Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Meltdown In The Arctic Is Speeding Up
Scientists warn that the North Pole could be free of ice in just five years' time instead of 60
Ice at the North Pole melted at an unprecedented rate last week, with leading scientists warning that the Arctic could be ice-free in summer by 2013.
Satellite images show that ice caps started to disintegrate dramatically several days ago as storms over Alaska's Beaufort Sea began sucking streams of warm air into the Arctic.
As a result, scientists say that the disappearance of sea ice at the North Pole could exceed last year's record loss. More than a million square kilometres melted over the summer of 2007 as global warming tightened its grip on the Arctic. But such destruction could now be matched, or even topped, this year.
'It is a neck-and-neck race between 2007 and this year over the issue of ice loss,' said Mark Serreze, of the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Boulder, Colorado. 'We thought Arctic ice cover might recover after last year's unprecedented melting - and indeed the picture didn't look too bad last month. Cover was significantly below normal, but at least it was up on last year.
'But the Beaufort Sea storms triggered steep ice losses and it now looks as if it will be a very close call indeed whether 2007 or 2008 is the worst year on record for ice cover over the Arctic. We will only find out when the cover reaches its minimum in mid-September.'
This startling loss of Arctic sea ice has major meteorological, environmental and ecological implications. The region acts like a giant refrigerator that has a strong effect on the northern hemisphere's meteorology. Without its cooling influence, weather patterns will be badly disrupted, including storms set to sweep over Britain.
At the same time, creatures such as polar bears and seals - which use sea ice for hunting and resting - face major threats. Similarly, coastlines will no longer be insulated by ice from wave damage and will suffer erosion, as is already happening in Alaska.
Other environmental changes are likely to follow. Without sea ice to bolster them, land ice - including glaciers - could topple into the ocean and raise global sea levels, threatening many low-lying areas, including Bangladesh and scores of Pacific islands. In addition, the disappearance of reflective ice over the Arctic means that solar radiation would no longer be bounced back into space, thus heating the planet even further.
On top of these issues, there are fears that water released by the melting caps will disrupt the Gulf Stream, while an ice-free Arctic in summer offers new opportunities for oil and gas drilling there - and for political disputes over territorial rights.
What really unsettles scientists, however, is their inability to forecast precisely what is happening in the Arctic, the part of the world most vulnerable to the effects of global warming. 'When we did the first climate change computer models, we thought the Arctic's summer ice cover would last until around 2070,' said Professor Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University. 'It is now clear we did not understand how thin the ice cap had already become - for Arctic ice cover has since been disappearing at ever increasing rates. Every few years we have to revise our estimates downwards. Now the most detailed computer models suggest the Arctic's summer ice is going to last for only a few more years - and given what we have seen happen last week, I think they are probably correct.'
The most important of these computer studies of ice cover was carried out a few months ago by Professor Wieslaw Maslowski of the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. Using US navy supercomputers, his team produced a forecast which indicated that by 2013 there will be no ice in the Arctic - other than a few outcrops on islands near Greenland and Canada - between mid-July and mid-September.
'It does not really matter whether 2007 or 2008 is the worst year on record for Arctic ice,' Maslowski said. 'The crucial point is that ice is clearly not building up enough over winter to restore cover and that when you combine current estimates of ice thickness with the extent of the ice cap, you get a very clear indication that the Arctic is going to be ice-free in summer in five years. And when that happens, there will be consequences.'
This point was backed by Serreze. 'The trouble is that sea ice is now disappearing from the Arctic faster than our ability to develop new computer models and to understand what is happening there. We always knew it would be the first region on Earth to feel the impact of climate change, but not at anything like this speed. What is happening now indicates that global warming is occurring far earlier than any of us expected.'
© 2008 The Guardian

238 Comments so far
Show AllAs all us angels dance on the head of a pin...
ALASKA MAID: Time IS non-linear, it's concentric circle dances.
VERACITY: I LOVE the 3:27 am posting! To move that fast while standing still, the ultimate Zen paradox! Great data!
I didn't know you wished for me to respond Lizard, I did't say anything one way or the other about your scientific comments.
