Back Where He Belongs
Acting on anonymous tips from the Hispanic-American community, U.S. border officials deported Luis Miguel Salvador Aguila Dominguez, who for the last 48 years had been living here illegally, with his 17 children, under the name Lou Dobbs. Officers said Dominguez/Dobbs pulled a knife, swore in Spanish and spit on them, "like they will," before they grabbed him by the serape. From the Onion.
CNN sources said they knew nothing about Dobbs' past: "All we knew was that he was willing to take the job most American newscasters didn't want – namely, speaking out hysterically against immigration at every turn to help us gain ratings points against Fox News."
Dominguez/Dobbs' family

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
97 Comments so far
Show AllLouDobbs.com is back up today. Apparently CNN had taken it down yesterday. But now it's up, independent of CNN.
There's lot's of commentary from journalists defending Dobbs and his record.
No excuse for believing things "you heard" about Dobbs. Read what he really thinks about illegal employers' exploitation of migrant wage-slaves, the Dems' mandatory health insurance purchases bill, "free" trade, corporate outsourcing, lack of true financial reform, and the Afghanistan War (he's calling for troop withdrawals).
When you think about it, who is further left on these issues: Dobbs or MSNBC's liberal hosts?
Unfortunately, the MSNBC crew seems to be more about defending Obama's "centrist" (read Republican) policies than the public interest. Among them, only Ed Shultz is questioning the phony health care reform bill. And, none are calling for troop withdrawals from Afghanistan.
Perhaps the real sticking-point between Dobbs and CNN was his criticism of both corporate Democrats and corporate Republicans.
Lou Dobbs should have focused more on illegal employers and "free trade" but by focusing on the immigrants solely, he pulled a "Sean Hannity" and got himself into trouble. I have a hard time understanding who the hell he stands for.
Neither Dobbs nor MSNBC stand for the progressive ideology. You should know that Dobbs was a libertarian until somewhere this decade when outsourcing became a major problem and obvious. He is right to blame the corporate Republicans and corporate Democrats but he is offering no solutions to motivate his audience into fighting back. I could watch him every night and be unemployed or not bother watching MSM and side with people taking harmless steps to fighting back the outsourcing and "free trading" scams which I did.
Bring America Back !!!!
****Nice piece of Satire alleging the immigration issue was the pressure point for Dobbs abdication.
WRONG< , little tongue-in-cheekers, IT was his Tirades
demanding Prez Obama's original Birth Certificate !!!
****You Dummies ! Do not ever Forget that, prior to joining the FOX TV war cheerleaders, Glen Beck held a prime time Spot at CNN for at least a couple years!
****If immigration issues were the hot button, Dobbs would've been gone many years ago!
So, if we're going to do the sarcasm thing., it needs to be pointed in the correct and accurate direction.
Obama is a raw nerve right now that CNN places so highly at the WH Press Corps==and that FOX does NOT!
CNN just could not afford to give Dobbs any more
Free Speech or Free Press==and this article with
CD's help today===sure makes Latinos good Patsies !
George Lopez should have a field day with this one !
****The Cartoon s/b entitled "Politics for Dummies &
For Birthers !!! Ho Ho Ho
Ah yes, satire, parody, it is entertaining. And now for a dose of reality.
Here’s a link: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/fugitives/vc/murders/vc_murders.htm
Here are only a few of the surnames of murderers in the Chicago area, a majority of who happen to be latino. Oh, let's not forget the more than 100 young Latinas murdered and dumped outside Juarez, Mexico (aka $hithole) over the past 10 years or the dozen recently found in Abq:
Padron
Rodriquez
Tinajero
De Oca
Rivera
Monarrez
Martinez
Gonzales
Garcai
Lopez
Molina
Brizuela
Alcaraz
Alberran
Enchutequi
Etc, etc, Latino/Latina ad nauseam
Check out the surnames on this site: http://www.fugitivehunter.org/index.html
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you; be careful what you wish for.
Wake up people; Lou Dobbs is the least of your worries.
Mozoltoff! By the way have you considered yaliha? There are very few latinos in Israel and those are Jewish so you don't have to worry.
Das vidana, gaspadine!
Das vidana, gaspadine!
----------------------
Just FYI, that's more conventionally transliterated "do svidaniya, gospodin" (do=until svidaniya=mutual-seeing, from the verb "vidat'" to see, and gospodin=sir)
Right,Mairead,or, as some say "hasta la vista." Gospodin, unfortunately, is coming back.
Who needs Latinos when there are Palestinians to oppress?
Not all Jews are bloodthirsty man.
But what about the ones who are. Especially here in American, young college age Jews tend to be spoiled rabid Zionist fascists. And you know what? They are just as ugly as the Nazis.
That's not necessarily true. I've met young Jews fresh out of college and not all of them are that bad. Some do believe the zionist propaganda but it's usually mixed and divided.
I actually am an American, young college age Jew who just graduated college with a BA in International Studies with a focus on conflict, terrorism, and human rights a year ago. And considering I was only able to attend college thanks to Pell grants, transfer scholarships, work-study, and federally subsidized loans and this is the first year of my life my annual income has been greater than $9500, I don't think I'm spoiled either, especially considering how close my family came to homelessness 10 years ago.
I do admit that I'm no runway model, though.
Be careful about generalizing.
Oh, I'm careful enough. I live in a University Town, and I'm basing my observations on actual conversations of Greek (frat.) Jews. Pretty shocking. They sounded more like Brown Shirts. These are the people who will help decide our foreign policy in a few years.
