Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Behind Politics, A Philosophy of Fear
George Orwell, in his novel "1984," described Oceania, a society in which the prime motivating force for controlling the populace was fear, both fear of its own government and its enemies. He wrote of continual war, of enemies so horrendous that the public was constrained to rigid compliance with its rulers in order to demonstrate its patriotism. Much of Orwell's description is found again in the teachings of University of Chicago Professor Leo Strauss, who died in 1973.
Strauss's political philosophy contains many subtle and not-so-subtle effects evident in the Bush administration's activities since Sept. 11. And remarkably, taken as a whole, they resemble the fictional world of Oceania. For instance, there's the perpetual political deception between rulers and ruled, a necessity according to Strauss. There's the obsession with secrecy and the Machiavellian conviction that stability among the populace requires an external threat, that if no such threat exists one must be manufactured. John Foster Dulles fully understood this when he recommended that, "In order to bring a nation to support the burdens of great military establishments, it is necessary to create an emotional state akin to psychology. There must be the portrayal of external menace. This involves the development of a nation-hero, nation-villain ideology and the arousing of the population to a sense of sacrifice."
Strauss and today's neocons believe that our nation must maintain the appearance of continuous war. As Vice President Dick Cheney said, "This war may last for the rest of our lives." The government can thus sustain a continued state of war hysteria to keep the population motivated. Through this creation and control of mass paranoia they can maintain an intense nationalism with complete loyalty and total subservience to the "national interest."
Orwell described a "labyrinthine world of doublethink ..." for instance, "to believe that democracy was impossible, and that the party was the guardian of democracy."
Americans believe very deeply in the ideals that America stands for, will sacrifice their lives and those of their children when necessary to defend them. Yet at the same time, the neocons have convinced the public to believe that these ideals are impractical in dealing with the complexities of today's world. To burden the federal government with our revered Constitution and its checks and balances would cripple it in its difficult fight against terrorism. We must, they say, sacrifice our ideals in order to preserve them.
The neocons, who have controlled the White House for the past seven years, have utilized Strauss and Orwell's observations to provide a society much like that described in Orwell's novel.
Oceania had an archenemy which the population was encouraged to fear and hate. In the novel this demonic figure was of Jewish heritage, but today's "hated" figure is an Iranian leader named Ahmadinejad.
Our government and news media must keep painting him as a terrible threat, not only to Israel, but also to world peace. Our administration has distorted many of Ahmadinejad's talks into violent threats, and the media has repeated them endlessly, making them seem truthful, just as Orwell described in his novel.
For instance, in a talk by our president in March 2006, "the threat from Iran is, of course, their stated objective to destroy our strong ally Israel. That's a threat, a serious threat. It's a threat to world peace."
Yet Ahmadinejad was actually calling for a regime change in Israel and the U.S. He was not threatening to physically "wipe Israel off the map." His goal was to end the terrible oppression of the Palestinians. Common sense must reveal that, should Iran acquire nuclear weapons, bombing Israel would also destroy the Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank. And it would mean certain suicide for Iran.
This fostering of fear and hate among Americans is necessary in order to prepare our nation to go to war. It was carefully crafted prior to the invasion of Iraq and is now being used to stir up the blood of Americans for invading another country. This is the "continuous war" predicted by Orwell. When will we ever learn?
Eliot J. Chandler of Bangor is the author of "Ancient Sagadahoc," a book on Maine history.

76 Comments so far
Show All"This fostering of fear and hate among Americans is necessary in order to prepare our nation to go to war."
Yes, it's also necessary to keep the fearful in denial of other pyschological manipulations, especially with regard to our economic crisis. Another aspect of
psychological "warfare" of, by and for the elite rulers of our borrow-and-spend declining kingdom.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/deepcaster/2008/0815.html
"Big Brother is Watching You"
Posters plastered everywhere in Orwell's Oceania.
"We're always watching!"
Posters plastered about the Dallas DART public trans system.