Hi Brian, Your post is confusing. You address Anm/Namaste, are they the same person? Then you refer to a post Lizard posted about ignoring me and then you say that Ann/Namaste were only fooling about being AGW deniers. Is that a fact? If so, Mamaste has fooled everyone. _____ For what Earthly purpose? Strange.
And ~ARRY~ gave a very good response to your comments ~Lizard~, nothing more needed to be said that I could see.
What was the "nice touch" about posting a Wiki link about Antartica on this subject of the thawing Arctic? I found it to be just another denier's attempt to confuse the issue.
GottaGetOffTheGrid August 12th, 2008 12:42 pm
I'll check out your links later.
Thanks
Ann R. Key -- The anomaly can't be seen on the graph in question because it isn't designed to show rapid changes. In fact, it would hide any rapid changes because of the way time is compressed on it.
As I mentioned, the only way to find what we are looking for would be to stretch it out to be more precise for shorter periods of time...but then it wouldn't be the same graph.
"Science and technology cannot mitigate global warming and their adherents mock any spiritual solutions." As well they should. Just what form of "spiritual" solution is going to save humanity? Where is it ordained that any species survives forever? If anything is going to find solutions, if there are any, it is not going to be Woo Woo, Om mane pad meum, nor prayer. It is going to be science. The ability of human beings to continue procreating beyond their replacement numbers is a big part of the problem. Science has given us ways to temper that. Many of the world's "spiritual" paths, however, encourage as many progeny as "God" would gift us. Wonderful, eh? Obvious solutions are impeded by politics. Combine politics, with spiritual ideas such as the end times and the rapture and you have the insanity of fostering Armageddon not preventing it. Spirituality is the ego saying "Pay some attention to me! I am the light and the way." Sure it is.
What really unsettles scientists, however, is their inability to forecast precisely what is happening in the Arctic, the part of the world most vulnerable to the effects of global warming.
*well they shouldnt be unsettled because they arent gods or wizards. nature has a way of surprising, and its not like governments and corporations care no matter how bleak the assessments are now.
Humans-the embarrassing failure of planet earth.The only thing worse than being a failure are the people who actually think humans are great. Shame on you folks for being so stupid. You know who you are.
Look at the bright side. Shipping companies will love an ice-free Arctic. And if Antarctica warms up as well, think of the real estate opportunities. Visit my website at www.polargetrichschemes.com to learn more!
"Mankind's long held desire for ( apparent ) control over nature is now a historic footnote of idiocy unacknowledged yet." Sorry, science's major impetus is not to control. It is to understand. The application of science is where putting it to good use or ill takes place. You can't blame the discovery of fire for the creation of incendiary bombs.
_
This makes no sense to me: "Over 500 years, our strident advances in the sciences have fueled "PROGRESS", but this growing vector has now reached the WALL — a point of where morality and systemic understanding HAS to be re-inserted into decision making — or we risk the end of humankind itself." What wall have we hit in science progression? Yes, "morality....HAS to be re-inserted into decision making", but what does that have to do with science? You conflate politics, i.e., setting policy, with science. Science is, as the word's Latin origin indicates, knowledge. I'm going to suggest a lack of wisdom in this statement, "Mankind's long held desire for ( apparent ) control over nature is now a historic footnote of idiocy unacknowledged yet." Uh. I have a son who is on dialysis. The kidney I gave him in 1991 when he was 5 years old has failed. Science is what kept and keeps him alive and offers the prospect of a somewhat "normal" life. I am awe struck at the lunacy of calling his continued existence "desire for ( apparent ) control over nature" that is "a historic footnote of idiocy unacknowledged yet." Really? I'm going to venture that the medical and technical people who have kept him going for 23 years now are "humans" who "remember who they are" far more than anything spiritual you can dream up. Sorry, but "spiritual knowledge" is an oxymoron. And if it has been "obliterated" it is because it is shullbit to begin with.
No no no...sea ice & arctic ice is increasing. I saw a website that said so.
And it is cooler here than normal, therefore I deny global warming. I cannot understand that in a complex & volitile system that changes are not linear and equal...