I've met almost no frat/sorority members (most nominal Xians, I suppose) whom I'd consider to be in good shape emotionally. Most have been *very* concerned with personal social status and have believed that birth is the principal determinant of actual social value. I find such people both pathetic and scary.
Apropos Jews with that attitude (there's a word in Yiddish for them, but I'm blanking on it): I've been reading the collected correspondence of Richard Feynman that his daughter Michelle edited. Feynman received one letter from a woman compiling a book about 'great Jews'. He wrote back saying (I'm paraphrasing because I didn't bookmark it): 'Leave me out. I effectively gave up being a Jew at age 13 because I couldn't stomach that "Chosen People" garbage that your planned book would encourage.' A couple years later he received another letter from the same woman -either not very good at learning from experience, or armored in khutspa- wanting to put him in an article about 'great Jews in science'. He wrote back saying (I again paraphrase): 'Please see my earlier letter to you. I don't want to participate in your latest adventure in prejudice, either'.
I'm no representative for Judaism, but my own person views on the "chosen people" stuff is that if we are chosen, it is to be a good example for humanity to follow, since Judaism seems more concerned with the current life than the afterlife, unlike Christianity. And most of us are doing a piss-poor job at it.
"Coming soon to a neighborhood near you"? Since I live a mere 60 miles from the Mexican border, they're already here. Matter of fact, they were here LONG before I moved in.
And they do worry me so very, very much. After all, they and they alone are to blame for our skyrocketing unemployment rate, having stolen all the good jobs from American workers. And as you pointed out, Latinos commit the lion's share of violent crimes in America. (There was a time when we thought it was the Italians. Then we were sure it was the Blacks. Now we know better.) Yessiree! Show me someone with a Latino-sounding surname and I'll show you a potential serial killer. Either that or a Supreme Court Justice. Whichever....
Sorry, annak. Your "dose of reality" is what the rest of us would call "racism". You are a "racist", you see.
Hmmmmm..."annak"? Sounds suspiciously like the name of an Islamic extremist to me....
"After all, they and they alone are to blame for our skyrocketing unemployment rate, having stolen all the good jobs from American workers. And as you pointed out, Latinos commit the lion's share of violent crimes in America."
The U.S. government is far more violent, just that you don't read about it in clear and thoroughly truthful terms in the msm media. And you're awfully mistaken about Latinos and the unemployment rate, etcetera. Most of these people took low-paying jobs that Americans, white ones anyway, wouldn't take when offered [little]. And there've been plenty of violent whites, including the worst psychopaths in the country (similarly in canada), just that I guess the corporate news media doesn't cover these crimes, or maybe they do, but [little].
TheOnion.com article refers to the H-1B program as if it's legal and harmless, but the very contrary is the truth. It's been HIGHLY harmful to Americans who're hi-tech professionals, and I would know about this, being one of the many who were displaced out of the hi-tech job market because of this legal-only-on-lips program, which is illegal according to the U.S. Constitution when it's thoroughly understood in ethical terms. If it's against the Constitution, then it's illegal, but the U.S. has a hijacked government and many people have grown accustomed to this to the point of being asleep with respect to plenty of ways in which the government has blatantly acted against the Constitution.
This doesn't justify what ... Dobbs did, for his tirades against immigration or immigrants on CNN were clearly hypocritical on his part; heinously hypocritical and evidently just to make money, assuming CNN paid him, which it must've, since he was a reporter for CNN. However, TheOnion.com article also gives us examples of U.S. hypocrisy, and I guess also racism; wherein it refers to the U.S. government people claiming that this is a great thing, to stop and deport ... Dobbs, because of the diseases that foreigners bring with them, including leprosy. Most H-1Bs come from India and I'm not sure, but would guess that there's more leprosy there than there is in Mexico or even it and South America, combined. I take it as a racist sort of statement, as well as hypocritical; or at least I know of no facts proving that foreigners in the U.S. have brought any serious degree of foreign diseases infecting Americans.
The 23-year-old agent, Jared Burns, again illustrates U.S. stupidity. Contrary to what he claims, this incident did NOT make this a "proud day for any true American". He's not a "true American"; he's an idiot and supports U.S. hypocrisy, while incidently backing U.S. hegemony, and more.
It's NOT "a proud day" for [anyone]. It's a sad day, but is also a good day because Dobbs will no longer be making his hypocritical statements against immigrants or immigration on U.S. "news" media.
The Latinos of Mexico and Central America have only come to the U.S. because of the hell the U.S. and its ruling corporatocracy have committed on these countries and their economies, all for PROFIT. It's never a truly "proud day" to be against the human rights of these many victims; but Dobbs should've never spoken against immigrants or immigration. For that reason alone, he's getting what he had coming, what he deserved.
Furthermore, if you care much about U.S. jobs, as well as the exploition of third-world people, then check out the following video for a CNN report (2:19)
"More American Workers Outsourcing Own Jobs Overseas"
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/more_american_workers_outsourcing
That page is undated, but I got the link in the page for the articles on ... Dobbs being caught and deported, plus the CNN news report that this video is for is clearly recent.
"War is a Racket", former USMC Major General Smedley Butler wrote, while speaking of the U.S. internationally and militarily, and while making it clear that it was about the ruling corporatocracy in the U.S. There's also economic war without use of the military, and this is somewhat, or even more seriously, related to what the above video is about. Too many Americans are lazy and economic pigs, and lust for exploiting humanity in regularly extreme ways. Americans outsourcing their jobs should or certainly can be considered enemies from within. There isn't an honourable bone in such people.
