EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
Babysitting While White

The surreal saga of Scott Henson, a journalist, political consultant and blogger - Grits for Breakfast and Huevos Rancheros - on the criminal justice system in Texas who was stopped by Austin police in nine patrol cars with flashing lights, handcuffed and questioned at length for walking his five-year-old granddaughter home from a roller-skating rink. Henson is white; his granddaughter is black. It's not the first time he has been stopped with her. Evidently, we - and most notably the police - have a long way to go before achieving a post-racial, un-paranoid, non-authoritarian America.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

59 Comments so far
Show AllCome on -- about what WHAT was he "questioned at length"? In all candor, the information you've given provides not the slightest basis for inferring that the police involved were anything but heroes. Should they prove not to have been heroes is irrelevant to the inferences reasonably drawnn from what you wrote.
"Heroes?"
There's another standard that keeps sinking lower and lower....
sj
Hector -
Did you even read the link to the man's blog? Your definition of heroes is sadly lacking. The cops in this instance were certainly not heroes. They were intimidating, arbitrary and excessive. I've read your conservative apologisms on other matters before and this is typical.
What???
It seems clear that the police were more interested in protecting a little girl from someone who may have been a predator. They often get blamed for bad conduct, but this doesn't qualify.
Are you serious??
So who called the police??? and if it's happened before why aren't the police on to it by now...I guess it's just a questionable image...out of shape white guy with a little black girl just doesn't compute...nine patrol cars??? slow day in Austin??
Fetching far to completely understand this post!
Can you imagine if it was a middle-aged black man and a little white girl walking down the street?
For those thinking this is acceptable behavior from cops, why not a courtesy stop and ask rather than nine cars complete with sirens and handcuffs? Do cops even bother to ask questions anymore or is the hysterical over-reaction always the first move?
The police state is far too accepted here.
I was thinking the same thing. Had it been an older black man with a little white girl, I have doubts he would have been released and sent on his way after a while like this man was. More like tazed or pepper sprayed followed by a trip to central booking and a couple of hours in a cell while the police took their sweet time checking out his story.
The constable could have cleared this up quickly but chose to shift into knee jerk reaction mode.
Because white people and black people can't *possibly* be related....
Sad, but yes, the actions of the police are quite an indicator here of society's prejudices.
Handcuffs? With 9 patrol cars and how many cops? For one granddad and one granddaughter? How about just asking him for Mommy's name and number and checking it out? And maybe talk to that little sweetheart.
I sentence the police to 4 weeks of Charm School, followed by mandatory Adrenaline Anonymous meetings.
What happened to neighborhood policing, where police and neighbors know each other and can help each other out? Did they spend the money for it on tanks and missiles?
Exactly! Institutionalized cowardice has been the order of the day for decades now. It has become accepted practice that if a cop feels threatened by a wallet or cell phone he is permitted to empty his Glock's magazine into the "offender". Ever wonder why it has become standard practice to throw arrested persons into the gutter on their stomachs and handcuff their hands behind their backs? What an ugly country we have become.
Tony Vodvarka
They obviously spent the money on 8 extra police cars and maybe 12 extra bumbling , do nothing cops, constantly mouthing over and over their justification for taking up space in your face. One car, two cops, five minutes, no cuffs, be REAL nice to the child, and no bullshit. Mr. Police Officer, you really HAVE to get over yourself. You are roadblocks enough without the Narcissistic attitude.
Come on Abbey - it took me all of 10 seconds to see that this guy's blog has exposed corruption or bad admin within the Texas police and judiciary, eg the Tim Cole false conviction. Surely that, and other blogs of his, pissed off the powers that be and that's why they sent 9 cop cars etc, etc. To try make this a black-white issue is a touch disingenuous. Typical, but still disingenuous. I credit you with superb trawling abilities, so the fact that you chose deliberately to ignore this suggest you are grinding an axe. Nothing wrong with grinding axes, but it does so belittle the rest of your stances.
