EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Suffocating Dead Zones Spread Across World's Oceans
Critically low oxygen levels now pose as great a threat to life in the world's oceans as overfishing and habitat loss, say experts
Man-made pollution is spreading a growing number of suffocating dead zones across the world's seas with disastrous consequences for marine life, scientists have warned.
The experts say the hundreds of regions of critically low oxygen now affect a combined area the size of New Zealand, and that they pose as great a threat to life in the world's oceans as overfishing and habitat loss.
The number of such seabed zones - caused when massive algal blooms feeding off pollutants such as fertiliser die and decay - has boomed in the last decade. There were some 405 recorded in coastal waters worldwide in 2007, up from 305 in 1995 and 162 in the 1980s.
Robert Diaz, an oceans expert at the US Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, at Gloucester Point, said: "Dead zones were once rare. Now they're commonplace. There are more of them in more places."
Marine bacteria feed on the algae in the blooms after it has died and sunk to the bottom, and in doing so they use up all of the oxygen dissolved in the water. The resulting 'hypoxic' seabed zones can asphyxiate swathes of bottom dwelling organisms such as clams and worms, and disrupt fish populations.
Diaz and his colleague, Rutger Rosenberg of the department of marine ecology at the University of Gothenburg, call for more careful use of fertilisers to address the problem.
Writing in the journal Science, the researchers say the dead zones must be viewed as one of the "major global environmental problems". They say: "There is no other variable of such ecological importance to coastal marine ecosystems that has changed so drastically over such a short time."
The key solution, they say, is to "keep fertilisers on the land and out of the sea". Changes in the way fertilisers and other pollutants are managed on land have already "virtually eliminated" dead zones from the Mersey and Thames estuaries, they say.
Diaz says his concern is shared by farmers who are worried about the high cost of fertilisers. "They certainly don't want to see their dollars flowing off their fields. Scientists and farmers need to continue working together to minimise the transfer of nutrients from land to sea."
The number of dead zones reported has doubled each decade since the 1960s, but the scientists say they are often ignored until they provoke problems among populations of larger creatures such as fish or lobsters. By killing or stunting the growth of bottom-dwelling organisms, the lack of oxygen denies food to creatures higher up the food chain.
The Baltic Sea, site of the world's largest dead zone, has lost about 30% of its available food energy, which has led to a significant decline in its fisheries.
The lack of oxygen can also force fish into warmer waters closer to the surface, perhaps making them more susceptible to disease.
The size of marine dead zones often fluctuates with the seasons. A massive dead zone, some 8,000 square miles across, forms each summer in the Gulf of Mexico as floodwater flushes nitrogen-rich fertiliser into the Mississippi River.
Experts said it was slightly smaller than expected this year because Hurricane Dolly stirred up the water. Dead zones require the water to be separated into layers, with little or no mixing between.
As well as fertilisers rich in nitrates and phosphates, sewage discharges also contribute to the problem because they help the algal blooms to flourish.
Diaz and Rosenberg say: "We believe it would be unrealistic to return to pre-industrial levels of nutrient input [to oceans], but an appropriate management goal would be to reduce nutrient inputs to levels that occurred in the middle of the past century," before the rise in added nutrients began to spread dead zones globally.
Climate change could be adding to the problem. Many regions are expected to experience more severe periods of heavy rain, which could wash more nutrients from farmland into rivers.
In May, scientists reported that oxygen-depleted zones in tropical oceans are expanding. They analysed oxygen levels in samples of seawater and found the effect was largest in the central and eastern tropical Atlantic and the equatorial Pacific. The increase could push oxygen-starved zones closer to the surface and give marine life such as fish less room to live and look for food.
The scientists, led by Lothar Stramma from the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in Kiel, Germany, say the change could be linked to warming seas. At 0C, a litre of seawater can hold about 10ml of dissolved oxygen; at 25C this falls to 4ml. Stramma said: "Whether or not these observed changes in oxygen can be attributed to global warming alone is still unresolved." The reduction could also be down to natural processes working on shorter timescales, he said.
© 2008 The Guardian
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

92 Comments so far
Show AllThis could be "more bad news" or a warning.
