A Frozen Katrina
As John McCain and the Republicans trumpet their election year boldfaced lie--drill now so we can lower prices at the pump today--they continue to ignore a looming energy disaster with lives hanging in the balance.
Currently, eight million homes rely on heating oil during the winter months, and last winter's prices forced too many citizens to choose between heat, food, and medicine.
According to the New York Times, heating oil prices are now 36 percent higher than they were last winter and bills will be up to $1500 higher than they were last year. As for the 54 million households heating with natural gas, prices are expected to be 67 percent higher this winter. Current funding for the Low Income Heating Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) is below 1980's levels--"a time when fuel prices were just a tiny fraction of what they are now," The Timberjay newspapers point out. In fact, last year's $2.5 billion in LIHEAP funding allowed just 16 percent of eligible recipients to receive aid. Congressional representatives of New England states have sought as much as $6.5 billion in additional LIHEAP funding to meet the anticipated needs of the upcoming winter. With both lower-income and middle-class people now unable to afford this basic necessity--a requirement for security in one's own home--newspapers in the Northeast are sounding a clarion call to head-off the impending disaster.
As the Boston Globe wrote in an editorial this month:
The country had a few days to prepare for Hurricane Katrina, and failed. It has more than three months to prepare for this frozen Katrina, and there will be no excuse this time.... A frozen Katrina will be measured in hypothermia cases and malnutrition or unfilled prescriptions if the poor are forced to spend grocery or medicine money on fuel.
"It could be New England's own Katrina disaster," read a Stowe Reporter editorial. "Hundreds of homes rendered uninhabitable, families' finances stretched to the limit, some driven away altogether to take shelter with friends or family. But unlike Katrina, this calamity is clearly visible on the horizon and we have months to prepare."
The Rutland Herald warned of service-providers who are already stretched thin:
No one wants to see refugees from the cold breaking into stores or second homes to spend the night, but there will be desperate people that the state's social service providers will be challenged to help, since most homeless shelters are full at present and may not be able to house any more people in upcoming months.
And, finally, from the Concord Monitor :
It will be interesting to see if the prospect of masses of New Hampshire citizens freezing at home gets the attention it so clearly deserves.
Indeed, the crisis has gotten the attention of Democrats--and some Republicans--in Congress, but an effort to respond was thwarted by yet another GOP Senate filibuster. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) tried to increase LIHEAP funding all the way back in November, while President Bush proposed cutting it by $379 million. In March, Sen. Sanders offered a budget amendment that would have rescinded the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest three-tenths of 1 percent of taxpayers and increased LIHEAP funding by $4 billion. Last month, he was the lead sponsor of the Warm in the Winter and Cool in the Summer Act which would double LIHEAP funding, adding $2.5 billion to the program (less than one week's funding in Iraq). Although President Bush threatened a veto (no surprise there, he has also proposed cutting the weatherization program that helps lower-income families reduce energy consumption over the long-term), there were fifty-two co-sponsors, including thirteen Republicans. Sanders called it a "tripartisan bill" with the majority of Congress, the nation's governors, AARP and others on board.
"People in the north understand that it would be inhumane to stand by while seniors freeze to death this winter or kids get sick," he said "People in hot-weather states know heat waves can be killers." In a floor speech, Sanders cited Center for Disease Control statistics to further illustrate the urgency of this legislation:
Historically, from 1979 to 2003, excessive heat exposure caused 8,015 deaths in the United States. During this period, more people in this country died from extreme heat than from hurricanes, lightning, tornadoes, floods, and earthquakes combined.... During 1979 to 2002, a total of 16,555 deaths in the United States, an average of 689 per year...were attributed to exposure to excessive natural cold.
But when it came time to vote on the legislation on July 26, there were only fifty votes to end a Republican filibuster--ten shy of the sixty needed to bring the bill to the floor for a vote. The GOP wanted "a vote on legislation that would open up the continental shelf to oil drilling."
"I understand the games that are played in Washington, but it doesn't make the obstruction tactics any less revolting," Sanders said following the vote. "This is life or death. People are dying in the summer heat. People will freeze to death this winter."
