President Obama Up Against the Middle East 'Berlin Wall'
"People of the world -- look at Berlin, where a wall came down . . . and history proved that there is no challenge too great for a world that stands as one" -Barak Obama
On July 24, Barak Obama stood where a 96-mile-long wall of barbed wire and concrete once separated the ideologies and lives of East and West Berlin. He told a crowd of 200,000 that "history reminds us that walls can be torn down" and that the "greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us one from another."
He reminded the crowd that sixty years ago this summer, the Soviet Union "cut off food and supplies to more than two million Germans in an effort to extinguish the last flame of freedom in Berlin. That [was] when . . . the largest and most unlikely rescue in history brought food and hope to the people of this city."
American pilots nicknamed the rescue "Operation Vittles." History knows it as the Berlin Airlift.
For the fifteen months of Operation Vittles, American C-47 and British Avro York cargo planes flew over the wall separating East and West Berlin 278,228 times, flying 92 million miles and delivering over 2,325,000 tons of food and vital supplies.
The Allies literally "flew to the sun" to save two million people.
The day before his Berlin speech, Obama stood at the 187-foot-long Western Wall that flanks the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem. This wall is the closest anyone can get to the "Even ha-shetiya" (Foundation Stone), the holiest spot in Judaism and the biblical justification for the Zionist colonization of Palestine.
His presence at the wall so soon after his genuflection at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington D.C. in June assured the Israelis that their "security" would remain the number one priority of U.S. Middle East Policy.
As a C-47 flies, Obama was standing less than two miles from the 400-mile-long wall of concrete and fear and hate that divides a land and imprisons hope and makes a mockery of the democratic pretensions of Israel. On the Israeli side it is a landscaped separation barrier. On the Palestinian side it is a bleak apartheid wall. Neither barrier nor wall was mentioned by Obama. . . either day.
The walls surrounding the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have turned these areas into open-air prisons. At the whim of the Israeli government or commanding officer or private soldier, entry/exit points are closed for hours, days, weeks or months.
Palestinians seeking life-saving medical attention are denied passage to hospitals on the landscaped side. Children are born just to die in the scorched dust while their mothers wait for permission to pass-mothers die as well. Workers are denied access to jobs, farmers to fields and students to school. A season's worth of harvest rots in trucks broiling in the hot sun. Food, medical supplies, replacement parts for a deteriorating infrastructure and the stuff of daily commerce are permitted through in a trickle much too small to sustain the nearly four million people held beyond the reach of humanity's conscience.
Fully eighty percent of people in Gaza live on less than two dollars a day and depend on food aid for their day-to-day survival. Many parents can provide only one meal a day for themselves and their children.
Dov Weisglas, a senior Israeli government advisor, was candid, if not boastful, regarding Israel's unconscionable policy of cutting off food and supplies to the walled areas, "The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger." Anyone with an unblinkered view of the Zionist vision will understand Weisglas to mean, "The idea is to make their lives so intolerable that they lose hope and "choose" to go somewhere . . . anywhere . . . else."
If ever there was a need for an airlift to breech a wall and succor a desperate people it is now. It is Palestine. Should Barak Obama become the next president of the world's only superpower he will have an opportunity and the wherewithal to put his well-articulated Berlin vision into action. He will have an opportunity to walk his talk.
Forming a humanitarian "coalition of the willing," President Obama can order American C-130 Hercules cargo planes, with a payload of 18 tons, to transport supplies the 360 miles from Incirlik Air Force Base in Turkey to Israel. Sustaining the West Bank and Gaza Strip for fifteen months will require ferrying five million tons of food and supplies 93 million miles in 258,333 flights.
'Amaliet Ta'am (Operation Vittles), like the Berlin Airlift, will require a "trip to the sun." But the "trip" will send a message to Israel that the world is standing as one to demand that they tear down the walls and create a legitimate secular democracy that guarantees the civil and human rights of all its inhabitants regardless of religion or ideology.
Barak Obama is not a disinterested or ill informed or uncaring man. He knows the reality of the Palestinians' brutally suffocating existence. But he, like all national politicians in America, has had his knees weakened by the realpolitik of Israel's shadow government on K Street.