Meanwhile, unlike in "1984," our very scary "boggyman" changes when necessary - first there was Osama and al Qaida, then the Taliban, then Saddam (and dead-enders and extremists and, depending on the week, Sunnis or Shiites,) then Osama again, then there was Zarqawi and al Qaida, then Osama again, then Ahmadinejad and/or Iranian-supported whatevers, then the Taliban again, and just rolling out for a September wide-release:
The Russians are coming. Again. The Russians are coming. Again!!!
Thank You RichM . . . .
That about sums it up just fine.
the russians, the commies, the terrorists, the iraqis, the cubans, the mexicans, the north koreans, the iranians, al-qaida are coming!
not to mention Y2K, the killer bees, and whatever else i'm forgetting...
whoever said the only thing to fear is fear itself was right on
Being glib feeds into the Big Brother scheme. Better to notify your friends and family to resist and take a stand yourself. Superficial remarks however are good openings to send to friends and family to begin a dialogue. Thanks, I'll use them since probably unlike you all, there are a lot of AHs in my family. Friends seems to be a better thinking lot.
I've noticed over the last few years that FoxNews/CNN is broadcast in nearly every public place... banks, grocery stores, department stores, restaurants, EVERYWHERE!!!
Is someone "requiring" or "forcing" these public establishments to pump the propoganda and fear?
Fox "News" was on display on four screens at my veternarian's office, and I called them on it! I told them I was offended that they were forcing their patrons to watch Fox "Bullsh#t-News" and there was no way to escape it. Of course they said there was nothing they could do. I asked them to change the channel and they said they "couldn't". Why? Obviously, Me and My dog left never to return, but jeez... it's EVERYWHERE!
Who? How? Why?
Anyone have a reasonable answer?
I don't know the answer, Johnkotch but I would bet that is where they get their statistics that more people watch FoxViews than any other so called news channel.
Why are people so stupid? And the other thing that amazes me is they try to justify their stupidity.
Johnkotch --- GOOD for you voicing your objection to that vet and leaving for good! I'm sick of the screens, too. In the bank, CNN is on many screens all over the place. In our elevators at work, we have a screen called "Captivate" which gives headlines of junk news all on a republican slant. Many of us complained bitterly when the screens were installed but we were told to just move to the other side of the elevator if we didn't want to see it. However the stupid people who work here just LOVED the new screens and so they stayed.
MR E AUGUST -- Well put! And in a very amusing way.
RICH M -- Well, put, too!!
FRANK 1569 -- Loved your post!! You are so right.
The reason for this government's need to foster fear in the sheeple is this: America and the rest of the world is about to enter a deep depression. The "global" economy brought to us by thirty years of Reagan economics is about to hit home. We have seen a great restructuring of wealth from the workers to the elite--this restructuring is about to increase at a rate unseen in history.
The elite are placing their pieces on the board: Haliburton builds massive prisons in the south, New York City proposes spying on ALL citizens entering or leaving the city. Bush removes "habeas corpus" for anyone he deems to be an "enemy combatant." China is sold huge quantities of security apparatus. America now has free speech zones--when the Constitution declares that ALL of the USA is a free speech zone. Bush signs an order allowing "Homeland" security (can you say fatherland???) to seize ANY laptop, cellphone or electronic devise on ANY international flight--US citizen or not.
The game is over, boys and girls. We either REVOLT or we give our kids this FASCIST GOVERNMENT.
STAND UP!
johnkotch 3:31 PM: I know exactly how you feel. My son, daughter in law and myself went to a nice restaurant in Madison, GA a few months ago, and were offered a seat in front of a big plasma TV blaring Fox News. I told the owner we would not eat at that table, and he offered to change channels, but we took another table in the back with a view of the outside. Fox and CNN are both the same: propaganda. And the line of scary boogey men never stops. Nasser of Egypt is the first one I remember.
