It reportedly took Sony Music - not Apple as originally thought - somewhere between 30 minutes and 12 hours after Whitney Houston's death to jack up the price of her greatest hits album by 60%. Well-named: vulture capitalism.
In 1991 The U.S. was fighting the Persian Gulf War at the time, and Whitney Houston stood at the microphone of Super Bowl XXV to sing the national anthem in a red, white and blue track suit. The field was filled with military personnel. Thousands of spectators clutched American flags in the stands.
Another shining example of how militarism is so interconnected with the world of sports. Since Iraq never invaded the United States in 1991 nor even threatened to do so against the world's lone superpower, one has to wonder at the lack of any kind of critical thinking of so many Americans whenever they are so quick to accept what the government tells them especially when the U.S. invades and bombs third world countries. What the government and the military just loves is when celebrities like Ms. Houston make statements like this:
"If you were there, you could feel the intensity," Houston later said. "You know, we were in the Gulf War at the time. It was an intense time for a country. A lot of our daughters and sons were overseas fighting. I could see, in the stadium, I could see the fear, the hope, the intensity, the prayers going up, you know, and I just felt like this is the moment. And it was hope, we needed hope, you know, to bring our babies home and that's what it was about for me, that what I felt when I sang that song, and the overwhelming love coming out of the stands was incredible."
People like Ms. Houston certainly made the government's job of spreading propaganda about another one of their unjustifiable wars that much easier. If Ms. Houston was really concerned about "bring [ing] our babies home" then she should have been speaking out against that idiotic war instead of being a cheerleader for it. The irony about her statement is that the sanctions that the United States imposed upon Iraq subsequent to the invasion resulted in the deaths of at least 500,000 Iraqi children. That inconvenient fact is something that Ms. Houston and her devoted fans would much rather ignore than address.
Ms. Houston may have been a great singer but her politics left a hell of a lot to be desired.
Posted by dkshaw
Feb 13 2012 - 9:36pm
I wonder how much she got paid.
Great comment by the way.
Posted by AD
Feb 13 2012 - 9:46pm
Despite what may be the gal's flaws on the Persian Guf War, this last hit truly hit the mark.
Posted by AD
Feb 13 2012 - 9:50pm
Correction may be in order. I had the idea that Whitney Houston's last hit was called "vulture capitlaism," if not I withdraw the comment in reference to that matter-- thanks to all.
Posted by readytotransform
Feb 14 2012 - 2:06pm
Good post Erroll, although terribly politically impolite in this column which mirrors the Huffington Post 85% of the time. I do not feel uplifted by anyone's untimely death but i feel much worse about people who put themselves on the line for a higher cause and end up in a black site.
Why does it need to be cleared up here that Sony is the bad guy, as opposed to Apple by the way????? And to think i thought Sony was a humanitarian organization.
Posted by Sundome
Feb 13 2012 - 6:52pm
Whitney Houston was an incredible woman - one of the fine black women who broke through to the masses and kept the road paved for so many other women and black artists to be accepted. She had an incredible voice and she was gorgeous.
She also had problems with drugs and alcohol like so many artists. She could have had a few more decades. I've enjoyed her music and her acting. It's sad she's gone.
May she RIP. She'll be remembered for her great talent and for her great accomplishments.
I refuse to hold singing the national anthem against her.
Posted by Erroll
Feb 13 2012 - 7:20pm
"She had an incredible voice and she was gorgeous." She may have indeed been a superb singer but I do not think that the fact that she was "gorgeous" is something that she should be held in high esteem for as that was more an accident of birth rather than a major accomplishment by Ms. Houston. She most certainly, however, could have been praised if she would have had the courage to say that she would not sing the national anthem when the Persian Gulf War was going on. Another African-American from a by-gone era had something to say about this:
"Cowardice asks the question-is it safe? Expediency asks the question-is it politic? Vanity asks the question-is it popular? But conscience asks the question-is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right."-Martin Luther King, Jr.
I will admire the author of the above statement rather than Ms. Houston as she chose to take the popular position while Dr. King chose, in his Beyond Vietnam speech in 1967, the position that was neither safe nor politic nor popular but rather right because he, unlike Ms. Houston, had a conscience.