Hopefully, if Obama is the man he claims to be, he will change the realpolitik in America and will one day walk with strengthened knees across the sands of a true democracy in Palestine-Israel or Israel-Palestine . . . or whatever they elect to call it.
Robert Weitzel is a contributing editor to Media With a Conscience. His essays regularly appear in The Capital Times in Madison, WI. He can be contacted at: robertweitzel@mac.com.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
26 Comments so far
Show AllI wasn't expecting this article to mention that since the wall went up suicide bombings have almost dropped off completely (thanks for not disappointing me). Of course the radicals have now resorted to firing hundreds of rockets over the wall. I used to sympathize with the palestinians and to be honest still do. The truth is if the palestinians wanted peace they could have it. When Israel withdrew from lebanon as part of a peace agreement radical islamists immediatly moved in and fired rockets at Israel. When Israel withdrew from the Gaza strip again extremists moved in and bombarded Israel with rockets. See the pattern? Ask yourself would you rather be Jewish and live in the West Bank or Palestinian and live in Israel? Oddly enough there was never been an attack by a palestinian living in Israel (although this month for the first time ever israel did dismantle a sleeper cell inside it's borders. When the palestinians finally have the courage to stand up to the radical islamists they will truly be free from ever worrying about Israel.
Oh forgot to mention US private donors are the largest givers of aid in Palestine, even more than other Arab countries (excluding military aid of course).
"There are a lot of progressives who believe as you do that this wall is saving lives."
Goose2, whose lives? Could you be more specific? I take it you hold the view that only Jewish Israeli lives are worth anything?
How does that differentiate you from a Klu-Klux-Klansman who lynches a Black and then claims no-one was hurt by it? The sort of crap-head who was prepared to lynch Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbour, because of their ethnicity? (Read Woody Guthrie's Bound for Glory, if you want to enlarge your education.)
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Israeli historian describes how the Zionists led one of the largest forced migrations in modern history. This ethnic cleansing policy continues today. As Pappe states, "if the ideology that still drives the Israeli policy towards the Palestinians is not correctly identified, neither Palestinian nor Jews will be saved."
Peaceful relations will occur only if Israel wants it. So far Israel has not been interested.
hoodeet August 8th, 2008 4:36 pm
Thanks
That's why I will not waste my vote this time.
I am voting the Nader/Gonzalez ticket.
Nader will not blindy support Israel and her Apartheid Wall and brutality.
Nader will also stop BOTH wars.
Nader will not allow wiretaps unless they are court approved.
Gonzalez is the guy who nearly beat Gavin Newsome in San Fran.
Conservatives and progressives, both are joining the Nader camp.
To answer Thomas More's question:
a) The idea of an airlift to Gaza is primarily to challenge US leaders to take a stand. It would be a public test for Obama and others who still cite the Berlin airlift as a shining moment in US history.
b) Whether the western gov'ts do or don't take up the idea, NGO's should have the sense to charter planes and carry out a high-profile airlift.
c) There already is at least one ship headed for Gaza to challenge Israel's illegal blockade of the Palestinian coast. It is carrying Jews and non-Jews opposed to Israel's inhumane policies.
OK, this is getting confusing. Regarding other areas everyone is shouting stay out of foreign wars, don't interfere in other countries problems.
The airlift (which seems to be a great PR idea for reducing friction) seems to be supported and interference by us advocated in Gaza.
So which is it?
No initiative on the Apartheid Wall will ever be undertaken by a US politician.
The malign influence exerted by AIPAC is such that those politicians live in terror of an AIPAC campaign to unseat them, so whatever they want, US politicians will be happy to oblige them.
Anyone else feel like CD has been infiltrated by Neocon fascist posing as progressive to discredit Democrats and Obama, and get us to waste our votes on Nader?
If the Jews intended to torture the Palestinians into leaving Gaza, they would let any Palestinian walk out freely at any time, and would prevent only his or her return. Instead they have obviously turned Gaza into a huge Konzentrationslager.