"Americans believe very deeply in the ideals that America stands for . . . "
No, they don't. They believe in "The Secret", winning the Power Ball, the wisdom of Donald Trump, Oprah, Paris, Brangelina, tattoos (sorry, body art) and they hope that at the next NASCAR race there will be a multi-car pile-up in which several drivers are burned to death. Totally awesome, dude! Obama peddles change we can believe in and we all know it's a crock. McCain peddles fear we can believe in and that's what will make him the next president. That and the color of his skin.
Thanks johnkotch, I have noticed the same and asked the managers at the establishments, from cafeterias to autoshops if they would just turn the darn thing off, if that is the only station that has good reception. I believe that ClearChannel is the culprit there, by having bought the biggest bandwith???? or some other hi-tech reason that escapes my limited knowledge of such.
One of the things that I have come to understand, however, is that the Republicans who are the party of the richest people in the world, are very good at setting up systems that when the opportunity arises, can be taken advantage of rather easily. Case in point: the invasion of Iraq after the 9/11 attack. I have urged before on this website that someone should investigate the ties between Lowery Mays, Sr. the head of ClearChannel before Jr. took over and the Bushes in Texas. With Rupert Murdock and ClearChannel, it is no wonder that Fox soon dominated. I have it from a good source, however that the American public is getting tired of the Faux News Channel and that their ratings are dropping.
One more thing, since this column is about fear: I'd like to hear Garrison Keelor talk about fear in a Demo ad during the Olympics, or during the Demo or Repub convention. to be more specific, hear him debunk the paralyzing fear that has gripped some of the people during the Bush admin. Anybody with me on that?
I haven't seen anything about Orwell's "1984" being back in print. Has anyone here? I found an old copy at amazon.com a couple of years ago. I remember a time when publishers, acting on the public sentiment, would have had that book in print so fast it would make our heads swim. A very good indication of how tightly the screws are on us and the country.
Michael Moore covered this topic quite well in Farenheit 911. He exposed the government and media for fearmongering, noting that the Japanese have violent TV and movies just like Americans, and that Canadians own lots of guns just like Americans.
I've talked to many otherwise reasonable people who are "afraid of what will happen" if Obama is elected because of what his old preacher said, because his wife isn't proud enough of her country, and because his race "might interfere so much he won't be able to accomplish anything." It's not fear of anything real, it's free-floating, media induced anxiety.
And, in addition, I have a theory that the patriarchal powers-that-be have been very threatened for a very long time by the "feminization" of the US populace as represented by the hippies in the '60s. Generally speaking, peaceful societies tend to admire traditionally "feminine" characteristics like cooperation and nurturing and have female deities and leaders, while warlike societies generally tend to admire traditinally "male" characterstics like aggression and have male deities and leaders.
When many young people, seeing that America had more than enough resources and was not really threatened by outside invadors, began to move toward peace, nurturing, and cooperation, a backlash took place. Entities like the neocons and their PNAC organization found ways to ensure that the US is threatened and needs its warriors.
Fear creates a need for protection, and who better to protect than the military industrial government complex? Women are not admired or given equal status in this kind of environment.
This is a very brief overview of points made in an article I read years ago, but it still makes sense to me. In fact, recent events have made it even more applicable.
Americans have gone through 2 or 3 generations of constant fear mongering by their government.
Whether supposed or real external threats, such as, communists' global domination, left-wing regimes that nationalize local industries, terrorism against Americans, to internal threats, such as, crime, gays, abortion, socialism.
Today, there are no independent voices. Constant amplification of the fear by media has created a supple citizenry.
You'd think that the internet would shed light on this illusionary state of being. Hopefully this site is helping change things.
And the amazing thing is that McCain stands a chance to become the next president in the succession of fear-mongers. If he wins in November, the USA will slip even farther down the credibility charts in the eyes of most of the world.
The purveyors of fear are indeed cleverly diabolical in their manipulation of the masses. It seems trite to mention the stupidity, the self-serving ignorance and the mean-spirited myopia of those willing to be bamboozled by the Dick Cheneys of the world, but such is the nature of reality. Not a very nice image of the human race, is it?