Thank you for that information onemantribe. As many have said, I too would give a second look if I saw an older white man with a little black girl. I would look at her face to see if she seems OK. The level of response from the police shows that this has nothing to do with protecting a child. How sick.
jclient, "I too would give a second look if I saw an older white man with a little black girl" But you wouldn't give a second look at an older white man with a little white girl. Alas. A smile or a hello might be more appropriate than racist suspicion.
You are right that a smile and a hello are all too rare, alas. It is sad the kind of alienated world we live in that we are, or have to be, suspicious of older men with children. Some people are just nice, as they say in this song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZZ-4NDNFb0
Ahhhh. OK.
THAT explains it.
They were looking for an excuse to harass this guy.
Now it all makes perfect sense.
sj
.
I want to give the cops a pass on this one. At least , this is a case in which the little girl was being looked after. A lot of evidence shows that black children are not equally protected by police. So, Im gonna say. "Okay, thanks for checking."
The cops did the right thing. There are enough white sickos and weirdos in Texas (and plenty of other states) to make one wonder what the story is. Three cheers for Henson, but I am sure he believes the cops are on his side. What if some white racist decides to take his daughter from school?
Producing a sheet of paper saying "This little girl is Henson's grandaughter" ain't going to cut cake with anyone who is charged with protecting the innocent. So yeah, "questioning at length" AND producing the biological mother would be the only way I would release a child to an older man, of ANY color.
I get really tired of the bashing cops take around here. Most of them are good people doing a shitty job.
This kind of approach towards dealing with people sickens me. A simple phone call to check the identity of the grandfather would have been enough to spare the child from being questioned. But I understand how the thinking itself becomes perverted when one has to continually with violent sickos: one starts to assume that everyone one must be treated the same way, because they deserve it, out of principle, for the protection of oneself, for the benefit of the community. Well, police officers should be part of the community too, not just the big bad watch dogs ready to byte down hard first then check who they bit. Police officers in the USA seem to be always afraid of being shot. The cause of the problem: weapons and the readiness to use them (i have the right to do so, i have nothing to lose, fear of death sentence if caught, lifelong sentences, bad system of justice). In states that have less (automatic) weapons, less poor people, fewer slums than the rich USA, the fear of being shot as an officer is greatly reduced! And people get treated like human being where possible. In this case it was possible. There was no threat.
You are expressing the classic USAn paranoia instilled from watching sensationalist TV news which instills a sense of wildly exaggerated risk.
I assume you live in suburbia or a small town in the sticks, becasue If you had ever lived in a major ethnically. racially, culturally diverse city, (the city, not the suburbs)you would have thought nothing of a child with an adult caretaker of a different race.
Of all the comments here yours has to be the most stupid. EVERY child has an "older man" for a father, and two more for grandfathers. So you think the police should separate all children from their fathers and grandfathers, and not "release" them until the "biological mother" appears? If no "sheet of paper" (such as legal photo ID) would suffice for you, just how would you identify the genuine biological mother?
Someone needs to issue you a medical emergency ID that says "clinically stupid," because you are hazardous to public safety.
WTF???
You know what I'm getting tired of? People not minding their own damn business. When cops stop anyone not doing a crime, and use 9 cars and handcuffs to do it, they are exceeding their authority and acting like bullies. Bashing cops? Brother, where have you been?
You need to understand a little more about police procedure.
1) Cops cuff everyone whom they consider may have committed a crime, eg repeat speeders and DUIers. This is for everyone's safety.
2) Police are not trained in every unusual event. When something like this happens, a lot of junior policemen/women want to know how to handle unusual situations and attend it as a training exercise. Ever been in hospital and you are suddenly surrounded by 10 trainee doctors? Police need on-the-job training too.
3) Because a female child was involved, both a woman policeman and an policeman with social service training must attend. When the dispatcher puts out a call, those officers who need to attend do so without coordinating among themselves. My guess is more than half of the police who attended had the necessary training, and the other half wanted to be trained.
Most of the venomous comments here about the police are made by pathological cop-haters. Yet these same haters will be the first to call 911 when the neighbors barking dog keeps them awake every night. Haters are mentally-ill.
My fear now is that you may be in law enforcement. Your opinions here reflect a mentality that should, in a sane world, disqualify you from that work.