Some of you will doubtless be distressed that I refer to "Jews" rather than "Israelis". I don't call them Israelis because (a) there are many non-Jewish Israelis, and (b) the Jews overwhelmingly support Israel. If you doubt me, try talking to an otherwise liberal and intelligent Jew about Palestine. The response is predictable: The higher brain functions shut down, the right arm sticks out, the mouth shouts "Sieg Heil" ... okay, not exactly, but you get my point.
"Barak Obama is not a disinterested or ill informed or uncaring man." The mere fact that he is being allowed to run for President is enough to refute this assertion. There are two good Yiddish expressions to describe Obama: "shabbat-goy" and "tushis-lekher".
Mikep wrote:
"Israel needs to stand firm. It's in the right, it has international law and global opinion on its side, and it is winning the war."
Wrong, but then little things like international law, and global public opinion don't really matter much when you have nuclear warheads, all the latest killing technology, and the world's biggest colonial power on your side.
I wonder though. The US may not always dominate the world, and someday the Jewish people may be a minority in Isreal. The Palistinians will not likely forget the suffering that has been inflicted upon them. Isreal is winning the battles, and losing the war.
Actually almost the whole human race can trace their genes genetically back to the Middle East and Africa if you go far back enough not just Jews and Arabs. I had to point that out because if we all went by genetics then the Middle East and Africa is the heritage of not one group of people but all of humanity's heritage.
Ahuramazda wrote: "...Like saying Americans have to return territory that originally belonged to Mexico (Arizona, California, Utah, Nevada, Colorado etc.)"
1. Originally belonged to Mexico? What about the Indians who lived here for centuries before the Spanish took it from them? Palestinians are the new Indians.
2. Mexico surrendered the territory you mention in the Treaty of Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on Feburary 2, 1848. (A moot point perhaps because Mexicans, and other Central American nationals, are reclaiming that territory as we speak.)
Humans plunder, and have done so since they came down out of the trees. If anyone thinks it's going to stop -- ever -- I'd like to have some of what they're smoking.
atheist wrote:
"(Obama) is very interested ... in achieving his own personal goal of becoming the President of the US. He cares a lot ... about attaining that goal. And he is well informed ... to the extent that it will help him achieve that goal.
"I just hope the people who have fallen for his carefully crafted façade discover, before it's too late, that there's little of substance behind it."
Well said!
Barack Obama reminds me of Sammy Glick in the play "What Makes Sammy Run?" ... He is, in many ways, quite similar to Ronald Reagan -- an empty vessel into which one can pour whatever one wants to pour; see whatever one wants to see.
What follows is an excerpt from an August 5th article written by David Walsh, entitled "The Making and Marketing of Barack Obama: Image and Identity in US politics."
Walsh captures perfectly Obama's "nada y nada y pues nada."
David Walsh writes:
"Whereas the Clintons bore some connection to the protest movements of the late 1960s and early 1970s, albeit representing their most shallow and opportunist element, Obama was largely shaped by the sharp rightward shift in American ruling class policy that began in the late 1970s under Jimmy Carter and fully flowered during the Reagan administration. ...
"In 'The Audacity of Hope,' Obama offers this remarkable tribute (to Ronald Reagan): 'All of which may explain why, as disturbed as I (Barack Obama) might have been by Ronald Reagan's election in 1980... I understood his appeal... Reagan spoke to America's longing for order, our need to believe that we are not simply subject to blind, impersonal forces but that we can shape our individual and collective destinies, so long as we rediscover the traditional virtues of hard work, patriotism, personal responsibility, optimism, and faith.'...
David Walsh continues:
"(Obama's) intense ambition and his political 'androgyny,' the ability to be 'all over' an issue, to appear to address it fluidly and flexibly, while saying nothing, both emerge strongly from Wenner's 'Rolling Stone' interview. ...
"Wenner notes (in his interview of Obama) that 'change' is the byword of Obama's campaign. 'Can you describe what change is? What does it look like?' (Wenner) asks.
"This provides the opportunity for Obama to indulge in his specialty — empty generalities, vague commitments that commit him to nothing, 'feel-good' phrase-mongering. ...
