Can Obama Bridge America's Wall of Ignominy?
"The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down." -Barak Obama-
When Barak Obama visited Germany in July, he stood at the site where a wall once separated East and West Berlin. With his usual eloquence he praised the crowd of 200,000 for having had the courage to tear that wall down. He reminded them that the "greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us one from the other."
The day before his Berlin speech Obama was in Israel standing less than two miles from the 400-mile-long apartheid wall that separates Israel from the West Bank. He did not call on Israeli courage to tear their wall down, nor did he mention that wall to his Berlin audience.
I recently wrote about Obama's Berlin speech and his politically "prudent" silence regarding Israel's apartheid wall. I challenged him to walk his talk should he be elected president and work to tear down the world's most unconscionable wall.
Responding to that piece in an email, Eric Murillo, an activist from El Paso, Texas, reminded me that "there is another wall that exists on the US/Mexican border . . . this wall is still under construction . . .THIS wall is HERE! . . . Must we ignore it?"
Mr. Murillo was referring to the 700-mile-long, $2.2 billion wall along the US/Mexico border that will, in Obama's Kingesque prose, "separate us one from the other."
I should mention that Senator Obama voted for the 2006 Secure Fence Act, which authorized the construction of the five segments of the new wall along the 1,952-mile border between the United States and Mexico.
I should mention also that Kollsman Inc., an American-based subsidiary of the Israeli company, Elbit Systems Ltd., which supplies the surveillance and security technology for its apartheid wall, was awarded a contract from the Department of Homeland Security to supply "technology . . . to deter and prevent crossings . . . along the US borders with Canada and Mexico."
It seems American taxpayers, who are bankrolling Israel's million-dollar-a-mile apartheid wall with an annual contribution of $3 billion in economic and military aide (one-sixth of U.S. foreign aid budget), will be paying an Israeli company to help build our border wall using the experience and expertise the American nickel has already paid for-such is the way of boondoggles.
Mr. Murillo wishes America's million-dollar-a-mile border wall was a mere boondoggle. For him it is a "wall of ignominy," a phrase coined by Mexico's former president Vicente Fox. It is "concrete" evidence that the economic globalization policies championed by the Clinton and Bush administrations open borders for the "migration" of multinational corporate profits and natural resources to "countries with the most" from "those with the least," but closes borders to migration of those whose livelihoods have been diminished or destroyed by globalization's cynical reality.
Predictably then, the numbers of illegal immigrants from Mexico increased exponentially after the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in the early 1990s.
Raising a family's economic status ten-fold by illegally entering the United States-and that's assuming only minimum wage or less-is a powerful incentive to attempt the arduous, if not deadly, desert border crossing. Consider for a moment why swarms of Canucks are not illegally crossing our pine-forested northern borders each year.
Just as Israel's American financed apartheid wall separates lives and livelihoods and imprisons dreams, so goes America's Israeli built "wall of ignominy."
Calexico, California, a community of 27,000, has a mutual aid agreement with Mexicali, just across the border. These two communities not only support each other with police and fire protection, but their economies are interdependent as well. Calexico's stores depend on Mexican shoppers. "If we don't have Mexico, we don't have Calexico," said former Calexico Mayor Alex Perrone.
This is not an isolated border relationship. It is one that occurs along the entire 1952-mile border. Mike Allen, an executive vice president with the Economic Development Corporation of McAllen, Texas, a community of 131,000 along the US/Mexico border, said, "Every single mayor from Brownsville to El Paso is against it [border wall]." He went on to say, "This will be a tremendous waste of money, and it will not stop [illegal] immigration. People will just go around it."
Jeff Passel, a demographer with the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington D.C., estimated that as many as one-third of the eleven million illegal immigrants in the United States in 2005 did not hop over or tunnel under or walk around a border wall. They entered the country legally on visitor, student, or work visas and stayed after their visas had expired. All nineteen of the 9/11 hijackers entered the country this way.
It is not "Israel-lite" walls we should be constructing between "[ourselves] with the most and those with the least." We should be constructing bridges to economic parity that will allow "those with the least" to cross over to a more secure, fulfilling future for themselves and their families without having to illegally cross a national border.