Prepare yourselves, we are all living in an illusion...well the illusion is fading and we replace it with delusion. A lot of people are in for a rude awakening.
Jaguara
How about putting all the oil execs and the entire bush administration out on the ice floes until they admit global warming is real?
As the Global Warming/Climate Change news will most likely get worse in the coming months/years I would like to turn folks on to my favorite website (filled with deep wisdom )including a mind-blowing 'World Clock' & many other fascinating features & articles...
http://www.peterrussell.com
I'm waiting for KEM to post :)
We know about global warming and its uncertain evolution - what is there to add?
"More than a million square kilometres melted over the summer of 2007 as global warming tightened its grip on the Arctic."
Just to be accurate - and not to play into the hands of the global warming deniers - it's not just global warming at play in the Arctic - it's also bad weather! Global warming is just tipping the balance :)
that's a good idea TRUTHMONGER..............
meanwhile, with these devastating predictions most people will just go on as normal and wash their hands of the whole affair and say 'what can i do about it?'..........oooh, our favourite soap is on the telly, let's go watch.
yeah, KEM will be here soon together with THOSE WHO SHALL NOT BE NAMED.....
What will we do for cocktails now. What will happen to all the ice cubes we will be needing.
Sigh
An old song on the Tiny Tim album:
♫The ice caps are melting♪
♪Yo ho ho ho♫
♫The whole world is drowning♪
♪Yo ho-ho ho-ho.♫
JFREE
thanks for that link............looks like a 'peaceful' site. the world population clock is a bit scary though. and something else reminded me that tonight is the highlight of the 'perseids' meteor shower.
should be a good 'natural' show..................
Thanks for the warning, Coco ;)
How about us ALL getting deadly serious and admit that what the author of the link I'll post here was spot on when it was published in 2004 and no one listened to him.
The world's leaders better get together in peace and initiate some firm sensible action right now, "this month", to prevent the outcome predicted by this author and the distnguished paleontologist Michael J. Benton.
http://www.energybulletin.net/3647.html
Any the scum of the Earth, who are harmful to all of mankind, "the global warming deniers", such as ~Mesanthorpe~, ~Verocity~, ~Lizard~, and ~MIMICCS~, etc, who says the most important information in the link I post is "infamous".
If you ignorant deniers should have the gall to show up here and display your incredible stupidity again, argue the author of this article and tell ~Robin McKie it's "infamous" bullshit also.
Well I guess Nukes will not kill us all but maybe good ole Methane gas being released from Ice and other sources that will come out from the big thaw. While the rich fight wars over meaningless money/oil, and meaningless money, they will have no Earth to reside on anymore to enjoy the spoils of their greed. Very poetic. Poetic Justice for us all.
The real tragedy in my mind is the loss of the Artic wildlife, not the fact that the ice will be gone in 5 or 6 years, maybe.
Megalomania is an unrealistic belief in one's superiority, grandiose abilities, and even omnipotence. It is characterized by a need for total power and control over others, and is marked by a lack of empathy for anything that is perceived as not feeding the self.
Although megalomania is a term often ascribed to anyone who is power-hungry, the clinical definition is that of a mental illness associated with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
Narcissism is most simply defined as self-love. Though it is considered healthy to care about your own well-being and have a healthy self-esteem, when someone loves himself to the exclusion of all else and others become objectified to be used only to serve the self, this is no longer considered healthy or normal.
There are different psychological theories about how and why NPD develops, most of which relate to the integration of different aspects of ego and self as a child, and the nature of the parental roles in that process. Regardless of theory, NPD is characterized by extremely low self-esteem, which is compensated for by delusions of grandeur and megalomania, a narcissistic neuroses. With the propensity to act only on behalf of one's self, the unbridled need to feed one's ego, and the objectification of others to serve the power-hungry needs of megalomania, it is easy to see how this can be a recipe for disaster, especially when wrapped in a charismatic personality.
Jaguara says-
"No no no…sea ice & arctic ice is increasing. I saw a website that said so."
Producing the website would help in making you sound even a little plausible!
