Physicists: US Could Cut Oil Use With Better Houses, Cars
WASHINGTON - The U.S. can reduce its dependence on foreign oil and greenhouse-gas emissions by making cars and buildings much more energy efficient, according to a study released Tuesday by a large national association of physicists.
The 46,000-member American Physical Society argues the need for action
is urgent because the energy crisis is the worst in U.S. history. It
also says that the physics and chemistry behind the human causes of
climate change - such as heat-trapping pollution from the burning of
fossil fuels - is "well understood and beyond dispute."
The report argues that the country can still go a long way to reduce energy use in cost-effective ways that allow for continued comfort and convenience. It recommends that the federal government adopt policies and make investments to boost energy efficiency.
"The opportunities are huge and the costs are small," the report said.
The report's authors noted that both Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama have called for improvements in energy efficiency and reduced oil imports and emissions. They said that the public also wants these changes because of worries about global warming, gasoline prices and national security.
"The bottom line is that the quickest way to do something about America's use of energy is through energy efficiency," said Burton Richter, the chairman of the study panel and a 1976 Nobel Prize winner in physics. "Energy that you don't use is free. It's not imported and it doesn't emit any greenhouse gases. Most of the things we recommend don't cost anything to the economy. The economy will save money."
The report concludes that the projected growth of energy use in buildings - 30 percent by 2030 - could be cut to zero using existing technology and what's likely to become available in the next decade at the current level of research and development. It argues that the federal government should encourage states to set standards for residential buildings and make sure they're enforced.
"One of the things we would love to see is all buildings have Energy Star labels," Richter said. "Right now you don't know how much energy a building is going to use that you're interested in moving into. We'd like to see an energy audit required before a building is sold or even built."
Some of the report's suggestions included installing roofs that reflect rather than absorb the sun's energy in hot climates, more efficient heating, cooling, lighting and appliances, and more government investment in research and development in building technologies.
Consumers would have to pay to install the technology, but they would save money in the long run, the report said.
On transportation, a key recommendation is more federal government investment in developing cheaper and more reliable batteries for electric cars.
"If you look at magically converting the whole fleet to plug-in hybrids" that get 40 miles per charge, greenhouse gases would be reduced by 33 percent and gasoline use by 60 percent, Richter said.
That would be the equivalent of cutting oil imports by 6 million barrels a day, Richter said. That's the amount the U.S. imports from OPEC (largely from Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Nigeria), out of a total of about 13.5 million barrels imported a day from all countries.
"So if you're looking at energy security issues, which is government's business, if you're looking at the overall economy, which also ought to be government's business, to spend a bit more on research and development to hasten the day when you're going to get all these benefits is a good thing to do," Richter said.
Also Tuesday, a group that included Pacific Gas & Electric, The Real Estate Roundtable, the Steel Manufacturers Association, AFL-CIO and Ceres called on state governments and the next president and Congress to make energy efficiency a priority.
Energy efficiency investments generate attractive, low-risk returns for investors, said Mindy Lubber, the president of Ceres, a network of investors and environmental groups. And efficiency is "essential to reducing our greenhouse-gas emissions to levels scientists say are absolutely necessary at the lowest overall cost to our economy," she said.
EXCERPTS FROM THE REPORT
Global warming: "The physics and chemistry of the greenhouse-gas effect are well understood and beyond dispute. Science has also achieved an overwhelming consensus that the increase in greenhouse gases is largely of human origin, tracing back to the Industrial Revolution and accelerating in recent years, as carbon dioxide and methane - the products of fossil fuel use - have entered the atmosphere in increasing quantities. Modeling the climate has proven to be a complex scientific task. But although the models are far from perfect, many of their predictions are so alarming that conservative, risk-averse policymaking requires that they be considered with extraordinary gravity."
U.S. energy use:
- 5 percent of the world's population, consumes 25 percent of the world's energy.
- Transportation sector uses 70 percent of petroleum used for fuel and emits 30 percent of U.S. greenhouse gases.
- Buildings account for 36 percent of emissions.
ON THE WEB
The complete APA energy efficiency report
MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
Nitrogen emerges as the latest climate-change threat
Low levels of Arctic sea ice signal global warming's advance
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show All"projected growth of energy use in buildings - 30 percent by 2030"
These projections of growth are not facts. They are propaganda. The propaganda that we are going to consume more energy enables the capitalist to invest more in energy. The over-investment and over-production creates over-supply, which depresses the price of the commodity which in turn promotes over-consumption far in excess of any natural demand. This is demand fabrication. Market manipulation. On a gargantuan scale. It's been going on. It will continue to go on as long as we let these capitalist freaks run our lives. Solution: Individuals stop consuming the capitalist production. Go local. Vote "third party" in all of your individual exchange/association.
We have the ability but not the will. Real Estate developers in New York City are still putting up hulking heaps of ugly wasteful crap in order to get a return on every bit of square inchage.
Green building could be a new enterprise zone for educated young people with a little seed money and no place to apply their ideals.
Joe
Lets go for it. How about some incentives, Mr. Obama?
I was out on the PA turnpike today. Set the cruise at 65 and watched the cars and trucks fly by me. I have also observed people sitting in idling cars while friends are inside a store. Sometimes 15 minutes or more when the temperature was around 75! Gas "falls" to $3.55, and we fall right back into the bad habits, and not a thought about CO2.
Simply converting all the buildings in the US to geothermal heat pumps replacing gas heat, oil heat and electric air conditioning would shut down coal plants AND free up enough oil and natural gas capacity to fuel all the vehicles in the US. That is with a simple heat pump connected to a well. If we got smart and started covering roofs and parking lots with solar panels we would have energy to spare to power plug-in hybrids.
The solutions are not rocket science, complicated or beyond the understanding of politicians. George W. Bush, Al Gore, John Kerry and John Edwards all use geothermal heat pumps on their houses. Alll that's required is an financial vehicle that pushes the conversion of homes, rentals and businesses hard.
We prefer to spend our money bailing out Wall Street pirates and occupying foriegn countries. Our bad; we stupid.
Fighting the forces of rather dim lighting wherever they may be found!!
Has anyone suggested planting a tree or two? - or more.
I did that once, planting salt-resistant native trees at a park in St. Petersburg, Florida with the Student Environment Association at school. I got heat exhaustion after one bloody tree planting :-(
&YYY&
As the Vampire States are going beyond bankruptcy , the difficulties of funding new buildings and making , retooling, buying new cars, buses and trains is capitalist problem. The carbon energy credit philosophy above has always been true. Until there is an immediate and direct monetary penalty for creating energy wasting infrastructure, such that the lifetime carbon cost to the users is calculated and accounted, the incentives are all wrong. Their is an additional carbon cost of not replacing old inefficient infrastructure.
How will a bankrupt America go about that when it is pouring most of its money going bad into wars and military black holes? War is where the priority of the main Presidential candidates is, and nothing but war on peoples, military attacks on peoples and murder of poor, energy efficient and low carbon usage people in foriegn nations of no conceivable threat to the Vampire States .
There is no decent Presidential candidate policy about the war on climate change. Unless of course the current drive to turn every American worker into penury means they can no longer afford to pay for carbon derived energy. Who will sell carbon based electricity to people with no money?
where did we go wrong?....................
But posters at CD are just that... posters. But it seems that the same can be said about Scientists, seeing as our Government and people don't listen to them at all.
"It is not if we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists will we be"
-- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr
It takes a report to figure this out? There is nothing here that I have not seen suggested by the posters at CD.
I agree. DUH would be the appropriate comment to this story.