Attorney For Gitmo Inmate Works To Drum Up Support
SAN FRANCISCO - For six years, and for no pay, Dennis Edney has represented Omar Khadr, the next prisoner at Guantanamo Bay to face trial in a military tribunal system that the lawyer calls a sham.
So he's stepping outside the courtroom, speaking out about his client and hoping to win a victory in another venue. His goal is to sway public opinion and pressure the Canadian government into bringing his Toronto-born client home.
"I realize the only success we're going to have for Omar Khadr is a political one," Edney said in an interview with The Associated Press after addressing aspiring lawyers at the University of San Francisco this week. "So I've moved from being a lawyer to someone who goes on the lecture circuit - all on my own cost, of course."
Khadr is the only Western citizen still imprisoned at the Guantanamo Bay Navy base, held back despite the repatriation of British and Australian detainees as U.S. military prosecutors prepare to bring him to trial. He is charged with tossing a hand grenade that killed a U.S. soldier during a 2002 firefight at an al-Qaida compound in Afghanistan.
Khadr, who was captured at age 15, faces a maximum life sentence at a trial expected to begin Nov. 10.
A Pentagon spokesman, Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, discounted Edney's criticism of the military tribunal, saying "we're implementing the law as spelled out in Military Commissions Act," and adding that Khadr's Pentagon-appointed lawyer, Lt.-Cmdr. Bill Kuebler, is the lead counsel, not Edney.
But Khadr's attorneys and other critics say a fair trial will be impossible in the special military tribunal system, which departs from traditional U.S. civilian and military courts by allowing hearsay and evidence obtained through coercion.
"We're running out of time," Edney said.
So far, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has refused to press for Khadr's release, saying the tribunal at the U.S. Navy base in southeast Cuba should be allowed to run its course.
With speaking engagements across North America, Edney is trying to stir sympathy for Khadr and put pressure on the conservative prime minister to take another look at the case of the youngest man at Guantanamo.
In July, defense lawyers made public seven hours of video from interrogations in which Khadr, then 16, breaks into tears, asking for his mother and the Canadian government's help. He is not shown being directly ill-treated.
Last week, they filed documents in a Canadian court showing that the U.S. denied a Canadian Foreign Affairs officer's attempts to make sure Khadr had sunglasses and blankets to protect his shrapnel-damaged eyes and body.
"The United States has violated international standards by refusing to recognize Omar Khadr's status as a minor and treating him accordingly," Amnesty International has said.
Edney said he initially took on the case because it was a just cause and posed interesting legal challenges. Six years later, it's become an opportunity to "educate the public about their obligation to ensure justice is done," Edney said.
"I have never before represented anyone who has been treated so badly and abandoned by those who should know better," he said.
One obstacle to the public relations effort has been Khadr's own family, which has a history of involvement in radical Islamic causes and outspoken criticism of the U.S. and Canada.
One of his brothers, Abdullah Khadr, is wanted in the U.S. for allegedly purchasing weapons for al-Qaida. Another brother has acknowledged that their Egyptian-born father, now deceased, and some of his brothers visited with Osama bin Laden and fought for al-Qaida.
This family background suggests that Omar Khadr, who was 6 when taken to Afghanistan, should be treated as a child soldier, said Edney.
"He was his mother's baby, and he got caught up in something beyond his control," said Edney. "He was a victim."
Edney said that Khadr is not asking for forgiveness or even freedom.
"Just give him a court room. He's asking for a fair process," he said.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllDon't forget, most of these insurgent fighters are not STATE-AFFILIATED, and the only category to which they can be assigned are wanton "TERRORISTS", for whom rights, including human rights, are deemed not to apply. And those same principles are being instituted for dissenters right here in the good ol' U.S. of A.
If Khadr is guilty of a crime for using a weapon IN COMBAT then every member of the US Armed Forces that's ever been in combat past, present and future is automatically guilty as well.
Only if they were 15 at the time. War is Crime. Warcrime!
