Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
RFK's Mindless Menace of Violence, Still
Given Arizona, and Obama's speech, and the upcoming MLK Day, it's instructive to revisit the remarkable but little-noted speech Robert Kennedy made in Cleveland the day after King's murder in 1968, just months before he himself was killed. Deriding violence as "the voice of madness, not the voice of reason," Kennedy stressed that the victims of violence "are human beings whom other human beings loved and needed."
The whole speech:
"This is a time of shame and sorrow. It is not a day for politics. I have saved this one opportunity, my only event of today, to speak briefly to you about the mindless menace of violence in America which again stains our land and every one of our lives.
It is not the concern of any one race. The victims of the violence are black and white, rich and poor, young and old, famous and unknown. They are, most important of all, human beings whom other human beings loved and needed. No one - no matter where he lives or what he does - can be certain who will suffer from some senseless act of bloodshed. And yet it goes on and on and on in this country of ours.
Why? What has violence ever accomplished? What has it ever created? No martyr's cause has ever been stilled by an assassin's bullet.
No wrongs have ever been righted by riots and civil disorders. A sniper is only a coward, not a hero; and an uncontrolled, uncontrollable mob is only the voice of madness, not the voice of reason.
Whenever any American's life is taken by another American unnecessarily - whether it is done in the name of the law or in the defiance of the law, by one man or a gang, in cold blood or in passion, in an attack of violence or in response to violence - whenever we tear at the fabric of the life which another man has painfully and clumsily woven for himself and his children, the whole nation is degraded.
"Among free men," said Abraham Lincoln, "there can be no successful appeal from the ballot to the bullet; and those who take such appeal are sure to lose their cause and pay the costs."
Yet we seemingly tolerate a rising level of violence that ignores our common humanity and our claims to civilization alike. We calmly accept newspaper reports of civilian slaughter in far-off lands. We glorify killing on movie and television screens and call it entertainment. We make it easy for men of all shades of sanity to acquire whatever weapons and ammunition they desire.
Too often we honor swagger and bluster and wielders of force; too often we excuse those who are willing to build their own lives on the shattered dreams of others. Some Americans who preach non-violence abroad fail to practice it here at home. Some who accuse others of inciting riots have by their own conduct invited them.
Some look for scapegoats, others look for conspiracies, but this much is clear: violence breeds violence, repression brings retaliation, and only a cleansing of our whole society can remove this sickness from our soul.
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. This is the slow destruction of a child by hunger, and schools without books and homes without heat in the winter.
This is the breaking of a man's spirit by denying him the chance to stand as a father and as a man among other men. And this too afflicts us all.
I have not come here to propose a set of specific remedies nor is there a single set. For a broad and adequate outline we know what must be done. When you teach a man to hate and fear his brother, when you teach that he is a lesser man because of his color or his beliefs or the policies he pursues, when you teach that those who differ from you threaten your freedom or your job or your family, then you also learn to confront others not as fellow citizens but as enemies, to be met not with cooperation but with conquest; to be subjugated and mastered.
We learn, at the last, to look at our brothers as aliens, men with whom we share a city, but not a community; men bound to us in common dwelling, but not in common effort. We learn to share only a common fear, only a common desire to retreat from each other, only a common impulse to meet disagreement with force. For all this, there are no final answers.
Yet we know what we must do. It is to achieve true justice among our fellow citizens. The question is not what programs we should seek to enact. The question is whether we can find in our own midst and in our own hearts that leadership of humane purpose that will recognize the terrible truths of our existence.
We must admit the vanity of our false distinctions among men and learn to find our own advancement in the search for the advancement of others. We must admit in ourselves that our own children's future cannot be built on the misfortunes of others. We must recognize that this short life can neither be ennobled or enriched by hatred or revenge.
Our lives on this planet are too short and the work to be done too great to let this spirit flourish any longer in our land. Of course we cannot vanquish it with a program, nor with a resolution.
But we can perhaps remember, if only for a time, that those who live with us are our brothers, that they share with us the same short moment of life; that they seek, as do we, nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and in happiness, winning what satisfaction and fulfillment they can.
Surely, this bond of common faith, this bond of common goal, can begin to teach us something. Surely, we can learn, at least, to look at those around us as fellow men, and surely we can begin to work a little harder to bind up the wounds among us and to become in our own hearts brothers and countrymen once again."

21 Comments so far
Show AllBring America Back !!!!
***rfk had 5 years of contemplation after his
brothers jfk death, to form these words and
opinions, and to put them to oratory.
***his speech did not reach, nor impress his
killer alleged who shot at the ambassador
hotel kitchen later that year. but it is
possible his announced candidacy for the wh
impressed people similar to jfk's assassins.
sirhan b sirhaan then became another lone
gunman type killer in a cascade of others
being tailor fitted into those roles.
hence now another lone gunman pops up in the
instant arizona tragedy to fit into the mold.
guess the common theme for all these is that
the victims were of the democratic party.
I wonder if Kennedy counted the people of Cuba as victims of violence? Oh yeah... that was his (and his brother's) violence. So it doesn't count.
Violence is "the voice of madness, not the voice of reason"? Really? Would Kennedy think the power elite who employ state violence to destroy nations such as Vietnam are mad? I doubt it. Glorifying the dead Kennedys makes the left an easy target for hypocrisy.
Well said. I read the biography of RFK. LBJ was bent out of shape at RFK because he was running a "murder incorporated" (LBJ's words) in Cuba. Of course LBJ was no saint either. So a lot of this glorifying and myth creating is straw grasping. They weren't robots. They did some good but, on balance, they were imperialists and status quo defenders to the hilt.
