West's Diplomats Rush To Save Musharraf From Impeachment as Resignation Rumors Grow
ISLAMABAD - British and American diplomats are attempting to find an exit for Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf, a staunch western ally, before he is dragged through a humiliating impeachment process.
Rumours that Musharraf is set to quit have been circulating in Pakistan for several days. He has suffered a collapse in support as three of Pakistan's four provincial parliaments have passed resolutions, with overwhelming backing, declaring him unfit for office. The fourth province is expected to follow soon.
The provincial votes were symbolic, but the formal process will begin early next week with an impeachment motion in the national parliament. It is clear that the ruling coalition now has the two-thirds majority needed to impeach him.
Government insiders said that if Musharraf wants to quit, he must do so before the impeachment proceedings begin, leaving him with only a few days.
His spokesman has rebutted any suggestion that he will step down.
Western diplomats have sought to convince the coalition government that impeachment would further undermine the security and political situation in crisis-racked Pakistan, and that he should instead be offered a "graceful exit".
"We're being told [by western envoys] that it's not going to bring more stability to have a long trial. And that it is in the interests of stability for him to exit," said one senior coalition politician.
Sir Mark Lyall Grant, director of political affairs at the British Foreign Office, currently in Pakistan, is said to spearheading the message of caution. Lyall Grant met Asif Zardari, leader of the Pakistan People's Party, one of the two big parties in the coalition, on Tuesday night at the British high commission. He held a separate meeting with Sherry Rehman, a senior minister, and he also saw Musharraf, the FCO confirmed.
Lyall Grant, a former British high commissioner to Pakistan, was intimately involved in western-mediated negotiations last year between Musharraf and former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, which presaged her return to Pakistan and the holding of elections.
American diplomats are also engaged in an intensive round of meetings. The deputy US ambassador, Peter Bodde, is understood to have met Zardari in the last couple of days. American ambassador Anne Patterson saw Nisar Ali Khan, a senior member of Nawaz Sharif's party, the Pakistan Muslim League-N, the other main group in the coalition. Sources in Sharif's party said her message was: "Give Musharraf safe passage."
However, spokesmen for both the British and US missions denied that they were seeking to interfere. Aidan Liddle, a spokesman for the British embassy, said: "We are very clear that we have no role to play in this impeachment process. Britain has no interest in talking about the fate of individuals."
Musharraf has been a crucial partner in the so-called "war on terror". US officials in particular are anxious that he is not disgraced now.
They are also concerned that impeachment of Musharraf, a former army chief, will poison relations between the government and Pakistan's powerful military.
"There is a link between Musharraf and the army, so humiliating him is like humiliating the army," said Daniel Markey, a former US state department official who is now at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington. "The [US] administration would have much preferred to see a workable political arrangement, between Musharraf and the government, not another looming transition."
The attack on Musharraf has been inflamed in recent days by Zardari's accusations that the president siphoned off hundreds of millions of dollars in American aid. The accusation, backed up by no evidence, is said to have made Musharraf more determined to fight on. The PPP is willing to allow the president to resign and retreat from public life.
However, the party of Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted as prime minister in 1999 by Musharraf's military coup, seems determined to prosecute the president. "We've had enough of dictators," said Ahsan Iqbal, one of the leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League-N. "Whoever abrogates the constitution must be punished or we will never stop these dictators usurping power here."
Sheikh Waqas Akram, a pro-Musharraf member of the national parliament, warned: "This is a man who stood up against al-Qaida. Who will face al-Qaida after Musharraf? Certainly not this coalition." Akram, who is close to the president, said that Musharraf wanted to stay in Pakistan after he leaves office.
However, there have been at least three assassination attempts on the president by extremist groups, and it is considered highly dangerous for him to remain in the country. Al-Qaida recently issued a video denouncing Musharraf's rule.
Where could he go?
United States
Musharraf has been one of the Bush administration's closest allies. While Washington would prefer not to host his exile, as it would look bad politically, it would if he has nowhere else to go. His son lives in the US.
Pakistan
The president has a small farm just outside Islamabad but the house is still being constructed and security would be a challenge. Another option would be Karachi but it is a volatile city with a huge population of Pushtuns, the ethnic group most angered by his rule.