As I've said before. These Scientists are not using "exponents" in the Computer Models. Global Warming is/will increase exponentially when all the elements of it are combined.
And when Iceland has none and Greenland becomes Green, no more Gulf Stream. Then warm becomes cold very fast. Northern Europe becomes an ice cube. Last ice age ranged south to what is now called Missouri in the land now called the United States. As you know from your history, this genocidal slave empire peaked in the late 20th century c.e. before collapsing early in the 21st from gross economic and social abuse by their Oligarchy coinciding with environmental collapse. And no Scipio, nobody lives there any more except a few diseased bands of scavengers and they are dying out.
MISANTHROPE writes: "There are different psychological theories about how and why NPD develops, most of which relate to the integration of different aspects of ego and self as a child, and the nature of the parental roles in that process."
-
Psychologists are mostly bullsh**tters.
No one understands what in the brain controls our behavior, or how consciousness arises, and yet certain psychologists think they understand all about the human mind, can tell you why people behave the way they do, what it is that is driving them, etc.
A lot of psychology is politics wrapped up as science (pseudo-science, actually!).
Some psychologists used to claim - it wouldn't surprise me if some still do - that gay people were mentally ill.
Where was their scientific evidence to back up this claim? It was merely what they believed, BASED ON THEIR PREJUDICES.
I met a "psychologist" once, and he stank of politics, and was filled with prejudice.
These charlatans need to be exposed NOT encouraged.
jpbreeze...my entire post was facetious.
I was poking fun at the regular deniers who come on here.
As far as exponentials in the models...they HAVE been doing this, but the problem is that they have needed to be putting in exponentials on their exponentials!
Every time they find another contributing/linked factor - they incorporate it...on an appropriate exponential curve. What they do not do is allow for all of the undiscovered factors that will continue to increase the exponent...(instead of x to the y, x to the y to the z - where z represents the impact of undiscovered inputs.
I have often wondered, and would love some research money to investigate...if you plotted all of the model predictions as they continue to exponentially reduce the timelines for these events if you might not find that this is pointing us toward a hypothetical true curve. (Like how absolute zero temperature is theoretically calculated/extrapolated by the slowing of atomic motion as temperature drops). If any of you work with a lab, and have some money to burn, please contact me...
Jaguara
RE: Psychologists...
"Doctor treat thyself".
Speaking of my own prejudices, most psychologists I have met needed therapy themselves, and many of them had entered the field to try and deal with their own demons. That said, this is an over generalization.
It is funny though to read "staying_sane_in_an_insane_world" posting about phsychologists being political and prejudiced...which in itself is very prejudicial against psychologists!!! So a bit of pot calling the kettle black...
Jaguara
The Arctic will be ice free before Iraq is GI free.
~LUCKYLEFTY~ climate changes prior to humanity burnig billions of tons of fossil fuels in a brief time span, almost always evolved over time periods of millions of years. So don't expect an ice age any time soon.
Do expect the Arctic to thaw completely and the 400 gigatons of methane gas, which is now safely trapped in the Arctic's perma-frost to then burp out into our atmosphere. Now please do not think that I am attempting to be the expert on that scientific based opinion. I am not.
If any don't believe it, argue with the scientists and geologists I "referenced" here, who state those warnings, explain why they are wrong. Mesanthorpe, "a global warming denier scum bag", claims they suffer a serious personality malfunction, termed "megalnomania".
~Mesanthorpe~ suffers from an incurable brain disorder, termed "Utterstupidious". At least he didn't attempt to proclaim the author of this article was wrong this time. Be difficult to do that huh? We can visually see it happening, no science necessary.
"What really unsettles scientists, however, is their inability to forecast precisely what is happening in the Arctic,..."
If they are unable, then they are also unable to accurately forcast what will happen to weather patterns OUTSIDE of the Arctic region--other than very general trends. If as seems likely the Northeastern Pacific storm track shifts further north, will that mean a subsequent northerly movement of climatic zones in the western half of North America? Will that in turn mean lesser rain/snowfall amounts in watersheds, and the extension of desertification in California? How will tropical and tornadic storm formation be effected? And so forth.