Obama's good looks and charisma and cadenced speechifying cannot help but remind one of John Kennedy. Hopefully, before he makes another speech about tearing down walls he will read Kennedy's "Alliance for Progress" and begin building bridges so that its vision of a "hemisphere where all men can hope for a suitable standard of living and all can live out their lives in dignity and in freedom" has a chance to finally be realized.
In such a hemisphere, people will be content to remain in the country where their roots are secured by the generations buried there.
Robert Weitzel is a contributing editor to Media With a Conscience. His essays regularly appear in The Capital Times in Madison, WI. He can be contacted at: robertweitzel@mac.com
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
39 Comments so far
Show AllDump Bush - take heart........comments like those of RichM are not reasoned or civil Whichever side one takes I would have hoped that people in a progressive forum would behave as....well.....progressives and not like those we claim to oppose.
Name-calling has become the preserve of the Right and we demean ourselves when we do the same.
Make Way For the Money Ball (revised since earlier posting)
Make way for the money ball
it's a juggernaut of greed
it's a runaway picking up speed
Make way for the money wrecking ball
selling short on the profit of the fall
the money ball overwhelms us all
The money ball is our treadmill
our treadmill for the man
the corporate puppeteers for Uncle Sam
with more poppy fields blooming in Afghanistan
to maximize the profit
or.......
forget the pain
Make way for the money ball
it's awesome shock indeed
bomb rebuild and feed
bomb rebuild and feed
The snowballing money ball free fall
is cheered on by the neo liberal republican dons
and media cons who feed on wars
called... 'spreading freedom'
Since there is no other way
make way for the money ball
help TINA!.... full spectrum stupidity...
it's total dominance on the way
Make way for the money ball
it's a juggernaut of greed
it's a runaway picking up speed
Don't jig or jog just 'duck and cover'
the money ball juggernaut just flattened the clover
and it ain't going to stop for the 'cliffs of Dover'
It feeds on nukes and neo con pukes
tumbling trump towers and freedom spooks
as it rolls down yellow ribbons
it's a runaway....
Make way for the money ball
while it builds another wall
and squeezes those with least
for their 'duck and cover' is our bread and butter
Make way for the money ball
as it inflates as if turned on by yeast
don't spurn the beast with
the 'least of these'
Parsimony won't deter the money ball
Us & the marks get inflated with the fall
might as well eat drink and be merry
and build another wall
If you don't see the glow of dawn
you may miss the money ball
for....
it's a runaway
arkitekton August 14th, 2008 11:45 pm
If it doesn't, it won't be because Obama is black.
Mordechai
Your right...Canada is not an empire. With an US BIASED asshole like Harper in charge, we cant even be an UMPIRE
"The fence in Israel was built to keep suicide bombers and other terrorists from entering the sovereign country of Israel to kill and maim Israeli civilians!"
Pity the Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Egyptians, Jordanians, and Iraqis (and perhaps Iranians) can't build a wall to keep Israeli F-16's, Merkavas and assassins from entering their sovereign territory to kill and maim their civilians at will, or have a powerful patron like Israel's groveling sub bitch the USA covering their ass in the UN Security Council. Who's the real terrorist?
Kettle, thou art black!
Okay, I'm getting a little freaked out so forgive me if this is a bit much but,
THE PRESIDENT IS NOT A KING! THE PRESIDENT IS NOT A KING! THE PRESIDENT IS NOT A KING!
Weren't any of you alive in the '90s?
Remember what the Congress can do to hinder the desires of the President?
"Before Barack Obama goes about reforming the world economy he needs to work on the US economy." -Poet.
Well as long as he duly sacrifices to Lord Zeus why can't he do both?
He is, after all the "commander in chief" (Latin translation-Imperator) who are we -as mere Citizens and Slaves- to say what the Favorite Son of Heaven can or cannot do?
Worry not, if His Glory, Barak Ceaser gets to far out of line, the Equestrian Families can simply persuade the Preatorian Guard to take care of the problem, and then there can be a new Dictator-for-Four-Years!
I have nothing against ~Poet~ in specific. That example was just one of many. And I realize I'm mashing Roman History all together a bit.
But this way of "speaking" about the President of the United States DRIVES ME BONKERS!
Maybe if we stopped thinking of the President as a Tyrant, Presidents would cease to act as Tyrants, and we could have this crazy thing called Representative Democracy that I think Thomas Jefferson and some other guys went on about a couple of hundred years ago.