Your contempt and hostility toward "civilians" is quite obvious. Yet you portray law enforcement officers as the victims, and so justify police behavior as well as your attitude toward the critics of law enforcement.
You no doubt can't see that your remarks here weaken your case, and support the case of those you so derisively dismiss. The attitude you are expressing here is the problem.
"Cops cuff(ing) everyone whom they consider may have committed a crime" is not for anyone's safety, it is an abuse of power and it is un-Constitutional. The fact that you present this as standard and routine "police procedure" makes it all the more disturbing.
So, critics of law enforcement are "venomous" and "pathological" and "haters" and "mentally ill" in your view? I think you are projecting, and that is all too common among those attracted to careers in law enforcement. It is a big red flag. Certain personality types are prone to project their own hostilities and violent urges onto the public they serve. A culture can then develop around that within a force, and the officers start feeling persecuted and misunderstood and become more and more alienated from the community they supposedly serve. Denial that this is a problem is another red flag.
If you said these things in real life and I heard them, I would file a complaint with your superiors. If that did not rectify the situation, I would organize to remove your superiors from power.
I have done just that in the past, with less cause than your remarks represent, and successfully, and rogue officers have been disciplined or removed. That tells us that you do not speak for all law enforcement officers, as you so strongly imply and wish us to believe.
* "1) Cops cuff everyone whom they consider may have committed a crime, eg repeat speeders and DUIers. This is for everyone's safety." *
Now I understand. But why wasnt the cop handcuffed who kicked the helpless man in diabetic shock in Austin, breaking several of his ribs? I guess he was not committing a crime, because officers do not commit crimes. They treat eyerone the same way. Well, except for themselves.
* "2) Police are not trained in every unusual event." *
Yes, obviously every day normal life needs to be trained. I think so too.
* "When something like this happens, a lot of junior policemen/women want to know how to handle unusual situations and attend it as a training exercise. Ever been in hospital and you are suddenly surrounded by 10 trainee doctors? Police need on-the-job training too." *
They do the training while on the job? Isnt that a bit late? No wonder they are afraid they can not handle a situation without 8 more police cars. I would suggest that you bring in a whole bus load so that the training can be intensified and repeated. Please wait for the croosk until the bus arrives.
*"3) Because a female child was involved, both a woman policeman and an policeman with social service training must attend. "*
Social service training did not seem to do the trick here. It was a police flash light that did. So, while this may be meant to do good, it just did harm and was not needed. Procedure again? Yes, I guess the procedure is needed to keep everyone busy. Not enough to do in a small town, eh?
* "Most of the venomous comments here about the police are made by pathological cop-haters. Yet these same haters will be the first to call 911 when the neighbors barking dog keeps them awake every night. Haters are mentally-ill." *
No one would hate cops, if they did not treat people so badly for no reason. Ok, now I learned that the reason is procedure. The Waffen-SS followed procedures too. The first leader actually was fired, because he did not follow procedure, because he had his trousers sown by someone declared the wrong race.
I suggest the police should handcuff you anytime you are in the presence of your small child or grandchild. I suggest the police should take the child from you and not release the child from their custody until the biological mother appears. I suggest that this scenario should occur repeatedly, and that no paper document should prevent if from repeatedly occurring. This is all justified by "public safety."
Then, we'll see how long it takes for you to change your tune. I'll bet less than three minutes.
What if they didn't stop him and the little girl dissapeared. They may have over reacted a bit. But to place this as racism, with such meager facts, is insulting. Community policing is the answer, if they know who lives where and what, that would solve alot more problems like this. They also probably acted on a call from a concerned citizen. Bravo, on that.
Plenty of black children disappear or are murdered every year in the US. The usual police response, unless pushed by the media because there have been multiple disappearances in a short time period, is to take a report and do NOTHING.
Compare the (continuing) over-reaction and fascination with a white child beauty pageant contestant from a politically connected family, Jon Benet Ramsey, with the utter indifference from most of America when an out-of-control Police officer kicks in a front door and executes a ten year old black girl sleeping on her grandmother's couch with a hail of gunfire while serving a search warrant for her father.
Huh???