Posted by clearbluesky
Feb 13 2012 - 10:01pm
That was beautiful but you have to realize both Dr King and Ms.Houston (once beautiful too) died from the same bullet.
Posted by sLiMsHaDy
Feb 14 2012 - 3:20am
And I will stand with you on this. She absolutely seized her moment in time. Unforgettable; that voice.
It's rather sad that the topic of this article concerns exploitation by shitty corporations and yet many choose to degrade the departed lady who gave voice to beauty and soul.
Posted by Erroll
Feb 14 2012 - 11:01am
sLiMsHaDy states that "It's rather sad that the topic of this article concerns exploitation by shitty corporations and yet many choose to degrade the departed lady who gave voice to beauty and soul." I suggest that you re-read what I had written as I conceded that Ms. Houston was indeed a great singer. But as Galenwainwright correctly notes, I am certainly not going to do what so many Americans do and that is engage in the deification of dead celebrities, as was seen when Ronald Reagan died and everyone, liberals and conservatives alike, pretended that he was as pure as the driven snow.
As I attempted to point out in my comments, Ms. Houston appeared to support the Persian Gulf War in 1991 as seen by her singing of the national anthem during the Super Bowl in 1991 and also by her patriotic comments about supporting the troops which followed afterward in an interview. As this is supposed to be a progressive web site I fail to see how my criticizing Ms. Houston for supporting that unjust war is somehow supposed to be proof that I was allegedly degrading her. Since Ms. Houston was a public figure that then means that her political views should be open to criticism. I rather doubt that the families of those Iraqi children who had died because medical supplies were unable to reach them due to the embargo set up by the United States in 1991 would agree with Ms. Houston's position on the Persian Gulf War.
Posted by sLiMsHaDy
Feb 14 2012 - 1:48pm
Erroll and others, I agree with many if not all of the political conclusions made here, but the public figure is gone; she has most recently departed. I'd be willing to to guess that her statement following her Super Bowl appearance weren't even necessarily her own words and thoughts, it was likely coached and the whole thing was staged. Furthermore, I don't really think that she had any particular political stance; none that I can recall, She just didn't operate on that plane. The plane that she did operate on had a crash landing; she did not survive.
In our perfect dream world, everyone would know what is right from wrong, and be able to express and share POVs in a meaningful and productive way. Our perfect world doesn't exist. It seems unlikely that it ever will. I mourn the tragic death and loss of a singular talent; I appreciated her art for the sake of art - period -
The topic of the article relates to the exploitation by Sony Music. Pretty disgusting, but that's how these fat-cats roll. Peace to all.
Posted by Erroll
Feb 14 2012 - 3:28pm
Please do not attempt to put a spin on what she did when you claim that: "I'd be willing to to guess that her statement following her Super Bowl appearance weren't even necessarily her own words and thoughts, it was likely coached and the whole thing was staged. Furthermore, I don't really think that she had any particular political stance; none that I can recall..."
Are you really trying to claim that it was just a gigantic coincidence that she happened to sing the National Anthem while wearing a red, white and blue track suit? Or perhaps you would have us believe that someone put a gun to her head to not only wear that patriotic outfit that she had on but to also say what she did in that interview. I think not especially given the fact that I have not come across any information where she had retracted those statements that she had made in that interview.
As I stated in another post, since Ms. Houston was a public figure then her perceived views on the Persian Gulf War should then be allowed and argued as a matter of public discourse especially on a web site which discusses such matters as war and politics.
Posted by sLiMsHaDy
Feb 14 2012 - 10:22pm
No- I'm saying that she was "dressed" by someone as they all are, her statement about the Gulf War was entirely "apolitical" meaning that that she was only talking about getting (USAns) "babies" back home and rather general prattle that indicated a total unawareness of the real situation like 99% of the audience she performed for.
I'm saying that it was HER VOICE that made the bombastic anthem tolerable to listen to for the first time in its history. I'm saying that she did not undertake to be a role model for your expectations. I'm saying that people should stop criticizing a dead woman for what they wanted her to do and be and say. It's too late for her to change a thing that she has done. Go after the remaining demonic hellraisors - there are plenty left.
And, there should be neither deification nor damnation from the people.