The dead zones mentioned in this article have been known to many in the environmental movement for many years now. Off the coast of Texas there now is a "dead zone" that is lager in dimension than the state of Connecticut---and it has grown from a much smaller size---and is growing still.
The cause(s) of these dead zones have been attributed to human activity---especially agricultural run off which contains huge amounts of chemicals as well as other wastes which feed into the river systems and eventually into the oceans.
Public awareness is another matter. When it was first brought to the attention of the public in Texas, then Gov GW Bush proclaimed that "more research needs to be done to understand this phenomenon and its causes" --I have a news clip from that in my own "scrap book" of "stupid politicians statements" . Gov Bush was intentionally misleading since the highly regarded Texas A&M University had done the original study in it's Oceanography department, and made the report public. True to Texas' Conservative dominated political system little or nothing was done----and the argument later came out that "A&M" had done the study already, and not much could be done to stop it. So it has grown more each year in size.
The one important signal here is that as long as the conservative mindset continues to control so much in the USA, things will simply get worse----there is no limit as to how much worse things could get----there is a limit as to how much humanity will be able to observe: once the humans have died off---most likely at their own hands---they will not be around to witness anything.
When I was a child all my mother had to do was warn me that I could get into trouble if I continued a certain activity or conduct; I would usually stop it.
Our Mother the Earth is warning us now. The conservative thinkers would rather "wait for more information" instead of acting upon the information already in hand that clearly states the seriousness of the warning. If they continue to dominate---they will take the rest of the life forms with them-----.
All of this can be directly attributed to Human activity and the ever increasing population. If Human beings are not willing to control their numbers; nature will do it for them.
That most likely is the warning that is being witnessed here------how many out there are listening?
http://www.whyplankton.com
We are killing them.
'future generations are going to look back on us and they are going to think of us as barbarians, the same way we think of the slave traders. they're going to look at us as barbarians for what we are doing, the fact that we're burning all the fossil fuels in a few generations, that we wiped out the oceans, that we've driven species to extinction, and worse, this is the worst part, we know what we are doing. the scientists know, the environmentalists know, the companies know, and the general public knows, and yet we are allowing ourselves to do it'
- rex wyler, founder greenpeace international, author
What is left to say? We in the west, especially the US, flaunted our affluent lifestyles in front of the whole world and now they want what we have.
McDonalds, for example, intends to build a huge amounts of new stores in China. Market research must indicate then that the Chinese want McDonalds, which shows that they are as susceptible to being brainwashed into the corporate-consumer reality-tunnel as Americans were and still are for the most part.
How could anyone see the proliferation of Mcdonalds as a sign of "the good life?"
I'd love to see rich businessmen and political leaders in the West stand up and say to the world, "We were wrong, our way of life and our life-philosophy of endless cancerous corporate proliferation and the consumer lifestyle are dead ends."
Plus, how many people would be willing to forego having children? How many would be willing to accept the proposition that, yes, all those who came before them had children but that now they are going to have to refrain from doing so so that humanity can reduce the population to a sustainable level which i would imagine would be no more than 3 billion people.
but both of the above will never happen. an intelligent global dialogue about all of theis wont happen because human beings are just not mature enough to do it.
To clean a river you simply stop polluting it. To clean the ocean you stop polluting it. We know what the solutions are. We need regulations and enforcement. We can assume how mccain stands on the issue. What is obama's position?
zaz said: "To clean a river you simply stop polluting it. To clean the ocean you stop polluting it. We know what the solutions are. We need regulations and enforcement. We can assume how mccain stands on the issue. What is obama's position?"