"He's my grandpa." Shoulda' been end of story.
Tribeofone saw the real story.
"a journalist, political consultant and blogger .... on the criminal justice system"
Heroes? Poppycock.
The little peanut's wince upon seeing cops later tells that tale.
What's interesting to me is that some folks consider the very fact that a white man was with a black girl to be PROBABLE CAUSE of criminal activity.
What if she were white?
White guys don't kidnap white girls??
And what about little boys???
Are they stopping EVERY older man who's with a child????
Something stinks here. There's more going on.
sj
Gone are the days of the policeman walking the beat and getting to know the neighborhood. Now is the time of maximum force, shock and awe, fear of face to face encounters. I feel badly for the child who had to experience this event and the fear of harm to her grandfather.
Owing to the 1 or 2 % that earned it, all males over the age of 3 years are now suspect and are advised to avoid any unsupervised contact with any females.This recalls the now forgotten mores of the mid-20th century when respectable gentlemen restricted their unaccompanied leisure to the safety of stag bars and private clubs where no women were admitted. But respectable gentlemen were too happy with that arrangement so it became politically incorrect. So, having elevated our taboos to a high state of conflict and confusion, we now retreat into disconnected anonymity. Except, of course, for corporations, which have sufficient resources to defend their personhood.
Changed my mind. Not worth it.
No; please speak your mind...
Anyone who thinks there is justified suspicion of an adult and child of different races seriously needs to take a trip to a major Canadian city (particularly Toronto), and see what an ethically/racially diverse, non-racist society looks like.
To those rationalizing and justifying the police actions--suppose this had happened in Boston, New York, San Francisco--or any city outside the deep south, frankly. The cops would be dealing with a shitstorm and this would probably have made the evening news. But in Texas, the good 'ol boys just do what they do.
This is not really true. There are incidents of excessive police force and fatal shootings of unarmed men and some women all the time here in NYC. Now that everyone has a camera, many incidents are recorded. As with vets, suicide is becoming a problem among police, as those with consciences find themselves in untenable positions and the stress levels are high. The police mission is supposed to be to protect and serve but there are several obstacles to that.
1. The culture of protecting Wall Street and high status people
2. The culture of racism and targetting young black and Hispanic males
3. The fact that there are few repercussions for those that shoot and administer beatings to unarmed and subdued individuals
Some of the videos are painful even to watch, as several police officers surround a downed victim (aka citizen presumed to be innocent) and keep hitting him hard over and over with their billy clubs.
I don't see the correlation between Occupy activists being at the receiving end of excessive force and a man who is taking his granddaughter for a walk. That's a pretty suspect link you make. But thank you for missing my point and the lecture on how nasty the police state is.
Also to the point, many people yet have mixed feelings about Occupy and its intentions. That being no excuse for excessive, violent police force.
Who is going to dispute a man out for a stroll with his granddaughter, who happen to be white and black, respectively? Only a knuckledragging racist or those yet in that mindset, by my estimation.
Hey "Peace Czar", as a life long Texan and Austinite, I think you're off base here. Listen, I live in the neighborhood this unfortunate incident occurred. Let me speak on it from that level:
Pretenses and value judgements aside, and in spite of it's current free-thinking reputation, the racial history of Austin is indeed Deep South, and is still apparent generations later through the legacy of old racial zoning laws. Near-East Austin has been historically Latino (esp. below 7th St) and African American (7th to Manor Rd). The lines have blurred a bit since the civil rights movement began opening things up. Also, the near-east side has been gentrifying in earnest for the past 10-15 years, with whites, but also people of all colors moving in who did not previously have roots in these neighborhoods. Still, most white people living on the east side are younger, or like punk-rock or hipster types. Therefore, in all fairness some might indeed find it "strange" to see a middle aged white man walking near that part of 12th St, and especially with a little black girl. Statistically speaking, this is an outlier. I'm sorry if this offends anyone's sensibilities about how it "should be", but its just kind of how it still is in that particular area.
