come."
Climate Refugees a Growing Concern
While conflict has traditionally been known as the primary trigger for displacement, climate change has proven over the last several years its equally immense power to destroy homes and livelihoods.
"Climate change will have serious human repercussions -- in the form of sea level rise, more frequent and more devastating weather events, freshwater shortages, disruption of agricultural systems, impaired ecosystem services, and health epidemics -- that are bound to force people to relocate," says Michael Renner of the Worldwatch Institute, an environmental think tank based in Washington, DC.
"In China, the Gobi desert expands more than 10,000 square kilometers per year, threatening many villages," explained a report from the United Nations University, an international research and training organization, in 2005. "Oxford-based expert Norman Myers says Morocco, Tunisia, and Libya each lose over 1,000 square kilometers of productive land a year to desertification. In Egypt, half of irrigated croplands suffer from salinization while in Turkey 160,000 square kilometers of farmland is affected by soil erosion," the report added.
All these losses of habitat are forcing hundreds of thousands of rural people around the world to migrate in search of fertile lands from which they can gain their livelihood.
And just last month, a series of hurricanes swept through Haiti -- not long ago the scene of widescale, violent protests against rising food prices -- inciting massive flooding and lethal mudslides that forced hundreds of thousands to abandon their homes. The storms caused widespread displacement throughout the islands of the Caribbean and in the U.S. states of Texas and Louisiana.
Many scientists believe the increasing number and intensity of storms in recent years is due in part to global climate change.
Will Economic Crisis Sap Funding?
Compounding the negative repercussions of conflict and climate change, the U.S. economic crisis -- and its predictably negative fallout overseas -- threatens to serve a major setback to global humanitarian relief efforts.
The United Nations is seeking increased financial assistance from rich nations to help developing countries meet the faltering Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), including a 50-percent reduction in extreme poverty and hunger by 2015, but "the urgent needs of developing nations will now be the least of the priorities of the United States and other Western donors," said an Asian delegate at the annual meeting of the UN General Assembly in late September.
Just days later, U.S. lawmakers approved an unprecedented $700-billion economic package in an attempt to shore up confidence in the U.S. financial system.
By way of comparison, notes food and trade policy analyst Devinder Sharma, "$600 billion could have wiped out hunger...from the face of the planet. The additional $900 billion that the United States has spent in the past one year could have pulled out the world's estimated 2 billion poor from perpetual poverty -- and that too on a long-term sustainable basis."
UNHCR's Guterres hopes funding to aid the world's 37 million uprooted people will not dry up in the new economic climate. "I fully recognize the challenges of the current financial environment and its impact on national budgets," Guterres said Monday. "At the same time, I must point out that the resources required to support the 31 million people we care for are very modest indeed when compared for instance to the sums being spent -- and it is necessary to do so -- to bring stability to the international financial system.
"It would be tragic if the funds available to the humanitarian community as a whole and UNHCR in particular were to decline at the very time when the demands made upon us are increasing so dramatically."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
4 Comments so far
Show AllI listen to friends tell me Obama is a liberal.
I always correct them and say NO HE IS NOT.
Liberals put PEOPLE before BUSINESS EVERY TIME.
Obama was for the $700 billion+ gift to the criminal bankers for committing crimes.
The money could've..."wiped out hunger...from the face of the planet."
This planet cannot continue to support so many humans. Yet our government, which can really help, if it chose to, continues to deny funding for birth control and family planning in the most desperately needed areas. If they're not a consumer with a dollar or more in their pocket, they, the Democrats and Republicans aren't really interested. The Democrats may say they are, but there are just enough of them in Congress that they could get serious issues like this, as well as so many others (impeachment anyone?) even a quick hearing. As the majority, they set the calendar. Even when they were the minority, they can still introduce bills and measures and resolutions. If they really cared, they could even do, in the Senate, what the Republicans do, which is to force a supermajority on every issue. Yes, things would stall, but isn't it better to at least be fighting for something worthwhile, like the future of our species and the planet? As opposed to the continuation of war's death and destruction which they seem all to ready to accept. If they really cared about the country, they could force Congress, since they are the majority, to step back and really craft a solution to the economic problems, which are affecting the whole world, the refugees and other poor the most severely, but instead the rush to hand over the keys to the Treasury so that Wall Street can have a big Splurge. It takes months to pass a spending bill, normally. And just as long for regular laws. But this, the Patriot act also, they fast track.
“The United Nations is seeking increased financial assistance from rich nations to help developing countries...”
And we, the US, if we can still consider ourselves rich, are busy giving everything, including the kitchen sink, to extremely wealthy people who already have much more than they can ever spend in what remains of their lives, who will still have tremendous wealth after the implosion of their “precious” market and so many of their riches is destroyed. Getting the perpetual poor out of poverty, on a “sustainable basis”, would have done much more to fix what Wall Street seems to break all too frequently. On November 4, I intend to participate, but no way in hell will the status quo get my vote!
Would someone please tell me why is all this sh*t happening under Republicans and under Bush's watch?
As if I didn't know.
The continuing hope that the oligarchy will somehow become humane, stop the gorging of the M/I/I complex and go about improving things for life on earth has proved to be a pipe dream. They will continue stuffing their fat asses with all the world's wealth, impoverishing, torturing and killing for their convenient Friedmanite theory.
The first thing AIG did after getting their first 38 billion bailout is to throw a $400,000 party. Then they came back for their second 38 billion.