Please inform all the farmers east of the Continental Divide that you want them to stop using fertilizer so that we can stop the annual killing a New Jersey size portion of the Gulf of New Mexico.
wwww.StudentsForTheEarth.org
this reminds of the soylent green movie starring chuck pry-that-gun-from-my-cold-dead-hand heston
also it was the last movie edward g robinson was in
the secret report in that movie had to do with the death of the oceans - then, as we know, they started to make food out of dead people
one thing i hope for, if we survive the looming nuclear war with the russians, is that i don't get a burger made out of recycled cheney
man, talk about heartburn
KEM PATRICK: Why do you keep posting the link to the site to buy plankton capsules? Do you get a kickback or something? ;)
More useful information would be:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plankton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton
Here is a great article by Jensen:
http://www.alternet.org/story/95126/the_delusion_revolution%3A_we%27re_on_the_road_to_extinction_and_in_denial_/?page=2
You know, this is one of those things that's actually a lot simpler to solve than people assume. It's not even about stopping the use of fertilizers - synthetic or "organic." It's about stopping these things from washing down into the waterways and being emptied into the oceans.
Policy could address this problem easily by setting standards for erosion buffers surrounding agricultural fields, catching the majority of the runoff during heavy precipitation events, thereby keeping fertilizer trapped in soils rather than pouring into rivers.
This is one of the many issues that require good governance, which much of the world is lacking. So the politicians keep lying, the corporate agribusiness giants keep profiting, and the oceans keep dying.
The oceans are dying and you know what they're doing in Cumberland, MD? This evening they are having 500 Harley-Davidson motorcycle riders at the downtown business mall, revving up their bikes at the same time and going off on a long ride in the country.
If you look at the map, the area around the arctic is all but pristine.
But for how long. ? Will we wake up and try and preserve THAT ara before it too late or will this mad rush to develop its resources take hold once again.?
zaz said: "To clean a river you simply stop polluting it. To clean the ocean you stop polluting it.
And this will happen just as soon as there are no 'future generations' to continue polluting.
This is nothing more than the logical outcome of the so-called 'Green Revolution'.
When you over use chemical fertilizers, the run off flows into streams and rivers which lead eventually, to the sea. During the most recent episode of flooding in the US Midwest, in the weeks that followed the Texas Gulf dead zone exploded in area.
You want to stop the spread of dead zones?
Go to local (Hundred Mile Diet) organic gardening. For everyone. Break the agri-corp monopolies. AND STOP BLOODY USING OIL BASED FERTILIZERS!
We are the masters of arrogance and supreme, scary fools! It's like watching the fall of the roller coaster - just going along for the ride ...
The bad news just keeps pouring in.
Just another example of the results of our environmental neglect. The longer corrective measures are delayed, ther worse things will become and the rates of decline will accelerate. The mentality of this administration and their war on science has contributed largely to this condition.
GWNorth said: "If you look at the map, the area around the arctic is all but pristine."
Well, the map doesn't indicate "pollution levels", it's an indication of levels of dissolved O2. Considering that colder water can hold more O2, it's logical that the Arctic doesn't have a dead-zone... yet.
Simple Sauce says "Policy could address this problem easily by setting standards for erosion buffers surrounding agricultural fields, catching the majority of the runoff during heavy precipitation events, thereby keeping fertilizer trapped in soils rather than pouring into rivers."
That would make a big difference. But there's still all the fertilizer, pesticides, and other poisons that leech into the soil and end up in underground water sources, that also end up in the ocean.
And what about the Great Plastic Whorl in the Pacific?
there should be a massive effort to plant industrial HEMP along streams and rivers that eventually pour into the oceans. It is unbelievable that more people are not speaking up about how much of a difference it would make if industrial hemp is legalized. The federal government needs to stop the maddness known as the 'war on drugs' as it really is a war on people. INDUSTRIAL HEMP should be every american farmers right to grow. within 2 years of legalization, it would infuse the economy with BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars and thousands of good jobs. NO more cutting down old growth forests so the rich can wipe their asses with virgin pulp. NO more wastefull corn ethanol when you can make twice as much on half the land without using these caustic fertilizers!! HEMP has Sooooo many uses, thats why it has so much opposition. The OWNERS dont want a plant that can replace all that plastic crap out there. The PEOPLE must start demanding their right to this worldsaving plant. Wilmore has the right idea, HEMP IS THE ANSWER!!!!!!
No ~Elmystero~ I don't get anythng for posting that link, nor do I use the capsules. Is there something in that link about the fact that phytoplankton supplies most of the oxygen on Earth that annoys you? I only post it to help inform just how important the Phytoplankton are for life to survive on Earth and there are icons in that link that also offer other importnant information.