For a good example of the philosophy of fear, check out:
"The Beijing Olympics, are they a trap?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqNaAU2vXlI
Actually, Orwell was an astute student of history. He studied Hitler's techniques of creating "national unity" for a dispirited, broken, and demoralized Germany.
Hitler's solution? Give all the Germans a "common enemy," one they could all unite and rally against--variants or subsets of this theme were the communists, socialists, anarchists, gypsies, etc.
Hitler's point was to find a social glue, a unifying, cohesive principle by which the collective anger, free-floating fears and anxieties in post-Treaty of Versailles Germany could be "harnessed." He succeeded alright.
Any student of the past and of present day demagogues will find these opportunistic blood-suckers in our midst, some preach from a TV network, others from talk radio, and still others from the pulpit.
Some get elected to Congress, another to the Oval Office and some in the Supreme Court condone this crap!
A people who "feel" disempowered will empower anyone who _promises_ to empower them. And that is the downfall of any nation.
Perhaps there are systems and social structures that are _intentionally designed_ to disempower people (or at least make them feel disempowered), from the currency system manipulated by a handful of crooked bankers (that devastate the average family's savings and retirement and purchasing power at the grocery store) to the oil/gasoline oligarchs/corporations that play with the "law of supply and demand." To our entertainment industry that exploits "power-worship" and sells us a _synthetic_ "power hierarchy" in cop and military TV series/movies where the (wo)man with the fastest draw, harder punch, or largest organization behind him/her "wins" in the end...
Snap out of it, folks.
We have a Constitution that empowers us to _do a lot about it_. We have a right to vote. We have a right to read up on what _all_ the candidates really stand for, not just the Two Party tweedle-dees and dums. It is laziness on the part of the voters. Look up. Who are all the candidates running besides the "Big Two?" There are Greens, Socialists, Citizens, Americans, Constitutionalists, etc. And we have a right to run for ANY ofice in the land we want, if we are dissatisfied with the clowns in office and with those waiting in line to run...and how _they (mis)spend_ our hard-earned taxes.
We _don't need_ a demagogue to tell (or sell) us anything, who to fear or who we can "avenge ourselves against," or who we need to destroy to emancipate our spirits.
This is a Constitutional democracy. We don't go get bullets, we get ballots and change our future that way. We don't sit on our butts and watch someone on the little screen _vicariously_ defeat "our enemies." There lies the self-destructive path of delusion. We are supposed to grow up and outgrow Batman, Superman, Green Lantern, Rambo, John Wayne, and even the Lone Ranger.
By the way, I suspect a big reason demagogues create these _strawman_ enemies is to distract the public from noticing the power grab, the loss of rights, and the control freak's dangerous autocratic policies.
To end, two quotes come to mind:
"When I was a child I spake and believed as a child..."
"The fault is not in our stars...it is in ourselves."
And, you know FDR's about "Fear."
Leo Strauss expressly endorsed fascism and its fascism's "authoritarian and imperial principles"
in contrast to Hitler and Nazism, apparently regarding the new German regime as not sufficently extreme in repudiating the revolutionary principal of "the rights of man." This was contained in a letter to Karl Loewith dated May 19, 1933, obviously before he understood the seriousness of Hitler's anti-Semitism. To my knowledge, Strauss never later retracted the pro-Fascist views expresssed in this letter.
i tend to agree with Mordechai Shiblikov when he challenges the notion that americans have this strong commitment to high ideals
poppycock and rubbish
mordechai writes:
"They believe in "The Secret", winning the Power Ball, the wisdom of Donald Trump, Oprah, Paris, Brangelina, tattoos (sorry, body art) and they hope that at the next NASCAR race there will be a multi-car pile-up in which several drivers are burned to death."