It's evidently not Mexicans who are getting this work; they cost too much compared to other third-worlder populations.
"More American Workers Outsourcing Own Jobs Overseas"
So true. You can't blame immigrants, the whole idea of a capitalist system is to maximize profits, whether it be bribing US officals or outsourcing jobs.
I love War is a Racket. I very commonly reference that book during any debate about the military.
I'm fairly sure he was being sarcastic.
You're clearly right, zmann.
Maybe I should try finishing the reading of a post before letting something in it that sets my burners firing lead me into posting without seeing the post's sarcasm. It wouldn't be a bad idea to read the whole post, first, heh. Hmmm. Oops.
It happens :-)
Thanks. *phew*!
Let me guess, you're a transplant with all your new-found "understanding" of the "local" cultures. How enlightening. Feel better, now that you've had a chance to say the "r" word? Ever driven down into Mexico for a couple of months, can you converse, deal, survive? BTW, you could have picked a better place than Tucson, not much of a traditional culture like NM. Get back to me in a couple of years. Everyone I've known there has long since moved.
You really are ignorant about Tucson. I hope you're better informed about other things. I was raised here in Tucson, back in the 50s. There has always been a thriving Latino culture here, and Tucson tends to be prouder of its heritage as time goes on. At least the Anglos no longer urge the Apaches to wipe out Mexicans so they can steal their land. When I go 'down' to Mexico, I get along just fine, thank you, with all the lingo I've picked up from friends.
"Let me guess, you're a transplant with all your new-found 'understanding' of the 'local' cultures."
Well, I've lived here for 37 years. Not that that's in any way relevant to the points I raised in my previous comment. Good job, though, of avoiding having to defend the indefensible by using the "Attack The Messenger's Character" ploy. Very, um, O'Reilly-like of you.
"Feel better, now that you've had a chance to say the "r" word?"
No. I always find it depressing when I encounter ignorance.
"not much of a traditional culture like NM."
True, Tucson's Spanish heritage only dates back to the early 16th century.
"Everyone I've known there has long since moved."
Not surprising. Tucson is and always has been a politically progressive city. Let me guess - They all moved to Maricopa County.
Much, if not most, of the violence in Mexico is "Thanks to Uncle Sam".
Yup, just like the Italians, the Eastern Europeans, the Irish and the Germans before them. Not to mention the original bad-ass Limeys.
And here's a list of 43 white guys and one black guy that have pretty much all had their own pet wars and/or genocides.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/
Hey vato, as much as I might wish the "white guys" were on the most wanted list, they're not, it's only your primos that are of interest.
Hopefully at least one of them will be somewhere, soon.
I can only guess that you and ricardohead are either La Raza, Southern Poverty Law Center or neoliberal operatives. Ever notice that Commondreams never seems to have a fundraising problem while Counterpunch struggles. Counterpunch seldom brings up the immigration issue and when they do it is usually much more in-depth than the emotional race-baiting that Zimet provides. The truth, my friend, is that Commondreams has been co-opted. The crowd I've grown up with, white, brown and red, are pretty much live and let live types especially here in my native New Mexico, but things have changed with the influx of these mojados. They're violent, greedy, ignorant, insular and irresponsible. There is a limit to tolerance and a physical limit to resources, don't fool yourself. All races participate.
As any fool can see from my nom de CD, I'm into flatheads.Now that could be a cylinder head design, or an Indian tribe.You choose.But I do not belong to La Raza -even though I admire the Spanish speaking hillbillies you got down there in New Mexico-some of whom might be into flatheads,and I have never had anything to do with the Southern Poverty Law Center.I'm am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the Manchester School of 1844.Neo my ass. Jeez, it's complicated out there.
Yes, we can google can't we. Anyway, "flathead", someplace to set your beer?
On the head of the Native American sitting next to me? Never. What are you, some kind of racist? Or do you have something against beer?
Cheeky monkey...
Over head valves are just a passing fad.
IC engines, in general, are a passing fad.
It'll take a while to pass.Steam is still around.I'm looking into becoming a steam punk.
Perceptive comments on CD and Counterpunch. I agree. And, thanks for your first-hand account of the situation in New Mexico.
The problem with many posters here is they have no direct or in-depth knowledge, only knee-jerk liberal opinions. They accept what opinion leaders feed them without every obtaining the facts, just like the right wing-nuts do. (I think I made that observation earlier in this thread.)
Your argument is so lame and predictable, it's downright embarrassing. I'm old enough to have witnessed at least four periods in recent American history when "illegal immigration" suddenly became a huge threat - THE BIGGEST threat - to the nation. Not surprisingly, it always happened during periods of economic strife. Unemployment, inflation, recession, crime....Frightened Americans needed a convenient scapegoat. A simplistic solution. And a bunch of impoverished, desperate, third-world "aliens" were the perfect target. Build a wall! Shoot 'em on sight! Defend our borders! Curiously, when prosperity returned, immigration became not just a minor issue again - It became a NON-issue.
Oh, and then there are those convincing "facts" you use to "prove" your point. 100 murder victims who were buried in Juarez, Mexico turned out to have all been MEXICANS?? WOW! INCREDIBLE! Sure does prove that....ummm....what does that prove again?
