Amazon Rainforest Threatened By New Wave of Oil and Gas Exploration
With over 35 multinational companies racing to tap into oil and gas reserves situated in peak biodiversity spots, conservationists urge an environmental impact assessment
Vast swathes of the western Amazon are to be opened up for oil and gas exploration, putting some of the planet's most pristine and biodiverse forests at risk, conservationists have warned.
A survey of land earmarked for exploration by energy companies revealed a steep rise in recent years, to around 180 zones, which together cover an area of 688,000 sq km, almost equivalent to the size of Texas.
Detailed mapping of the region shows the majority of planned oil and gas projects, which are operated by at least 35 multinational companies, are in the most species-rich areas of the Amazon for mammals, birds and amphibians.
Researchers used government information on land that has been leased to state or multinational energy companies over the past four years to create oil and gas exploration maps for western Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia and Colombia. The maps showed that in Peru and Ecuador, regions designated for oil and gas projects already cover more than two thirds of the Amazon. Of 64 oil and gas regions that cover 72% of the Peruvian Amazon, all but eight were approved since 2003. Major increases in activity are expected in Bolivia and western Brazil.
"We've been following oil and gas development in the Amazon since 2004 and the picture has changed before our eyes," said Matt Finer of Save America's Forests, a US-based environment group. "When you look at where the oil and gas blocks are, they overlap perfectly on top of the peak biodiversity spots, almost as if by design, and this is in one of the most, if not the most, biodiverse place on Earth."
Some regions have established oil and gas reserves, but in others, companies will need to cut into the forest to conduct speculative tests, including explosive seismic investigations and test drilling. Typically, companies have seven years to explore a region before deciding whether to go into full production.
"The real concern is when exploration is successful and a zone moves into the development phase, because that's when the roads, drilling and pipelines come in," said Finer.
Writing in the journal PLoS One, Finer and others from Duke university in North Carolina and Land is Life, a Massachusetts-based environment group, call for governments to rethink how energy reserves in the Amazon are exploited.
One issue, the authors argue, is that while companies must submit an environmental impact assessment for their project, these are often considered individually instead of collectively. "They're not looking at the bigger picture of what happens if there are lots of projects going on at the same time.
"You could have each individual company thinking they're being relatively responsible and keeping their own road networks under control and so on, but what happens when you have 15 other projects around you? All of a sudden, when you look at the bigger picture, you have a sprawling road network," said Finer.
The creation of widespread road networks will put previously inaccessible forest at risk of deforestation, illegal hunting and logging, the authors argue.
The researchers urge companies to adopt a moratorium on new road building, and instead use helicopters to ferry personnel and machinery to and from the sites, as has been done in some locations. They also call for governments to take a broader view of the environmental impacts of new projects, by assessing them as a group rather than individually.
Further research by the team found that many of the planned exploration and extraction projects were on land that is home to indigenous people, who whilst being consulted, have no say in whether a project goes ahead or not. At least 58 of the 64 regions in Peru are on land where isolated communities live, with a further 17 infringing areas that have existing or proposed reserves for indigenous groups.
"The way that oil development is being pursued in the western Amazon is a gross violation of the rights of the indigenous peoples of the region," said Brain Keane of Land is Life. "International agreements and inter-American human rights law recognise indigenous peoples have rights to their lands, and explicitly prohibit the granting of concessions to exploit natural resources in their territories without their free, prior and informed consent," he added.
The report adds that the international community should pay countries in the Amazon to leave forest lands untouched. Ecuador has said it will not develop its largest untapped oil reserve if it receives compensation by the end of the year, an offer that countries have yet to take them up on.
© 2008 The Guardian
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
35 Comments so far
Show AllThis article goes to highlight another case of positive feedback loops of a system, where doing one thing encourages another which encourages the original..ad infinitum. Unfortunately, the system is broken.
"AND YET MANY OF OUR ELECTORATE HAVE CHOSEN SIDES AND ARE ARGUING FOR MORE OF THE ABOVE . IT'S AS IF THEY WERE IN A HYPNOTIC STUPOR AND CAN NOT FEEL PAIN ."
unionave,
I think you're on to something. You know, ever since WWII, big biz has had to sell more stuff and have aggressively marketed us with mass marketing/psychological tactics. If it feels as if we've been hypnotized, it's because we have been.
I get algae without much effort here.
Just looking for simple solutions Kem. Don't start.
```
Of course it might help. Not much. Just plant a tree. Do you think there are enough back yards to equal the surface areas of the Oceans? Do you think that the back yard farmers could insure the salinety and Ph of the water was constantly maintained at the proper levels? Do you think that was a goofy question on a rather serious subject? ____ I do.
http://whyplankton.com
¿
Kitaj,
I too am where you are. I used to be a radical. Thinking, believing, persuading, painting a picture for others that IF we just did such and such all would be right with the world.