i would take the secret out of that list as it is too complex for most americans to even follow let alone agree with
to me it is more than irony to see the public sleepwalk through the georgian crisis that is transpiring at this moment - leaving us all in peril from an all out nucular (bush) war
they shit their pants over a guy who is in a cave in afghanistan - got a newsflash for the quivering american public - bin laden was killed in 2001 - a ghost who isn't even alive yet they have no awareness of a real life situation that could truly end the world
the same public who did not want to know who smeared jfk's brain all over dealey plaza, the public who is too afraid to determine who it was who destroyed the wtc on 9/11, the same public mesmerized by paris hilton's blowjobs, britney's pussycat and john edward's sperm deposits can't even get their minds around the true moment of peril when it finally presents itself
now i know there are many many americans who are brave and true to their schools
what is frustrating is how impotent they are in this crucial time
if anyone mentions the word security one more time i think i'll barf
All posters who blamed fear mongering on the republicans need to go back and read the first post again.
Nicely put, RichM
Thanks, Rich M., for putting it so well in the opening comment to this thread: that the promulgation of fear is a fully "bi-partisan" operation in our politics. Republicans promote fear of terrorist bogeymen, Democrats promote fear of Republicans. As Obama has gone "so bad" in the eyes of many progressives for his multiple panderings toward "Republican" positions, they can only justify their continued support of him by pinning a tail and horns on McCain and scaring us away from the only admitted "alternative" to an unsatisfactory Democrat. The fear game has many permutations and will only be ended when people genuinely express their aspirations over their fears in their choices of candidates and positions to take on political issues. Many things (like 3rd party success) that appear to be impossible are possible if the fear of alternatives can be put aside and people can start to construct the world of their ideals rather than the one of their defenses against those things they fear. "We have nothing to fear but fear itself," what FDR exists today to utter that sentiment in support of a genuinely "New Deal?"
It's not just about fear. 3 books that may help in the quest to understand the impulse:
The Mass Psychology of Fascism by Wilhelm Reich
Saharasia by James DeMeo
The Emotional Plague, by Charles Konia, MD
among others
Blame it on the Russians, they went broke playing bad guy, blame it on those Aliens, they didn't show up in time, so now Americans are reduced to living in fear of raggedy assed Islamic militants living in caves and slums to be the great enemy. It's pathetic, but help may be on the way. Wait until China starts dumping all those treasury bonds at 10 cents on the dollar. There may be a great enemy emerge yet.
Thank you, Mordechai Shiblikov. I like you must, whenever the opportunity presents itself, confront the mantras and the self-delusion. In this ocassion you responded to another writer who wrote, "Americans believe very deeply in the ideals that America stands for . . . " In another piece recently at TruthOut it was a writer using the phrase "our beloved Nation of America". I think my response to that writer works equally well with regards to the phrase "Americans believe very deeply in the ideals America stands for ..."
I do have to take major exception to some of the statements like the
"ideals America stands for" and "our beloved Nation of America". Are you kidding me? Who brought us Vietnam? Who brought us the contras in Nicaragua and death squads in El Salvador, and any number of other atrocities and anti-democratic barbarities committed by or with military support and financing of the U.S.?
Our America! But beloved? By whom? Those short of perspective and weak of analysis.
It sort of reminds me of former U.S. Marine intelligence officer Scott Ritter who I heard in Spokane a few years ago bemoaning what has become of the CIA under the Bush administration. Is he kidding us? What has become of the CIA under THIS administration? Oh, yes, our Beloved CIA and our Beloved America. Once so noble, only now fallen from grace.
Get a clue. The heart of this beast is a cold, hard, ruthless organ of destruction, blood thirsty and capable of much worse than we have seen of yet.
The Clinton years and the Carter years and the Johnson years and the Kennedy years were not the years of a peace loving, justice seeking America. Nor will the years of the ruling class Obama be years of "our beloved America" and the "ideals that America stands for".
That America does not exist.
Richar Hofstadter wrote eloquently of the "Paranoid Style in American Politics." In reality, a thread has always been there; but since Wilson the government has consciously used fear in the way described here; It's only become more bizarre and more destructive over time. Think McCarthy's attacks on the military; Nixon's desperate spying; the CIA flooding the country with drugs during Iran Contra; the constant so-called 'scandals' of the Clinton era and now Bush.