But the icing on the cake; the last refuge of the self-denying bigot that you just could not resist mentioning; the homey little anecdote that PROVES you're not a racist (and I quote): "The crowd I've grown up with, white, brown and red..." HEY! SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS......!"
pathetic
The largest threat to the Nation (of hard working, clean cut, crime free anglos) occurred when the newly created FDA needed to wield more power and garner increased federal funding. "Wetbacks" as they were then called, were a very handy scapegoat, and soon muckrakers and newspapers (such as the Hearst rags) were pumping out stories of crimes committed by dope crazed, horridly slimy filthy Mexicans on upstanding American men and women. The dope was, of course, marijuana. The Great Depression was just starting, produced by the largest bubble the crooks on Wall Street had ever created. Mexicans were seen as lazy and depraved, but at the same time able to wrench away good jobs from hard working Americans. The FDA was able to project itself into one of the largest, most powerful federal agencies is the country, another nail was pounded into the casket of Mexican/American relations, Hearst was able to sell millions of papers, and everyone was happy, except for thousands of "Wetbacks" and those unlucky enough to enjoy the benefits of one of God's gifts to humanity, marijuana.
Jeez, you're getting kinda' worked up. Untwist your panties.
See, Tucson used to be a laid-back place. What's with all the shrieking (caps)?
Just the way this issue gets, annak. When people get so emotionalized about an issue, they can no longer look at it objectively. Identification sets in and self-righteous indignation follows. I agree with you that Counterpunch is more nuanced than many of the articles here. You said something about 'race-baiting,' which caught my attention. I've noticed that there is a certain script which so-called progressives must follow, and which the slightest deviation from brings 'bats' swooping down from all sides. In my view, unfettered open borders would be a disaster (watching for the bats!), though I do not agree with everything Lou Dobbs says or asserts. And genuine compassion does not require one to throw away common sense.
You're very perceptive. Zimet gets to stir things up using the same tactics yet the CD disciples eagerly await her next word; it's National Enquirer journalism. That's one thing I like about Counterpunch -no commentary, no writers pandering to the subscribers. Progressives are a funny, if not confused, lot. I'm definitely further to left. My reference earlier to whites, browns, reds in NM just trying to get along really means we are not really required to like one another, which is part of this wide-open, beautiful land in which I live, but that we share some common respect and code of conduct, call it honor if you will. I am proud of the Spanish heritage in my state especially the rural folks of northern NM, Tierra Amarilla, "tierra o muerte", Elfego Baca and even John Nichols "Milagro Beanfield War".
The illegals coming in now don't have any honor. Through their enablers which include the gov't, corporate, media, lawyers, Catholic Church and the ones here on CD who like to feel good about themselves as being "open-minded" or "liberal", the illegals will have the last laugh. Yes, I traveled quite extensively thru Mexico back in the day. I enjoyed it but was always glad to return to El Norte. The cultural border of Mexico will move northward, already has in some places, and it ain't gonna be pretty. Factor in the eventual drying out of the SW (we're already seeing shorter winters), the jetstream is moving north, parts of Mexico becoming arid desert, the fertility rate of Mexicans, the effects will be catastrophic. They've fouled their nest but instead of cleaning it up they want a new place to $hit; they're invaders, period. If I were younger I'd be heading to MT, WY, western WA, maybe ID.
Funny, it was the gringos here in Southern Arizona who were the invaders, period. Maybe it was different in New Mexico, and Texas even, but I doubt it. You keep talking about people without honor. That just makes me laugh.
I think you need to be a little more curious, George, of your own local history. You see, it was the Spanish conquistadors who conquered and brutalized the indigenous people of the SW, with the help of the Catholic Church of course. The predominantly male and very violent Spanish bred with the indigenous women, hence the mestizos of today.
Your white man's guilt is obvious in your overwrought responses.
I've always wondered about the past 'guilt' thing. The only time we really have is the present, and we are not individually responsible for our father's or grandfather's sins, UNLESS we continue their behavior in the present. Our forefathers, evil as they may have been, did not exploit and oppress those alive today. Therefore, they are not necessarily entitled, nor we obligated to pay for 'sins' committed in the past. That said, if there are PRESENT policies that are exploitative and oppressive, THEY should be changed. I don't think anyone posting here is in disagreement with that. Many of us who post here are trapped in an exploitative system without a pot to piss in ourselves, and our nation is becoming more and more unequal everyday. Perhaps we can start by dropping our individual hate for one another, and try to see beyond ideology, whether it be from the left, middle, or right.
I think you are correct in many respects, but let me say first that, like in any population, there are good, as well as those who would steal and exploit. My son is dating a sweet and very well mannered Mexican girl, and we enjoy having her over. There are good folks and not so good in every culture, no? I am married to a Filipino lady, who is as sweet as they come. She has intimated to me her concern for the huge influx of illegals here in NC (according to the news a 500% increase in the last few years!). With the economic downturn, schools have been hit hard, as well as social services. I remember that a group of Hispanic parents had to have a special translator at one of the parent/teacher meetings, and all of the letters sent home regarding students are written in both Spanish and English (my only point here is that these additional services do not come for free). My wife thinks it's crazy that they are not required to learn English, as she had to do to become naturalized; this is from the perspective of an individual who grew up in dire poverty.