While Republicans continue to push drilling as their election year elixir, real pain, real lives, and real security are ignored.
Katrina vanden Heuvel has been The Nation's editor since 1995 and publisher since 2005.
Copyright © 2008 The Nation
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
27 Comments so far
Show AllMs. Heuvel,
Changing topics...
Would you please elaborate on your point:
"And while Obama is a former professor of constitutional law, he hasn't called for dismantling the imperial presidency. It will take independent efforts to reclaim for the Congress and the people the powers Bush has arrogated to the presidency."
If he wins, there will be no change in status quo...as we will still have a one party ie unitary system (a very "conservative" scenario)...so what does "independent efforts" mean exactly? Your article was a bloviating obfuscation on this point.
Unfreeze thy nimble fingers and venture a reply please. The Nation awaits....
"Thus if Chavez helps the Venezuelan poor too much"
How does Chavez help the poor at all by giving away for free the products of his country, namely gasoline? WOuldn't the poor be better off if he sold that on the global market for cash which can be traded for anything? Doessn't cheap gasoline encourage wasteful use and the attendant environmental problems? Think about it, and look up "Opportunity Cost".
jake, the rightwing vampires in Venezuela drink the blood of the Venezuelan poor. Thus if Chavez helps the Venezuelan poor too much, he will have vampire claws in his eyes, ever more than usual. So he went around the vampires and helped the US poor instead. Smart guy.
"You have no clue about Chavez."
Tell me specifically what was wrong with what I said then. Hint: Look up "Opportunity Cost" first. I'll make us some popcorn while you put that together.
While we're talking Valero (Radio_tec 6:32 p.m.)
http://www.militaryindustrialcomplex.com/totals.asp?thisContractor=Valero%20Marketing%20and%20Supply%2...
See Nick Turse's The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives
Shintao, the "Largest Refinery" being built in Texas is actually the expansion of an existing oil refinery owned by Valero Energy in Beaumont. http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/local/refinery_expansion_a_complex_process_08-13-2008.html Its not news to us here in Texas as it has been splashed all over our TV screens and Beaumont is seen as a boomtown yet again. As for Saudi ownership, Valero was broken off from Coastal Petroleum by the Texas Railroad commission back around 1980 as punishment for breaking a contract it had with a small town in South Texas during the first energy crisis and selling natural gas it was contracted to sell to this small town and instead sold it for a higher price during the '73 energy crisis. As for Saudi ownership here's what I found, "in February 1985, Valero entered into an agreement with Techniques d'Avant Garde Group SA, known as TAG, a holding company controlled by Saudi Arabian Akkram Ojjeh. TAG invested $15 million in Valero as part of an agreement that the Saudi investor would raise its interest in the company to one-third if Valero could locate a cheap source of raw materials for its refinery." http://www.answers.com/topic/valero-energy-corp There's no there there.
Now as per your point that we can drill our way out here are the numbers and you can find them at the Energy Information Agency website. There are about 20.5 billion barrels in proven reserves in the US. The US consumes about 7.5 billion barrels per year. If we were to exist solely on US oil reserves we would run out in slightly less than 3 years. Those wells you referred to as capped are capped for many reasons. They either are too costly or are technically too difficult to extract the oil from. When my dad tried his hand at oil field extraction back in the 80's it was hard but he could inject gas into the well to pressurize it and force the oil up. You can only do that for so long and then production declines set in. The wells didn't last very long.
The only real oil discovery is called conservation, with respects to Matt Simmons. That's going to be the only way we get out of this mess because of the enormous and increasing energy demands that the fossil fuel era simply is becoming less able to meet.
Look Logically at the susposed "oil crisis." Big oil admitted that high oil prices were the result of less demand (down 5% from 2007), and a need to maintain a high return for its stockholders. The high prices we are being gouged is a National Security issue being perpetrated by Corporations.
People are dying from the heat and cold, people are losing jobs, businesses are folding, banks going belly up, housing market diving, food and goods prices soaring, and the economy has headed South to Mexico.
