Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
- 'Biggest Act of Civil Disobedience in Canadian History'
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Pentagon's New Africa Command Raises Suspicions About US Motives
NAIROBI, Kenya - The U.S. Africa Command, the Pentagon's first effort to unite its counterterrorism, training and humanitarian operations on the continent, launches Wednesday amid questions at home about its mission and deep suspicions in Africa about its intentions. U.S. officials have billed the new command, known as Africom, as a sign of Africa's strategic importance, but many in Africa see it as an unwelcome expansion of the U.S.-led war on terrorism and a bid to secure greater access to the continent's vast oil resources. Several countries have refused to host the command, and officials say Africom will be based in Stuttgart, Germany, for the foreseeable future.
U.S.-based
aid groups and some in Congress have expressed worries that Africom
will tilt U.S policy in Africa away from democracy-building and
economic development and toward security objectives such as stemming
the growth of militant Islamist groups in Somalia and North Africa,
some of which have ties to al Qaida.
U.S. covert operations in Somalia and elsewhere have fueled the controversy. In late 2006, the U.S. military provided intelligence to help Ethiopia topple a fundamentalist Islamic regime in Somalia, an invasion that's fueled a violent Islamist insurgency.
U.S. forces have since launched several strikes on suspected terrorist targets in Somalia. While one of the strikes killed a top militant commander, Aden Hashi Ayro, in May, Somalis say the attacks also killed and badly wounded civilians.
Underlining the skepticism in Washington, the House of Representatives voted last week to provide $266 million to fund Africom's first year of operations - $123 million less than President Bush had requested. The House Appropriations Committee said the reduction was due partly to "the failure to establish an Africom presence on the continent."
The fledgling command's image problem, at home and abroad, is cause for concern because of Africa's growing importance to the United States.
The Department of Energy says that 17 percent of U.S. crude oil imports now come from Africa, more than the U.S. gets from Persian Gulf countries. But rising powers such as China have strengthened their ties with Africa and become a powerful counterweight to American influence.
Pentagon officials reject claims that Africom is about oil or China, but those perceptions remain strong in Africa.
"Obviously the U.S. is concerned about China's influence, security, oil, counterterrorism, hunting down al Qaida suspects," said Erin Weir of Refugees International, a Washington-based advocacy group that's opposed Africom. "Africans read the newspaper just the same as we do, and they know what drives U.S. interests now."
Witney Schneidman, who served as deputy assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs in the Clinton administration, said: "In many parts of Africa it is perceived as the U.S. bringing its war on terror to Africa. That is not what Africom is about, but that is how it has been seen."
While the public face of the U.S. military in Africa has been that of a benign partner, human rights activists say that the Bush administration's focus on terrorism has fueled suspicion of Africom.
"Anything to do with the U.S. military evokes some level of anxiety," said Hassan Omar, a member of the independent Kenya National Commission on Human Rights. "There is a strong feeling that America would overlook a crisis within a government or violations by certain governments if only they could secure more cooperation on matters of security."
After Bush announced the creation of Africom in February 2007, the Pentagon began issuing mixed messages about its mission, with some officials suggesting that the new command would help "coordinate" U.S. policy in the region. Experts immediately questioned whether U.S. troops would participate in humanitarian programs and other non-combat operations that have long been run by the State Department and U.S. embassies.
Pentagon officials have acknowledged mistakes in marketing Africom, and they no longer list humanitarian projects as part of its mission. Instead, they say that Africom will support other U.S. government agencies and focus on helping bolster African militaries.
"Africom will support, not shape, U.S. foreign policy on the continent," Teresa Whelan, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for African Affairs, told a congressional hearing in July.
About 1,300 people, divided roughly evenly between civilian and military positions, are expected to staff the Germany headquarters, but no additional soldiers will be deployed in Africa yet. Instead, Africom will take charge of small U.S. military teams that are already on the continent training national militaries and maritime agencies, providing immunizations, drilling wells, rebuilding schools and conducting other projects.
Africom will assume control over the largest U.S. military base in the region, the 1,500-strong Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, housed at a former French Foreign Legion facility in the tiny eastern nation of Djibouti.
