Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
- Are JPMorgan's Losses a Canary in a Coal Mine?
Popular content
Today's Top News
To the UC Chancellor: Pepper-Spraying, Baton-Wielding Riot Police Do Not Constitute “A Safe Welcoming Environment”

In the wake of the horrific assault by police against UC Davis students protesting "in the highest tradition of non-violent civil disobedience," an open outraged letter from faculty member Nathan Brown calling for the resignation of chancellor Linda Katehi, who Brown calls "the primary threat to the safety of students at UC Davis." Wow.
Open Letter to Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi
Linda P.B. Katehi,
I am a junior faculty member at UC Davis. I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of English, and I teach in the Program in Critical Theory and in Science & Technology Studies. I have a strong record of research, teaching, and service. I am currently a Board Member of the Davis Faculty Association. I have also taken an active role in supporting the student movement to defend public education on our campus and throughout the UC system. In a word: I am the sort of young faculty member, like many of my colleagues, this campus needs. I am an asset to the University of California at Davis.
You are not.
I write to you and to my colleagues for three reasons:
1) to express my outrage at the police brutality which occurred against students engaged in peaceful protest on the UC Davis campus today
2) to hold you accountable for this police brutality
3) to demand your immediate resignation
Today you ordered police onto our campus to clear student protesters from the quad. These were protesters who participated in a rally speaking out against tuition increases and police brutality on UC campuses on Tuesday—a rally that I organized, and which was endorsed by the Davis Faculty Association. These students attended that rally in response to a call for solidarity from students and faculty who were bludgeoned with batons, hospitalized, and arrested at UC Berkeley last week. In the highest tradition of non-violent civil disobedience, those protesters had linked arms and held their ground in defense of tents they set up beside Sproul Hall. In a gesture of solidarity with those students and faculty, and in solidarity with the national Occupy movement, students at UC Davis set up tents on the main quad. When you ordered police outfitted with riot helmets, brandishing batons and teargas guns to remove their tents today, those students sat down on the ground in a circle and linked arms to protect them.
Without any provocation whatsoever, other than the bodies of these students sitting where they were on the ground, with their arms linked, police pepper-sprayed students. Students remained on the ground, now writhing in pain, with their arms linked.
What happened next?
Police used batons to try to push the students apart. Those they could separate, they arrested, kneeling on their bodies and pushing their heads into the ground. Those they could not separate, they pepper-sprayed directly in the face, holding these students as they did so. When students covered their eyes with their clothing, police forced open their mouths and pepper-sprayed down their throats. Several of these students were hospitalized. Others are seriously injured. One of them, forty-five minutes after being pepper-sprayed down his throat, was still coughing up blood.
This is what happened. You are responsible for it.
You are responsible for it because this is what happens when UC Chancellors order police onto our campuses to disperse peaceful protesters through the use of force: students get hurt. Faculty get hurt. One of the most inspiring things (inspiring for those of us who care about students who assert their rights to free speech and peaceful assembly) about the demonstration in Berkeley on November 9 is that UC Berkeley faculty stood together with students, their arms linked together. Associate Professor of English Celeste Langan was grabbed by her hair, thrown on the ground, and arrested. Associate Professor Geoffrey O’Brien was injured by baton blows. Professor Robert Hass, former Poet Laureate of the United States, National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize winner, was also struck with a baton. These faculty stood together with students in solidarity, and they too were beaten and arrested by the police. In writing this letter, I stand together with those faculty and with the students they supported.
One week after this happened at UC Berkeley, you ordered police to clear tents from the quad at UC Davis. When students responded in the same way—linking arms and holding their ground—police also responded in the same way: with violent force. The fact is: the administration of UC campuses systematically uses police brutality to terrorize students and faculty, to crush political dissent on our campuses, and to suppress free speech and peaceful assembly. Many people know this. Many more people are learning it very quickly.
You are responsible for the police violence directed against students on the UC Davis quad on November 18, 2011. As I said, I am writing to hold you responsible and to demand your immediate resignation on these grounds.
On Wednesday November 16, you issued a letter by email to the campus community. In this letter, you discussed a hate crime which occurred at UC Davis on Sunday November 13. In this letter, you express concern about the safety of our students. You write, “it is particularly disturbing that such an act of intolerance should occur at a time when the campus community is working to create a safe and inviting space for all our students.” You write, “while these are turbulent economic times, as a campus community, we must all be committed to a safe, welcoming environment that advances our efforts to diversity and excellence at UC Davis.”
