Starbucks Wastes Millions of Litres of Water A Day
Coffee giant's running-tap policy contradicts its claimed green credentials
Environmental campaigners have attacked Starbucks after the discovery that millions of litres of water are wasted in its coffee shops every day, contradicting its much-boasted green credentials.
An investigation by the Sun
revealed that over 23.4m litres of water are poured down the drains of
10,000 outlets worldwide due to a policy of keeping a tap running
non-stop.
It is enough daily water for the entire 2 million population of Namibia in Africa, which has severe droughts, or to fill an Olympic pool every 83 minutes.
A single Starbucks tap left running for just over three minutes wastes the amount of water one African needs to survive for a day in drought conditions.
Each Starbucks has a cold tap behind the counter that runs into a sink known as a "dipper well" - used to wash utensils.
Under the company's health and safety rules, staff are banned from turning the water off because management claim that a constant flow of water prevents germs breeding in taps.
Water companies joined green activists in criticising the firm for harming the environment and wasting a vital natural resource. Experts said leaving taps running for hygiene reasons was "nonsense".
Water shortage is one of the world's biggest problems. Australia is in the grip of a seven-year drought - the worst in a century.
In the UK, Starbucks has 698 branches, each open for 13 hours a day. Even a slow tap flows three litres of water a minute, meaning Starbucks in the UK is wasting an estimated 1.63m litres a day - enough to supply Matlock village in Derbyshire.
The running water policy was revealed after a Starbucks executive wrote back to a couple who complained about the tap at their local branch.
Lisa Woolfe, 39, of Cuffley, Hertfordshire, said: "I noticed a small sink behind the counter had its tap running. The assistant said the store was told to keep it running as it cleaned the pipes.
"I could not believe it but when we contacted head office, they confirmed the taps were left on and the water was not recycled.
"It is an absolutely astonishing waste of water, especially for a company which prides itself on its green credentials."
Speaking to staff at Starbucks outlets around the world, the Sun found that many did not use the running tap or even know what it was for.
Peter Robinson, of the environmental charity Waste Watch, said: "Leaving taps running all day is a shocking waste of precious water. And to claim you are doing it for health and safety reasons is bonkers.
"Tap water comes from rivers and groundwater and wasting it can cause great harm to the environment and wildlife. Big companies should set an example."
Jacob Tompkins, of the independent water efficiency agency Water Wise, said: "If they are doing all their basic cleaning procedures, I fail to see why they would need to do this. There are a lot of other ways to stop a build-up of bacteria.
"The chance of a build-up in the spout is extremely remote. And if there is one they're not cleaning the tap properly."
Ian Barker, the head of water resources at the Environment Agency, said: "We are already taking too much water from the environment and are seeing reduced river flows."
A spokeswoman for Starbucks said that the company's water use adhered to the World Health Organisation, US and EU environmental directives for in-store water supply standards. But she acknowledged the company could cut its water use.
She defended its dipper well system, saying the technique was common and accepted in the industry.
"Starbucks' challenge is to balance water conservation with the need for customer safety," the spokeswoman said. "The dipper well system currently in use in Starbucks retail stores ensures that we meet or exceed our own and local health standards."
She said the company had tested alternative methods such as the use of an ice bath but it was not successful. It was considering other alternatives and cut its water use per square foot this year.
Starbucks is known for its campaigns and instore advertising boasting how it gives back to communities and the environment.
In the company's latest corporate social responsibility report, it says: "From promoting conservation in coffee-growing countries to in-store 'green teams' and recycling programs, Starbucks has established high standards for environmental responsibility.
"By taking steps to reduce waste from our operations and recycle, we can preserve the Earth's natural resources and enhance the quality of lives around the globe.
"Starbucks actively seeks opportunities to minimise our environmental impact."
This is not the first time the Seattle-based firm has come under fire over its social and environmental credentials. In 2006, the Guardian reported how the US coffee giant has used its muscle to block an attempt by Ethiopia's farmers to copyright their most famous coffee bean types, denying them potential earnings of up to £47m a year.
As a result, Starbucks negotiated an agreement with the Ethiopian government to give the country more ownership and a better price for its coffee beans.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
18 Comments so far
Show AllI would occasionally buy a "Tall Americano" at the Starbucks kiosk in my local
Target Store. but never, I repeat NEVER again. I'll buy my espresso at one of
a number of locally owned coffee houses.
Buy fair trade and make/take your own coffee, or buy a serving from small local shops. Time to stop supporting mega corporations.
Not meant as a defense of Starbucks — although the quality of life in the U.S. greatly improved with the spread of cappuccino, whether Starbucks or one of its competitors sells it.
(There was once a time, my children, when you could travel this land coast to coast and never know what real coffee tastes like.)
And yes, they should turn of the running tap, but I'm not sure the water is wasted. More likely it is re-cycled.
I'm guessing — and I'm hoping an expert in this area will set me straight if I'm wrong — but isn't Starbucks paying for this "wasted" water and giving it right back to the cities?
Where does this water go?
Reading comprehension disorder ?