All through this, both parties have been complacent. It was a democrat who announced, when the House was about to do its job and vote articles of impeachment against Nixon, that we had a "constitutional crisis". It was another democrat who declared "impeachment off the table" for Bush. Democrats controlled the house during McCarthy's term, and Wilson -- who planted the national security state -- was a democrat.
Both parties have participated in eroding the republic, and both parties are culpable in the enslavement of the American people in a shroud of fear.
It doesn't seem accidental to me that all major media outlets (radio, television, newspapers, music, movies) are controlled by less than a dozen major corporations. It helps to control the populace.
It all boils down to: There is no money in peace. Those in the business of running the world, dicatating the economy, and defining the financial paradigm under which the world operates, do not profit without conflict. Regular citizens throughout the world would be content with long-term peace. It would allow for a predictable livelihood, planning for a future in which it is possible to pass the gains of a lifetime of labor on to your descendants. But the barons of industry, the oligarchy of political rulers, the financial emperors who actually control the lives of us rabble, they will not reap the return on investment with steady growth, or with conservation of resources, or with harnessing alternative energy for the masses. Their payback has to be immediate and their control absolute -- why else would you want to rule the world? The future? They don't care about the future -- we'll all be dead.
tayacan wrote, "That America does not exist."
blackfeather7 replies, "Nothing exists."
Fear 101 (one naught one)
Now who are we suppose to fear again?
Osama Obama .....
Putin Rasputin
pope Ratsinger and
President Hu
Olmert Ahmadinejad
The Talliban.....Mr. Sadaam
or
McCain the McPuppet?
well.......
Barak 'the blessed' goes with Obama
while lightning
goes more with McCain
I'd sooner the blessing
over the bolt
for past policy smites
could become us, ......
the smote
the audacity of hope....
seems rather odd...
though
when it's brave to hope
and...
I ain't beggin for a little poke
for I dare ya to have a little hope!
just like the blessing without the bolt
but....
what will it take to get truly smote?
fear 'one naught one'
RICHM - RIGHT ON!
1913 exists -- the year of the Central Bank and the 16th amemndment.
RichM nails it again.
This is why I've become fond of characterizing the duopoly as consisting of the Party of Cain and the Party of Judas.
orange alert
Understanding communication and rhetorical theory is a powerful tool to reading between the lines of propaganda. I think that the american public is largely apothetic and ill informed of current events, not because they are stupid, but because the following issues are very complicated and we are regularly denied disclosure as to what the man behind the social control curtain is really up to:
a. The general public doesn't understand communication theory, and therefore can't spot propaganda when it's right in front of them.
b. the MSM doesn't carry the progressive side of the story... and the public doesn't know where, how, or even that they need to find well balanced sources of information outside of the MSM.
c. the public does not examine, question, or understand media ownership, and how ownership of any source determines the content of the message. And they do not understand how nearly every MSM buck eventually stops on the Military Ind. Complex desk.
d. the public does not understand the vast all encomposing 'success' of the Military Industrial Complex. The MIC has been so successful at hiding it's prolific business conglomerants, funding, and technological support bases, and media ownership, that we don't even see it operating right next door. The money trail is very well disguised.
e. language itself derives meaning through the use of implied opposites. This nature of language and meaning is being exploited as a tool to divide and conquere... even though common citizens share many of the same common concerns. We are being pigeon holed into futile factions that can't form a common consesus... thereby empowering the MIC to be the consesus dictactor.
f. the economy has been setup as a middle class race to the bottom, denying the citizenry the time and resources they need to actively participate in democracy.
g. the 'townhall' has been replaced by the movie theater, direct TV, and corporate sponsored public events. You have no opportunity to speak your mind at these privately owned functions. They exist not to listen to you, but to tell you what to do.
h. Violence and capitalism are perfect bedfellows. No peaceful business alternatives can compete with a sinister capitalist model that is based on death and destruction and devoid of any human/eco friendly morallity. And both the implied and real threat of violence are the biggest money makers of all. People will pay almost anything for the illusionary promise of "Suckerity".