I will leave it to my colleagues and every reader of this letter to decide what poses a greater threat to “a safe and inviting space for all our students” or “a safe, welcoming environment” at UC Davis: 1) Setting up tents on the quad in solidarity with faculty and students brutalized by police at UC Berkeley? or 2) Sending in riot police to disperse students with batons, pepper-spray, and tear-gas guns, while those students sit peacefully on the ground with their arms linked? Is this what you have in mind when you refer to creating “a safe and inviting space?” Is this what you have in mind when you express commitment to “a safe, welcoming environment?”
I am writing to tell you in no uncertain terms that there must be space for protest on our campus. There must be space for political dissent on our campus. There must be space for civil disobedience on our campus. There must be space for students to assert their right to decide on the form of their protest, their dissent, and their civil disobedience—including the simple act of setting up tents in solidarity with other students who have done so. There must be space for protest and dissent, especially, when the object of protest and dissent is police brutality itself. You may not order police to forcefully disperse student protesters peacefully protesting police brutality. You may not do so. It is not an option available to you as the Chancellor of a UC campus. That is why I am calling for your immediate resignation.
Your words express concern for the safety of our students. Your actions express no concern whatsoever for the safety of our students. I deduce from this discrepancy that you are not, in fact, concerned about the safety of our students. Your actions directly threaten the safety of our students. And I want you to know that this is clear. It is clear to anyone who reads your campus emails concerning our “Principles of Community” and who also takes the time to inform themselves about your actions. You should bear in mind that when you send emails to the UC Davis community, you address a body of faculty and students who are well trained to see through rhetoric that evinces care for students while implicitly threatening them. I see through your rhetoric very clearly. You also write to a campus community that knows how to speak truth to power. That is what I am doing.
I call for your resignation because you are unfit to do your job. You are unfit to ensure the safety of students at UC Davis. In fact: you are the primary threat to the safety of students at UC Davis. As such, I call upon you to resign immediately.
Sincerely,
Nathan Brown
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Program in Critical Theory
University of California at Davis

102 Comments so far
Show AllAn excellent and most necessary letter. It would be difficult to comprehend how anyone could not conclude after looking at this video that this country is tilting quite heavily toward being a fascist state as evidenced by the stormtroopers carrying out their message of brutality aimed at those students which apparently has been approved by those who are in power.
If only more faculty members would see fit to add their names alongside that of Nathan Brown.
Tilting toward becoming a fascist state? That statement must rank among the greatest understatements of our time. Amerika has been a fascist state since the Bush/Cheney/SCOTUS coup d'tat in 2000.
You're shitting me.
Try Friday, November 23, 1963, when JFK forgot to duck.
This made me laugh and touche. One could very agreeably argue the truth in that statement.
Having experienced police brutality on UC campuses during the 60s and having been an assistant professor at a major public university (heavily dependent upon federal research funding) denied tenure for failing to buy in to the groupthink that it takes to advance in that "culture" I hope Professor Brown is able to change the university culture or redirect his career path.
Good call.
But it was Nov 22nd.
sj
There's a petition you can sign asking for the Chancellor's resignation, it's already got 18K signatures:
http://www.change.org/petitions/police-pepper-spray-peaceful-uc-davis-students-ask-chancellor-katehi-to-resign
You could normally email the Chancellor here, but I can't seem to get the page to load:
chancellor.ucdavis.edu/contact.php
You can also contact the Police Department to about their actions and ask for the firing of Lt. John Pike: http://cityofdavis.org/police/contact.cfm
Here is an interview with one of the pepper-sprayed students, which revels how much John Pike relished doing his job in this case: http://boingboing.net/2011/11/20/ucdeyetwitness.html
..
These students consist of mostly minors, I want to report some child abuse you fucking pigs!
You are heroic. Thank you very, very, very much for the letter and for taking a stand against violent oppression. There is an epidemic of cowardice in our country. We are not the land of the free and home of the brave. We are a land of police brutality and of cowards who acquiesce to it.
An excellent letter. Beautifully stated and moving. Thank you.
These are the times which will define how the fall of empire will proceed, and I fear that the more those in privileged positions do nothing while the violence of the state increases in proportion to its decline, we will be in great danger.
It is letters like these, that sound the moral and ethical voice of dissent, that will protect many lives as we slide down the path of political and economic collapse, not only of the US, but of the entire ecosystem.
I don't know if I'm sad that there are so few courageous citizens like Nathan Brown, or if I'm glad that we at least have the occasional hero.