Have Fun,
-matti.
Dump Bush (9:01 pm) writes, "...Why do you think Palestinians should have a right to unrestricted access to Israel? They are not Israeli citizens....The fence in Israel was built to keep suicide bombers and other terrorists from entering the sovereign country of Israel to kill and maim Israeli civilians....The purpose of the fence was not to keep a captive population in....but to keep terrorists out!"
- This is the comment of a bigoted jackass. One can only hope that someone will soon do to the land of Mr Dump_Bush's family exactly what the Israelis did to the Palestinians' land. Then maybe he'd get a clue about who the real terrorists are.
And incidentally, you pathetic ass - the wall is not built on any legal international "border." It's built along lines that steal additional lands from the Palestinians -- as though the Israelis hadn't already stolen enough.
The author poses a rhetorical question, but refuses to acknowledge his own facts. Namely, that Obama supported the border wall between the United States and Mexico.
That's all you need to know about Obama's principles.
No, Obama is no metaphorical bridge builder. He's going to do the military Keynesianism routine that is driving this country further into the red and killing so many abroad.
Obama is the bad pattern in the Democratic Party that needs to end, along with that of the Republicans. Look elsewhere for your bridge builders.
"Can Obama Bridge America's Wall of Ignominy?"
No, because America won't elect a black man. I'm not overwhelmed by Obama's mild politics, drab voting record, and tremulous schtick, but I'd much rather see him in office than McCain. It's not going to happen.
wsws at 6:19 Thanks for the compliment on my "style"; also to Little Brother for nice smiley face. These are what an author colleague of mine called "little blessings," referring specifically to the citation of one's own published work in other authors' books.
I post whenever I feel I have something relevant to say and the time to do it. For an old fart retiree, I'm surprisingly busy. If you want to sample my "style" as expressed every day of the week, you could visit the "creative" headlines that I post every morning on my website at http://www.sunstateactivist.org/ and even get these headlines in the form of a daily e-mail if you're so a-mind by writing me at jerrydrose11@yahoo.com
I agree with Overkill--The author is asking the wrong question. Before Barack Obama goes about reforming the world economy he needs to work on the US economy.
As Zaz illustrates there are models of other first world countries successfully doing this reform--if we would but follow them, we could do similarly.
Israel's apartheid wall?
"The day before his Berlin speech Obama was in Israel standing less than two miles from the 400-mile-long apartheid wall that separates Israel from the West Bank. He did not call on Israeli courage to tear their wall down, nor did he mention that wall to his Berlin audience."
Why do you think Palestinians should have a right to unrestricted access to Israel? They are not Israeli citizens.
The fence in Israel was built to keep suicide bombers and other terrorists from entering the sovereign country of Israel to kill and maim Israeli civilians! Since the fence was erected the number of terrorist events in Israel has been substantially decreased.
The purpose of the fence was not to keep a captive population in, as the Berlin Wall was, but to keep terrorists out!
The Israelis have a right to keep its borders secure and restrict entry to terrorists whose only intent it is to murder Israelis.
overkill August 14th, 2008 1:36 pm
"America's highest wall is it's separation of wealth. This has led us to Fascism and bloody revolt is sure to follow."
This is exactly right, except it doesn't reach far enough. If it weren't for the inequality between certain bordering nations and the massive debt that the rich countries have finagled on the poor, no walls would be built because the point would be moot. Most people do not dislocate themselves and their families and risk going to foreign countries because they want to, they do it because they have to. Take away the negative incentive and migration would slow to a normal background level instead of the mass fleeing that we now see.
Regarding fascism - exactly right again. We're in for bumpy times.
Politicians are the targets that the oligarchy sets up to let us vent our rage on.
I'm as gung-ho about freedom of expression as anyone posting here but I'm weary of the likes of Weitzel who disparages Obama without even mentioning the hypocrisy and insincerity of his opponent. Also, it's especially annoying that Weitzel writes for Common Dreams.
No wonder us Libs are called whiners! Talk about tearing down walls! Obama is a candidate who represents change in the very COLOR OF HIS SKIN! He smashes the walls of bigotry that's been such a pervasive part of America's history since our beginning.