So I think the first inquiry made should perhaps be forgiven as an exercise of the precautionary principle. The next encounter, with 9 squad cars, handcuffs, and a traumatized little psyche, was disgusting, histrionic overkill. (Was it also perhaps in response to this guy's blog that is critical of police? We don't have enough information to make that inference here.) But on the whole, I view this as less of a racial incident, (as it was spun by Abby's headline) and more about general police overkill.
To me, the real takeaway is that this is just another example of the militarization of the police force, due to the mentality many ex-military and war vet police recruits bring with them to their new stateside job. The police are more and more feeling like an occupying force. And APD has its own share of brutality incidents. However, as a local, I must be fair and say that some of the police I know can be friendly, reasonable people when you talk to them one-on-one. It's a mixed bag of course, but I think the overall police culture promotes aggressive overkill to many situations.
Finally, a word to the dismissive "that's the South for you" comments on this thread (and many other times here on CD): Sorry, we can't all be Toronto. We are born into the places we are, and some of these places carry heavier historical (and present) burdens of racism, sexism, rigid class hierarchy, etc. (I would argue that Austin has come a long way, though...) Does it make you feel smug to dwell on the differences that may still exist? To reinforce stereotypes in the popular imagination? Or perhaps you could drop the pretension and realize that every region has its own baggage, and stand in solidarity with those of us down here who seek to perform whatever alchemy we are able with our words, deeds, and lives. Because that would feel like respect to me. You can't insult a region towards progressive change.
I appreciate your comments. Considering what happened with the 9 squad cars, the handcuffing and interrogation, I stand by what I said. You seem to be in agreement with that from your own comments. And I too could understand the initial inquiry by the constable before she dropped the ball. So, where's the disagreement?
Don't presume I feel smug. There are dumb rednecks in my part of the country too. It's just less urban and dare I say even less integrated. Don't take it personally. Austin is the beacon of hope in Texas--I'm sure you can imagine how this might have gone down in an uncultured part of the state. And yeah, I mean uncultured as in places full of dumb, fearful, xenophones. My home state of Pennsyltucky has them too, so don't go being a proud hero for Texas now. It doesn't deserve it, nor does PA or anywhere else. Shitty behavior exists. Address and hold it accountable when you get the chance.
My reference to Toronto should not be construed in any way a remark on "the south", unless by "south" we mean everything to tthe south of the 49th parallel and Great Lakes. I was not suggesting going there to live, but Canadian cities are close-to-home examples of how an otherwise very similar people can be refreshingly different and different in a very good way. Yet, what percentage of USAns overall - even those living in border states - have been to Canada?
Hey man, first of all, I love Canada too, and spent a summer in Quebec a while back, even looked into moving there for a while. Mais tabarnac! That winter is cold!
What actually triggered my reply was an overarching disdain for regional stereotypes, which I've noticed have a tendency to stand in for actual, nuanced analysis, even here on Common Dreams. To chalk up the event in question to "those good old boys down in Texas" does the conversation a disservice. And I also don't find APD cops particularly "redneck", btw. (I also don't consider the term "redneck" as strictly pejorative, but that's another conversation).
I think the heart of the matter is the (growing?) paranoid authoritarianism of law enforcement, and the concomitant expectation of, (as Obedient Servant put it in an excellent post below), obsequious submission to the point of abject humility on part of the citizenry. And the fact that this guy is with the ACLU police oversight project means that this might not all be a coincidence either... To carelessly dismiss it as a Southern thing is lazy and offensive, and obfuscates the other more salient dynamics.
Having read the linked blog post (which some commentators clearly have not), the words "ignorant" and "assholes" come to mind.
They did the right thing in the first 2 minutes, then boarded the authoritarian nightmare train to Police brutality.
There is no date on when this occurred.
The victim of this police retaliation is head of the ACLU of Texas Police Accountability Project.
All of you need to pay attention to "onemantribe"'s entry and do a little Googling of his discovery on your own.
That vicious abuse of police power is common in this country is also addressed by "jclientelle". The cops do not deserve a pass on this one. They need to be prosecuted.
Police need to be disarmed. This can be done on a jursidiction by jurisdiction basis.
Anybody who has been part of one of our occupying armies needs to be barred from law enforcement. Communities need to take action to rein in police.