Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Arkansas, Exxon Is Threatening to Arrest Reporters But Otherwise Telling Nobody Nothing
- It’s Official: A Democratic President Proposes to Cut Social Security
- Why Would Anyone Celebrate the Death of Margaret Thatcher? Ask a Chilean
- The Corporate Betrayal of America
- The Elephant in the Room: Militarism
Popular content
Today's Top News
From Our Archives: Police Violence Shocks Activists, Others at Port of Oakland Protest
Common Dreams Editors' Note: In light of the violence done by the Oakland, CA police against Occupy Oakland, we wanted to share with you this headline from our 2003 archives. The protesters took the city to court, and Oakland eventually awarded $2 million to 58 demonstrators for police abuses.
Published on Monday, April 7, 2003 by the San Jose Mercury News
A protestor, who refused to give her name, bears the wounds after she says was hit by Oakland police weapon during a anti-war protest in Oakland, Calif., Monday, April 7, 2003 outside the port area. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma) An anti-war demonstration at the Port of Oakland turned violent this morning when Oakland Police opened fire with wooden dowels, ``sting balls,'' concussion grendades, tear gas and other non-lethal weapons when protesters at the gates of two shipping lines refused an order to disperse.
Scores of protesters ran from a line of police or tried to hide behind nearby big rigs. At least a dozen demonstrators and nine longshoremen who were standing nearby were injured.
``Our guys were standing in one area waiting to go to work, and then the police started firing on the longshoremen,'' said Henry Graham, the president of ILWU Local 10. ``Some were hit in the chest with rubber bullets, and seven of our guys went to the hospital. I don't want to imply that the police deliberately did this, but it doesn't make sense.''
Berkeley resident Clay Hinson (R), who was shot once in the chest and twice in the back during an anti-war protest, shows his wounds to an Oakland Police sergeant (L) who takes his statement at the West Oakland train station, April 7, 2003. Oakland police fired rubber bullets and wooden pellets on Monday to disperse hundreds of anti-war protesters in what was believed to be their first such use against U.S. protesters since the American-led war on Iraq began. REUTERS/Tim WimborneThere have been so many anti-war demonstrations in the Bay Area in recent months that they have almost become routine, and most have been peaceful. Monday's events mark the first time that local police have used projectiles to disperse crowds, and many demonstrators said they were stunned that the projectiles were fired at such close range.
``I was just marching in a big circle and the police lowered their guns at us,'' said Scott Fleming, 29, who took off his shirt to reveal four large red and swollen welts on his back. ``I turned to run and I started getting hit with wooden bullets. They just kept shooting at us, and I kept running. I'm a lawyer, and I'm seriously considering filing charges.''
The early morning mayhem came as a shock to veteran activists and Oakland leaders alike. Oakland was one of the first cities in the region to pass a resolution condeming the U.S.-led war with Iraq, and the City Council has a progressive reputation. Some well known public officials even turned out to participate in the early morning protest.
``I got hit a few times with rubber bullets,'' said Dan Siegel, an attorney and member of the Oakland School Board. Siegel pulled a sting ball out of the pocket of his business suit and said he was outraged that the police fired on a peaceful protest. ``The police totally overreacted. It's over the top. They were reckless, and I also saw an officer on a motorcycle run over a woman's foot.''
The port protest was one of several anti-war demonstrations held Monday in the Bay Area. Several people were arrested at the Concord Naval Weapons Station, and seven were arrested after they temporarily blocked an off-ramp from Interstate 280 in San Francisco. Other demonstrators walked in a circle in front of the federal building in San Francisco, drumming wooden spoons together as federal employees arrived for work.
The action at the Port was the largest. Hundreds of demonstrators met near dawn Monday at the terminals of Neptune Orient Lines Ltd.'s APL unit and Stevedoring Services of America, shipping companies that activists say are profiting from the war.
An Oakland Police officer fires a shotgun towards a group of anti-war protesters near the Port of Oakland, April 7, 2003. Oakland police fired rubber bullets and wooden pellets on Monday to disperse hundreds of anti-war protesters in what was believed to be the first such use against U.S. protesters since the American-led war on Iraq began. REUTERS/Tim Wimborne In late March, Stevedoring Services of America won a $4.8 million contract from the U.S. government to manage the Iraqi port Umm Qasr and ensure that urgent food assistance and materials flow smoothly through the seaport. Critics are screaming foul over the process, which excluded any foreign companies from bidding on the lucrative contracts.
