Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
- 'Biggest Act of Civil Disobedience in Canadian History'
Popular content
Today's Top News
Cotton Symbolizes Global Trade System’s 'Iniquity'
ACCRA - The international cotton trade has been a sad tale for West African countries. The region produces five percent of the world's cotton and 15 percent of the global cotton fibre trade. Yet West African cotton farmers are among the poorest in the world.
The international cotton trade has been a sad tale for West African countries. The region produces five percent of the world's cotton and 15 percent of the global cotton fibre trade. Yet West African cotton farmers are among the poorest in the world. (File photo) Their purchasing power is only five percent that of farmers in Europe, the U.S. and Japan. Purchasing power refers to the value of goods (cotton) compared to the amount of money paid.
Non-governmental organisation Oxfam GB's trade spokesperson, Amy Barry, told IPS, ‘‘cotton has become a symbol of the unfairness of the global trading system.
‘‘In West Africa alone, 10 million people depend on cotton for their livelihoods. For these households, the subsidies the U.S. pays its farmers have a critical bearing on their ability to put food on the table, educate their children, and sustain their health.''
Unfortunately the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which is supposed to create a level playing field for global trade, finds it difficult to be of any help to these farmers because the industrialised countries do not want to play by the rules.
West African cotton farmers' uphill battle against subsided U.S. farmers has been an issue for many years. Last year Oxfam issued another report on the fate of the West African farmers.
Barry said, ‘‘it has been proven time and again that U.S. cotton subsidies do significant damage to farmers in developing countries, particularly West Africa. The refusal so far by the U.S. to adequately reform these cotton subsidies is a signal that they are not serious about the promise to reform trade rules to promote development.
‘‘The US must act in good faith and honour its promises to treat cotton as a priority issue.''
However, with the situation remaining the same, there are signs that cotton farmers in West Africa will be taking up other forms of farming.
Cotton production takes a very central place in the economies of some countries in West Africa. The depressed prices, caused by large quantities of subsidised cotton on the world market, affect the livelihoods of thousands.
It is against this background that the governments of Mali, Benin, Burkina Faso and Chad have fought in the WTO to find ways to end the subsidies that farmers in the industrialised countries receive from their governments.
According to Oxfam, these subsidies caused losses of 400 million dollars to these West African economies in the period 2001 to 2003 alone.
Therefore it urged the WTO to find ways to stabilise prices paid to producers. This is yet to be taken seriously. Unfortunately, with the breakdown in the Doha Round of the WTO talks in July this year, West African farmers will be badly hit.
Barry pointed out that, ‘‘U.S. cotton producers will receive about one billion dollars annually in subsidies over the next five years under the new U.S. Farm Bill. The vast majority of these subsidies go to about 12,000 mostly large-scale cotton farms.
‘‘A quarter of all subsidies go to the top one percent of recipients, who get 500,000 dollars each on average. The Farm Bill recently passed by the U.S. Congress actually reinstated cotton subsidies already ruled illegal at the WTO.
‘‘The U.S. offer to cap its trade distorting agricultural subsidies at 14.4 billion dollars, made at the Doha talks in July, would not require the US to cut trade-distorting cotton subsidies by one cent. The U.S.'s failure to get serious on this issue is undermining their position in what were meant to be pro-development negotiations,'' Barry added.
Beninese journalist Gerard Migan told IPS cotton production plays a very important part in his country's economy. Therefore anything that distorts production would greatly harm both the nation and the farmers at large.
Migan said that since 2006 the government had to support farmers with the assistance of the World Bank so that they could maintain production. ‘‘That is why Benin has joined the ranks with others to battle against U.S. subsidies to its cotton farmers,'' he added.
Oxfam's suggestion for the establishment of a support fund was mean to create a mechanism to stabilise prices. This has been started in Burkina Faso where the government created the fund in 1992, which ensured that farmers received guaranteed prices even if prices fell lower than expected.
According to Oxfam, ‘‘the producers became active in the management of the fund in 1999. The fund also ensured that cotton companies were reimbursed the difference between the actual sale price and the reference price for the tonnage sold, when actual prices fell below this reference price.''
According to Oxfam, this success story has been destroyed because of unchecked U.S. subsidies and the downward trend of commodity prices.
- Posted in

17 Comments so far
Show AllI hear hemp would make a great substitute for cotton. Can anyone confirm that?
of course it would.