Though I've been accused of being superficial here because I assert that Mexicans cannot wholly blame their situation on US policy, but must take some responsibility themselves, I understand something about human nature and desperation. Desperation has no conscience. And as soon as many of these individuals get a chance (with the crumbling economy, it may not be too long either), they will show us what their REAL motives are. As you say, there will be a veritable war, where everyone but the rich (the rich will flee, if necessary) will be fighting for whatever scraps are left. It's been that way for centuries in similar situations, and human nature hasn't changed.
Whether people who post here like it or not, I think your perspective needs to be heard, and the warning heeded. We've been sold down the drain, while being fattened for the 'kill,' and many won't see it coming. Some will be very shocked and feel betrayed by those they tried to help. But by then, it may be too late.
They're violent, greedy, ignorant, insular and irresponsible.
Don't talk that way about Wall Street CEOs! They can't help being monsters. They were brainwashed with zionist "chosen people" propaganda rom birth. So what if the 50 states have a 167 billion dollar deficit and Goldman Sachs has accumulated (coincidentally, of course) 168 billion dollars in funds? So what if the lack of jobs, social services and policing has left average people to fight for the scraps? That's survival of the fittest, don'tcha know?
Hey, I've got an idea! Blame the most impoverished, desperate segment of the population (latinos, veterans, homeless, unemployed gays, whatever) and maybe you can get a job in Wall Street or Madison avenue doing PR. They love convincing liars there (note: being Jewish will improve your chances of landing a job at Wall Street and Madison Avenue).
Mozoltoff!
Much of what you say about Wall Street is true. Too bad you are a bigot. I hate Zionism as much as any radical, but jeeze, give the anti-Semitic banter a rest!
Better be careful with all that anti-semetic talk, Zimet might get pi$$ed.
Heh, I did once think as a neoliberal when it came to national security, but that's about it. No, I work at a progressive media watchdog, and in my off time I'm an environmental activist.
Huh, neoliberal re: economics, cheap labor and all of that.
Environmental activist huh, well back in the day I spent a fair amount of time driving around in Mexico, lots of broken glass beaches, robbed at gunpoint, bribing Federales (malta) and all that, handmade boots from Casas Grandes, sold tractor parts out of Deming to blue-eyed German-Mexicans. Never bought or smuggled drugs but would hide a case of Modelo under the seat when crossing the border at Agua Fria or Palomas.
I think I know what I'm talking about.
Funny, my months and months of time spent in Mexico have been completely different than yours. Are you sure we have the same country?
I think you are both 'right' and 'wrong' from your personal perspectives. Perhaps you visited some regions and avoided others, such as the more rural regions. Nevertheless, according to 'crime statistics,' Mexico ranks 6th highest in murders, while the US ranks 24th in murders per capita:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita
Thom Hartman believes that there can be a direct correlation drawn between how 'unequal' a region is and the crime rate. I've always believed this to be true.
As stated further above, the serious problems in Mexico are, "Thanks to Uncle Sam", while, this time, I'll add the ruling U.S. corporatocracy. This doesn't make violent criminals anywhere innocent, but the problems in Mexico nevertheless are due to U.S. "War is a Racket", that is, "War a-la Racket", and it doesn't always involve the U.S. military, albeit that has been very present in 20th century Mexican and Central American history, as well as into the 21st and continuing in it.
If the ruling corporatocracy which controls the government of the USA hadn't done the extreme damage they have done and caused in these countries of MUCH poverty, then conditions there would be very, starkly different from what they are today.
"Thanks to Uncle Sam" and the ruling corporatocracy of the USA. Note, NOT Zionism.
I began the above post by saying, "As stated further above, the serious problems in Mexico are, ...", but that's while I loaded reader comments "newest first", instead of "oldest first", that is, in the order that they were posted. Now that I'm switching to loading them in the latter and therefore chronological order, the above post would read, "As stated further below, ..."
It's too easy of an out to blame all the problems in Mexico on the US. It's a false justification for pillage and murder, if that is the point you are trying to make. It is also an insult to those individuals there who come here and are above board. These people rushing across the border are neither saints nor villains, but they are desperate individuals out to obtain what they believe they so desperately need. And many individuals do things in desperation that they would not ordinarily do. Predatory businesses prey off that need for their own ends. They do not care the least little bit for those they exploit; they are simply a means to an end, pawns to be played and used. If you believe that this status quo is fine and dandy, then just say so. Not addressing this issue or avoiding discussing it, amounts to a kind of subterfuge in and of itself.
FALSE, in several respects. The only part you're right about is the "desperation" of these extremely poor people in Mexico and Central American countries.
It's very much the fault of the US and its corporatocracy. Otherwise, the situation in these poor countries would be tremendously better. And what I posted definitely is NO insult to the people who "illegally" come to the U.S. to try to get [needed] income for themselves and the families back home. Anyone who thinks what I posted is an insult to these people is very weak in terms of critical thought; or simply likes to superficially demonise others, which is common in the USA.
And it took compliant leaders in those countries for the U.S. and its corporatocrats to be able to achieve the pillage they attained there; often having strategically needed to make sure to replace good leaders with despots. But this only happened because the U.S. government and its corporatocrats were behind this pillagin from the start, to ... the not yet end. In some cases, it's not that the leaders were or are despots, they're sometimes just too weak; like, f.e., in Honduras, where the government, prior to the military coup in June, kept refusing to prosecute Canadian-based GoldCorp's executives, for the extremely criminal poisoning of an area of the country.