The demonstrations at the port were planned with the quiet support of the ILWU, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union.
Many rank-and-file members of ILWU Local 10 oppose the war with Iraq, and the local has its own Anti-War Action Committee.
Police fired into the crowd after some protesters failed to clear the street in front of the terminals.
``At that point, we fired non-lethal munitions,'' said Danielle Ashford, an officer with the Oakland Police Department. ``There were a few agitators in the crowd. The majority of them were peaceful.''
But others said they never saw any evidence of ``agitators'' and urged any witnesses to come to Tuesday's City Council meeting.
``I was there from 5 a.m. on, and the only violence that I saw was from the police,'' said Joel Tena, the constituent liason for Vice Mayor Nancy Nadel. ``What happened today was very surprising. It seemed the police were operating under the assumption that they were not going to let any kind of protest happen.''
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

127 Comments so far
Show All"The policeman isn't there to create disorder. He's there to preserve disorder."-comment by Mayor Richard Daley at a press conference regarding the police riot that took place at the 1968 Democratic party National Convention in Chicago.
One sees that little has changed from the time Daley unleashed his stormtroopers upon the protesters in 1968 to now. Will President Obama quickly condemn the actions of the police or will he remain mute regarding the violence that has been used upon those who dare to exercise their First Amendment rights in what is supposed to be the land of the free?
Obama, the constitutional law expert turned president has an established legacy of abusing the constitution to the same degree that Dubya did.
Why would Obama change now ?
When I participated in Viet Nam occupation activities in Oakland and Berkeley during the 60s the Oakland cops were the most brutal of the police agencies we dealt with.
Oakland Police have shown a particular propensity for violence and repression historically, not to mention Oscar Grant recently. This is a systemic problem, not something that occurred as a result of a certain degradation in the heat of the moment. I am sure the men and women who make up the police force are decent people in their individual settings, however turn into sociopaths in group settings. That's how they acted, as sociopaths do, two nights ago.
Take a look at their use of assassination of members of the Black Panthers of the late sixties as a case in point. This entire 'so called' police force ought to be disbanded. These f-cing scum ought to be punsihed with the most severe sanctions.
It is not likely that anyone on the force in the 1960s is still on the force today. That said, attitudes about dissent do not seem to have changed among the leadership. And as the leadership goes, so go the guys on the beat. At least they were using rubber bullets this time. In Oakland, that may be a sign of progress.
The same genes are there since there is a lot of nepotism in Oakland and other big city departments.
Good point. It certainly is true in NY City..
So you don't think the culture of OAKLAND PD along with archival records of radical activists has been destroyed or currently ignored?
Nah... They're not decent. They're fascist pigs who would rather murder every black person, every hippie, every gay person, every Muslim.... If they were more imaginative they'd find even more reasons to hate even more people.
There are 17 Law Enforcement Agencies, from all over Central CA, not just Oakland (Palo Alto, SJ, Gilroy, Pleasanton, Mill Valley, SF, etc,) involved in OOakland police riots, and the state CHPs came on board just last night as well. This isn't just an OPD officers problem. No, it's a symptom of egregious greed of LEAs, the obvious lack of control with no checks and balances on the taxpayer money that is spent on policing in Oakland proper. These LEAs that are lining up to the trough of taxpayer $s for overtime pay, $pecific "public threat" abatement pay, etc, etc, etc, and thus, whatever "category of pay" can be applied to any kind of policing there, Oakland seems to never have an "off $pigot" in that regard.
So, every weapon, chemical, donned uniform, enforcement division, you name it, can be billed to Oakland, in perpetuity it seems, without real oversight, audit, and culpability of their actions, nor the obvious prior question of the need for their actions. If the term "police state" is overused in this case, it's because what Oakland has is quintessentially that definition of a problem, fueled by a seemingly never-ending $upply of taxpayer funding for it. Nobody, from the State or the Feds, seems to be able to stop all the LEAs around the area from "lathering themselves up" whenever/wherever/whichever situation these LEAs make the decision to do so, and whence the money$ pour into the LEAs coffers, to rinse/repeat, rinse/repeat. This isn't a new problem, just a never-ending checks-and-balances problem, making the public virtually perplexed as to how this continues without some sort of "rule of law" abatement of these overtly abusive and deadly LEA practices there. Hence, we see police violence for profit$, over and over and over and....