Posted by Nanothermite
Feb 15 2012 - 12:09am
I, too, have long been disgusted with the deification of dead celebrities, especially when they hasten their own deaths through Darwin-award lifestyle choices like drug abuse. At the time Nixon died, I still watched MSM news and couldn't believe no one mentioned the "W" word (Watergate). When Reagan died, I avoided the MSM in order to protect myself from Reagan hagiography.
Aesthetics are always at least in part a matter of personal preference, but I was never a Whitney Houston fan and won't pretend to be one now. Her first hit single, released when she was 20 years old, was "Saving All My Love for You," about a woman having an affair with a married man. . .a first impression in bad taste. At the time I was in high school and an admirer of the multitalented Erica Gimpel (who played Coco on "Fame"). To me, Ms. Gimpel was especially compelling as a young woman because she conveyed sexiness and innocence equally well, and sang with actual emotion. Innocence and emotion were qualities I never perceived in "belting = feeling" Ms. Houston. When Ms. Gimpel sang "Be Your Own Hero," I believed she meant it. When Ms. Houston sang "The Greatest Love of All" (originally recorded by George Benson with much more feeling and much less ego), I heard her subtext as "I'm wonderful. . .and you're not." Yet Ms. Houston apparently didn't love herself enough to avoid drug abuse.
We are all human, and, as such, all capable of good and evil. Death does not automatically make us saints, but merely confirms our shared humanity.
"Innocence in white chiffon
You can't save it once it's gone"
(from "Be Your Own Hero")
Posted by mun
Feb 14 2012 - 11:46am
She was just a person. A great voice yes, but helped by her birth into a bit of a musical dynasty. Go listen to the words of Lennon's 'All You Need is Love' and get a reality check. I doubt he would have been singing in that super bowl farce... for any amount of cash.
Posted by Galenwainwright...
Feb 13 2012 - 7:40pm
In earlier cultures, singers and bards were respected and even feared by the ruling Elite, because their performances could literally bring down a noble house.
In later times, singers and other performers were regarded as a slightly more socially acceptable form of common criminal. Entertaining, but not to be trusted.
In today's Corporate controlled pseudo-culture, singers are nothing more than product. They are near deified, worshiped by uncritical masses, and their all to frequent deaths due to substance abuse routinely displace the critical information about a collapsing empire.
Something is seriously screwed up here folks.
Posted by Dante
Feb 13 2012 - 8:58pm
I just loved this woman's voice. May she rest in peace...
Thomas Gilbert-
Posted by 100thmonkey
Feb 14 2012 - 4:15pm
Yes, Thank you Dante.
RIP Whitney
Posted by PetMuse
Feb 13 2012 - 9:34pm
Hey folks
Hate to break it to you, but singers, artists, et al, have always been controlled by corporate. It's how everything gets sold to make money, since the beginning of it all. Centuries ago, there were those that were substantial in their art, though funded by the 1%. Back then, the Vatican was the primary source. But there were other private patrons as well, like the bankers, the Medici family, a political dynasty and banking family in Florence, late 14th century.
Perhaps in the early days of nineteenth and early twentieth century, it was more a 'company' doing the wheeling & dealing, but the same paradigm none-the-less.
Look to the artists, no matter the discipline, who struggled and made no money in their lifetime. They didn't play by the rules, hence, they lost out on the $$$.
But those who stayed true to themselves, and their art, live on through their art.
Point is, as I've told students time & again: want to be an artist, or musician: don't give up the day job, lest you are willing to sell all of your soul to the 'man'.
Peace
Pet
Posted by mun
Feb 14 2012 - 11:53am
Absolutely correct. Art and financial gain are the antithesis of one another. That's why today's music scene - benefitting from advanced sound technologies that the greats of the 60s could not even dream of - turns out so much mindless pap! 'It's that old devil called greed.'
Posted by Transition Analyst
Feb 13 2012 - 11:37pm
Whitney Houston, Chris Hedges, Martin King, Michael Jackson, Ted Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln and legions of others are blessed with rare gifts of communication. Their gifts remain, using ordinary words, through arrangement and sound they lift us, connecting our Spirit Eternal, Perhaps, they are the angels who live amongst us.