"What and who is Obama? What does he or anyone else have to show for his legal, political and "community organizing" careers? In reality, very little. Take the marketable identity away from him, and there's nothing there. ...
"US presidential hopefuls are selected, vetted, molded in a complex and time-consuming process. The ruling elite faces life-and-death questions and is not about to allow just anyone to take up residence in the White House. He, or she, must be prepared to make the most ruthless decisions.
"Obama has survived the process to this point largely because powerful forces in the country recognize that the Bush presidency has been a disaster. A different face, a different look, is needed. Bill Clinton came along to 'feel' the population's 'pain' during a sharp recession and after the Reagan phenomenon had exhausted itself. The situation today is far more serious.
"Bush and Cheney are identified with war, slump and wholesale criminality. Confused and searching for answers, the population is seething with anger. A mass radicalization threatens. That the relatively inexperienced, bi-racial Obama has been plucked out of the ranks and possibly given his moment in the sun is itself an indication of the depth of the crisis.
"Politically, Obama is meant to forestall as long as possible the eruption of mass opposition to the existing economic and political setup. He is being marketed to the public as a caring, thoughtful black man, with hints of Lincoln in the background. He has the constructed appearance, the outer form, of opposition. But only the outer form. He's clever and adroit. He's not Bush.
"But, minus his carefully crafted identity, he's not terribly different."
Click here for David Walsh's entire article --
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/aug2008/obam-a05.shtml
In Nam we used to say "Kill em' all , let God sort it out"; just ask "Driil n' Kill McCain!
Weitzel wrote: "Barak Obama is not a disinterested or ill informed or uncaring man."
Absolutely not. He is very interested ... in achieving his own personal goal of becoming the President of the US. He cares a lot ... about attaining that goal. And he is well informed ... to the extent that it will help him achieve that goal.
I just hope the people who have fallen for his carefully crafted façade discover, before it's too late, that there's little of substance behind it.
Uh, Mikep, I think it was Israel who invaded Gaza and the West Bank and now illegally occupy it. What you say is a bunch of trash. You must be a shock doctrine plant. I suggest you read "Witness in Palestine", by Anna Baltzer, to get a better idea of what's really going on there. The aparteid wall must come down, whether Obama has the guts to do it or not.
Anyone ever had a "blind knot" problem in their lives?
It is quite similar to real life situations such as this one in that region of the world.
First the Israelites claimed their ancient ancestral lands (borders of which still not known to anyone btw; it may expand to India or even China in the east and to the Americas in the west!)
then there was the resistance by the Palestinians; then there were talks of peace on either side and things were getting more or less fine until some fanatic Israeli kid killed their own prime minister who was succeeding in establishing a peace treaty between the two brothers and everything was turned upside down!
Then there was the ugly Hizbollah fighting against both Palestinians as well as the Israelites; now there is a wall; then there will be ...
I guess that is what they call a "blind knot" which no one can undo in a working and usable manner except to cut the knot and trash it!
At its best however, there might be left a little usable string after the nasty knot is cut off and trashed. Therefore, there is still some hope left, but the ONLY and last solution to a blind knot is: cut it and trash it man!
Right on MikeP There are a lot of progressives who believe as you do that this wall is saving lives. Keep on posting.
Biwee. You are wrong. In fact your comments come directly from the Christian Identity movement. Are you part of the Aryan Nation? Odd to see you here if you are. Your "facts" were proposed in the 1920's in Dearborn Michigan by whites who wanted to distance themselves from Jews. Easier to make their own claim for the Holy Land if the Jews weren't really supposed to be there.
This has been a controversy for 70 years and although the Khazars, a tribe in the Caucausus converted, they were not the ancestors of the Ashkanazi Jews.
For some scientific info on this you might want to check out the National Academy of Sciences who did a large survey of DNA and they found that: "The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora."
Now I know science here is not really looked upon with favor, but you might want to rethink your Khazar theory.
The comments of mikep is like saying to the Americans that they would have to return terrority to Mexico that originally belonged to Mexico up to the mid 19th Century (such as presnt day Arizona, California, Utah, Nevada, Colorado etc.) and then expecting Americans to be fine with this scenario.