Again, this history of pillaging by the U.S. and its corporatocracy doesn't justify the violent Mexicans, but there most likely wouldn't be this violence if it hadn't been for the destruction of the economies and the corruption of the governments in Latin America, committed by the U.S. and its corporatocracy. The "law and order" there would surely have been much better, etcetera.
And who are the violent actors anyway, and, really, why do they commit this violence? What is the purpose, what do they gain from this? Could the U.S., like in many other horrible situations, be behind these violent actors, at all?
Disagree, if you wish, but it's possible for the U.S. to be really behind these violent crimes in Mexico; like the U.S. is behind a lot of extreme criminality, globally, while we just don't have this happening in overt terms; and, overt or not, there's always U.S. corporate media cover-up and propaganda of deceit. The U.S. does a lot of hellish covert ops that are then used by the U.S. political "leadership" to try to fool us into supporting the USA's (once, formerly) secret goal of expanding empire, globally. These violent crimes in Mexico are used by the U.S. to try to buttress its faux drug war, which only serves U.S. hegemony and the criminal U.S. militarised presence and covert ops in Latin American countries. www.narconews.com struck me as a fine resource for this topic.
A peaceful Mexico, f.e., would not be good for promoting the faux U.S. drug war and empire efforts down South. If drugs were being trafficked, but without any violence, conditions would be entirely (or nearly so) peaceful, then this would not be a good reality when trying to promote the faux drug war which is about or related U.S. empire expansionism (and bigotry or stupidity). It could also cause people who haven't been involved in growing the related crops and in trafficking to want to also get involved, to try to derive needed income; therefore, while the U.S. could be very much behind the violent actors of today there, they could also be wanting to frighten other people of their country from also wanting to enter the drug business. That's something the U.S. covert ops could try to brainwash those people to believe and then violently act. After all, efforts to brainwash people in hellish ways is part of modus operandi of the U.S. government and its corporatocracy.
The U.S., during the GW Bush-Cheney admin. wanted to send military forces to Mexico because, they claimed, of these very violent crimes in Mexico against innocent Mexicans. Voila, again; "opportunity" for U.S. empire.
Etcetera.
In no way is this an insult to the poverty-stricken people who migrate to the U.S. in search of jobs that will provide little compensation, but enough that these people can manage to get by with less poverty for themselves and also send some money back to families desperately needing financial help. Au contraire, they are [victims] and like I've always left very clear for my own perspective, their desperation is understandable and deserves humane compassion on our part.
You read like an thoughtless individual, therefore. And you don't explain anything more than the most superficial aspect(s) of the whole reality. Meanwhile, and without being an expert on much of anything, I try to avoid being superficial and the above is all reflective of evil ways that we [know] that the U.S. government and its corporatocrats have long been acting, globally; including in Europe, with the notorious Operation Gladio that the U.S. covertly conducted there.
The U.S. empire [is] a Beast, globally.
True, but Mexico is a fucked up country, and the Mexicans themselves are at least partially responsible for the situation. It ain't all the fault of the Big Bad El Norte.I'll quote Charles Bukofsky again-from his series "Notes of a Dirty Old Man:
"Mexico isn't a bad place just because its people are oppressed.
It's just a bad place."
Mexico is not a bad place. It does have its slime balls. The Federales are not so nice, and the oligarchy which rules Mexico is just as bad or worse than ours. Mexico does have a cast system, however, with the Indians on the bottom. The Mestizos who are of mixed decent generally lord it over the Indians, and resent the 'pure' people of Spanish descent. I knew some pure Mayans in Compeche who were amongst the elite of that town in so far as social status was concerned. They claimed descent from the ancient rulers.
Mexico is a complicated country, but I've always found the people very friendly. You just have to lose that American air of superiority. It also helps if you at least try and speak their language. And it's no secret in Mexico that many of its problems are caused by corporate America and our drug wars. Hell, it's no secret anywhere in Latin America. They aren't stupid you know.
I haven't been to Mexico since 1967. Maybe it's improved a lot since then, but signs point to no.I spoke decent Spanish, having studied it in college, and I'd spent some time in Spain.It was interesting to compare the two countries: Spain was somewhat backward, European-poor, and suffering from an odious dictatorship-but it was a paradise compared to Mexico, where I encountered poverty that was truly frightening, of the kill that goat, hack it up and eat it now, because you don't know where the next meal is coming from variety.This in a bogus 'revolutionary' context: Electricidad al Campesino painted on rocks in the desert-but no electricidad, and plenty of campesinos.Radio commercials extoling the virtues of "Gusano de Oro, El Mescal Nacional" and so on.It was a fucked up place, but as you noted, the people were kindly and polite, and I was invited into modest homes.A year later, the Mexican government butchered several hundred student protesters.I'm sticking with the observations of Bukovsky.
Everything you say about Mexico is true for the United States as well, including butchering student protesters. We just do it neater and cleaner. We are, after all, gringos. And the kind people are a bit fewer and further between.
When I was in often in Mexico (back in the 70s), I was invited into homes that were hovels and homes that were pretty grand. That hacked up goat was always shared, along with a few beans and tortillas. And the gentry was just as ignorant as the gentry here, but they were still very warm and hospitable. I remember a few parties in Compeche around carnival time that were pretty outrageous. I'll never forget that party food. Yum! And these people were not rich, by any means.
I'm sticking with the observations I made with my own eyes.