The arctic has been continuously covered in ice for at least 800,000 years and quite possibly much longer. Now we are seeing estimates that it will be free of summer ice in 1 to 6 years. Noticeable melting began in recent decades. I'd like to ask those who deny anthropogenic global warming to explain how this could possibly be due to some previously unknown natural cycle. How is that a relatively brief total thaw of a million year-old ice sheet just happens to coincide with the relatively brief dumping of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere by humans? The odds of this being due to random coincidence rather than a causal relationship must be approximately 30,000 to one.
"Did he indeed bridge the hellespont?"
"Even so, inspired by some demon eager to see his downfall."
The ancient Greeks knew that hubris was dangerous. Modern humans are too wise for such superstitious nonsense.
In the Fifties I was a child and scientists then talked about using thermonuclear heat to melt the arctic ice so shipping lanes would be open.
Another idea was to create oil slicks on the ocean to keep warm ocean waters from evaporating and feeding hurricanes.
Liberals have always been more intelligent than conservatives. We effete, elite snobs will still be apologizing for our superiority when Daddy Warbucks is blaming us for causing global warming by calling attention to it.
Excellent point ~Billy~, or maybe a billion to one.
Where ya at ~VEROCITY~ and your new sidekick ~MIMICCS~? Oh forgot, your mostly night people. No full moon now though, you might not arrive.
While considered unlikely, sudden dramatic climate change is possible, and there's evidence that it has happened before. There are studies which indicate that the slowdown or stopping of the gulf stream can have a 'lightswitch' effect for triggering an ice age in northern Europe. It has been talked about on CommonDreams before:
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0130-11.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0224-01.htm
In his book "Chicago" City on the Make," Nelson Algren, speaking of the poor, quotes Carl Sandburg.
As Algren puts it: "'The slums will take their revenge,' the white-haired poet wrote."
Can the same be said of Mother Earth? ...
Funny, isn't it, that phrase, "Mother Earth."
Perhaps it has something to do with the difference between mother-love and father-love. ... A father's love is based on the child doing, on the child accomplishing, succeeding at something. ... But a mother's love is always there: unquestioning and all-forgiving.
When, at the height of his power and fame, they asked Al Capone's mother what sort of a son Al Capone was, Mrs. Capone is reputed to have said: "Oh, Al, he's-a nice-a boy!"
But of course! All sons are loved by their mother, rotten though some are.
"Mother Earth" -- when did that phrase originate? Did it begin at about the time of the Industrial Revolution? ... Or did Adam coin the term? ... Or was it, Frederick Taylor? Henry Ford?
One wonders, did Ms. Capone have a breaking point? What I mean is: was there some behavior her darling Al might have engaged in that she would have finally said: "Enough! Enough, Al! What's a-matter fa you? You no good! You no good boy!"
And where is Al's mom now? Is she perhaps at the North Pole? Or somewhere in some South American rain forest? ... Is she there with all the other gone-moms -- no longer all-loving, no longer all-forgiving?
Has the love in the hearts of all those dear sweet moms ... been replaced with revenge?
What -- and this comes as a surpise to you?!! You're shocked, you're amazed, you're frightened, that this has finally happened: that "Mother Earth" has now become "Mother Vengeance"?
The chickens have come home to roost. And they've come in the form of a woman scorned --"Mother Earth."
Of course there are those who would say about Mrs. Capone, "Well, didn't she know what a rotten son her Al was? Didn't she read the papers? Didn't she take heed from the media?"
The media?!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! The media?!! Are you kidding? Why, they *loved* Al Capone! They *lionized* Al Capone! They *romanticized* Al Capone!
Sure, the media mentioned Al's various transgressions. But what about those soup lines, and what about all those turkeys on Thanksgiving? ... And, more than that, what about the fact that Al was a ***success.*** A tycoon. A captain of industry.
A capitalist's capitalist.
Oh, sure, the media kicked Al when he was down, when he was on the way out, when he was a melting giant. But when he was on top, when he was a "success" -- why, he was just a lovable rogue, a "colorful" robber baron. .. Just like any other corporate exec, of the same ilk.