Then I read all the books and websites and reports and spent lots of time talking with others. People are living in la la land. They don't care enough.
I wasn't fooled by what I believed at the time but I did still remain optimistic that there would be a way to reverse the course we were on.
That sasid I am not pessimistic just pragmatic. There is nothing that will take place that will "save" us once the feedbacks from this monster climate change kick in. And we are very close to being there.
We know enough scientifically to understand what the consequences will be. Problem is we are unwilling to implement the drastic changes we need to make now. We'll debate it, study it, appoint a commission all the while Mother Nature is screaming the house is burning down.
We simply are not disciplined enough to do what it takes.
Samski August 13th, 2008 7:10 pm
KEM PATRICK August 14th, 2008 8:04 pm
Would it help if everyone grew algae in their back yard?
~SAMSKI~ Aug 13, 7:39pm "Our life giving oxygen is mostly produed by green algae."
That is true. Our ocean's "phytoplankton" or green algae, produce about 70% of our oxygen. If we lose say ten or twenty percent of our oxygen from the trees and plant life on land, we will have a rather serious problem. The obvious clues of a serious problem in progress will FIRST be: (A dramatic reduction of birds and inscet life.)
In addition, the phytoplanton are dying off at an alarming rate and the oceanic scientists are not sure of the reason, they strongly suspect that man created pollution of many varieties, mostly from burning coal is the culprit. We could easily lose enough of our oxygen until we won't be able to blog comments here Samski, if we humans don't stop the insane madness.
Take heart! Once we are all extinct, we won't need to drill any longer.
I tell you, looking at the pathetically immature Presidential election Spectacle and the never-ending crap from the MSM on virtually every important issue, I am becoming very very pessimistic about humanitys chances of growing up and dealing with this post Peak everything world.
I look at The Situation rationally and empirically - my pessimism cannot be blamed on me having a tendency toward an apocalyptic mind-set, a charge some are now using to try to discredit anyone who feels we are headed for catastrophe and have probably passed the point of no return.
Up until about 2 years ago, I still thought humanity would be able to make the transition to a sustainable way of life without widespread catastrophe. Now, I am sorry but i just dont see it happening.
yes, as jungle boy said, we are all children - siblings lacking parental guidance\control...there is no one to tell us to stop turning the planet into layers of noxious gases, caves of radioactive waste, lakes of oily goo and mountains of appliances and cars and barbies and legos and ipods and LCD screens...no one to explain that neither humans nor any other animals will be able to breathe, drink or eat these things, nor plants take root and grow in it...no one to force us to stop, even if we don't want to...to spank us...Mother Nature will do the spanking, I guess...
I always wonder what good they think all that oil money will do them on a dead world.
Just found this (NYT) Dot Earth thread on developing eco consciousness. (See link below.) Only through a consciousness of our predicament--of our need to consider others (all of the creatures) as well as ourselves--can we find a route back to living in harmony with the Earth.
Until we can do the 3 Rs:
Reduce population
Reduce consumption
Reduce income inequality
There is only going to be palliative care for a dying civilization.
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/wanted-young-eco-geniuses/
www.StudentsForTheEarth.org
Robert Settgast - so, so true. I too remember the character assassination of Carter. What really gets me is how so many people still believe the crap put out there about him.
When the oceans near death, and the forests become frail, the oxygen will thin as we gasp for breath. Even then will the corporations and investors scream for more. Only then will the politicians refuse their money offerings as they sit in their well appointed offices turning blue. Then everyone will have the blues.
"...and no one wanted it save one lonely old man"
They are just trying to make you mad to see how much you can take.
People have this view of our fellow man like he is something smart and knowing. Not realizing just how dumb and ignorant he is, he is just like you and me. The big problem here is we have no peer structure, no real god, Jesus is passe'. People use his name to start wars with Iran and stuff by countries who don't acknowledge the general "I'm a nice guy" status the dude is supposed to represent. We have a liar for a peer in the presidency. Evo Morales maybe but we get no news. Thanks prince Charles! Have some jam. Anyhow, here comes our attention to too much blood in the water. Not a good place to drop in a line. It takes some huge waves to clean water that bad! Not to mention the fact its the blind leading the blind out here with the exception of the greed disease and those who have it, trying to give it to everyone else so they feel better about themselves. Seen the boob lately? Anyhow the machine will have to stop for a bit and rot into the ground or it will come to life on its own and our planet will be dead save for the few slaves running the robot. Its time to think about the little bad guy behind the curtain, Dorothy. Time for Toto to get big! We are just getting to know technology that does good things, obviously, at a cost of all good things left. Change! We can, but will we?
