Morales to Push Bolivian Reforms After Winning Vote
LA PAZĀ - Bolivian President Evo Morales was Monday preparing a redoubled nationalization push and other socialist reforms after winning huge support in a weekend referendum.
But his victory in Sunday's vote, with more than 60 percent of voters backing his mandate according to unofficial results, was tempered by strong gains also handed to political enemies, leaving the country sharply divided.
In a triumphant speech late Sunday, Morales called on four opposition governors who are defying his program to work with him, in an uncharacteristic display of compromise.
But he also told a flag-waving crowd in La Paz: "Your vote consolidated the process of change."
"We are here to continue recovering natural resources and the consolidation of nationalization," he said.
A key political ally, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, called to congratulate Morales and reiterate his support for "the democratic and cultural revolution undertaken by the brotherly Bolivian people," according to a statement release by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro.
Despite his solid win -- improving on the 54 percent support that elected him Bolivia's first indigenous president in December 2005 -- Morales was facing a polarized country.
In the eastern lowlands, where the opposition governors rule, his authority was just as roundly rejected.
The divisions are ethnic, economic and historic.
The president relies on massive support among Bolivia's indigenous majority, which accounts for six out of 10 of the country's inhabitants.
They live mostly in the Andes to the west and have become increasingly assertive under Morales in their demands for a greater share of the national wealth.
But the elite, mostly of European descent, sitting on much of that wealth in the eastern lowlands in the form of farmland and gas fields, are just as determined to resist.
The governors of the states of Santa Cruz, Tarija, Pando and Beni overnight celebrated their own strong wins in the referendum.
Ruben Costas, of Santa Cruz, struck out in his speech against the president's "dictatorship" and vowed Morales would not be able to step foot in his state.
Of the other four state governors whose jobs were also on the line in the plebiscite, three were seen to have been ousted -- two of them Morales critics, and one an ally. Another Morales ally was reconfirmed to office.
One of the opposition leaders rejected in the referendum, Manfred Reyes of the central state of Cochabamba, has vowed to fight any attempt to make him stand down.
That raised the prospect of violence in his state, which has already been shaken by clashes early last year between his supporters and Morales loyalists.
Analysts said the referendum did not change the standoff between Morales and the opposition. He is expected to now organize another referendum, this one to approve a new constitution that would enshrine many of his reforms.
"The results tell us that the situation won't change... There are no conditions for an end to the crisis," one political specialist, Jimena Costa, told La Razon newspaper.
Another analyst, Franck Poupeau of the French Institute for Andean Studies, told AFP it was possible Morales would negotiate and give a little ground over his rewriting of the constitution.
But he is expected to dig in on direct taxes on the gas industry that would likely give La Paz control of income that has flowed through the hands of state governors.
"The confrontation is over the DHT (Direct Hydrocarbon Tax) because if they (the opposition governors) have no resources, autonomy will mean nothing," he said.
© 2008 Agence France Presse
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
28 Comments so far
Show AllEvo is my brother.
The popular movements towards more just and equitable societies now gaining power in S. America are the peaceful and democratic versions of the post-WW II violent revolutions that ousted U.S. sponsered military dictatorships in countries such as Cuba and Nicaragua. Except for Cuba, those revolutionary governments were toppled by U.S. supported and trained Contras posing as freedom-fighters. Seems that America can't tolerate any good example, being that, never can tell, even one good example might prove contagious. Which is exactly what's happening now in S. America, with already at least three good examples in there, not to mention Nicaragua's recently elected populist government. So the question isn't will the U.S. act to crush these populist revolutions, but when & how? We know, of course, that a few years ago a CIA sponsored attempt to topple President Hugo Chavez failed only because the Venezuealan people rose up en masse and saw to it that their president was reinstated. But the CIA undoubtedly will strike again. What's worse the CIA's track record suggest that sooner or later it'll succeed, that mass resistance to U.S. takeovers of the above countries won't be enough to save their revolutions. What'll save them?
Our electing a president who'll end the Iraq War, negotiate with Iran and Russia plus turning things around here at home. And then what sort of world? It'll be up to us.
Just a reminder, populist are never liked by the rich, bcause of the worry that the majority will viote themselves the rich's money, of course the problem comes when one thinks one is worth so much more than the next, and deserves it somehow?
gotov,
Churchill was a right-wing authoritarian. I'd appreciate if you wouldn't quote him on this website.
The Venezuelan people are better off under socialism. It's the elites who are not better off.
You sound like a neo-liberal.
Just imagine - a leader who believes that a nation's resources and assets should be national prosperity shared by all, rather than for individual gain by the opportunists, aquisitors, and profiteers from far away places...
Vive a true man of the earth and all it's creatures! Balance is possible!