It is evident we can no longer trust corporations to control oil in America, or any other necessity such as utilities (energy, water, oil).
Folks, you have been lied to. There is no shortage of oil in America. We do not need Sauda Arabia oil. We have millions of oil & gas wells capped across America, and big oil setting on government leases of one of the biggest fields in the world and not using it. During this so-called crisis we are still exporting oil to Japan, Canada, Mexico, etc. No shortage.
Because oil has become a National Security Issue, I am proposing we turn to National Oil for all our energy needs. That means we have the Army Engineers handling drilling on our own (gov) property, pumpimg oil, refining it in our own refineries (.17 cents a gallon for gasoline), and Americans pumping it at our service stations for $1.00 a gallon for gasoline. The oil is free, but we will charge for maintenance, a hefty .83 cents a gallon going right back into our own oil business.
Keep the free market running for big oil. Because they will not be subsidized any longer, we will not be taxed, nor should we be for our own oil. And we will close the taxloop holes that once served them and let them compete with us.
There is one last National Secuirty reason for National Oil. Sauda Arabia is currently building the largest oil refinery in America, down in Texas. Do we want foreigners running our economy when we cannot even trust our own American corporations?? So get behind National Oil and let your representative know we refuse to pay $5.00 gal. for oil we Americans already own.
I wonder if a grass roots program to install radiant floor heating sourced from solar heating collectors on the roofs on homes of the working poor or geothermal style heating could be started. It would be modeled along the lines of the Habitat for Humanity program and it could provide media exposure in a way that would shame and embarrass our elected officials.
I know some of you are thinking that these people are impossible to shame and embarrass which is why I would combine Hugo Chavez' offer of reduced cost heating oil in those homes that, for one reason or another, cannot be retro-fitted with radiant floor heating or geothermal heating/cooling. That way if the carrot doesn't work you can apply the stick. Either way its sure to get attention. After all didn't the Black Panthers gather attention from the before school breakfast program?
As for the Neocon NWO Freakzoids, they just do not realize it yet. They can not WIN. They can keep pushing, and pushing America to the breaking point. I can not wait until that happens! Because when America finally rises up, I will be waiting in the midst...... with a lot of rope. We will have alot of hangin' to do......
Coffeelover,,,,,,,,
Jakenewton: You have no clue about Chavez. You just keep spewing your neocon Bush loving talking points. Chavez offered to help New Orleans but he was turned away by your hero Bush.
Don't worry about it. We'll all just cuddle up with Barack Obama and he'll keep us warm. There's NOTHING he can't do!
I love the way the Democrats insist that you have to vote for them to get exactly the same policies that the Republicans would give you. Because only they can 'win'. But they ignore the fact that we still 'lose'.
Vote Democrat or Vote Republican. Either way you get an energy policy with the big focus on nuclear power and fossil fuels, and with the big bucks going to nuclear power and fossil fuels. Both candidate make noises about alternative energy, and both will promise to toss a tiny amount of money that way. But in overall terms, a vote for the Democrats or a vote for the Repubicans is a vote for continuing the current policies we've had from the Democrats and the Republicans for decades. The last President to try to do anything different was Jimmy Carter, and he was ridiculed by the Republicans and shunned by the Democrats for trying to do so.
If you want a real change in the direction America is going in terms of energy policy, then vote Green Party. Vote Green to get green.
Bernie Sanders makes a pitifully weak proposal, and the Democratic majority has the usual excuse for failing to make it happen.
Has everyone forgotten that a relatively simple rules change in the Senate allows bills to be voted up or down by simple majorities?
When Republicans threatened to use it against Democratic filibusters, it was known as the nuclear option, but the Democrats are such unprincipled wussies that now it's known as...
Nothing.
So the Democratic Coalition of Unprincipled Wussies has a perfect excuse to roll over for the Republicans forever, and if a few geezers freeze in Vermont, blame it on the Republicans.