1. Energy prices are high and getting higher .
2. Health care prices are high and rising .
3. Food prices are high and rising .
4. Travel costs are high and rising .
5. Broadcast commercials are loud and getting louder .
6. Clothing prices are high and rising .
7. Liberties we had are gone and dwindling .
AND YET MANY OF OUR ELECTORATE HAVE CHOSEN SIDES AND ARE ARGUING FOR MORE OF THE ABOVE . IT'S AS IF THEY WERE IN A HYPNOTIC STUPOR AND CAN NOT FEEL PAIN .
"QUITO, Aug. 13 (Xinhua) -- At least 10,000 gallons (37,854 liters) of petroleum residues were spilled into a river in Ecuador along the border with Colombia, local media reported Wednesday."
Biodiversity? What biodiversity?
There ain't no stinking biodiversity anymore.
One can only imagine how much better off the world would now if President Carter had not been replaced with Reagan by the energy cartels and right win, and an apathetic populace. The results have been disasterous.
Carter had a plan for reducing our environmental impact while reducing our dangerous dependance on foreign oil. This was feasible, and he could well have achieved these goals had he been able to serve a second term without the character assassinations from his opposition (which I well remember).
In reality Carter was a much stronger person than Reagan, and in a different league in terms of knowledge.
This underscores the control over the apathetic populace that the energy cartels command.
How very Sad.
Our life-giving oxygen supply is mostly produced by green algae.
The media has done a poor job of reporting on the status of fossil exploration in this era of global warming, peak oil and oil wars. The central glaring omission is that of a hydrocarbon exploration map indicating where hydrocarbon reserves have been found not to exist or found to exist, and extraction status. Instead of the map we get vague staements such as "Most of the easy-to-extract oil has been found." This vague statement begs us to assume that every square inch of the earth's surface has been explored - but has it? How much of the continental shelves have been explored? I will guess right here that 25% of land area has not been explored, 75% of continental shelves have not been explored, and 95% of deep ocean and polar regions have not been explored. But this is only speculation. Where's the map?
I just finished reading about the Japanese Beetles that destroy roses and other plants. At least they are doing what is natural and necessary for their survival. Multinational corporations are like Japanese beetles on steroids. What they are doing is not natural or necessary, but based on greed. And, what they are destroying is natural and necessary to our survival. They use money and violence to get their way, and have gone so far as to assassinate indigenous people who protest the ravaging of their habitat.
If we keep breeding there is no hope.
Instead of tearing down the Amazon, the least people could do is push for better sources of biofuel that are both economically and environmentally feasible. Hemp, switchgrass, or even algae are far better biofuels than corn, soy, and even sugar. At least with hemp and switchgrass, there's nothing to be sacrificed and those two can in fact further enhance the Amazon. Besides, each plant is different in their chemistry and will thus produce different results. But alas, when will people learn to draw the line?
Also, remember the strict authoritarian morality complex? When a rainforest is destroyed, it becomes a jungle and in a jungle, "you're on your own" combined with the fact that the predators thrive better. Amazingly, hemp and switchgrass can grow even in a jungle so maybe there's hope yet.
screw the grandchildren... we're corporatocracy repubs and we want it now. all of it.
When the last ice age retreated between 17,000 and 11,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 went from 190 ppm to 280 ppm. That 90 ppm rise in 60 centuries translates into pumping additional CO2 into the atmosphere at a rate of 1.5 ppm per century.
We are now putting additional CO2 into the atmosphere (primarily from burning fossil fuels and deforestation) at the rate of 2 ppm *per year* or more than 100 times as fast as the last natural greenhouse feedback period.
These oil moguls are truly insane!
Cockroaches. And the meek shall inherit the earth.
It's just a machine making money...
Yep
eat meat
torture animals
mutate frogs
and cut down your air supply.
At least one cant accuse humanity of being rational.
Cockroaches and rats I am sure about, but humans--no ha.
Let them think they are great while they have a shit eating grin--literally(check the Whole Foods article).
GREED UBER ALLES!
GREED UBER ALLES!
GREED UBER ALLES!
GREED UBER ALLES!
GREED UBER ALLES!
GREED UBER ALLES!
GREED UBER ALLES!
Makes sense to me !
Slash and burn trees that give us oxygen.
Then extract fossil fuels and put more carbon pollution in the air !
That is goofy also and since I responded to you Annie, I do believe the "start" is under your name. LOL
Both the deforistation and pollution of our Oceans are vitally important issues. I'm sure that you agree with little effort.
For simplicity ANN, a bathtub would be better. LOL