The Games and the Promises
I stood there in the whirling summer,
My hand capped on a withered heart,
And thought of China and of Greece. . . .
- Richard Eberhart, The Groundhog
Now that the Olympic games have begun, it is time to compare promise with performance.
China's first attempt in recent memory to host the Olympic summer games was in 1993. At that time its efforts to be selected were Herculean. The visit by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to evaluate Beijing's bid took place in March 1993 when smog hangs heavily over the city. The authorities knew that if the committee got wind of the smog it would never select Beijing as a site for the summer games. To reduce coal smoke in the atmosphere the government cut off all heat to large areas of Beijing.
Taxi drivers and peddlers with cars were advised to take a vacation so that the IOC members would not be slowed by traffic or offended by seeing people munching on food purchased from street vendors. Three hundred thirty thousand school children were enlisted to clean traffic signs. All buses and 30,000 taxicabs were required to post window-stickers supporting the city's Olympic bid. The government reduced its surveillance of foreign reporters. And that was not all.
China modeled itself after the state of Utah that 2 years earlier had lost out to Nagano, Japan for the 1998 winter games, Saddened by its loss to Nagano, but determined to do better when bidding for the 2002 games, Utah began wooing African IOC members by offering them and members of their families tuition and athletic training assistance in what some perceived as an attempt to get their votes when the venue for the 2002 games was determined. (The effort was enhanced when 5 years later the Salt Lake City bidding committee paid some individuals $500,000 in scholarships, 6 of the recipients being relatives of IOC members.) Recognizing what a good idea Utah had, the Chinese followed suit. They presented the IOC committee with a pair of cloisonné vases estimated to have a value of about $40,000. In addition, they gave the new Olympic museum in Lausanne, Switzerland, a terra cotta soldier from Xian for which China had earlier reportedly declined a $100 million offer. China's bid for the games did not succeed in 1993, but the IOC has a long memory and that may explain in part why Beijing is hosting the 2008 games.
When Beijing was awarded the games some, but not all, thought it would enhance human rights in China. In an interview with Ray Suarez on the News Hour shortly after the games were awarded, Sally Jenkins, a sports columnist for the Washington Post, was asked whether awarding the games would affect China's human rights policy. She said there was no evidence to support that. She was right. Two weeks before the games were to start, Liu Shaokun was sentenced to serve a year of "re-education through labor" because he posted pictures on the web of schools that had collapsed during the recent earthquake. He was charged with "disseminating rumours and destroying social order." Ye Guozhu was convicted in 2004 of "picking quarrels and stirring up trouble" for trying to organize a group against forced evictions without just compensation in order to make way for construction in preparation for the games. His sentence served, his release was delayed until after the Olymics thus preventing him from being interviewed by visiting reporters. Smog, traffic and press freedom have fared no better than human rights.
Smog covered the Beijing during much of July and early August. In 2007 authorities said driving restrictions would not be needed to solve the pollution and congestion problems. July 21 marked the first workday in which "car restrictions": were imposed on Beijing's residents.
The press, like driving, were restricted, contrary to earlier assurances that the press, like cars, would be able to operate freely. In 2001, Wang Wei, Secretary General of the Beijing Olympic Games Committee, told the IOC that the international press would have "complete freedom to report when they come to China." "Echoing those comments": last month, Jacques Rogge, the International Olympic Committee president and Cheer Leader In Chief "told Agence France-Presse": "For the first time, foreign media will be able to report freely and publish their work freely in China." On July 31 it was reported that the IOC had failed to insist on unfettered press access to the Internet. On August 2 Kevan Gosper, press commission chief of the IOC said somewhat enigmatically: "We believe we are moving to a point where you will be moving toward a point where you can report in an unfettered way."
The games have begun, the smog's in the heavens, the cars clog the roads, activists and the Internet are imprisoned and all's right with the world. As Mr. Rogge said on August 2: "Come the 9th of August the magic of the games and the flawless organization will take over."
Christopher Brauchli;brauchli.56@post.harvard.edu
For his political commentary see web page http://humanraceandothersports.com
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
8 Comments so far
Show AllSounds just like more liberal China-bashing to me. Personally, I think it's incredibly arrogant and rude for the IOC to make political conditions on China. The IOC is not a political organization and they have no mandate to force their own political views on the world.
This article is just not well informed. "In an interview with Ray Suarez on the News Hour shortly after the games were awarded, Sally Jenkins, a sports columnist for the Washington Post." Since when is a "sports" columnist, and one who presumably lives on the east coast of the US, thousands of miles from China, an appropriate source to quote on Chinese politics??? Does Ms. Jenkins know Chinese, ever been to China, ever studied politics at all? Very sad.
>>The Olympic Games have gone, in one generation, from being an actual sporting event (and at times a magnificent one) to being a kind of Paris Hilton extravaganza, <<
Mordechai, I don't think they have those events yet. Anyway would they be track and field or gymnastics?
I agree. When we watch we turn the sound off. The pictures are nice...
I think China is doing a very good job. The reports we are getting back and few and far between. We heard things from every country in the past.
CBC coverage is great, they show all the countries not just Canada. NBC has a USA only BS.
Hay Canuckchuck, you could say the way the USA treats its people with lack of health coverage even China has a better health system that America so I hope you jump on the US next time it is heald there.
The Olympic Games have gone, in one generation, from being an actual sporting event (and at times a magnificent one) to being a kind of Paris Hilton extravaganza, mixing commercialism and nationalism in abundant amounts with plain flakkery and bullshit. They are no longer worth watching or supporting. They have sunk low enough that they may elect George Wanker Bush head of the International Olympic Committee, if he is not made Commissioner of Baseball first. Personally, when (and if) Bush actually goes, he should take a job at Underwriters' Laboratory testing rope - the kind they use to hang people.
I bet the gold used in the medals are from political prisoners teeth....wear them in SHAME atheletes
By the authors logic, no Olympics can ever be held in any Western country that has caused such devastation in Iraq.
I am no supporter of China or its practices (internal repression) nor can I support my governments practices (external oppression, murder and displacement of millions of people ... Iraqis for instance). We really must apply the same logic to repression or oppression. This hypocrisy of somehow pointing fingers at other countries for their policies against their own people while we commit far greater crimes is unacceptable.
The effects are more subtle. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of people from around the world gathered in China. A huge majority of them are there in a very peaceful way, and have a shared common interest in sports. This means lots of people are talking to other people in a friendly and peaceful way. And the Chinese citizens are right in the middle of this.
Forget what the organizers and governments do. Hundreds of thousands of people gathered together in peace is a good thing.
Perhaps I might not have chosen China, given the upheaval and repression we have witnessed, but, was it realistic to expect China to remake its entire society to our liking for a sports event, any sports event, even one as grand as the Olympics?