Rep. Ellison Blasts Goldstone Vote -- Plus How Your Representative Voted
By a 344-36 vote (22 voting "present"), the House of Representatives condemned the so-called Goldstone report, which found that both Israel and Hamas committed war crimes in Gaza. (See how your representative voted here)
The resolution basically adopted the Israeli view that the war was necessary and that its military behaved with high regard for the safety of civilians (despite the fact that 1400 Palestinians were killed -- including 320 children -- versus a total of 13 Israeli soldiers). Israelis complained that the Goldstone report did not reflect the views of Israelis who participated in the attack. But Israel refused to cooperate with the Goldstone investigators.
In any case, this vote will give more evidence to those who argue that Congress is afraid to take any steps on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that do not track Israel's position (and the Israel lobby's).
Writing in Politico yesterday, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) strongly criticized the House vote:
Congress is poised to oppose the Goldstone report without holding a single hearing on a document that few members of Congress, if any, have read.
This is a mistake. The stance of this Congress will erode U.S. credibility in the post-Obama world, and it will tarnish our commitment to the principle that all nations must be held to the same standards. Rather than undermine the report or Goldstone, we are at risk of undermining Congress's and President Barack Obama's reputation as honest brokers.
Israel can still pursue its own investigation, and critics of the Goldstone report should recognize that Israel is strong enough to withstand inquiry. Self-reflection is one of the hallmarks of a strong democracy. In fact, Israel has investigated itself in the past in connection with the Sabra and Shatila incidents. When nations like the United States, Israel, South Africa and others have pursued the truth through investigations - however uncomfortable - their people and politics have emerged stronger.
We stand for the values of democracy, truth and justice. There is no reason for Congress, Israel or any other party to fear an honest judge. Richard Goldstone is such a judge, and his report should be studied, not dismissed.
Ellison is right. The House cast a cynical vote; one that, no doubt, many are ashamed of. The United States should be an honest broker between Israelis and Palestinians, not act as if "Israel Is Us." Actions like the House's yesterday are not just wrongheaded, they endanger America's security. We simply cannot afford to have every Muslim and Arab on the planet believe that our concern for human rights extends to everyone, but not to them. We need a course correction fast, for the sake of Israelis and Palestinians, but mostly for our own.
M.J. Rosenberg is Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Media Matters Action Network. Previously, he worked on Capitol Hill for various Democratic members of the House and Senate for 15 years. He was also a Clinton political appointee at USAID. In the early 1980s, he was editor of AIPACs weekly newsletter Near East Report. From 1998-2009, he was director of policy at Israel Policy Forum.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
12 Comments so far
Show AllThe House only wanted to be like Leiberman, carrying the Talmud in one pocket and a thousand-dollar bill from Aipac in the other.
These House flies are not fit to represent this country, though they'd probably excel at swindling real estate prospects in Florida, working as Hollywood agents or finessing junk on Wall Street.
And woe is me that Grayson turns out to be a flash in the pan, with a sometimes becoming bark perhaps but whose verities collapse at the Wailing Wall.
I can't begin to express my disappointment in Weiner and Grayson, especially Grayson.
My own local contribution whore, David Scott, supported the bill but I expected him to do so.
q
"I can't begin to express my disappointment in Weiner and Grayson, especially Grayson." -- quickstepper
Very disappointing!
I was gratified to see that DK came through again.
Frank (ptui!), who nominally represents me, voted for the condemnation.
What a disgraceful resolution!!
Again, AIPAC and these scum legislators who are more than eager to fellate it for its $$$$ and influence have gotten the Congress to mindlessly support the brutal and heartless Israeli regime.
Now I know how to vote next November.
Since the Cold War has ended, Israel no longer serves any strategic advantage through its relationship with the United States. During the Cold War, the US benefited from that relationship when Israel spied on neighboring countries and stole Soviet technology from them.
But, the Cold War is over. Many countries in the Middle East, including Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait are more than willing to do whatever Washington asks of them. That is to say that, as an ally, Israel no longer serves a crucial role in that region.
In fact, Israel has become a burden on the United States, particularity in that region. In an ironic twist, the US actually needs to protect itself from Israel's spies these days.
The time has come to reject this so-called special relationship. In the last 10 years alone, countries such as the UK have shown that they are far more loyal allies than Israel.
The USA commits war crimes and crimes against humanity and defends the high crimes of it's "friends" whenever it serves it's economic interests.
Always had, always will. Everyone around the world know this.
And if the great populous land occupying mid-section of North America stops doing it, it would no longer be appropraite to call this place the "United States". There are too many bad memories asociated with that name.
Revolution! But first, anyone have any ideas what to call this future new North American republic?
This vote just confirms what I have been saying: we do not have a Congress, we have a crime family posing as a Congress.
Well, at least Welch (Vermont) didn't vote yea. He voted "Present". It's better than yea but still short of what is needed. These zionists really have our congress bribed and /or extorted. At least Welch isn't on their payroll.
"It's better than yea..."
Let's see, Innocent people are being viciously slaughtered and maimed, families left with horror, like memories of your child's brain splattered on a wall, but some dim-witted, vain little pretender to power in a cozy seat in Washington (where many of the weapons came from) can't quite make up their mind if it is worth their time to do their so-called job.
No, your congressperson is on YOUR payroll, so YOU can be proud of their indifference!
Anyone who did not vote AGAINST this resolution is a disgrace.
Birdbrain Alley: "Anyone who did not vote AGAINST this resolution is a disgrace."
I agree!
My representative is Rangel -- and he voted "Yea!" Charles Rangel is mired in countless scandals, and I'm hoping that someone mounts a serious campaign against him in the upcoming election. Hopefully -- a 3rd party.