Despite the questions about its mission, experts say that Africom will raise Africa's profile in the Pentagon. Currently, three separate regional "combatant commands," which manage overseas U.S. military operations, share responsibility for Africa. The U.S. Central Command oversees seven countries in East Africa, Pacific Command has three Indian Ocean island nations and European Command handles 42 other African countries from Morocco to South Africa.
Now all the countries - except Egypt, which will continue to be grouped with Middle Eastern nations under the Central Command - will fall under Africom's jurisdiction. As with the other regional commands, Africom's commander, four-star Army Gen. William E. "Kip" Ward, reports to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
"One of the basic problems of U.S. engagement with Africa historically is there's been a lack of a long-term, sustained and steady commitment," said Abiodun Williams, a Sierra Leonean who's vice president of the Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "One of the positive things about Africom is this might finally be changing."
MORE FROM MCCLATCHY: Little-known dimension to war on terrorism plays out in East Africa
- Posted in

10 Comments so far
Show AllAs Hitler said, each time he gobbled up another nation, "I have no further territorial ambitions."
Humanitarian aid is off the table after people noticed that killing anybody that doesn't agree with us is not considered humanitarian by anybody but our military and the US Government.
Sooner or later, we will strangle or starve ourselves while trying to devour the world and its resources.
We should be taking care of ourselves at home, but even that is now the province of NorthCom, which is the military occupation of the United States by its own armed forces, aided by Homeland Security.
As in ancient Rome, I fear the days of the Republic are ended, supplanted by an Imperium supported by the military.
Ave Caesar, moritimus de salutat.
You mean, "Ave, Caesar, morituri te salutant"
And yes. Every country with foreign interests has a military group to monitor that area. France, the UK and the US have the biggest overseas interests and have the most bases. You can bet that each one has a military department that covers the others.
This is no big deal. no countries are getting gobbled up in Africa by the US.
Does Africa or any country in Africa have a USCom? Does any country in the world have a USCom or a NorthAmeriCom?
Excellent point! I wonder about this insanity every time I hear republican lies about how the Muslims are trying to take over the world. Name a Muslim country with military bases on more than one continent. Conservatives are insane. AMerica is on a Holy War
Corporate Hegemony at work? See how orderly they keep their own Wall Street house. This movement from order to chaos is Nature's way of counting time.
Once more, the wisdom of something I read elsewhere shines brightly --
(1) All empires eventually fall;
(2) Those with the most to lose -- an empire's political/economic elites -- are always the last to wake up and face the reality of #1.
As Cromwell would say, "Trust in God, but keep your powder dry."
John McCain and the neocons are certainly pro-military dominance of the world.
The PNAC called for such a build up of worldwide troops that could look out for our economic interests planetwide.
Poor Africa.
This move is good and bad for Africa for the same reason: the US military is actually paying attention to Africa. Considering the prior history of outside forces on the continent, it will probably be bad.
As a US citizen, I might feel safer that our troops would keep "our guy" in the presidential palace to maintain order in whatever nation in Africa, but that is not good for progress on the continent.
I say divest now. All African countries need to kick the Europeans out. If they haven't helped Africa by now, they don't want to help Africa.
If consumers back home knew how badly Africans were treated/are being treated so that they could get cheaper goods (coltan), they would be ashamed and make something happen.
For good reason the Africans should be VERY concerned! The Zionist/Neocon invention referred to as the G.W.O.T. is giving this cesspool of a nation, (with the help of an ignorant, arrogant bunch of "christian" murderers), carte blanche to invade, slaughter, steal and ruin any nations our corporations want access to while the lemmings that populate it coo about how wonderful "our boys" are for serving their country while slaughtering heathens not fit for life, (in THEIR opinion),
the recent act of Mr.'s Putin/Medvedev of hamstringing the "zhid" murderers in Russia while this nation of cowards is planning on bailing them out is on it's OWN very good reason to contact Russia for an alliance/protection from this cesspool and "christian democracy".....ROFLMAO,..sorry, lately when I say that, I can't help but (R)oll (o)n the (F)loor (L)aughing (M)y (A)ss (O)ff.
In closing, for all you nasty little parrots who squawk "you don't like it here,...LEAVE! Well, I would but I'm too old and too poor or all you'd see is a brown spot and 2 elbows heading out.
Only way to bring this monster called the United States of Amnesia under control is, all states simply secede from it. It's become too corrupt to wield such horrific power. It needs to be killed off.