Welcome to AmeriKKKa! Do as we say, not as we do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjfhOPCPJnE&feature=youtu.be
Will it take another Kent State before you finally decide to defend yourselves from these State sanctioned, authorized, armed and equipped predators?
Watch the video again, Galenwainwright. The students used a human megaphone to tell the police that they (the students) would give them a few minutes of peace in order for the police to leave. The students chanted "You can go!" in unison. The police then decided to leave.
You would presumably have preferred to see the students use force to try to defend themselves against the police. The consequences of such actions are clear. As I've said before, if you truly believe that this is the time to use violence against the police, then just go ahead and do it.
No, I'm saying that there will be another Police execution of innocents.
The Elite, their Government and Political puppets, and their pet goon squad (the Police) have succeeded in the utter domestication of the human spirit, to the point of even contemplating standing up to the abuses and assaults of the Police is now considered social heresy of the blackest sort.
Let me ask you something: If you saw a child torturing an animal, would you stop them? Or inform 'The Authorities(tm)' and let them take care of it?
Now extrapolate the following - imagine that you are witness to an adult beating a child so severely that there is a probability of maiming or death. Do you still stand by and do nothing? Would you still 'just call the cops' and let them 'take care of it'?
Now what if it WAS a cop doing the beating? WHo do you call? Because you KNOW, beyond even the suggestion of a shadow of a doubt that there is NO-ONE to call! You can't get a corrupt system to reform itself.
And you sure as shit can't negotiate with them to stop, or even minutely improve their behavior. Negotiations happen between equals, or PERCEIVED equals. As a nation, as a society, as a culture, collectively we have abandoned the power to hold those we granted authority to control us responsible for their actions.
Name me just one time, ONE TIME, especially in the past ten years a protest of ANY kind has shamed the Government, Corporations or the Police into changing ANY of their attitudes,practices or policies.
Oh providence, there is a GOD!
SOMEONE GETS IT! Someone understands that protecting your family (or innocents) is completely reasonable under the right circumstances!
Hey, I second this motion. Obvilously this is a case that needs rapid attention. As a business person, since that's supposed to be everything today, I'll take this jerk's job for three times the salary and a golden parachute contract to be paid by all Wall Street affiliated pimps representing the pampered power elites interests in this area, the rest of California and all others who want to chip in--a 10 million dollar year salary paid for by these psychopaths with me gettting a bonus anytime I choose sound like it ought to be about right-- thanks one per centers for your support. I'll gladly hand a certain sum of your ill gotten gains to the other 99% and continue the fight against Satan in its human form, you-- again it's been great not getting to know you.
Oh, and I must not leave out I'll seek legal advice on how to get prosecutions and or personal injury cases launched against all said perpetrators of gross violations of human rights, something some don't seem to grasp the concept of but a little money out of their bank accounts could begin to help them out.
It will take another Kent state and I can't wait to see how the nation spins it. Immediately after the students died in 1970, the message proclaimed was that the reserve was fired upon and felt threatened - so they shot and killed students hundreds of feet away, some walking to class. A soldier was quoted as taking aim on a target who wasn't protesting, just walking to class, some 300 feet away - who he then shot and killed. About 30% of their shots fired were hits and those that lived did so through a great price (paralysis) or great luck (to the head or neck). Even now, with photographic and audio evidence, along with 100's of witnesses, it's still ignored how obviously criminal this was. I KNOW that if this should happen again, our great nation will obscure it or perhaps do as in 1970; send in an armed agent agitator to begin the massacre or to be the preventative backup in case of overwhelming negative response by citizens. I want to see just how oblivious our nation will be when they hear about it in the news, then quickly forget it as immigration or gays are injected into the conversation.
Most Americans were appalled and infuriated that so FEW students were killed at Kent State. Don't kid yourself about Americans.
I don't know about "most", but I'm old enough to remember that a significant chunk of people thought they got what they deserved. I'm not sure that it would be so different today. I can hear Rush and Hannity and O'Reilly praising the brave armed thugs that gun down the traitorous protesters. Just watch.
Very true. Most americans were appalled not enough long haired dope smoking hippie communists were killed,wounded or arrested and gaoled.
"The dispensing of injustice is always in the right hands."
—Stanislaw Lec , Unkempt Thoughts, 1957
I have to agree with you.
Too many people equate "force" with "violence." They would ask us to believe that a rapist who uses force to harm an innocent person, and a woman who uses force to protect herself from that rapist, are morally equivalent. I think only a moron could hold that view. "Violence" is the illegitimate use of force to harm an innocent person; "Self-defense" is the legitimate use of force to prevent harm to yourself (an innocent person) or another innocent person.