For Whitney, all the days of this earth are in, She is home now. Reality reigns, Her voice, forever a bridge, to the secret place of Spirit that reside in all of us.
Posted by gardenernorcal
Feb 14 2012 - 11:45am
I wouldn't expect anything less from any corporation that owned the rights to her works. Her estate will receive increased royalties in return. It's how the "business" works.
Posted by mun
Feb 14 2012 - 11:54am
Yes. As was often said of Elvis, death is a smart career move... espcially once the career is flagging to a total stop.
Posted by sLiMsHaDy
Feb 14 2012 - 2:13pm
Yes, indeed. Sad but very true. Of course, one can not participate by not buying anything as "tribute". I like my own memories that a free video on the internet can bring back, as has been the case several times over the past few days. Shit on Sony.
Posted by clearbluesky
Feb 14 2012 - 6:06pm
Yes, indeed she had the most incredibly beautiful voice and strength of spirit. I believe RIP means exactly that rest in peace.
25 Comments so far
Show AllIn 1991 The U.S. was fighting the Persian Gulf War at the time, and Whitney Houston stood at the microphone of Super Bowl XXV to sing the national anthem in a red, white and blue track suit. The field was filled with military personnel. Thousands of spectators clutched American flags in the stands.
Another shining example of how militarism is so interconnected with the world of sports. Since Iraq never invaded the United States in 1991 nor even threatened to do so against the world's lone superpower, one has to wonder at the lack of any kind of critical thinking of so many Americans whenever they are so quick to accept what the government tells them especially when the U.S. invades and bombs third world countries. What the government and the military just loves is when celebrities like Ms. Houston make statements like this:
"If you were there, you could feel the intensity," Houston later said. "You know, we were in the Gulf War at the time. It was an intense time for a country. A lot of our daughters and sons were overseas fighting. I could see, in the stadium, I could see the fear, the hope, the intensity, the prayers going up, you know, and I just felt like this is the moment. And it was hope, we needed hope, you know, to bring our babies home and that's what it was about for me, that what I felt when I sang that song, and the overwhelming love coming out of the stands was incredible."
People like Ms. Houston certainly made the government's job of spreading propaganda about another one of their unjustifiable wars that much easier. If Ms. Houston was really concerned about "bring [ing] our babies home" then she should have been speaking out against that idiotic war instead of being a cheerleader for it. The irony about her statement is that the sanctions that the United States imposed upon Iraq subsequent to the invasion resulted in the deaths of at least 500,000 Iraqi children. That inconvenient fact is something that Ms. Houston and her devoted fans would much rather ignore than address.
Ms. Houston may have been a great singer but her politics left a hell of a lot to be desired.
I wonder how much she got paid.
Great comment by the way.
Despite what may be the gal's flaws on the Persian Guf War, this last hit truly hit the mark.
Correction may be in order. I had the idea that Whitney Houston's last hit was called "vulture capitlaism," if not I withdraw the comment in reference to that matter-- thanks to all.
Good post Erroll, although terribly politically impolite in this column which mirrors the Huffington Post 85% of the time. I do not feel uplifted by anyone's untimely death but i feel much worse about people who put themselves on the line for a higher cause and end up in a black site.
Why does it need to be cleared up here that Sony is the bad guy, as opposed to Apple by the way????? And to think i thought Sony was a humanitarian organization.
Whitney Houston was an incredible woman - one of the fine black women who broke through to the masses and kept the road paved for so many other women and black artists to be accepted. She had an incredible voice and she was gorgeous.
She also had problems with drugs and alcohol like so many artists. She could have had a few more decades. I've enjoyed her music and her acting. It's sad she's gone.
May she RIP. She'll be remembered for her great talent and for her great accomplishments.
I refuse to hold singing the national anthem against her.
"She had an incredible voice and she was gorgeous." She may have indeed been a superb singer but I do not think that the fact that she was "gorgeous" is something that she should be held in high esteem for as that was more an accident of birth rather than a major accomplishment by Ms. Houston. She most certainly, however, could have been praised if she would have had the courage to say that she would not sing the national anthem when the Persian Gulf War was going on. Another African-American from a by-gone era had something to say about this:
"Cowardice asks the question-is it safe? Expediency asks the question-is it politic? Vanity asks the question-is it popular? But conscience asks the question-is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right."-Martin Luther King, Jr.