So why shouldn't Al's mom have been proud of him? What could she possibly have conclude from the media coverage of her son other than that Al was "a little naughty" but, above all, and most important of all -- A Big Shot!
Wasn't Al praised and lionized just like his modern-day corporate-counterparts are praised and lionized? Oh, sure, there are various "transgressions" today's captains of industry have committed, but don't tell that to the people in the media who put them on the covers of their magazines. And don't tell that to the teevee programs that fawn over their yachts and mansions. And don't tell that to the editorial writers who oh-so-lovingly look out for their best interests.
They're successful! And isn't that what America is all about: money, success, power? (And screw the price.)
... "Mother Earth will take her revenge, the white-haired poet might just as well have said. ... And, one might add, a lot sooner than the slums.
Let me suggest a title for the next article on CD dreams about global warming:
"SUMMER ICE GONE IN 60 YEARS? TRY SIX DAYS!"
That should get a flurry of posts.
;)
You Melt My Ice Charmer
If desire goes with fire
then ice must go with expire
If to be loved is to be on the make
then the fittest better 'go eat cake'
If the don of the caring mother can't brag about Uncle Sam
then how should we not be happy to be on the lam?
So melt my ice charmer
were just one click from that final lick
I wonder at this CD rubbish that is suppoed to be aimed at the issues of the day.
The madness out there is the reason we have descended to the level of species and human anihilation.
Science and technology cannot mitigate global warming and their adherents mock any spiritual solutions. Poll's say people want a change in direction but have no clue what direction as evidenced by their support of John McCain. Republicans think the god like market will save us. The Dim's are hell bent on becoming Republicans. People are hurting financially and the snowball just began to roll downhill and four billion pointing fingers will change nothing. So, just what are your plans?
It's like a horror movie. There are signs and signs, but nobody pays attention. Then one day...
Sometimes things just go along and all of a sudden you see the results. For instance kudzu has been tenting over old shade trees along the parkways for years, and just this year all of a sudden many of the trees have tumbled over dead clearing large areas.
The arctic ice is much more critical to earth's stability than a few shade trees. It is very important to predict the speed of melting, an immediate matter of life and death in fact, to those who live in low lying areas.
Does anyone know whether scientists can assess how much the latent heat of fusion has already been absorbed by the ice? If the ice has been quietly sitting there at 0 degrees centigrade absorbing the latent heat required for melting, the liquification could begin to proceed at an almost instantaneous rate.
If we are at that stage, it is now past time for emergency planning for places like Bengladesh. Naturally we must not abandon the call for green energy to prevent further serious problems of global warming. Most of us who have computers are rich enough to simplify our lives - use and acquire only what you need, find joy in small things and try to influence others about peace and policy. (Peace is necessary to address every one of our problems).
1. Please provide documentation that the Arctic Ice is 1,000,000 years old.
2. Note that the article says they are not sure why the ice is melting
3. Anyone have answers?
One weird thing is we are currently having an anomaly within the anomaly. 2007 was the second hottest year ever, but the Hansen/GISS global averages took a tumble in October and haven't recovered. The July data isn't on the chart yet, but 2008 has averaged "only" 0.35 - 0.4 deg C higher than the 1950-70 base period. Some recent years have been 0.8 warmer than average. (Its where the deniers get there "cooling" BS.)
Temperatures have increased faster and are staying at the new high points in the far north longer than the middle lattitudes or the southern hemisphere. The models agree with the northern latitudes warming more quickly.
Apparently glacier and snowcap loss in the middle lattitudes that feed rivers in India, China, Europe and the southwest US has also not slowed down with this 2008 dip in global temperature. Have we reached one of the "tipping points" where the ice just doesn't get cold and thick enough during the winter to survive the warm months? Even when global temperatures are a little cooler than 2005-mid 2007? Or the dark seawater is absorbing light so much light once reflected by ice?
I looked a little the NOAA methane data. The curves did sneak up a little last year, but the apparent summer down spike still occurred (so far) this year. I guess methane is consumed or oxidzed faster during the summer, even as it evaporates out of warming permafrost. Maybe there is a time lag as methane travels from burp sites to the monitoring station. If that curve ever starts rapidly taking off without the seasonal down spikes...