Isn't it interesting that in Albany, NY the state and local police refused to remove the protesters - because they weren't doing any harm? I wonder where they found these guys.
Californians often claim that their state is "the most progressive stae in the union."
What a joke. Class disparity in CA is terrible and the police are monsterous. Dealing with government bureaucarcy in CA is much worse than back east.
Its the state that elected Ronny Raygun governor for two terms, and recalled Gov. Gray Davis (who buffered the effects of electrical power deregulation promulgated by the previous two GOP Governors) in favor of Arnold S. who twice vetoed single payer health care. Had single payer passed in California, Obamacare would never have surfaced and all Americans would have single payer medical insurance today.
Although I am a fifth generation Californian, I fled California when Duke the Incarcerater became governor in the 1980s.
And Cindy Sheehan lost to Nancy Pelosi.
I'm with you on Brown. He is a nogoodnik. The evil of two lessers.
Serawit,
that's my take as well. i live in wa state and a friend of mine visited the oakland occupy site for about 2-3 days last week. he said the attitude of the police was more aggressive and the demonstrators felt like they were on a line (like a police line). i appreciate some of the comments from californians, on this thread, tying the police's history w/ the panthers, racism and institutionalized corruption into the picture.
...peace...
Maybe it is time to start defending ourselves from the boot jack Gestapo some people call police. This country needs a second revolution. Armed rebellion is a hallmark of our founding fathers. The system is now owned by millionaires and billionaires who use the political process for their own benefit. This country rebelled against a monarchy by force. What really is the difference between the founding of this country and the ugly fascism it has become giving personhood to corporations. Has a corporation ever served time for wrongdoing? Has a corporation ever been sentenced to death for egregious criminal culpability?
"Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness".
George Washington
"Experience teaches us that it is much easier to prevent an enemy from posting themselves than it is to dislodge them after they have got possession."
G.Washington
Agreed. "Lowering ourselves to their level," a lot here on CD will say, but when those in power do not allow or respond to peaceful revolution, they make violent revolution inevitable (JFK). Further, violence is the only power these plutocratic fascist fucks understand. There will come a day - mark my words - in the not-so-distant future when Amereichans finally have had enough. Lessons will be taught to the Overlords that they will very thoroughly understand.
"Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny."
Thomas Jefferson
The people’s movement cannot become violent. The meager and basic demands for justice are on our side. The Constitution is on our side.
What needs to be done is to make sure that ALL American people CAN see and hear what happens to people like them that take to the streets in order to make those peaceful and meager demands. Then justice will be done. The country will demand justice from its government. There will we one voice, the American people’s voice.
"The people’s movement cannot become violent."
It certainly can. The question is whether it should.
At the moment this would be a mistake because the OWS is still such a small minority and would be crushed in a violent struggle. The Weather Underground is an apt example of what happens when a small minority tries to take the struggle to a violent level .
I agree - not yet. Give it another few years, after a few thousand protestors have been seriously injured by the police, after another few free trade agreements have offshored another 3 million Amereichan jobs, after a few million more fraudulent foreclosures by the banks, after the Obama administration and our Congress has stripped a few more hundred regulations from Corporate Amereicha, and a few more Amendments to the Constitution have been shredded. Maybe when SS/Medicare/Medicaid have been utterly butchered by the D/R duopoly.
All it takes is one spark. That spark has not yet been struck, but the pile of fuel is building, and each smirking rape and slap by the 1% Plutocracy is piling on the last one. Just a matter of time.
So what's your point? You think the OWS movement has the potential to become a violent revolution?
When a violent vanguard gets to far out in front of the masses they are crushed. A list of the current and pending capitalist atrocities doesn't change that fact.
Yes a spark may lead to widespread revolt and rioting, but that's very different from a small group of activists attempting to fight the police.
This comment is not exactly calling for peaceful nonviolent action. This kind of bravado is easy to write. But one bears responsibility for what it could unleash! We live in very high armed times..........ie check it out.......
I am just wondering if you even know what personal responsibility means?