I will admire the author of the above statement rather than Ms. Houston as she chose to take the popular position while Dr. King chose, in his Beyond Vietnam speech in 1967, the position that was neither safe nor politic nor popular but rather right because he, unlike Ms. Houston, had a conscience.
That was beautiful but you have to realize both Dr King and Ms.Houston (once beautiful too) died from the same bullet.
And I will stand with you on this. She absolutely seized her moment in time. Unforgettable; that voice.
It's rather sad that the topic of this article concerns exploitation by shitty corporations and yet many choose to degrade the departed lady who gave voice to beauty and soul.
sLiMsHaDy states that "It's rather sad that the topic of this article concerns exploitation by shitty corporations and yet many choose to degrade the departed lady who gave voice to beauty and soul." I suggest that you re-read what I had written as I conceded that Ms. Houston was indeed a great singer. But as Galenwainwright correctly notes, I am certainly not going to do what so many Americans do and that is engage in the deification of dead celebrities, as was seen when Ronald Reagan died and everyone, liberals and conservatives alike, pretended that he was as pure as the driven snow.
As I attempted to point out in my comments, Ms. Houston appeared to support the Persian Gulf War in 1991 as seen by her singing of the national anthem during the Super Bowl in 1991 and also by her patriotic comments about supporting the troops which followed afterward in an interview. As this is supposed to be a progressive web site I fail to see how my criticizing Ms. Houston for supporting that unjust war is somehow supposed to be proof that I was allegedly degrading her. Since Ms. Houston was a public figure that then means that her political views should be open to criticism. I rather doubt that the families of those Iraqi children who had died because medical supplies were unable to reach them due to the embargo set up by the United States in 1991 would agree with Ms. Houston's position on the Persian Gulf War.
Erroll and others, I agree with many if not all of the political conclusions made here, but the public figure is gone; she has most recently departed. I'd be willing to to guess that her statement following her Super Bowl appearance weren't even necessarily her own words and thoughts, it was likely coached and the whole thing was staged. Furthermore, I don't really think that she had any particular political stance; none that I can recall, She just didn't operate on that plane. The plane that she did operate on had a crash landing; she did not survive.
In our perfect dream world, everyone would know what is right from wrong, and be able to express and share POVs in a meaningful and productive way. Our perfect world doesn't exist. It seems unlikely that it ever will. I mourn the tragic death and loss of a singular talent; I appreciated her art for the sake of art - period -
The topic of the article relates to the exploitation by Sony Music. Pretty disgusting, but that's how these fat-cats roll. Peace to all.
Please do not attempt to put a spin on what she did when you claim that: "I'd be willing to to guess that her statement following her Super Bowl appearance weren't even necessarily her own words and thoughts, it was likely coached and the whole thing was staged. Furthermore, I don't really think that she had any particular political stance; none that I can recall..."
Are you really trying to claim that it was just a gigantic coincidence that she happened to sing the National Anthem while wearing a red, white and blue track suit? Or perhaps you would have us believe that someone put a gun to her head to not only wear that patriotic outfit that she had on but to also say what she did in that interview. I think not especially given the fact that I have not come across any information where she had retracted those statements that she had made in that interview.
As I stated in another post, since Ms. Houston was a public figure then her perceived views on the Persian Gulf War should then be allowed and argued as a matter of public discourse especially on a web site which discusses such matters as war and politics.
No- I'm saying that she was "dressed" by someone as they all are, her statement about the Gulf War was entirely "apolitical" meaning that that she was only talking about getting (USAns) "babies" back home and rather general prattle that indicated a total unawareness of the real situation like 99% of the audience she performed for.
I'm saying that it was HER VOICE that made the bombastic anthem tolerable to listen to for the first time in its history. I'm saying that she did not undertake to be a role model for your expectations. I'm saying that people should stop criticizing a dead woman for what they wanted her to do and be and say. It's too late for her to change a thing that she has done. Go after the remaining demonic hellraisors - there are plenty left.
And, there should be neither deification nor damnation from the people.
