Massive ordnance penetrator. Sounds powerful, right? This bomb is also known by its initials: MOP.
President Obama
has talked a lot about ridding the world of nuclear weapons. He won a
Nobel Peace prize largely on the strength of those words. Now, he needs
to translate words into actions and vindicate the Nobel committee's
decision. When he goes to Japan this month, the president should make
an unprecedented visit to Hiroshima.
In one key conflict area-Iran-President Barack Obama appears to be keeping, at
least for the moment, his campaign commitment to engage rather than threaten,
to use diplomacy rather than force.
As talks with Iran go forward, hope continues to rise for serious diplomacy
that could, just maybe, lead us a few steps closer to the "world without
nuclear weapons" that Obama has called for.
For the past 64 years the name "Hiroshima" has conjured a nightmare vision for all humanity: the unthinkable specter of instantaneous atomic annihilation. Only by personally visiting Hiroshima or Nagasaki, the two cities that have experienced atomic bombing, can one begin to grasp the threat posed by the world's present arsenal of nuclear weapons.
Just one bomb, dubbed "Little Boy," devastated Hiroshima in a split second.
When the United
States adopted torture as a weapon in its "war on terror," it was a
turn to methods that shock the conscience, and when discovered,
officials and their media surrogates went to great lengths to gain
public acquiescence for their policies. It was not the first time the
country betrayed its highest ideals, nor the first time U.S. citizens
were led to deny that any betrayal had occurred. The United States had
gone down the same road in 1945, when it used nuclear weapons to
destroy two Japanese cities.
Since President Obama was named this year's Nobel Peace Laureate,
there's been a fruitful debate about the degree to which the award was
deserved or strategically useful. It's worth noting that the
president's strong support for the cause of nuclear disarmament was a
key reason he got the nod from Oslo. This support has not only come in
speeches, but also in a very interesting U.N. Security Council
resolution that he cared enough about to deliver to the council
personally and even chair the session in which it was adopted, an
unprecedented move for a world leader.
As we demonstrated at the White House last Monday calling for an end to the U.S. war in Afghanistan, we could hardly have imagined President Barack Obama would be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize four days later.
While the award came as a surprise, it is somewhat understandable. We have met and conversed with peace activists from around the world over the last year, and we've observed a palpable, nearly desperate, universal hunger (obviously shared by the Nobel Committee) for a more peaceful, less militaristic U.S. foreign policy.
And you thought "don't ask, don't tell" was a U.S. law on
gays in the military that Barack Obama has
promised to
change. As it turns out, the same phrase plays quite a different role in the Middle East, where Obama seems to have no intention of changing it at all.
WASHINGTON - Excerpts of the
internal draft report by the staff of the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) published online last week show that the report's claims
about Iranian work on a nuclear weapon is based almost entirely on
intelligence documents which have provoked a serious conflict within
the agency.
Barack
Obama, the US president, has agreed to abide by a 40-year policy of
allowing Israel to keep nuclear weapons without opening them to
international inspection, according to a US newspaper.
In a report on Saturday, The Washington Times quoted three
unnamed sources as saying Obama had confirmed to Binyamin Netanyahu,
Israel's prime minister, that he would maintain the "don't ask, don't
tell" policy.