Surprisingly, many people don't realize that most of our oxygen is supplied by the microscopic plant life in our oceans and we are destroying that plant life, or phytoplankton, with man made pollution.
Does my posting it cause you to have some personal problem? I wish that you had not made a comment that might tend to discredit my honesty or integrity and then add a smiley face to show that you're a nice guy. What good did you derive by asking it of me? And thank you for giving the other links you posted about it, I didn't have those.
Good links Elmo thanks again.
But to get the important point across that the phytoplankton are vital for all life and the very basis for life on Earth, I find that the link I offer is much easier to read and the fact that it quotes NASA scientists I felt helps enhanse the understanding more so than the very lengthy Wikipedia links. So I'll stick to my links ~Elymesterio~ and won't criticize any which you may offer.
P/S, I don't do smiley faces.
Dead oceans + deforestation = no oxygen = suffocation.
Unfortunately, human beings - especially Americans - will only react when dead zones appear and people start suffocating, but by then it will be too late.
It's probably too late already, as there's no way to significantly reduce the human population or restore the oxygen supply.
Call this growing ocean die off just one more aspect of Great Downward Spiral. It works this way: The growing world economy is making ever increasing demands on a Ecosystem increasingly unable to meet those demands. But this is not a problem, if the oil is running out, start turning food into fuel, plow down your Appalachian mountains for coal, strip Alberta's Boreal forest for oil sands, and plan to do the same out West to extract the oil shale. If you find fish are harder to get out of the Ocean, build bigger fishing ships with more sophisticated technology. And when you have stripped the Oceans go find yourself some toxic Talapia from China at WalMart or Safeway. Oh I almost forgot the American fish farms shutting down because the feeds are now too expensive. But don't worry, we are cutting down the Everglades not only to drill for more energy but also to produce more soybeans for the soybeans displaced in this county by the corn to power your (and my) car back and forth between work, school, the big box stores, and our suburban homes. Meanwhile, we have only increased hunger by an extra 100 million people just to keep our vehicles going. And so the cycle goes as we spend down the would be Ecologic Inheritance of future generations in order to keep afloat this grand, but very brief, illusion of our independence of Earth Systems.
For a rigorous presentation of man's spending down of the natural capital, see WWF's Living Planet Report at http://www.panda.org/news_facts/publications/living_planet_report/index.cfm
www.StudentsForTheEarth.org
It is easy to create planted areas that will catch runoff then measure the effectiveness. All easy, we don't care.
Rule; "No one changes the path they are on until they get in enough pain."
We are not in enough pain!
homeward-angel August 15th, 2008 5:46 pm
You are SO right!!!! Hemp makes a great linen type paper, ropes, clothes, the list goes on and on. Germany is even making car body parts from hemp. A totally renewable resource.
Industrial hemp could save the american family farm if we can keep Monsanto away from the seed.
The US is the only industrial nation in the world to not allow hemp cultivation.
Fertilizer run off from suburban lawns contributes too. We fertilize lawns, mow them with more fossil fuels and then haul clippings to landfills instead of composting or grass cycling. This is idiotic. Use grasscycling- leave clippings on the lawn to recycle nutrients or compost. Better yet change your lawn to a kitchen garden. Put in drip irrigation and grow veggies and reduce your carbon footprint and pollution of the rivers and oceans.
Farmwife - Add Canada to the list of countries that do not allow the widespread cultivation of hemp. The (VERY) few operations there are are heavily licensed, paranoically monitored by the RCMP, and subject to random search and testing. As well, all product has to be meticulously accounted for and monitored. Most of the early operations have shut down due to all of this invasive policing.
FREEQUARK
DEAD OCEANS PLUS DEFORESTATION
EQUALS NO OXYGEN EQUALS SUFFOCATION
that's a poem, you maybe didn't realise. and it would be a good ad to educate people. but i agree, it's probably too late already.........