Turkey
This has long been the favoured destination for Musharraf in exile. He spent his childhood in Turkey, speaks the language and loves the country. He is rumoured to own property there. But Turkey is a Muslim-majority country and he may become a target.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia has a rich tradition of taking in former dictators and, as a firm ally of Pakistan, would be willing to accommodate Musharraf as part of an exit deal. Nawaz Sharif was given refuge there in 2000, after Musharraf ousted him from power.
© 2008 The Guardian
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show AllWhere could he go?
-Send the motherfucker to hell!
8)
well the american death machine is reduced to tyrant saving
so much for full spectrum dominance - they can't even arrange full pakistan dominance or full iraqi dominance
no doubt though that the united states protected and coddled this prick to "save our freedoms" and to make the world safe for democracy
The US and the West has a RICH TRADITION of supporting dictators politically, economically and militarily (through CIA). For the US and the West, these dictators are the beacons of freedom and democracy. The US and the West played a major role in the coup to bring Musharaf to power. CIA, ISI and the Pakistan military have a very close relationship. Since the democratically elected government is in power in Pakistan, now the US and the West are trying to widen the wedge between the democratically elected government and the army, in order to resurrect another dictator through a military coup.
This sweet talk of concern for Musharaf, a dictator, and the country ("They are also concerned that the impeachment of Musharaf will poison the relations between the government and the powerful military) is missing when the US and the West hastened the (in)justice process to send Saddam Hussein to gallows. Why are they not talking about the justice of the land now? Why can't these evil forces (empires) leave Musharaf matter to the government of Pakistan and the people of Pakistan to decide? These evil powers have been using Pakistan for their selfish benefits at the cost of the welfare of the people of Pakistan. The public (majority) in the US and the West are in collusion with their governments and the benefits of what their governments are doing in the world are blinding their eyes and minds and hardened their hearts to the cries of the affected peoples groups.
Mush will be fine. All the loot he stole is in his numbered swiss bank accounts. He has a green card and his brother is a US citizen.
The Pakistanis can come out from under the thumb of a military dictator and have the guts to impeach him, but here in the U.S. our own would-be dictator gets a free pass from his Democratic accomplices. Can the cowards in Congress draw any courage from the Pakistani's example? All those now fawning over Musharraf are revealing their true allegiances .
Hey Sung425, I totally agree with you, but must you inflict more of these Folks on the US people? Hell, we don't want them either! We're tired of them as well as the rest of the world, say I've got a great idea, perhaps, folks in your country could open a Gitmo like detention camp and put the Imperialist's in a camp and throw away the Key. I know I'd be grateful!!!
Diplomats? :?:
They need to send Pelosi & Reid over there as Ambassadors Plenipotentiary to expedite the impeachment process.
That ought to give Musharraf all the breathing room he needs.
Well, now we've realized that impeachment is inadequate when it's not actually in the hands of the people, and instead in the hands of the oligarchs. What will it take to remind the US government that they serve us, not the other way around? Justice will be impossible until this becomes a reality. It's good to know that there are countries where the people actually have influence. It's almost enough to make this anarchist accept the possibility of democratic government.
A bravo must be yelled to the Pakistani lawmakers who have determined to get rid of Musharraf. Too bad that Pelosi & Co. do not intend to follow their example in the USA.
This must be sweet revenge for Nawaz Shariff who spent all these years in exile waiting for this very moment. But then Sharif and Zardari are the last people who should be meting out this justice to Musharraf !!
Musharraf needs to burn in hell for continuing the endless Pakistani policy of upending and destabilizing the neighborhood. Kashmir burns today mainly because of Pakistans insidious state policy of arming and funding extremists who have infiltrated and destabilized the entire region. Musharraf was just another flag bearer in this ultimately failed Pakistani State policy that has managed to engulf and threaten not only the very existence of Pakistan itself but also Afghanistan and to a large extent India as well. The U.S. of course has aided and abetted this continuous stream of pliable dictators ... something we specialize in doing. If Musharraf should hang so should Bush and Dick.
American imperialist despots are being spanked all over the world; Iraq, Georgia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bolivia, and Africa. The rest of the world is getting wise. Does Yankee Go Home sound familiar?
It might work: the diplomats (i.e. politicians) of the West have been able to keep George Bush impeachment "off the table" even though a significant fraction (in some polls, a majority) of American citizens say he should be impeached if he committed crimes.