No, Obama's not perfect. His vote on the FISA "compromise" last month really ticked me off and I let his campaign HQ know about it. Yet history shows FDR had his foibles and inconsistencies, too--through FOUR ELECTIONS.
Let's remember: Obama is a politician facing the toughest--and most momentous--presidential campaign since Lincoln's run in 1860. And right now, I'll take his "Kingesque" rhetoric before anything that muddling, pasty-faced curmudgeon the Grand Oil Party has to offer.
To me it's a matter of character v. no character.
rtdrury 2:08 p.m:
"Is the people's engaging in the capitalist economy, compassion or not, effectively creating the wealth maldistribution? I think the only way to solve the wealth maldistribution is for people, individuals, everybody, including NGO volunteers, to shift their exchange/association away from the capitalists and toward the disenfranchised. Can we make that change? Can we cut out the capitalist middleman and build equality from the ground up?"
Thanks for your post, i appreciate when we turn the conversation from "Which politician will save us?" (hint - none of them!), to "What can we do?"
The idea that ordinary people might wise up and actively STOP supporting the economic structures of corporate capitalist hegemony - seems to be quite literally Un-Thinkable for most of us, even those who see clearly the problems.
i think we are generally truly deeply afraid (if unconsciously so) that if we attempt to stop supporting the economic structures of corporate capitalist hegemony, we will fail, and starve, and be killed, and die. We feel dependent on the very systems that we analyze and criticize. Of course we also like the toys, and the food, and the medicines etc. that that machine produces...
Well, we all gonna die one way or another. What does it take to get to the point of consciously deciding that it is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees?
Can we see that these systems, and the participation of so many millions of humans in their perpetuation, is killing us all now anyway?
So, which party / candidate / hero / villain shall i vote for, or blog about?
Jerry D. Rose,
Based on this and your posts in other CD threads -- let's hear more from you.
I like your style!
I'll say it again. Obama's hands are tied with respect to Israel, as is every other politician's in this country. I hate it, you hate it. The only way to fix this is to stop voting more Zionists and Israel-firsters into office and remove the ones that are there.
Then we have to tackle the media.
I should live so long.
"What enables such a wealth mal-distribution that the US minimum wage is ten times the income of poor Mexicans?"
The Mexican elite aided by American big business would be muy call.
I have high hopes for Obama. We had all better have high hopes for Obama and a two-thirds Democratic Congress.
The only alternatives are slavery or revolution. Both would be unpleasant and bloody.
#
canuckchuck August 14th, 2008 2:24 pm
"Consider for a moment why swarms of Canucks are not illegally crossing our pine-forested northern borders each year."
Because we would rather live in a Free Democracy than a Fascist psuedo-republic?
But you are saddled with Stephen Harper whom my Canadian friends tell me is as big a cheesedick and religious fanatic as George Wanker Bush. Fortunately, Canada is not an empire.
Jesusofjonesboro, "So we should vote for McCain because we won't be as disappointed in his presidency?"
Perhaps there are people running for congress and for prez that are not affiliated with the Dems and the Repubs? Hmmm?
"I don't have any difficulty seeing Obama changing many things with the help of a Congress truly controlled by Democrats."
Good for you! Look up someone named "Bill Clinton". He was the Obama of the nineties.
What the author recommends was done by the European Union before the borders were opened. clinton and the neocons did the opposite.
So we should vote for McCain because we won't be as disappointed in his presidency?
I don't have any difficulty seeing Obama changing many things with the help of a Congress truly controlled by Democrats.
jj
How about the walls (12 ft high solid concrete barriers) that the US forces occupying Iraq have erected between the neighborhoods in Baghdad, separating Shiite from Sunni?
When are those walls coming down?
What happens when they do?
Esusofjonesboro, "Interesting that the author of this very poorly written article fails to mention John McCain or his policies."
It is quite obvious, really. Out in the real world, where 95 percent of humans live outside the US, McCain symbolizes a continuation of the Bush policies vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Obama on the other hand presents an image of great expectations. It is these expectations that are problematic.
Even if Obama wanted to change the course of US foreign policy, and his track record in the senate shows no signs of this, it is hard to see him accomplishing with congress the many changes that a majority of Americans want to see. The current covert, black ops, us vs. them, Iran contra, war on terror, you are either with us or against us regime that has been followed through the Reagan/Clinton years, up till today, albeit more clumsily by GW has not been addressed by either of the corporate candidates.