The founding fathers of the US were all rich and wealthy. They owned the most and therefor had 'more' to lose when taxes on what they made came rolling in. All of the people so many like to hold up as champions of fairness and such were really just rich douches who got a bunch of poor people to fight a war so they could keep more of their wealth. Look it up, it's a fact and people have written many books about it. People across America champion these rich before the other rich people across the ocean. Classic.
If you go on to say something like, "There's a big difference, things are so bad now or are different in this way or that..." then you're not using your head. Things have always been bad or different, but the masses take it all in stride so long as the enemy is someone else.
I disagree with anyone advocating violent revolution. Mass presence in non-violent witness can take may forms and carries the dignity of our children and generations to come.
Be very certain to recognize, fully identify and starve the real roots of violence with information, solidarity and education. If violence is chosen, that is what you will have at the end of the day.
The powers that be want nothing more than the confusion, manipulability and control granted by the twisted rationale of fear. Life itself calls us to be fearless, faithful and loving. Our task is to prove the inefficacy of the entire virus of violence and control. That is achieved by manifesting en mass the continued revelation of the old tools of division that have been imposed for centuries.
The best way to reveal the confusion and destruction inherent in a police state is to hold up a mirror to those who, according to their own understanding, exercise the system, ignorant of other ways of learning and being.
Would you really choose to support murder as a method for life? Because, ultimately, thats the end game that violent revolution proposes. Is that a world you want people to live in?
OLD GOAT & DOG FACE: Excellent post. I think it's also worth remembering the names of those who recommend the use of violent force in this forum. There ARE agents amongst us.
So I am an agent of what, exactly?
I have no idea ekobe, but it seems we are agents of something and SR is keeping files on us.
( I like to think we are agents of reality )
I was taken aback by her remark. I respect and admire her contribution to this forum. But if the implication is that I represent some neo conservative infiltration that goes against everything I've had to say on this forum.
Get used to it.
If anyone disagrees with her new age man hating pseudophilosophising middle class crap then she gets very nasty very quickly
Sure, Morticia, the pseudo Marxist who can't spell Proletariat, I am a man hating pseudo philosopher. And you are just the most loving, enlightened, educated poster in this forum... not a sneering, angry wanabe, who uses snide, disgusting terminology in lieu of a lack of original thought, or genuine capacity for insight.----------------------------------------------
EKOBE: I cannot attest to what you are or are not. But there are a number of posters who definitely appear in this forum to MONITOR the threads and plant distrust towards key Progressive figures, while disparaging authors and activists they (if they had the sensibilities they appear to hold) should instead applaud. This species of targeted character assassination has been ongoing. Only you know what Master you serve. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fascinating the way Morticia equates my call to gender parity and the need to extinguish the emphasis on MARS/war/warriors in our society with "man" hating. This dingo has actually made references to what's going on in MY bedroom... while also once leaving a one line post about issues being resolved best through the barrel of a gun. She's also stated that she "served" in the military. Strange female, if indeed she is one. What type of Progressie would "serve" in the military, lest, like ERROLL, she came out of the experience enlightened enough to work for peace? And her constant libertarian defense of things as disgusting as "art" based upon the MAIMING of women, is a testament to a SICK soul. No SANE woman would defend the indefensible. I would say she is WOMAN-hating, as opposed to her false allegations constantly sent my way. Apart from the tag team she's part of, does anyone think this individual has anything of worth to share? If so, "Good night and good luck," to you.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are only a few people on CD who literally make my skin crawl, and she is decidedly one of them.
It boils down to the ability to pick one's battles.
When you are dealing with the most corrupt, violent and well armed government and military in history, there is less than zero chance that one's cause will be advanced (let alone actually winning ANYTHING) by applying violence as a means.
The cops will always be the winner of head to head violent confrontation
Self defense is not about "winning" its about survival. But then again, to understand that norm, one would have to be on the front lines. Maybe you could share with us what the Vet who got shot in the head with a rubber bullet 'won' in all of this? Are you advocating for us to stay home and do nothing. Or perhaps, that we do get involved and sacrifice ourselves for the middle class' preoccupation with their own addictions like commodity fetishism?
This is reality. Thank you ekobe.