Force and violence are NOT synonymous.
Why do you think that the "1%" have "educated" people to believe that passivity is "non-violence." and that "non-violence" is a supreme virtue -- while they, themselves, respond with overwhelming force to the least sign of disobedience? It's the same reason a rapist says, "Lay still and I won't hurt you."
Look, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and certainly trumps traffic laws and park regulations. Police officers attacking the protestors are acting unlawfully. They're not cops anymore; they're criminals. Every human being has a legal and moral right to protect himself or herself from a criminal assault, and to protect another innocent third person from such an assault. The fact that the crime is being committed "under the color of law" makes no difference.
When the protestors out-number the police 5 or 10 to 1 it is absurd to allow the cops to ride roughshod over them with utter impunity. If the protestors were to ACT together with same conviction they demonstrated to remaining PASSIVE, police brutality like this would quickly become a thing of the past.
liberty & justice,
sj
But you don't understand! The thugs savagely attacking these kids had silver, shiny badges! And blue uniforms! Of course, you can't stand up to these people, with their shiny badges... when will you ever learn? They can do whatever they want, because they have the state-ordained right to the legitimate use of violence. And they are the only ones with that right! Now, be quiet and passively accept your beatings like a good little pacifist.
Don't get caught in the "campus protest" trap!
UC campuses are NOT your home, your city, your State, or your Empire.
They are temporary and ever-fluctuating communities of transient students. Students seeking either higher or tertiary education.
These temporary communities are ALWAYS housed within existing, perpetual communities -like Berkeley, Davis, etc.
Go to these communities for actions such as this.
"Campus protest" kills movements by draining their effort and energy resources below the critical line needed to establish a self-renewing social machine.
This has been realized since the mid-'60s (at least) and proven since 1968 (at least).
There's plenty of room for protests both within and without college and university campuses. The more, the better.
Campus protest drains the energy of social movements.
This is proven by history.
"The more, the better" does not hold if the resources of the movement are not up to making all the actions successes AND coordinating them and building a network from such coordination.
You can argue that OWS has those resources -though I would argue they do not.
But you can't just assert that it's all good without a backing argument at all.
What they heck use is that?
Agreed. My student activism and my being an all around pain in the ass to the administration taught me invaluable tools in later organizing.
It also taught me that those that profess to be authorities in positions of institutional power are more often than not, functionaries of the existing status quo and cretinous scum.
A healthy dose of having a "go fuck yourself" attitude to those in power is essential for participatory democracy to replace this pathetic sham of our "Democracy".
You do understand that this is a different question than the one my post raised, yes?
My own activism in my own student days taught me similar things.
And of course your last sentence is true.
But, I was referring to how such activities on university campuses effect specific movements.
The movements of my time (basically 1999-2004) failed miserably to achieve their goals. I WATCHED, with my own eyes, the attempt to forge an organization around an ever-shifting group of transients concurrently undergoing their social "finding themselves" period (students) contribute to these failures. Since then, I have studied the matter and concluded from my reading of history that "campus protests" drain movements and isolate them at the same time -that this is a general rule.
From the point of view of the individual and collective Student, learning some lessons is a positive outcome -they are students after all. ;)
From the point of view of individual non-students and Society as a whole, we need at least one of these movements to become the Revolution and for Society to be renewed and re-invigorated through that.
We've already learned the lessons, now we need the victories.
As I replied to John Mitchell, if the movement really has the resources to handle "the more, the better" then let's do it.
But let us not just ASSUME the gas tank is full before we set out on that long drive, let's check the gauge, shall we?
And if it is NOT full, let's stop and fill up before we set off, yes?
Because one of these flippin' times, the goal needs to be to actually get there, not just learn a lesson from the attempt.
Why do the police get a pass for "Just following orders"? WTF, this sounds like the Nazis at the Neurenburg trials. It's a sad commentary on modern civilization(?) when modern storm troopers will commit crimes against their own neighbors.
Here's a hint: The Fascists won WW II.
Hit. Nail. Head.
Nathan Brown is clearly both principled and brave. It will be interesting to see how many other faculty members join him in calling for the resignation of chancellor Katehi.
The Wikipedia page on chancellor Katehi doesn't mention this protest at the moment. It does, however, praise her liberal credentials, including:
*) The creation of “Beyond Tolerance Tuesday,” ... for ... a more inclusive community.
*) A collaboration with the Museum of Tolerance to confront hate and bias.
*) The creation of a speakers series and the Civility Project ...