Uh, this is news? How old is Chandler? Eighteen? I suggest he move up a few decades and read Vidal's "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace".
Purvis ames:
Google "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace" with Vidal excluded from the search.
You'll find a book with that title, first published in 1953, by Harry Elmer Barnes. Amazon.com says it is "Currently unavailable" but it can be downloaded in pdf format from mises.comn.
Good article.
BTW, the Dems use the same tactics, and seem to have adopted the GWOT as well. Global warming is one of the external threats Dems use to terrorize you. The objectives of dems and republicans are the same though. They use some different tactics, and have some tactics in common.
http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
From the Club of Rome, which gave us the greaan revolution:
""Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today's problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time."
They express many of the same sentiments as Strauss if read the link, and that was in 1972 when we were told an ice age was looming.
Srauss taught that within societies, some are fit to lead, while others are fit only to be led. For Strauss, a NWO would accept, understand, and harness man's tendency for "self-interest", or "human nature". Those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality. He believed the world to be a place where policy advisers may have to deceive their own public leaders. If exposed to the absolute truth, the masses would quickly succumb to nihilism or anarchy. They "can't handle the truth". Thus, according to Strauss, it is necessary to maintain "the Noble Lie".
Strauss believed that the aggressive nature of human beings could only be restrained by a powerful state. "Because mankind is wicked, he has to be governed," he once wrote. "Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united – and they can only be united against other people." Or against external threats such as AQ and Global warming.
In Plato's "Republic", he outlined the basis of the future totalitarian state, ruled by the elite he called "philosopher kings", or "guardians". The Republic provided the basis for communism, the elimination of marriage and the family, compulsory education, the use of eugenics by the state, and the employment of deceptive propaganda methods. Global Warming and GWOT are both products of propaganda that the elite use to control the people.
They also have some stuff in the works like UFO's, perhaps they will say aliens have inflitrated our society and manadatory DNA testing is required to root them out (hey, Dick Cheney does look like he is from another world, doesnt he, could we be ruled by aliens?).
Fear is the mind killer. So long as Americans are so easily terrorized, the terrorists in DC will continue to rule by fear.
Read "The Report From Iron Mountain" (google it, look for pdf version on line)
cultivating fear is not possible when people refuse to believe the horseshit they are fed by corporate media.
there is a tendency toward gulibility, republicrat and demoblican alike, based on a collective insecurity that is directly linked to the means by which wealth is made, hoarded and used to oppress others.
our culture (or lack thereof) and economy can only function through the paradigm of absolute separation of nations, communities, families and individuals from each other. easier to use/exploit others for one's own gain.
no one likes to think about the countless masses of suffering humanity whose lives have been robbed of value by the very people who are now living in fear. anyone else see the connection here?
RichM August 15th, 2008 2:55 pm
greenerthanthou August 15th, 2008 5:55 pm
Jerry D. Rose August 15th, 2008 5:57 pm
You guys have said it all, said it well and expressed it completely. Thanks!
Settle down, Purvis. Note that Mr. Chandler is writing for The Bangor Daily News. For that audience this is an effective and, one hopes, eye-opening piece.
A fellow Mainah
I had to email this to 60 Minutes last Sunday...
Re Bob Simon's story on Israel
Dear 60 Minutes,
I turned off your program tonight as soon as the opening montage stated that the Iranian president said Israel should be wiped off the map. For many months it has been widely known that this is an inaccurate American translation of what he said. Furthermore, the montage implied that the president of Iran has the same level of power in his country as our president has in ours. In 2003, the Iranian government bent over backwards to try to reach an agreement of friendship between our two countries, and the Bush administration ignored them.
Sincerely,
Gene Silvers
Los Angeles
Zazmo
Don't bother. It's like sending a protest letter to Josef Goebbels.
Three Branches of Government.
Executive, Legislative , Judicial.
Since all three have decided to shit on the Constitution over the last seven years, I pray for three things to happen.