I think we're in basic agreement on a lot of this stuff.And I agree that we're a little slicker about how the government here goes about doing in political opponents-although some of the Black Panter Party assassinations were certainly worthy of Mexico.I gave up on The Mexican Dream a long time ago.All in all, I'd rather be in Spain-especially now, but it's unfortunately not an option for me at the moment.There's a country that's come a long way in a relatively short time.Maybe I'm naive, but the Spaniards give me hope.
"You read like an thoughtless individual, therefore. And you don't explain anything more than the most superficial aspect(s) of the whole reality."
Wow, didn't realize you were such an expert on the whole of reality. I bow in deference to you and you're projection of me, superficial as I am.
A comment on jobs, H1 visas, outsourcing and insourcing. All three are working together to increase corporate profits and lower pay across the board. Insourcing has two prongs:
1) H1 visas, i.e., importing workers from overseas into the country to fill mostly high-tech positions and
2) Illegal immigration, which amounts to looking the other way as multitudes of low-skilled, low-wage workers cross the border to be exploited by service, construction, and other industries, and in some cases, servants for elite estates.
Regardless of the motives, all 3 prongs serve to place a downward pressure on wages, and increase unemployment. In essence our economy has been gutted. Dobbs had been addressing these issues in his program while everyone else was singing their praises. Dobbs gave them a voice too; you know, those who said how much we all were benefiting from the low prices, cheap labor, etc, etc.
Paul Craig Roberts has written some excellent articles about these issues as well (see www.counterpunch.com )
It's very much the fault of the US and its corporatocracy. Otherwise, the situation in these poor countries would be tremendously better.
-------------------------------
Then why has it always been so awful in India? The US is hardly involved there at all, yet in every century throughout historical time there's been at least one major famine and often more. We can blame the UK for famines during the 200 years of the Raj, but what about the ones before and since? What about the endemic, steady-state conditions of poverty and famine-like near-starvation?
I think we really must accept that not all foreign scum are puppets.
Neolibs also tend to be hawkish, that's what I was getting at.
And that sounds like a hell of a time, looking back at it.
Like Hitler being ashamed of his Jewish ancestors, Lou Dobbs is ashamed of being a Latino through and through. Has he even admitted that he was never circumcised?
Pig.
Forty or fifty years ago, lots of non-Jews got circumcised. It was the 'scientific' thing to do.It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that swing. Not exactly relevant, but what the hell.
Did you see the photo of his family above!
They live in poverty!
Dobbs made millions at CNN and never sent a cent back home!
IDIOT!
Funny stuff, it reminds me of the satire that Alberto Gonzalez was fired because he was an illegal Irish Immigrant:
http://www.satireandcomment.com/0807bertie.html
Luis Miguel Salvador Aguila Dominguez..
or as he is known in his village "El Pendejo Grosso"
I am glad they finally caught him.
Nobody is above the law.
The Yes Men wouldn't be behind this would they?
"Cowardly liars and fools..."
In a contest of who is the most ignorant, right wing-nuts claim Obama's insurance company bailout is a "government takeover of health care," and left-wing sheep claim Lou Dobbs is an anti-immigrant racist. And the winner is ... a tie! The two fact-free groups finish in a tie!
________________________________________________
Dobbs: The Truth About Immigration
Nov-13-2009
Ethnocentric special interest groups often mischaracterize Lou's position on illegal immigration. The left routinely ignores the context of everything Lou has said about illegal immigrants. So here's the truth about what the left does not want you to hear: Listen to Lou's record on illegal immigration and illegal immigrants.
[Audio at Google's cache of LouDobbs.com]
A few examples [quoted statements are actual recordings from his broadcasts]:
"I've said for some time that the only rational actor in this entire immigration crisis, illegal immigration crisis, is the illegal alien, trying to benefit himself, herself and better their lives. But illegal employer is acting against the national interests, acting against the law in every respect. How can we get to the employer who is so shamelessly exploiting the illegal alien and so shamelessly flaunting U.S. law?"
"I have great respect for the people who make up the preponderance of the illegal alien population in our country, that is Mexican migrant workers."
"I'm absolutely one of the most passionate opponents of illegal immigration, but I've also made it very clear I'm also one of those who respects most the illegal aliens, I've described them on numerous occasions as the only rational actor in this crisis."
"For the record, I am absolutely supportive of legal immigration. In fact, I favor even higher levels of legal immigration when it suits public policy. Let me repeat -- we are the most welcoming nation in the world for immigrants and I've consistently called for an increase in legal immigration when warranted."
"I think I'm the only one on this panel who's actually worked with migrant workers in the fields, with beans, potatoes, hay in my youth. I know them to be good and decent people."
"You've heard me say time and time again that the only rational actor in this is the illegal alien trying to improve his or her life. You've heard me say time and time again that the illegal employer of the illegal alien deserves the greatest sanctions in this mess."
"The broadcast has repeatedly stressed the need to solve this nation's massive illegal alien crisis. It has always, this broadcast, been a strong supporter of legal, fair, humane immigration policies."
Isn't it funny how cowardly liars and fools leave out all of these statements over the past six years ... as they attack me. If you have any doubt that we are in a struggle for the soul of this nation, a day's reading of those left-wing activists' blogs and statements will show you who's really fanning the flames of hate.
_________________________________________________________________
Naturally, are you "One Old Veteran" that runs the site that you got that cut and past from?
Along with those Lou Dobbs cherries, I decided to go after a few of his lemons.
http://mediamatters.org/research/200605240011
"Dobbs's immigration reporting marked by misinformation, extreme rhetoric, attacks on Mexican president, and data from organization linked to white supremacists."