Meanwhile, on a much better planet, the Democrats have already nationalized the oil companies by simple majority vote, and kicked the Saudi royal family so hard in their crown jewels that oil prices have fallen back to where they were before the sadistic retards George W. Bush and Dick Cheney stole the last couple of elections, and most of the rest of the Republican Party is awaiting trial for war crimes in chain-link cages on Guantanamo Bay.
If you're going to make a wish, why waste it on some pitiful little heating program that would still leave two thirds of poor families out in the cold, instead of three fourths?
Only Dems and no-accounts will freeze in the New England and other Northern States- they are currently the Iraqis of the USA THIS time around.
Not so long ago it was the Katrina victims- it is always people of colour,it is many people just getting a mortgage to have a damn place to live- this need for cannon fodder until yet another WAR (Iran or Iceland or Mongolia or anywhere) that blood can be shed profitably(Canada is trying HARD RIGHT TOO) IS WHAT MATTERS.
Since when did a corpse, frozen or starved or napalmed or tortured or bullet-ridden EVER stop an honest to GAWD EMPIRE and its DEADLY PROFIT TAKING???
Anan - thanks for the correction. I admit to trying to do 10 things at once when I rushed the post. The point, I was making is that Katrina tends to be the apologetic arm of the Dem Party. While she correctly critiques the Republicans and McCain, she always ignores, skips over, and avoids any negative critique of the Dems and Obama despite the fact that both are inimical to environmental sustainability. Besides Obama accepting corporate cash from the coal industry his web site policy issues assert the value of nuclear and Bio fuel. Both very bad ideas. I will assume as an educated voter that you have investigated these issues in detail, and can identify their harmful effects for yourself without some one like me holding your hand for you and leading you and Katrina through it step by painful step. Another aspect of Katrina's agenda that you might not be familiar is her support of Pelosi and efforts to smash the candidacy of Cindy Sheehan. To you final point, I don't see it in terms of lesser evilism, as both McCain and Obama will harm the Earth community of beings irreparably. Nor do I ascribe to the none sense puppeted ad nausea that the Party can be moved in a progressive fashion under some grand schema of infiltration. If this were true Obama would have kept his word on undermining FISA instead of voting for it; he would have attempted filibusters of extreme Supreme Court nominees Alito and Roberts; he would have taken a principled stand against Habeus Corpus and Torture; he would have voted to cut off funding of the Iraq war; instead of vote for a minimum wage Bill he would have advanced a Living Wage Bill; nor - and perhaps from a social perspective, the most egregious - he supports an insider Health care system run by the insurance industry rather than a Single Payer system predicated on socialist values like Canada, England, and France. I will be voting for Nader or McKinney whichever gets on my ballot. If you reward scum like Obama and McCain you are doomed for MORE OF THE SAME! Is that clear, tadpole?
Coyote Teacher,
"Obama voted for a bill augment liquid coal which produces almost three time the carbon pollution as does fossil fuels."
Whatchew been tellin' them dogs, teach?
Liquid coal IS a "fossil fuels". You could look it up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_coal#Liquefaction_-_Coal-To-Liquids_.28CTL.29
Perhaps you meant "three time (sic) the carbon pollution burning gasoline does"?
So we've established that you don't like Obama because he's a senator from Illinois (a long time coal state). Who exactly would you suggest as an alternative? The Ralpher isn't going to get elected dog-catcher (coyotes WATCH OUT!).
I'll take my Frozen Katrina shaken, not stirred, with a twist of lemon.
Seriously, last winter I saved a bundle on oil by keeping the house at 55 and heating two bedrooms and the bath with a DeLonghi electric heater. Also, it was unseasonably warm. This winter electric rates are deregulating up 25-50% too.
Amerst, MA has a community program (as seen on PBS) that uses experts to conduct energy audits on homes and small businesses and recommend the most money effective way to cut energy bills.
We need to provide this service to everyone and provide tax incentives for insulation, purchase of energy efficient appliances and cars (even used appliances and cars). We need to "destroy the demand" for oil and gas, and reduce the demand for electricity at the same time.