What is ironic in all of this is my orignal assertion that our country was founded on armed rebellion which provoked a barrage of comments linking me to advocating for violence. I was advocating for self defense; butressed against a historic fact. These people want all the benefits to exercise their right to destroy Mother Earth while commenting on political praxis but I sincerely doubt any of them has been arrested for their personal activism much less walked the streets. And here is the big joke in all of this: their activism is restricted to rhetorical ejaculations. After which they most likely light up to ease the buildup of stress. Nothing more.
People don't like reality. It's hard.
LOL. Are you talking about yourself?
The reality is that the vet who got shot with a rubber bullet, would have been shot with a real bullet if he had a gun and used it.
THAT is reality.
I know reality.
Thank you .
Historical fact:
The American rebels were not fighting against an opponent who overwhelmingly overpowers them.
And of course, it is trivially easy on the internet to call everyone who disagrees with you someone engaging in rhetorical ejaculations, whereas you, of course, are some activist hero.
What utter nonsense. You selectively read the posts and ignore the entire context. If anyone here is engaging in trivial status quo norms it is you, not me. But your shallow understanding of US history is also absurd. The monarchy was trashing the colonials in every battle until the French joined the side of the colonial patriots to turn the tide. You've been watching too many Mel Gibson films. One certainly comes to mind regarding your robust flexing of galatic stupidity which is forefully attached to middle class orthodoxy: namely, The Beaver.
Before you make a fool of yourself again, maybe you ought to read a book.
I suggest you go read a few books on war, on the logistics of war. Logistics of war is something that many people, especially amateur historians type disregard. Your disregard fir logistics does not mean that it does not matter. In the end, all wars are won or lost, based on logistics. It is why the Brits lost, It is why Hannibal lost in the end when he invaded Italy. It is why the English in the end got ejected from France. It is why Napoleon got chased out of Russia. It is why Hitler repeated Napoleon's experience. It is why Rome was so successful in conquering, because Roman generals were drilled in paying lots of attention the the nitty gritty details of logistics. It is why Roman generals would yes, get trashed initially, like the American colonials. but win in the end.
Your understanding of the history of war is extremely shallow. You've been reading too much pop history. Since your appear to be extremely ignorant, I will simplify things for you: the UK was fighting a war thousands of miles away from home, from its other territories. This was at a time when there was no such thing as flight. No such thing as mechanised transport. When moving things across the seas could take months. Conversely, the American colonials were fighting a defense on home ground. The home ground advantage, and that they were fighting a defense action gave them an advantage in the long run.
Before you make an even more complete fool of yourself, go read up about war,
Yawn! LOL: Like I said: read a book.
.
Reply to rfloh
Too much argument in an expanded threaded list creates very narrow comments.
So this reply to rfloh has been moved to the bottom of the thread at Posted by PuffinThrush Oct 29 2011 - 8:34am.
Puffin, I've always respected the way you surf this forum: you remind me of a Zen master who has conquered the rough spots... keep the fire alive...
.
Thank you ekobe.
Sometimes I keep editing and refining my comments after I have posted them.
It is sort of a curse, actually.
In any case, the comment I moved to the end of the thread is now at PuffinThrush Oct 29 2011 - 8:50am.
When you replied to that post you caught me attempting to make one more edit.
:>)
I will answer your question posted in a reply to that post about linking to images a little later. Anyone who wants to do that needs to know a few more things than just the html code.
Regards
OK.
Why don't you ask yourself your own question? Let's say the vet had a gun and used it. Would that have prevented him being shot? Or would even more powerful force be used against him?
I've negatively critiqued Hartmann, Flanders, Heyden, Nichols, and a few other in that lame wing of the Dem party and NEVER VOTED Republican. I've only voted for one Democrat in my life in 1971 0r 72. Ive consistently defended Hedges, Greenwald, and the authentic progressvies when others would not, including you. I serve no master and collect no corporate income from any source including corporate owned radio. I was an activist for over twenty years for substandard wages. Now I earn my living as a self employed Acupunturist; before that I was a massage therapist and did Rolfing. I volunteer my time at a community clinic for marginal populations. I live off the grid in a one room cabin. And shit in an outhouse.But I still fail to see you linking of me to "disparaging remarks of activists." I hope you don't mean the Dem shill M. Moore?
You don't need to explain yourself ekobe, certainly not to people who call you names or defame you or bring your motives into question..