Bolivia's Crisis Worsens As President Calls New Referendum
LA PAZ - Bolivian President Evo Morales has called a referendum for December 7 to rewrite the constitution, sharpening a political struggle with rebel governors opposed to his sweeping socialist reforms.
"This is a historic day," he said late Thursday, announcing from his presidential palace in La Paz a decree setting up the plebiscite. "This is to deepen democracy."
The new referendum -- which had been widely expected since Morales won two-thirds support in an August 10 recall referendum confirming his mandate -- is "to consolidate the process of change," he said.
Regional authorities in the eastern state of Santa Cruz, an opposition bastion, immediately challenged the legality of the decree.
"We reject the policies that the government wants to impose through a decree," they said in a statement.
They stressed that the August 10 recall referendum had also solidly confirmed the mandates of several of the opposition governors ranged against Morales.
The rebel governors have already said they will not permit any such referendum to be held in their states.
The president, who became the first indigenous leader of Bolivia in 2006, is locked in a worsening power struggle with the governors of five of the country's nine states who are blocking his attempts to redistribute more land and national wealth to the indigenous majority.
The governors of the states of Santa Cruz, Beni, Tarija and Chuquisaca -- all with populations of mostly European descent and with indigenous minorities -- are demanding more control over revenues from gas fields in their territories that are vital to the economy of Bolivia, South America's poorest nation.
Morales has been prevented in recent weeks by protesters in those states from landing his aircraft. On Wednesday, he was forced to touch down over the border in Brazil after his helicopter ran low on fuel over opposition territory.
The long crisis had stymied Morales's forceful efforts to redraft the constitution to enshrine his reforms, and he had hoped the August 10 referendum would give him the upper hand.
Instead, the results secured his mandate and those of his chief foes. That briefly pushed them together for an attempt at dialogue to find a solution, but the talks failed.
The opposition governors quickly ratcheted up anti-Morales demonstrations, prompting the president last weekend to order troops to guard gas and oil installations in the east.
The threat of the confrontation turning into widespread unrest is real. A few violent incidents have already erupted over the past 18 months between pro- and anti-government protesters, resulting in half a dozen deaths.
Roads in some parts of eastern Bolivia are being blocked by anti-Morales protesters, and local authorities in those areas say they are "on a war-footing" against attempts to change the constitution.

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
19 Comments so far
Show AllC'mon folks you didn't expect the forces of darkness to give up so easily did you? If it weren't for their middle east adventures, US military would have probably overthrown Evo and his popularly elected government in the name of Chevron, Exxon-Mobile, BP, and the whole stinking rest of them.
Be greatful for these tar-babies sticking to the US military and the dwindling supplies of crude oil which give Hugo Chavez of Venezuela the financial muscle to keep building alliances and help undo the poverty imposed by neoliberal imperialism.
Poet
McBush and Cain have a chance to undo this democratically elected Bolivian government before the American election
I smell the stench of oily Yankees in this....
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
This article gives the impression that Evo Morales, as an individual, has recently decided, on the basis of the recent referendum, to write a new constitution and have it approved in a new referendum. Actually, the proposed new constitution was written in a long, tumultuous process by the 150 or so members of a constituent assembly who had been elected by popular vote and who braved violent attacks from the rightist minority. The referendum on the draft constitution, to be held in December, was decided on long ago. The Movement toward Socialism party has recently declared that the referendum will proceed as scheduled with or without the support of rightist opponents.
Bolivia is a lot more democratic and a lot more complex than the press in this country generally recognizes.
QUESTION ??? When was the last time the people of the "greatest democracy in the world" voted on a referendum.?
In California, they vote quite frequently. TOO frequently, which is why the State is drowning in red ink, the people of California, in their infinite wisdom, have demanded far more government services than they are willing to pay for in taxes.
I have a feeling that most progressives would not be happy about the results of a NATIONAL referendum in the US on, say, third trimester abortion, school prayer, gay marriage, affirmative action, immigration, or a raft of other things.
Fifty-four percent of likely voters are against California Prop. 8
Vote NO on California Prop. 8
If it fails, I will personally sh!t on myself from a high place, that is how surprised I will be. Do not believe the polls, many are lying because they do not want to sound discriminatory.
Anyway, that is CALIFORNIA. Put this on the ballot nationally and watch what happens...
If you want to see classic "class warfare" you need only to look south. From 1960 til 1980 the real income in Latin America increased 76%. Thats 3.5% a year. From 1980 til 2000 the increase was a TOTAL of about 7% thanks to neo-liberal economics. The result was the population's demand for leftist leaders and anti corporate policies. Question - How was it that the people of the South figured it out and Americans are behind the curve? One reason I've come up with is because we have a larger middle class including some working poor believing they're middle class. We've seen the same neo-liberal transfer of wealth in America and it needs to be reversed. The only time we force change in America is OVERWHELMING OUTRAGE and ACTIVISM.
From 1960 to 1980, EVERY country in Latin America, except Columbia, spent significant time under Right Wing Military Dictatorships.
I hope you are not advocating a return to that....(In the 1980's, Peru, Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil, and Bolivia had to deal with hyper-inflation as a hangover from that 1970's era "paradise")
All those "Right Wing Military Dictatorships" were sponsored aided and abetted by the USA.
I wish Morales all the best with his reforms.
Lets hope the US isn't messing around with things in there again.
You can bet your arse we're messing around - and with our tax money.
TruthTeller - Canundrum accepted. My primary argument was against Free Trade - Globalization - Neo-liberal economics - Unregulated capitalism and the catastrophic results.
No attack on you zaz; too many on this site seem to pick an arbritary date (usually early 80's) when "neoliberalism" was unleased on the world, and paint everything prior to that as some kind of paradise. It was not. As someone who spent significant time in Brazil in the late 80's and early 90's, I will be the first to attest that the economy sucked. (On the other hand, at one point I was a BILLIONAIRE, which I have never been before or since.) BUT, seeing the pleasure on the face of a 40 year old woman who was voting for president for the FIRST TIME in 1990, because the previous election had been in 1964, makes me think that the 80's were better than what came before.
Better to be a free man and hungry than a well fed slave.
Sorry - meant to say national referendum.
Hi Zaz, Yes, I often feel that America has fallen behind in the "rage-against-the machine" race. Other countries are passing us up in organizing for social benefit, true democracy and eliminating fascism.
The biblical quote, "the last shall be first and the first shall be last" seems to resonate in this context.
So, Morales gets a huge mandate from the recent referendum, where in even the most hostile states he got 45-50% support. Nonetheless there is a "crisis", and the governments of these few states seem to have a well oiled, lavishly funded machine running their opposition.
Bolivia is a poor country. I wonder where all the money and organizers are coming from?
Santa Cruz is not poor, and it is full of immigrants. Including MANY from Brazil, which, I think, is the giant untold story here. Brazil has a rather large appetite for natural gas, and does not produce much of its own.
Evo better hope Brazil never does a Putin and decides to "protect" it citizens in Santa Cruz.
The local elite, ATT, oil companies, mineral companies and the CIA - just an informed guess.
Joe