I read the May 2006 report from MediaMatters that you reference. It gives no examples of any racist or anti-immigrant statements that Dobbs has made.
No I'm not. I don't know that site. I cut-and-pasted the transcript from the Google cache of (November 13, 2009) LouDobbs.com.
I found the article at LouDobbs.com and it contains an embedded Youtube video of him speaking on illegal and legal immigration, while being a little over 5 minutes in length.
"Dobbs: The Truth About Immigration", Nov 13, 2009
http://www.loudobbs.com/blog?action=viewBlog&blogID=-744737085256637687
The video is the following one for the direct link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh_Dum-_IMA
Listen carefully to his words, because he's playing with them; evidently not being straight-forward truthful. He says the illegal immigrants, the migrants, are the most rational of everyone in all of this, but also says he's against illegal immigration several times and that he's for strengthening border controls. He says he's for the legal kind, but emphasises that this is only if it suits "public policy", and this is seriously playing with the wording, for these words of his hide a fact, which is that it'll suit "public policy" only when it profits the ruling corporatocracy and their "friends" in Corporate America. He doesn't admit to having come to and remained in the U.S. illegally, and his words otherwise are or certainly seem to be of the kind intending a deception.
I agree that the "illegal immigrants" are acting rationally, to try to save their lives and those of their family members who remain in extreme poverty. It's Americans who are inhumane towards these "illegals" who are irrational; irrational, greedy, etcetera. But the rest of what Dobbs says in the above video uses what definitely seems to arguably be deceptive language.
The H-1B program has been used to displace many U.S. hi-tech professionals from our jobs and potential future possibilities of work, but I don't hate any H-1Bs for this, while hating the fact that they refuse to respect the right of U.S. citizens to be able to have a fair chance of obtaining fair employment in our own country. The H-1Bs mostly come from India, not a country that the U.S. corporatocracy has harmed or certainly nowhere near the extent that it has done in Mexico and Central America. So I have certainly more sympathy for the "illegals" from down south, but without hating H-1Bs. The problem is not race; it's U.S. corporatocracy and a gangster U.S. government that are the PROBLEM and the USA's greatest enemies of all history, past, present, and in the making, future.
Of course that doesn't justify Dobbs playing with words in what evidently is a deceptive way. After all, the U.S. does NOT have any real record of fair, humane, just policy-making. If he thinks otherwise, then maybe he didn't mean to be seeming like he's playing with words, but there's no excuse for someone in his position to be ignorant of what real U.S. policy-making is truly like. Hence, his words end up smelling of deception while being wrapped in feel-good words. A lot of Americans and probably foreigners would be easily fooled by the "feel-good" words he employed in this piece or compilation of his past statements, but alert people don't get fooled with such wording. Instead, they think [critically], follow every word, and analyse everything said.
I suppose because it's more fun to demonize Dobbs by misrepresentation. That said, I do not agree with everything he stands for. But overall I do not see progressives 'fanning the flames of hate,' like making such an assertion does. Progressives are more for 'equality' in general than the right-wing fear mongers, who maintain some people are just more deserving than others, even when it come to basic needs.
The term progressive itself is misleading because it covers a whole umbrella of stands on issues that not all self-proclaimed 'progressives' support. There are many shades of gray, and it seems that some progressives are quick to attack their would-be allies because of disagreement with one issue, regardless of how big or small.
The right does seem to have an advantage in this regard, even if what they unite around is destructive.
I actually don't know much about Lou Dobbs.I don't watch TV.However, I do see his ugly mug on billboards from time to time, and I know his reputation.What I have read of him and his rants doesn't lead to to believe that he's anything more than just another right wing bloviator, who doesn't deserve to be taken as seriously as some people apparently do.And I enjoy a good send-up of a guy like this.But you're right about one thing: there is no shortage of nut balls on both end of the political spectrum. I would be interested to find out what you mean by "soul of the nation." Are we talking spiritual essence here? What might that be?
"Soul of the nation," and everything else between the two horizontal lines, are Dobbs' words, not mine.
For my opinions, see my November 13th, 2009 3:24pm post at http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/12-12.
You are correct, you don't actually know much about Dobbs, but are condemning him based on hearsay. He spoke against Bush and Bush policies quite a lot. He also spoke against NAFTA when most conservatives were praising it. That said, I did not like his program after Obama got elected.
Thanks. It's not often that I'm correct twice on the same day.Re the rest of it-some one else has already dug up some comments by Dobbs which directly contradict the ones you've found on Google.I'm sure we could bat that ball around until the cows come home.He talks a lot-therefore he contradicts himself, and don't we all.It will be interesting to see where he surfaces next.There's another angle on this, which is that if huge numbers of 'conservatives' hear a racist/ nativist message in what Lou Dobbs says,then that message must be there. Or maybe they're making that up?
Perhaps people hear what they want to hear, no? And slapping a derogatory label on someone does not necessarily make it so, especially when there're interest groups with a different agenda. I grant you that it's often hard to extract the truth from the spin. Naturally was the one who cited the quotes, not me. I used to watch Dobbs a lot during the time when Bush was in power, mostly for information on NAFTA and trade policy. I actually liked Christine Romans better than Dobbs though.
All I can say is thank god for the leaders in investigative journalism; the Onion and Jon Stewart, of course.
These self-hating Hispanics go beyond the pale.
An Hispanic Pale-what a hoot!