I, too, have long been disgusted with the deification of dead celebrities, especially when they hasten their own deaths through Darwin-award lifestyle choices like drug abuse. At the time Nixon died, I still watched MSM news and couldn't believe no one mentioned the "W" word (Watergate). When Reagan died, I avoided the MSM in order to protect myself from Reagan hagiography.
Aesthetics are always at least in part a matter of personal preference, but I was never a Whitney Houston fan and won't pretend to be one now. Her first hit single, released when she was 20 years old, was "Saving All My Love for You," about a woman having an affair with a married man. . .a first impression in bad taste. At the time I was in high school and an admirer of the multitalented Erica Gimpel (who played Coco on "Fame"). To me, Ms. Gimpel was especially compelling as a young woman because she conveyed sexiness and innocence equally well, and sang with actual emotion. Innocence and emotion were qualities I never perceived in "belting = feeling" Ms. Houston. When Ms. Gimpel sang "Be Your Own Hero," I believed she meant it. When Ms. Houston sang "The Greatest Love of All" (originally recorded by George Benson with much more feeling and much less ego), I heard her subtext as "I'm wonderful. . .and you're not." Yet Ms. Houston apparently didn't love herself enough to avoid drug abuse.
We are all human, and, as such, all capable of good and evil. Death does not automatically make us saints, but merely confirms our shared humanity.
"Innocence in white chiffon
You can't save it once it's gone"
(from "Be Your Own Hero")
She was just a person. A great voice yes, but helped by her birth into a bit of a musical dynasty. Go listen to the words of Lennon's 'All You Need is Love' and get a reality check. I doubt he would have been singing in that super bowl farce... for any amount of cash.
In earlier cultures, singers and bards were respected and even feared by the ruling Elite, because their performances could literally bring down a noble house.
In later times, singers and other performers were regarded as a slightly more socially acceptable form of common criminal. Entertaining, but not to be trusted.
In today's Corporate controlled pseudo-culture, singers are nothing more than product. They are near deified, worshiped by uncritical masses, and their all to frequent deaths due to substance abuse routinely displace the critical information about a collapsing empire.
Something is seriously screwed up here folks.
I just loved this woman's voice. May she rest in peace...
Thomas Gilbert-
Yes, Thank you Dante.
RIP Whitney
Hey folks
Hate to break it to you, but singers, artists, et al, have always been controlled by corporate. It's how everything gets sold to make money, since the beginning of it all. Centuries ago, there were those that were substantial in their art, though funded by the 1%. Back then, the Vatican was the primary source. But there were other private patrons as well, like the bankers, the Medici family, a political dynasty and banking family in Florence, late 14th century.
Perhaps in the early days of nineteenth and early twentieth century, it was more a 'company' doing the wheeling & dealing, but the same paradigm none-the-less.
Look to the artists, no matter the discipline, who struggled and made no money in their lifetime. They didn't play by the rules, hence, they lost out on the $$$.
But those who stayed true to themselves, and their art, live on through their art.
Point is, as I've told students time & again: want to be an artist, or musician: don't give up the day job, lest you are willing to sell all of your soul to the 'man'.
Peace
Pet
Absolutely correct. Art and financial gain are the antithesis of one another. That's why today's music scene - benefitting from advanced sound technologies that the greats of the 60s could not even dream of - turns out so much mindless pap! 'It's that old devil called greed.'
Whitney Houston, Chris Hedges, Martin King, Michael Jackson, Ted Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln and legions of others are blessed with rare gifts of communication. Their gifts remain, using ordinary words, through arrangement and sound they lift us, connecting our Spirit Eternal, Perhaps, they are the angels who live amongst us.
For Whitney, all the days of this earth are in, She is home now. Reality reigns, Her voice, forever a bridge, to the secret place of Spirit that reside in all of us.
I wouldn't expect anything less from any corporation that owned the rights to her works. Her estate will receive increased royalties in return. It's how the "business" works.
Yes. As was often said of Elvis, death is a smart career move... espcially once the career is flagging to a total stop.
Yes, indeed. Sad but very true. Of course, one can not participate by not buying anything as "tribute". I like my own memories that a free video on the internet can bring back, as has been the case several times over the past few days. Shit on Sony.
Yes, indeed she had the most incredibly beautiful voice and strength of spirit. I believe RIP means exactly that rest in peace.