Walter Cronkite believed his "proudest"
moment as a journalist occurred when he told the nation that the
Vietnam War was unwinnable, despite rosy rhetoric from the Johnson
White House and Defense Department. Following his death last week,
various network news tributes replayed footage of Cronkite's
influential '68 on-air editorial.
With his measured calm and seriousness of purpose, Walter Cronkite set
a high standard for television journalism that has rarely been met
since his retirement in 1981. But the legendary CBS anchorman who died
Friday also may have unintentionally contributed to the American Left's
dangerous complacency about media.
The feeling of many Americans (especially liberals) about the Cronkite
era was that journalists could be trusted to give the news reasonably
straight.
Media eulogies for Walter Cronkite -- including from progressive commentators -- rarely talk about his coverage of the Vietnam War before 1968. This obit omit is essential to the myth of Cronkite as a courageous truth-teller.
But facts are facts, and history is history -- including what Cronkite actually did as TV's most influential journalist during the first years of the Vietnam War.
The most vocal critics of human rights commissions often
invoke freedom of speech. Yet they were strangely silent when Ottawa
effectively blocked Al Jazeera Arabic TV's entry into Canada in 2004.
And they are mostly silent now about Al Jazeera English's application
before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.
Being
treated like that in Canada is a minor irritation for the folks at the
Qatar-based Al Jazeera, including the Canadian Tony Burman, managing
director, English. They have seen far worse.
China just delivered a stunning, real-world demonstration of the changes rocking -- and transforming -- modern journalism.
Corporate media are in a state of severe business shock, it
seems—layoffs at newspapers large and small, due to advertising revenue
drying up and readers ceasing to pay for a printed copy of a newspaper
that they can usually read for free online. The state of the press has
generated an enormous amount of attention in the press itself, with
journalists and pundits offering any number of plans to "save" dying
newspapers. Congressional hearings on the state of the media suggest
that lawmakers are worried about what might happen next.
One thing to keep in mind while worrying about the future of journalism is that its past hasn’t been all that great either.
There are several noteworthy developments since I wrote on Tuesday
about the refusal of NPR's Ombdusman, Alica Shepard, to be interviewed
by me about NPR's ban on using the word "torture" to describe the Bush
administration's interrogation tactics. Given the utter vapidity of her rationale ("there
are two sides to the issue.
Jay Rosen calls it "the Froomkin kissoff." Others call it, less colorfully, "l'affaire Froomkin." Many call it politically motivated. Some call it "dumb, short-sighted, and self-destructive." Some just call it stupid.