Perhaps it would be wise for the African countries to do two things:
1) diversify their crops so that more of them are food items for their own people.
2) develop local industries that use the cotton to make stuff for their own people.
Perhaps one of the reasons they are in this fix is that they were convinced they had to rely on commodity exports (cotton) to supply themselves with income so they could buy the stuff they really needed. Perhaps it would be better if they could become as self sufficient as possible and trade only for what they couldn't make. Oh I know that defies all the "comparative advantage" stuff that has been the supposed basis for our current trade regime. But, comparatively speaking, wouldn't it be better to be self-sustaining as much as possible than to rely on a system you have no control over? Why should their livelihood have to rely on the "sense of fair play" of a nation like US?
Come to think of it, wouldn't self sufficiency be a good idea for us as well?
And a much better foreign policy than our current one might be one aimed at helping all nations to be self-sufficient to the extent possible.
I agree 100% - that was what I was thinking the whole time I read this article.
If I was in Africa I wouldn't grow anything meant to be shipped overseas for pennies. I would grow things to sell localy - but of course we (the US) sell our crops over there also - at a much lower price than the locals can afford due to government handouts to our rich farmers.
The solution has to be to stop taking taxes from the rich cities of the US to pay for crazy stuff in the red states.
Establishing self sufficiency alongside all these fascist states is like wearing a deer suit in hunting season. Ask the South American states that became CIA targets last century time and again during peasant revolts.
The wealthy land owners would obviously rather go along to get along and simply treat their workers without the respect of a livable wage. So long as the buck can be passed...
Funny how the analysis on this here commondreams ever groups people who are nearly totally unrelated, like the peasant workers and the wealthy land owners in this article all being grouped as African farmers. I don't doubt lots of those African farmers are rich white guys whose families have been neck deep in the bush boogee @$$ since the days of French and British colonialism. For a few decades now International MegaCorporations have been bankrupting farmers in developing nations so they can have their land on the cheap. So it wouldn't surprise me if MonSanto was grouped in this African farmer plight.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
Tell that to the IMF, which forces these countries to produce exports for cash so they can pay off their loans. The IMF doesn't give a shit about what actually happens to the country.
Hemp is a far superior to cotton as far the durability of the product goes. It is also far more environmentally friendly. Cotton requires the use of more herbicides, pesticides, and chemical fertilizer than almost any other crop. Hemp, on the other hand, will grow anywhere with hardly any attention.
I'm all in favor of hemp products in theory, but when I bought some, I found them to be scratchy and uncomfortable. I'd like to see and buy fair trade cotton.
I'd also like to comment that the article seems to imply that the crash and burn of the Doha Round was some kind of disaster for poor farmers. Not by a long shot. The Doha Round was bad in many ways for developing nations, that's why they, and not US, brought it down. The framing of the article also seems to imply that Oxfam is bemoaning the collapse of Doha, and maybe they are, but the article doesn't actually say that, it just frames the whole article so that the reader will come to that, quite likely erroneous, conclusion.
The good old USA is ugly, greedy, and mean. US property and the property of individual Americans is far more valuable than the lives of non-Europeans.
If you ever get any articles made with African cotton, especially Egyptian, please notice the better quality created by the longer fibres.
But I could be wrong !
If you ever get any articles made with African cotton, especially Egyptian, please notice the better quality created by the longer fibres.
But I could be wrong !
Hemp is legal to grow in Africa. Well, as long as the US-supported dictatorships haven't made it illegal to grow.
I've lived in the south all my life. I hope never to see another poor black family standing in a cotton field. That picture will keep me awake tonight.
I've seen it in real life a hundred times. Some things you never get used to.
That's why all those jobs have been shipped overseas to keep us Americans uninformed.
Thuggery of every imaginable variety proliferates until the people teach their children economic/political solidarity with all of their brothers and sisters worldwide. Only when the chimp-in-waiting O'Bama decides to move this priority up to the top will any vote for him accomplish anything. The audacity of dilution ain't cuttin it. We need wide open throttle on the solidarity train. Where's San Francisco?
praising the virtues of hemp, in the atmosphere of lies and distortions fed to the average joe, may well end up with you having a red flag by your name in some data base in a gov building somewhere.. forever.
Yeah? Well better to be a braveheart than a coward. Besides, this country's collapsing and peak oil is hitting hard. There's nothing to lose.