And the worst part of this travesty is that the corrupt and malign persons perpetuating it are absolutely DETERMINED to "gain" a conviction, come hell or high water.
Once one's humanity and conscience have withered away, something like a keloid scar forms where the soul used to be.
Criticism and public pressure that might move those whose hearts and souls still function only make the scar itch and burn, and make the evildoer that much more embittered-- and resolved to see the abomination through.
A killer whale playing with a seal pup, before devouring it.
A giant crushing kittens.
15 years old.
Which is it? War or crime? Warcrime!
Gulag, hell-hole, Gitmo, Abu your totally fucked Ghraib.
It is ALL right there in the open. Our liberties shit on. Non-Americans treated as sub-human. (no one says peep about spying on 'feriners')
Nation-States are inhuman monsters, demons, torturers, control freaks. Corporations run the show. Governments get their hands dirty, blood and money. The people get fat, lazy, and ignorant (thank you MSM).
Nothing will change until you are in the Cell or Storming the Gates!
george sebouhian
First: no trials should be held before the inauguration of the next President.
Second: the people of Canada and the US should rise up and express their views on this matter: join like-minded groups, send letters to newspapers and political leaders, participate in public demonstrations--and do whatever else it takes to awaken the consciences of their fellow citizens.
Third: the American Bar Association and/or US lawyers on their own should develop published arguments supporting civil--not military--legal procedures consonant with those that guarantee justice for an American citizen accused of a crime.
The above suggestions are rational, but I cannot deny that they come from a deep emotional identification with Omar Khadr; I feel that I and many other US citizens would find him guilty of no more than self-defense during an attack in a time of war, just as those in the attacking force must have felt just about killing the enemy.
Please note, in case I have not been clear: I am arguing that war makes killing a necessity--and that's why we must be very careful about charging a person in combat with the equivalent of murder, which seems to be happening in this case.
Will I ever be able to put these little ditties away?Tony
Do you see?
Do you see where this people go with this law “the military commissions act of 2006”?
Did we not cross the Rubicon when we went to Iraq and utterly destroy a nation and murder over 600,000 children, men and women that had nothing to do with what happened on 9/11?
A secrecy in a government “of the people, for the people and by the people”? To protect a corrupt cabal, to be sure, and a word, homeland, brought from an earlier time in Germany. Is this de javu?
To propose a law so diametrically opposed to the Constitution sent my heart into a tailspin and to see the congress breach their oath to defend the Constitution with a bevy of excuses that would stump a teen. It makes me sick.
Fear is a cancer, safety is not freedom and only freedom under the Constitution would guarantee what safety we would have. This is not politics to me, this is the most serious of attacks undermining this nation. The road to an oven.
Support the troops? So long as they are someone else’s. Is not this a nation of 300 million and in war are not all to sacrifice? Show me where this is so. It is an abomination. The German said: They came for other different peoples but not him until finally they came for him. He did not speak up and there was none to speak for him. Will they come for you?
Read ‘em and weep, Tony
Samuel Adams:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom,-go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
Paul Siemering
There is no evidence Omar ever did anything wrong
He can't be tried anyway since he was 15 at the time- as a child soldier he's a victim, not a perpetrator
The military needs to stop trying to charge people for "murder" when they are defending themselves from hostile fire by the world's most powerful military force.
most powerful, and also biggest crybabies
Every day that we as American citizens allow Guantanamo to remain open w/o demanding a transparent and constitutional and timely legal system for the prisoners to be processed through is a little bit of death to our country and our liberty that could not have been inflicted by any terrorist or outside force, but that so many are willing to accept in the name of fighting some nebulous and ill-defined enemy. My biggest surprise so far is that the US military is still running Gitmo and it hasn't been outsourced to Wackenhut like so many other penal colonies in our country.
*Support your local organic family farmers.*
Edney Hattersley & Dolphin Barrist
10123 99 St NW
Edmonton, AB
T5J 3H1
Where do I donate, or sign a petition.
Do you not just love "Kangaroo Courts".
Coffeelover,,,,,