Ah, the hypocrisy of contemporary liberalism.
Nathan may be fired for this letter. If so that will further show the true colors of those in power. One thing the OWS movement has done is force the hand of the powerful. The moves of the !% shout out loud that we are not in a free country. What has not been found out yet is what kind of force Obama would let the police use if a group of 10 000 pressed forward at the barricades. That is; the second wave pushes forward after the first has been sprayed and clubbed and then the third wave and so on. If the bullets fly then we are in Egypt or Syria etc. Wouldn't that be a splash of cold water on our faces. Good show Nathan; we all wish you the best. You have acted on principle and stood fast to your principles.
I was going to ask if the man had tenure, or if he had already been fired.
Not that tenure protects those whom it's supposed to protect anymore...
Tenure is almost always awarded along with promotion to associate professor. This guy's only an assistant professor. His days are numbered. But of course you're right; tenure didn't protect Ward Churchill or any number of leftists in the 1950s.
Look at those fascists tuck tail and run like curs! Very telling, for all you pacifists out there, the looks on the cops faces during the spraying and after the crowd surrounded them. First they looked amused, especially when the hippies were yelling "shame on you". They have no shame. Stop trying to appeal to their humanity. This wasn't a misunderstanding. The latter expression was definetely fear; fear of an implicit threat (What if they aren't Gandhians!?); fear followed by retreat.
Tap:
I agree, attempts to appeal to these (or any) officers' humanity is useless. While they're wielding their spray and swinging those batons, I believe they become automatons.
When the students implemented the "people's mic" , gave them their moment of silence, and then kept telling the officers "You can go!!" - I thought they looked kind of confused and embarrassed. I think perhaps it was because the students (even those in the crowd) were very disciplined. Everyone remained non-violent. What do you want to bet that they were confused / ashamed because one of their goals was to provoke the students to violence. Their attempt failed miserably!
Most, if not all, cops are conservative. Give them weapons and a uniform and anyone to oppose and they become in fact what before they only, secretly, dreamed of being: Fascist thugs.
"Most, if not all, cops are conservative."
Yes, but many, if not a majority, of them are Dims too.
For the first time in forty years of watching my country devolve into a fascist state [we are not quite there yet, I hope] I am encouraged, and hopeful. This Occupy movement is doing more to erase irrelevant social boundaries than anything has ever done. This young, idealistic professor is part of the hope for that future. He will probably 'not be re-hired'. I doubt that he will be openly sacked. Academia is usually slower and more deliberate than that. But profs like him have been eased out of the system for years. I have intimate knowledge of this. His brash courage is all the more notable because he, too, knows this. As the gloves come off, and the Homeland Insecurity thugs combine with the Feebs to encourage local police departments to assault demonstrators with 'non-lethal' weapons, we will see how well the mass media propaganda machine does its job. Will the idiot box talking heads persuade most americans to be amerikkans, or will enough people be outraged by police brutality, and ultimately, killing, to stand up for integrity? Will the populace demand redress, or more fucking on tv? The answer to this question will determine the final fate of our descent into fascism. It is blowing in the wind.
BTW, watch the video. The shape of this thug's helmet is no accident.
What are those things they are holding, the long poll with the mounted looks like a power unit or something?
WTF, now we need gated college campuses so that these ass holes can't abuse our kids when they are off to college? It's bad enough they pull our daughters over for no reason, and young men too! These stupid bastards are in need of Mental help, until then the cops should know about it, OH, WTF, they are the cops! Chancellor! Who should be the first one arrested for child abuse?How about you? How much do you get paid? Why? Are you protecting our kids?
It makes me wonder: what if there were a high school (or younger) where students decided that, since their parents can't protest without giving up their jobs, they would protest on their behalf; and what if the principal decided to call in the cops to have the students beaten?
If they had been high schoolers they'd have been locked up for disobedience and then jailed for juvenile delinquency. The youngest are the ones from whom disrespect isn't tolerated at all. The uni students get away with it for now as the state hasn't quite hit the full on totalitarian fascist mode.
Yet.
Hey, Monday's coming...
Here is a very well made short film called I Am Not Moving which does an extremely effective job in demonstrating the hypocrisy of people like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton when they condemn the repressive policies of Libya and Syria and Iran toward their people while not uttering a peep of protest concerning the oppressive tactics used by the police across the United States against the Occupy movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBN9Lrp-GMI
Professor John Yoo, who occupies the Joseph Goebbels chair at UC Berkeley's law school, is working to supply the legal rationale for the police violence against all UC students.