1. King George and his Dick get shoved out of office in November by someone that will Protect the Constitution from enemy's Domestic, our abused military is doing a great job protecting our Constitution on the foreign fronts. God Bless our Troops.
2. I would love to hear our Presidential candidates talk about restoring our Constitution and abolishing the Patriot Act during the debates, before we become a communist country.
We do not need to spend 80 billion a year on private company contracts to Verizon, CACI, L3 Communications, Lockheed Martin, EMS terrorist spy training, IAFF Spy Training, Infra Gard,infrastructure.
They will create suspects, and fear to keep the money train going. I hope its not to late, for they are the Stazi police.They our torturing thousands of Americans using Cointel Pro tactics to create suspects, build the new spy nation one community at a time, and will end up controlling America.
3. The Judicial system must realize that they are loosing there share of power every day that goes by, if they do not act to make the Constitution the Law of the Land. The legislative will loose their power in turn.
Because of their failure to protect the Constitution, both the Legislative and Judicial branches of government have allowed the Executive branch to move this country in a communist direction.
If I have to choose between living with some fear of terrorist attack ,or having the constitution destroyed by those who would tell us that freedom is not free,
I choose not to pay the high price of giving up our Constitutional Civil Rights that so many have died to protect.
BornFreeMen
This is a TEST of the Emergency Broadcast System. This is only a TEST. (But as Pavlov's experiments in the former Soviet Union proved, it doesn't have to be a real emergency to generate hysteria in the society. A "test" is psychologically sufficient.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwErz68GfF8&feature=related
Threat Level: Yellow (elevated)
Go here to get frightened:
http://www.dhs.gov/xinfoshare/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm
Boo!
For decades a very corrupt and controlled media has been directing the attention of the masses (that's you and I) by uniformly reporting on a state of managed chaos, which is scripted and staged to produce mental confusion and fatigue.
The relentless reporting and rehashing of catastrophic and traumatic events with images of despair and destruction repeatly planted into the minds of "news consumers," creates overwhelming states of anxiety (quite often layer upon layer hidden from our conscious awareness). Such activity can be thought of as a form of psycholotical warfare.
Authorities play with truths, half-truths, deceptions, and lies to render all of us feeling it is hopeless and pointless to do anything at all.
In this way a paralysis of personal and bottom-up social power takes hold because countless people become convinced that the only reality is what is described and prescribed by the wizard authorities pulling levers "behind the curtains."
Remember, when we abdicate our role of responsibility in creating our lives, we actually - by default - open the door to others who will control it for us.
In reality there are only a few who want to kill and are obsessed with destroying others. There are many who want fellow humans, the Biosphere, and the planet we call Earth to live and thrive.
Will the many or the few succeed in creating our future world? Will *we* make the necessary choices to create the world a "life-positive world" or will the few succeed with their desperate, despotic game plans to separate humanity and destroy Life?
There is one irony: in their arrogant, presumptuous, hubristic assaults on Life, the few are indeed waking up an increasing number of "the many" - to the value of genuine inner and outer freedom and the true power of the human spirit.
Rich M,
"Chandler notes the Orwellian truth: that Republican policy is based entirely on cultivating irrational fear & hatred of external threats into the national psyche.
Meanwhile, Democratic Party politics is based entirely on cultivating fear and hatred of Republicans into the collective psyche of susceptible voters. At the very same time (shades of "doublethink"!), the Dem Party supports virtually all Republican initiatives, exposes no Republican crimes, opposes virtually none of the Republican program, while protecting Republicans against impeachment & accountability.
It would be hard to say which of these is more Orwellian."
Well said. Yet I know from reading your posts here that we don't quite agree on what are the right tactical decisions for the moment, nor, for that matter I suppose, do we agree on medium or long term strategies and solutions.
Somehow, I hope we're still potential allies in the end.
RichM is right. But when are we as a people gonna move from behind our computers, and blogs, to demand better from our leaders---peacefully, democratically? IN unison. All together now!