Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
After the Quake, Depend on Women
Editor’s Note: MADRE ,
an international women's human rights group, is working with the
Haitian relief organization, Zanmi Lasante, to bring humanitarian aid
into the country overland from the Dominican Republic.
If you want to help alleviate the suffering in Haiti, give your money to the women.
In the wake of disasters like the catastrophic earthquake that struck
Haiti, it can be comforting to see big international agencies taking
charge of relief and reconstruction efforts. No doubt international
agencies—with their resources, know-how, heavy machinery, and access to
government—have a critical role to play. But large-scale relief
operations are not always best suited to meet the needs of those who
are made most vulnerable by disaster, namely, women and their children.
Women in Haiti have been made vulnerable for a constellation of
reasons. First, the Haitian population at large has been buffeted by
forces beyond their control for generations. Harmful and manipulative
international economic policies, like unfair U.S. agricultural
subsidies, disadvantage local farmers and undermine Haitian
self-sufficiency. In 2008, Haiti was slammed by a succession of four
hurricanes, spreading destruction from which it had yet to fully
recover. All this means that Haiti’s infrastructure was weak, poverty
was rampant, and people had little access to much-needed social
services.
Then, the earthquake struck.
All Haitians are suffering right now. But, women are often hardest hit
when disaster strikes because they were at a deficit even before the
catastrophe. In Haiti, and in every country, women are the poorest and
often have no safety net, leaving them most exposed to violence,
homelessness and hunger in the wake of disasters. Women are also
overwhelmingly responsible for other vulnerable people, including
infants, children, the elderly, and people who are ill or disabled.
Because of their role as caretakers and because of the discrimination
they face, women have a disproportionate need for assistance. Yet, they
are often overlooked in large-scale aid operations. In the chaos that
follows disasters, aid too often reaches those who yell the loudest or
push their way to the front of the line. When aid is distributed
through the "head of household" approach, women-headed families may not
even be recognized, and women within male-headed families may be
marginalized when aid is controlled by male relatives.
It is not enough to ensure that women receive aid. Women in communities
must also be integral to designing and carrying out relief efforts.
When relief is distributed by women, it has the best chance of reaching
those most in need. That’s not because women are morally superior. It
is because their roles as caretakers in the community means they know
where every family lives, which households have new babies or disabled
elders, and how to reach remote communities even in disaster
conditions.
Moreover, women in the community have expertise about the specific problems women and their families face during disasters.
Unfortunately, in big relief operations, already-marginalized people
are usually the ones who "fall through the cracks." After Hurricane
Katrina, for example, many battered women didn't use missing person
registries for fear that they would enable their abusers to find them.
Women’s organizations, recognizing the documented trend of a surge in
violence against women after a disaster, were able to provide community
support services for battered women.
Rather than replicating the work of existing organizations, relief and
reconstruction programs should leave resources and training in the
hands of community women who therefore become better equipped to
rebuild their lives and communities on a stronger foundation. What
Haiti needs most in the long-term is the resilience that comes from
having responsive democratic government and vibrant health, education
and social institutions. We must work with women in the wake of this
earthquake to build that resilience.
Marie St. Cyr is a MADRE board member and a longtime NYC-based
Haitian human rights advocate. Yifat Susskind is MADRE's policy and
communications director.
Related Articles:
Haitian Americans Pledge Relief After Killer Quake
US Residents Mount Humanitarian Aid to Haiti



5 Comments so far
Show All"It is not enough to ensure that women receive aid. Women in communities must also be integral to designing and carrying out relief efforts. When relief is distributed by women, it has the best chance of reaching those most in need. That’s not because women are morally superior. It is because their roles as caretakers in the community means they know where every family lives, which households have new babies or disabled elders, and how to reach remote communities even in disaster conditions.
Moreover, women in the community have expertise about the specific problems women and their families face during disasters."
This is important, thanks for calling attention to the necessity of working with women. Women are a good knowledge base logistically during this time, when people are scattered.
I read an article recently in the NYT about a central American micro-lending specialist who said that it always made more sense to lend money to women, who could generally be counted on to put it to good use.If you lent it to the men, it often got spent on booze and boogey,so to speak, and the money was wasted.Something similar seems to happen with the men who have jobs: about a third of their wages gets spent on booze, gambling, and whores.The rest goes to their families. Nice.A slightly less funky version of the same thing often happens in our 'enlightened' developed country. It has often been my experience, that if anything needs to be done, it will be the women who will do it.And get paid .78 cents on the dollar while they're doing it.
Madre is a principled organization that has stayed true to their mission for so many yrs. I started donating to Madre about 20 yrs ago and always feel that they will use my small contributions wisely.
They have my money, too. And so I feel confident it won't go to booze, whores, and bling, as ricardohead correctly points out.
Back in the day when I was a hard-ass corporate ladder climber, I attended a seminar that included a day long exercise in what we were told was "problem solving" techniques.
The "problem" was surviving a plane crash in the Canadian tundra. We were given test forms to complete individually and then organized in teams to work together on the problem. Team scores were overwhelmingly higher than individual scores.
We were then told that this test had been given to a wide range of control groups, some of whom were special forces and other survival experts. The group that had the all-time highest score was...
a team of single mothers from an inner city ghetto.
The shrink that ran this show explained that the real point of this exercise was demonstrating the counter-intuitive fact that focused, cooperative teamwork almost invariably out performs competitive individual expertise. (Men like me would too often spend more effort on gaining and keeping control than reaching the solution. Sound familiar?)
The ghetto mothers were superior to other groups in this because day-to-day survival for themselves and their children had been utterly dependent upon it for generations.
I offer this to all other recovering hard-asses out there that may have any remaining doubts - Ms. St. Cyr is positively, absolutely right.