Galen August 15th, 2008 7:44 pm
Thank you for educating me. The information I had didn't include how regulated it was, but just that it was allowed. A poster on CD just the other day said one state (sorry I can't remember which one, maybe Kentucky) is now allowing hemp cultivation. I imagine it must be a similar nightmare for the growers.
I might add at this point that part of the problems we have with run off from farms is allowing cultivation right up to the very edge of streams and rivers. Common sense would suggest that keeping trees, grass, and other ground covers close to steam and riverbank areas would impede run off of chemicals (which I do not endorse) and land erosion. Also as other posters have noted, chemicals leak into ground water. Urban lawns are also part of the problem, it is not just agriculture.
I think you're right. It is too late. Most people around here just keep their TVs running all the time staring vacantly at car chases and sex scandals. If you try to get into a serious conversation with someone, anyone, within one minute they are asking if you are a veteran, as though non-vets aren't even allowed to have an opinion on anything. So I tell them that I am a veteran, and I don't agree with their opinion, and they start comparing how many years they were in the military to how many years I was in the military. And if I was only in for five years and they were in for twenty four years, they walk away with little triumphant smiles on their faces.
It seems almost cruelly ironic that this earth's lower apes instinctively know how to avoid fouling their own nests, while we higher apes have lost those same smarts; that the price we humans must pay for becoming more creative and complexly prosperous than gorillas - is not knowing where or how to sensibly shit anymore.
Apparently, anything is allowed to happen in this universe.
I don't like that too much.
But I still believe that Creation intends Good for us humans, and that those of us who can see the oceans for their waters, and the forests for their trees, are expected act on that premise - against those humans who greedily produce harm to what sustains the human experiment.
publius perfidius August 15th, 2008 9:16 pm
Great point!
May I quote from a stupid movie? Coneheads:
Men are pigs. Pig, a domesticated ominivore that deficates in the same place in consumes. Exactly.
Well, humankind could learn a lot from the South American jaguar. He's been a top-predator for longer than humans have been top-predators. You'll never see a jaguar unless you're about to become his lunch.
Thanks to modern science and technology, we can now destroy the worlds oceans in our pursuit of comfort, convenience and consumer goods.
There is a limit to how much shit a cess pool will hold and we have managed to use our precious waters, aquifers and the oceans for cess pools.
The scientist, explorer, inventor, navigator, seaman, pilot and author, ~Jacques Costeau~ warned us as far back as 1960 and he was ignored. Top level scientists are still being ignored.
Hey ~FARMWIFE~ Men are pigs? Now please don't tell us that you're married to a pig.
LOL
These dead zones 'affect a combined area the size of New Zealand'. Have we all looked at a map of the world and seen just what the 'size of New Zealand' is? Pretty small. Not that dead zones are not something we should be concerned about, but, you can't spread New Zealand across the face of the earth. It just isn't big enough!
Kem,
Well...??? How should I put this? Anyone who has co-habitated with another human (marriage, roommates, etc.) knows how difficult it can become when one member of the household leaves his or her mess for another to clean up.
In this particule post I was refering to men in the sense of Mankind, including woman kind, the general sense of the word.
The same rules apply no matter how big the "living space". Who does the laundry? Who earns the wage? Who does the dishes? Who plants the garden? Who maintains the spirital climate? Is the maid less important than the wage earner? Without one the other is less.
So yes at times I am married to a pig. And so is he. Because I am not perfect.
At least I am taking my own bags to the grocery store. LOL
And sometimes I miss the bowl when I pee.
"Oink ___ oink".
At least you don't pee in the sink. Do you?
on the dirty dishes?
Galen: 4:31 PM post- I certainly agree. Good post.
~KAYAKER~ That massive garbage dump of several feet deep plastic in the Mid-Pacific that Galen mentioned at 5:17am, is larger than the United States however. It's perhaps worse than the growing dead zones.
You better have a little talk with hubby Housewife.
Ocean dead zones remind me somewhat of a melanoma cancer spot on one's forehead. Cancer spreads, and it kills.
But what to do? He just wants to drill for more oil. That is all he cares about.
Do you think we should get a divorce?
He doesn't care about me as a person, he only cares about what he can get out of me. He is using me up.