Why no McCain? Because not even the most naïve partisan loyalists believe that McCain will try to make systemic change to America's democratic deficit. What you have to worry about, if Obama wins, is that there may be an immense sense of disappointment and disillusionment when he fails to be what everyone hopes he is.
Jerry D. Rose - 1:40 pm
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... ;)
It's not the stone walls and iron bars but fear, distrust and attachment to wealth that has distroyed America.
overkill (1:36 pm),
Good point. People in gated communities are putting up walls in the good old United States of Avarice like there is no tomorrow (I suspect that is because they expect there to be not much of a tomorrow for the rest of us).
"Consider for a moment why swarms of Canucks are not illegally crossing our pine-forested northern borders each year."
Because we would rather live in a Free Democracy than a Fascist psuedo-republic?
I will bet you dollars to donuts that 90% of Americans don't even know what "Ignominy" means....
here, let me help..
ig·no·miny (ig′nə min′ē)
noun pl. -·min′·ies
loss of one's reputation; shame and dishonor; infamy
disgraceful, shameful, or contemptible quality, behavior, or act
Etymology: Fr ignominie < L ignominia < in-, no, not + nomen, name
ignominy Synonyms
ignominy
n.
Offensive behavior
lowness, baseness, sordidness; see disgrace 2, evil 1, meanness 1.
Shame
mortification, dishonor, humiliation, disrepute; see disgrace 1.
Interesting that the author of this very poorly written article fails to mention John McCain or his policies.
jj
What enables such a wealth mal-distribution that the US minimum wage is ten times the income of poor Mexicans?
Let's ask in particular the people who operate the NGOs and such - the so-called leftists in the USA. Is the people's engaging in the capitalist economy, compassion or not, effectively creating the wealth maldistribution? I think the only way to solve the wealth maldistribution is for people, individuals, everybody, including NGO volunteers, to shift their exchange/association away from the capitalists and toward the disenfranchised. Can we make that change? Can we cut out the capitalist middleman and build equality from the ground up? Maybe our compassionate leftists will ignore the question and we'll never know the answer.
"This will be a tremendous waste of money"
The border fence a tremendous waste of money? Of course. Winston Churchill said: "You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing - after they have exhausted every other possibility."
The problem is that today Churchill would have to "raise the bar" by saying something like: "You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing - if they don't destroy themselves and everything else first."
This is a fine article but as for its title, why even bother to put a question mark at its end? There is absolutely nothing, beyond the empty Berlin rhetoric (there is no actual "wall" there)and the rather forlorn "hopefully" that the author throws in toward the end of his essay to indicate any remote possibility Obama will be tearing down the real walls that are built and being built in Israel and Texas. For all his high-sounding phrases about division and uniting, Obama is a divider not a uniter. But then he's the "lesser evil" because something even worse can be cited about McCain, right? To arms, to arms, Ye vigilant Lesser Evilists!
America's highest wall is it's separation of wealth. This has led us to Fascism and bloody revolt is sure to follow.
The apartheid wall is built on the Irrael/occupied Palestine border in very few places.
In most places, it cuts deep into Palestinian territory, especially when there are coveted water resources and fertile farmland on the Palestinian side. So the argument that it is to protect sovereign Israeli territroy is nonsense, the World court has ruled that this argument is nonsense, and that the wall is illegal.
TINA's Got Back
The gourmet coffee is getting cold
and FUBAR is going for the gold
Jaxon is picking butts
...while
Axton is ogling back
and TINA she sure... does have back
say if she only had a rack.....
she'd be a ten...
and could sing the anthem
for the gold stars on a field of red
or for Uncle Sam who is kicking butt
while on the lam
...say
who's got your back Sam?
who's got your gold?
Is it FUBAR too?..... Sam?
Oh go on..
Hope on ..
Audacity off... for it's beyond all
reason recognition or repair
Oscar Is your javelin devine
are you also somewhat FUBAR
hey......
Go for the gold
Trinity is the up and coming star
while the prodded bear is gettin bold
and my coffee is gettin cold
arkitekton, you are so wrong. But that's the excuse all of the Obama groupies will use when he loses.