So what's your point, gotov? Chavez and Morales WERE democratically elected. And we here in neo-conservative jesus land are also faced with rapidly escalating food prices, unemployment and real hardship not just for the poor, but for everyone who isn't a member of the ultra rich elite. The poor in Venezuela now can see a doctor and eat 3 meals a day. What's wrong with that? Sure wish we could say the same thing here.
Been to Venezuela lately ?
Their president Chavez has nationalized just about everything that moves in the name of socialism, and is now faced with rapidly escalating food prices, unemployment and real hardship for the poor that his program allegedly supports.
Churchill once said that democracy was the worst form of government, except for all the others.
Go EVO!
Chump Amerika fooled by the Tortured Few.
Less then 13% of the ignorant support Bush.
Do you believe anything they say on the FAUX Blues?
Less than 1/10 0f 1% benefit and rule this Demockary.
Their strings pulled from Zio-land.
Phony polls
Faux Media Parrots and
Corpirate Stooges
Get the message.
SURGE PURGE Update and
REBOOT
Thank Grog,
There are still a few indigenous people left.
After the Corpirates have destroyed your culture and erased your heritage,
what do you have left?
BU__! SH__!
Put the mega phone Chimp back in his box and send the Aristo-Whores back to Europe.
Evo is a good man working for his country in trying to build a more equitable society.
The extremely wealthy people in Bolivia don't like him for that reason. It is the same in most countries. A certain segment of people want it all for themselves and the heck with everyone else.
Long Live Evo Morales!
The Europeans in Bolivia discredited themselves with lies. Same as in the USA. Congratulations to Evo Morales and the Aymara of Bolivia for their democratic achievements.
Good for Bolivia. They got an anti-corporate candidate and he won. We need a guy like that to be president here in the U.S., too, and I believe 60% of Americans want that, too. The closest we've come in a long time-- was Jimmy Carter.
In a time when we have two imperialist free traders battling to assume the title of chief corporate cheerleader here in the U.S., it is really sweet to see President Morales with a convincing win.
Viva Morales and his peoples' fight to throw off the yoke of US Empire and rule by the corporate gangsters.
Now, all we have to do is wake up the people in Columbia and rid the world of Uribe! Maybe then So. America will have a fighting chance at independence and true freedom.
Intersting, isn't it that the article feels the need to characterize Morales sound and vindicating electoral victory as "ruling over a polorized nation. Give me a break. WE ARE A POLORIZED NATION HERE IN AMERIKA!!! But I never see that characterization made in print. Somehow we are the land of the "big middle" in more ways than one. HA!
Hurrah and bravo for Morales and his principled leadership!!! Would that we had such a one as him at the helm of our sinking ship of state.
Or we could call him a drug "Kingpin" and either off or arrest him.
Bolivia IS, unfortunately, polarized, and much of that division is because the right-wing corporatists who are in charge (temporarily, thank goodness) of our government use State Dept. "democracy building" funds to support opposition to the democratically elected governments of any South American countries that refuse to kowtow to the IMF and the World Bank, to US trade policies that favor our corporations while hurting their populations and environment and bleeding them of natural resources, and to the US Wars on terror and drugs.
Bolivia is now one of the countries so "favored" by our attention, as is Ecuador (which is refusing to renew the US lease on a military base) and, of course, Venezuela. The US media seems for the most part complicit in the demonization of leaders like Morales. It is very sad.
Obama's advisors are worried about Morale's "bad example" that will rot the region. Don't worry Obama, there are plenty of collaborators to work with in Latin America to take out Chavez and other "managable threats" to stability (US influence).
From my HS spanish years ago, I think it's just...
Evo. Cambio que podemos creer.
People who don't understand that wealth belongs to the wealthy should stay out of small planes.
Viva Evo!
Maybe Evo needs to use missle strikes and targeted assassination against the rebels amd separatists...but, wait...no civilized government would do that.
The referendum was the Bolivian people's way of saying: Evo Morales-- now THAT's "cambio que usted puede creer adentro*"!
*courtesy of Babelfish
A 60% win here would be an unbelievable mandate yet this article keeps referring to a "polarized" country. If you want to see "polarized" look over here where a squeak through election is seen as license to kill. Hurrah for Evo Morales!
Long live the axis of good!
evo has done great things for his country and for this us defamed concept called democracy
let's hope the cia doesn't send in black ops to kill him
Maybe Bolivia qualify for some humanitarian foreign aid from Chavez and other governments who like to help make the world safe for democracy? It seems the first thing to do is to make governors who aren't re-elected step down and give their offices over to the ones who were elected, right?
This is good news, but Evo has his work cut out for him. I sure hope Evo can fend off any chances of civil war or of any coups against his government.
Viva Evo!
Congratulations, Evo! Maybe you can get your white upper class to move to Miami, where they belong.