In RFK's biography it is noted that he was himself frightened on the day MLK was killed becaquse he was in an all African-American neighborhood and, as usual when African Americans are involved, the whiggar government feared a black insurrection. RFK was warned right after MLK was killed. He knew his job as a national leader was to 'calm the natives'. He did. His speech must be seen for what it was designed to accomplish. I wish he had screamed for Hoover's head instead of trying to assuage the African American community's anger. If you think that RFK didn't know Hoover was tailing and harrassing MLK, you need to remember that RFK had been attorney general. I think RFK was afraid of Hoover. But that's another story.
300-year old, increasingly more inhumane, and ever more violent policies that this country have systematically pursued
against the common men and women domestic and international
are no mistakes or accidents.
until those are replaced with just and peaceful ones,
no amount of beautiful words will matter.
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."
J Krishnamurti
I suspect the fellow who made the quote was being polite.
It's a measure of insanity to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
Exhibit A: Mightymite's world view (paraphrased):
There isn't a thing wrong with America or Americans. We're just doing what everyone else would do if they had our power, brains, glory, marines and good old American knowhow. Yeah, we've got a few bad apple crooked politicians but who doesn't? We really are the good guys even if we have to kill a FEW bad guys every now and then to prove it. The world is a knife fight and we've got to bring a gun to it. Hey, are you lookin' at me, huh?!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Cockburn at Counterpunch just stated that one in 12 Americans is as mentally unstable as Loughner according to the shrinks. He thinks it's more. I do too.
I wonder if Mightymite & friends will ever run out of fingers to point at others when ascribing blame. Hubris doesn't DO guilt.
"...indifference, inaction and slow decay.." That about says it all.
I wonder what Robert Kennedy would think of this world? Even more, I wonder, what would the world be like if he had become President?
Whenever high profile people are shot in the United States the politicians talk about how violence solves nothing and then they return to work supporting useless slaughters in countries they know nothing about.
"Lock and load!"
"Second amendment solution!"
"You'll have to pry my gun from these cold, dead hands!"
"Shock and awe!"
"The American way!"
I posted and passed out flyers for RFK's campaign in '68 and hadn't read that speech since. There are very radical--for the USA--sentiments and ideas clearly stated that likely sealed his fate. MLK's assassination was a government operation proved by King family's 1999 civil suit. Both JFK and RFK's assassinations were subjected to government coverups that allowed the guilty to escape, just as they continue to escape today. As now, the Propaganda System abetted the government. A moot but worthy question is would RFK been able to beat back the violent Daley Machine in Chicago to gain the nomination--the Police Riot outside the Convention was ordered by Daley.
Obama is incapable of composing such a speech; indeed, I can't think of any US politician since RFK that could.
And Obama ironically hired Daley's son, William Daley, as his chief of staff. Well, maybe it's no big deal.
-TIA
I think it is wrong to throw stones at people who are dead. Who knows what they would have accomplished if they were not assassinated.
Let us heed the words spoken here and let us make these words live, first in our own hearts, then speak them into existence with our whole heart. "In the beginning was the word, and the word was made flesh and dwelt among us". If these words of wisdom and of truth spoken by Mr. Kennedy would dwell in our mouths and in our spirits, the ideals they speak to, would give a new beginning and a new strength.
And didn't his brother say "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable"?
Yes he did. And John Foster Dulles, the author of the American doctrine of brinkmanship begun after WWII and thoroughly solidified during the Eisenhower administration, didn't like those words one bit. The Dulles boys went to war with the Kennedys. You know who won.
We know what was happening then (more or less) after word leaked out decades later. It's still going on. Nothing has changed. The people wielding real power are still behind the scenes and are still coercing the nominal leaders day in and day out to keep the natives calm while our MIC wreaks havoc.
It's a wonder that things stay together.
http://www.rfkmustdie.com/
Or try this:
The Plot to Kill Robert Kennedy
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6212999048582712723
And considering it will be Martin Luther King Jr. Day in 3 days, did you ever notice that with all of these lone-nuts going on shooting sprees that we have had here, I can't think of even one of them who was black. I guess maybe white guys are much more prone to go nuts!
Interesting, thanks for the link. I'm checking it out.
What I find interesting about Shane O'Sullivans documentary is the photo proof and eye witness accounts of some Bay of Pigs CIA agents(the kind that harbored a hatred for the Kennedy's.. and had no business being in LA) hanging out in the lobby before the event, and the new audio forensic evidence showing 12-13 shots recorded on tape (exceeding Sirhan's gun's capacity of 9 bullets).
here's an article on the new evidence from the Guardian printed in 2006
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/20/usa.features11
It's a mistake to weight political speeches over political actions and history. You won't find the Kennedy administration to have shirked from instigating violence, whether in Vietnam, Cuba or Latin America. That's an important consideration when reading this speech.
RFK expresses a dread of the mobs, a common fear among U.S. elites extending back to the founding fathers' time. Probably, the protests of the day looked senseless to the Kennedys. Certainly, the authorities responded with great violence during the civil rights protests by blacks and others.
-TIA
Whoever wishes to be nostalgic about Robert Kennedy should watch "Point of Order", a movie about Senator Joseph McCarthy, to see actual movie footage of the young Robert Kennedy and his colleague Roy Cohn, as Senator McCarthy's legislative aides and henchmen, closely attending to the Senator's every wish.
An amoral opportunist? Who ever could think that?