Still no sign of solar cycle 24 getting serious. Hansen discounts the 11 year cycle, but 2011-12 could be scary with all the melting already underway, peaking solar activity and maybe an El Nino year on top of that.
Southeastern Shelf of the Laptev Sea, Arctic Ocean
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference
Matul, A.G., Khusid, T.A., Mukhina, V.V., Chekhovskaya, M.P. and Safarova, S.A. 2007. Recent and late Holocene environments on the southeastern shelf of the Laptev Sea as inferred from microfossil data. Oceanology 47: 80-90.
Description
Matul et al. studied the distributions of different species of siliceous microflora (diatoms), calcareous microfauna (foraminifers) and spore-pollen assemblages found in sediment cores retrieved from 21 sites on the inner shelf of the southern and eastern Laptev Sea, starting from the Lena River delta and moving seaward between about 130 and 134°E and stretching from approximately 71 to 78°N, which cores were acquired by a Russian-French Expedition during the cruise of R/V Yakov Smirnitsky in 1991. This endeavor indicated the existence of "the Medieval Warm Period, ~600-1100 years BP; the Little Ice Age, ~100-600 years BP, with the cooling maximum, ~150-450 years BP; and the 'industrial' warming during the last 100 years." In addition, "judging from the increased diversity and abundance of the benthic foraminifers, the appearance of moderately thermophilic diatom species, and the presence of forest tundra (instead of tundra) pollen," they write that "the Medieval warming exceeded the recent 'industrial' one."
"CD rubbish" Why do you call reporting these things rubbish? Have you watched television news lately?
Lower Murray Lake, Canada
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference
Besonen, M.R., Patridge, W., Bradley, R.S., Francus, P., Stoner, J.S. and Abbott, M.B. 2008. A record of climate over the last millennium based on varved lake sediments from the Canadian High Arctic. The Holocene 18: 169-180.
Description
The authors derived thousand-year histories of varve thickness and sedimentation accumulation rate for Canada's Lower Murray Lake (81°20'N, 69°30'W), which parameters, in their words, "are related to temperatures during the short summer season that prevails in this region," according to the findings of several studies that had previously conducted similar field-work on other High Arctic lakes. These new data bases revealed that "the twelfth and thirteenth centuries were relatively warm," and their graphical representations indicate that Lower Murray Lake and its environs were often much warmer during this time period (AD 1080-1320) than they were at any time in the 20th century.
Surface Air Temperatures Over the Arctic Ocean
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference
Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Hu, Y., Chen, L., Dai, Y. and Ren, X. 2008. Assessment of surface air temperature over the Arctic Ocean in reanalysis and IPCC AR4 model simulations with IABP/POLES observations. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: 10.1029/2007JD009380.
What was done
The authors "assessed how well the current day state-of-the-art reanalyses and CGCMs [coupled global climate models] are reproducing the annual mean, seasonal cycle, variability and trend of the observed SAT [surface air temperature] over the Arctic Ocean for the late 20th century (where sea ice changes are largest)."
What was learned
Lin et al. report that "large uncertainties are still found in simulating the climate of the 20th century," noting that on an annual basis, "almost two thirds of the IPCC AR4 [Fourth Assessment Report] models have biases that [are] greater than the standard deviation of the observed SAT variability," additionally noting that the models "can not capture the observed dominant SAT mode variability in winter and seasonality of SAT trends." They also state that "the majority of the models show an out-of-phase relationship between the sea ice area and SAT biases," and that "there is no obvious improvement since the IPCC Third Assessment Report."
What it means
Not only does it appear that state-of-the-art climate models have a long way to go before they can adequately simulate even the past climate of the Arctic Ocean (much less predict its future), we have the word of the six scientists who evaluated them in this study that their creators have made "no obvious improvement" in the models' simulation ability since the time of the Third Assessment Report several years earlier. Does that make what has transpired in the interim something akin to beating a dead horse? Or has it been more like attempting to steer a ship that is dead in the water? However one characterizes the activity, it has apparently gotten us nowhere.