"Starbucks Wastes Millions of Litres of Water A Day
Coffee giant's running-tap policy contradicts its claimed green credentials
by Angela Balakrishnan
Environmental campaigners have attacked Starbucks after the discovery that millions of litres of water are wasted in its coffee shops every day, contradicting its much-boasted green credentials"
"I could not believe it but when we contacted head office, they confirmed the taps were left on and the water was not recycled."
"I could not believe it but when we contacted head office, they confirmed the taps were left on and the water was not recycled."
"I could not believe it but when we contacted head office, they confirmed the taps were left on and the water was not recycled."
"I could not believe it but when we contacted head office, they confirmed the taps were left on and the water was not recycled."
"I could not believe it but when we contacted head office, they confirmed the taps were left on and the water was not recycled."
OMG!! i couldn't help but burst out laughing! yea, sometimes you just gotta shake your head and wonder.....i was doing that myself after reading about the recycled part. i mean i got that after reading once.
now we have starbuck's apologists... goodness gracious.
"Nothing will benefit human health and increase chances for survival of life on earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet."
--Albert Einstein, American physicist
Wow. I've never been in a Starbucks, so I had no idea. Then again, I'm one of those odd people who doesn't like coffee.
Talk about stupid let alone wasteful! My God, if I left our water running all day, our water bill would be a ransom! :O
But on the other hand, aren't we all wasting water?
$tarbuck$ are the biggest greenwashers of them all. Something like 70% of their advertising shows them promoting fair trade, when less than 10% (maybe less even less than 5%) of the coffee they buy is fair trade. I know they have been shamed into improving the figure by activists (and I am not sure what percentage they are at with that at this moment), but it is still just a tiny bit.
gives me another good reason never to set foot inside a starbucks again. have you seen the damning documentary "black gold?" after watching it, i vowed to not support starbucks ever.
ninebears is right, the Rove/Diebold machine is working 24/7 too assure that vote counting goes their way.
In related but happier news, a Starbucks location was recently unionized with the IWW.
http://www.iww.org/unions/iu660/starbucks/
The IWW!
gotta love it :)
Damn. Now I feel guilty about those venti mint mocha chips.
Could the corporate heads, at Starbucks, really not know that running the water continually offers no more protection than the existing "air gap" between the faucet and sink, and a probably required chlorine residual in the water? Cleaning the pipes? Cleaning them from what....they're full of water. Got to be another reason and they're blowing smoke because the public caught on. LOL!!!
Water treatment operator, in Alaska. Sorry about Palin, I didn't vote for her.
Electronic tabulators will steal the election.
Anyone paying more than $2 for a coffee is a real star BERK. I'd much rather frequent a locally owned sandwich/coffee bar, take my cheaper coffee to a pleasant outside communal area such as a park and enjoy the weather, than bask/pose in a trendy sofa surrounded by ponces who revel in their corporate recreation of a *spit* 'Friends' set.
I have to laugh whenever I see a disposable cup from the "Seattle's Best" coffee shop chain. In big letters across the cup it says "PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT" ... gotta love Green Branding...
On a slight tangent- I wonder how much energy is wasted by the omnipresent policy of restaurants completely filling your water glass with ice. It takes energy to make ice... I wonder how many kilowatts we'd save if they filled our glasses, say, with HALF a cup of ice. The water would still be 0.01 degrees Celsius... So much random, redundant wastefulness...
Sioux Rose
One of the few treats I indulge is a cup of espresso daily. At times, given my life as a freelance writer, a visit to a coffee shop constituted the ONLY social interaction I experienced. Then when one of my columns was cut, the $1.85 (plus tip) a day could no longer be financially justified. As it turned out, I happened on a used espresso machine at a Florida Keys yard sale in 2004... and it's served me well. Rather than spend that $2 a day (about $700 a year), I buy the coffee usually from Starbucks (about $10 for a pound which lasts a month), and I joke with my friends that the savings has allowed me to travel extensively. I even took my espresso machine to Singapore... one funny thing is trying to figure out if the price is the same in other Starbuck locations. When the 15 hour flight (from LA) landed first in Hong Kong, I grabbed a US bill and rushed over to the airport STarbucks, and am clueless as to the change I received. Same thing in Thailand. It would make for an interesting HS math question to have students do the monetary magic from one currency to another, to win that singlel shot of espresso!
Please Starbucks... turn off the water. And ditto anyone who lets it run while they brush their teeth, or move around the kitchen with a sponge, cleaning off the table, etc. I sometimes turn the water off while I lather my hair in a shampoo, then turn it back on to rinse. WATER is our most precious resource and in many areas will become more difficult to come by. The low price tag (so long as the privatizers don't get their hands on it) allows too many people to treat this resource without the sacred respect it deserves.
never mind the water, who in their right mind would pay 5$... FOR A CUP OF COFFEE..?
only in the greed driven corporate, looks-is-everything world, do people pay more for an item that is usually the same, or inferior, as the regular item simply because of the "logo".
i bet if a blind taste test was done , not many could find a significant difference between a 1$ coffee and a 5$ cup..pathetic
Now more than ever, "Small is Beautiful".
In view of the downward spiraling economy, Starbucks soon will not have enough customers to afford to pay their water bill.