Tax cuts on oil and gas purchases is just chasing up the price. Maybe something based on income, but only temporary with a commitment to eventually by a more fuel efficient car or furnace, better appliances, and improve insulation. On the other hand, tax SUVs and poor mileage cars, and use that money for an incentive program. Watcha gonna do Mr. Obama?
.
http://www.countercurrents.org/nader300508.htm
What's Really Driving
The High Price Of Oil?
By Ralph Nader 30 May, 2008
[snipit]
Imagine, our government is letting your price for gasoline and home heating oil be determined by a gambling casino on Wall Street called NYMEX. The people need regulatory protection from speculators and an excess profits tax on Big Oil.
In addition, a sane government would see the present price crises as an opportunity to expand our passenger and freight railroad capacity and technology.
A sane government would drop all subsidies and tax loopholes for Big Oil's huge profits and other fossil fuels and promote a national mission to solarize our economy to achieve major savings from energy conservation technology, retrofitting buildings, and upgrading efficiency standards for motor vehicles, home appliances, industrial engines and electric generating plants.
Those are the permanent ways to achieve energy independence, reduce our trade deficit, create good jobs that can't be exported and protect the environmental health of people and nature.
Those are the reforms and advances that a muscular consumer, worker and small business revolt can focus on in the coming weeks.
What say you, America?
Ralph Nader is running for president as an independent.
http://www.votenader.org/index.html
.
Katrina ought to get off her elevated perch long enough to tell the truth about Obama's anti environmental record. But such is the nature of her LIES and OBFUSCATION in parroting the Dem company line as the soak up corporate cash and engage in GREEN WAHING! This women has absolutely no right to be posting on this site. The Nation is nothing more than an arm of the DLC apologetic so common in this moment to obscure the TRUTH about the anti environmental activities of Democrats. Wake Up people.
"What about Hugo Chavez's offer to help low income Americans with subsidized heating oil? Might be time to take him up on that one?"
Sure, just help him deprive his own poverty stricken people of the proceeds they would otherwise receive. Purely a political ploy on the part of Chavez. Same goes for him basically giving away gasoline.
"What about Hugo Chavez's offer to help low income Americans with subsidized heating oil? Might be time to take him up on that one?"
Sure, just help him deprive his own poverty stricken people of the proceeds they would otherwise receive. Purely a political ploy on the part of Chavez. Same goes for him basically giving away gasoline.
CanuckChuck: great idea! We should do the same up here in Canada, too. I think Harper would love having all that company and I hear his wife is a good cook too.
I know that I for one will be keeping the heat down really low trying to cut the cost.
What about Hugo Chavez's offer to help low income Americans with subsidized heating oil? Might be time to take him up on that one? I know, I know... It'll be a cold day in hell and an honest day in DC before that happens.
Hello, all political candidates:
The heating season starts October 1. All of the public will be screaming about their home/apartment heating bills about a week before the election, just after your last tracking poll results but before they finally decide. You're running for office on November 4.
Do you want to be timely? Or, are you waiting for a pie in the face?
As Katrina and the her Democratic Handlers trumpet their election year boldface lie-that they offer sustainable solutions for our Earth Mother=while paying lip service to those solutions and offering instead pay backs for corporate investments on from the Bio fuel, nuclear, and coal industries, thus ignoring the looming disaster with lives hanging in the balance.
I've worked in the environmental movement for over twenty years and Katrina is void of any understanding of the issues - nor apparently - of the fact that Obama has been in bed with the coal industry since he entered politics. His presidential campaign has taken over half a million bucks. Obama voted for a bill augment liquid coal which produces almost three time the carbon pollution as does fossil fuels.
My advice to Katrina is get your head out of your rectum!
Not to worry, Global Warming will take care of the problem.... Those folks in the North will be walking around in shorts, sandals, tropical shirts and drinking umbrella drinks.
Ain't it jus' wonner'ful how we've tamed mother nature to do our bidding...???
What, me worry...????
Everyone shoud take shelter for the winter in the "People's Houses" ...Congress and the White House.