Robert Weitzel:
Thank You.
Great idea, the airlift into Gaza (and the West Bank, while they're at it). Quite the challenge for Mr. Obama. But will AIPAC's minions not pull out every penny of funding if anyone in the Democratic Party even breathes a word of this proposal?
As for Israel's state of war with the Palestinians: for 50 years Israelis officially denied the existence of Palestinians; then, when it was no longer possible to play that game and the pressure from the peace movement grew, the dominant right-wing Israeli parties equivocated or made what seemed to be reasonable and conciliatory offers while at the same continuing to encourage or support illegal Zionist settlements (many of them by fundamentalists who claim all lands as far as the River Jordan as God-given Jewish territories) and carrying out violent raids on Palestinian militants and non-combatants alike.
No one would ask Israel to trust the Palestinians naively.
HOWEVER, the Zionist State has flouted the U.N. and international law (from the Geneva Convention to the UN Human Rights Charter) and even the biblical injunctions of the Torah (Book of Daniel) in its pursual of collective punishment, reprisals against civilians, destruction of crops and other means of livelihood, psychological torment (roadblocks, curfews, threats of imprisonment), extrajudicial assassinations, and the kidnapping and imprisonment (often followed by torture) of tens of thousands of Palestinians (more than 10,000 are currently in Israeli custody, including at least 3,000 women and children). Young Israeli soldiers routinely abuse and humiliate Palestinians. Medical assistance is impeded and people are dying because medical staff and ambulances are stalled, and we now hear that the Israeli military are using extortion, allowing Palestinians into Israel for medical treatment in exchange for their agreeing to spy for Israeli security forces (an almost certain death sentence if they are caught by the Palestinian authorities).
The Wall is being built on expropriated Palestinian land, cutting people off from family and farms and guaranteeing an economic withering away of many communities. It often involves uprooting orchards and small farms or bulldozing family dwellings.
What more does Israel have to do before the international community finds its backbone and stops being blackmailed and cowed and no longer pretends it sees and hears nothing except the pious whining by Israeli extremists? Why are the mainstream media still ignoring the call of the peace movement of Israelis and Jews abroad?
Israel's violations of humanitarian law go against Jewish law, besides alienating Arabs and Muslims and progressives the world over and giving more fodder to neonazis and antisemites generally.
Of course it then becomes part of the self-fulfilling prophecy of the right-wing zionists, that the whole world is anti-Jewish and pro-Nazi and hates Israel.
It's time to call a halt to the brazen exploitation of the Holocaust that is continually touted as the sacred trust being defended by Israel's every action and time to liberate and restore the blessed memory of its millions of victims --and the pain of the survivors-- from the cynical politics of Zionist expansionism and the humiliation and repression of Palestinians.
mikep, you are crazy. Maybe if you and your family were forced to live in conditions such as these people are, perhaps then you would be singing a different tune.
mikep's comments are a joke. The true Palestinian Semite Jews are Sephardic. The Russian, Polish and Eastern European Ashkenazi Khazars have no real connection to Palestine, only to Bolshevism. Read Koestler's book. This Hungarian Jew wrote the truth.
Not all walls are bad. The Israeli wall was built to protect both Palestinians and Israelis from Palestinian violence. It is unfortunate that they had to resort to such measures but the Palestinians continue to refuse offers of peace, leaving the Israelis with few alternatives.
Keep in mind that there is a declared state of war between the Israelis and the Palestinians. This war was begun by the Palestinians, who began it with the intention of stealing Jewish land and murdering all Jews they could find. Which is still their intention.
If the Palestinians want peace, it is their responsibility to demonstrate to the world that they are ready to live in peace and to respect international law. The first step is to recognize Israel. Endless anti-Semitic attacks are not going to change this fundamental fact. They will just encourage the Palestinians to continue fighting a war that they have long since lost and to cause themselves to suffer.
Israel needs to stand firm. It's in the right, it has international law and global opinion on its side, and it is winning the war. It is sad that the Palestinians continue to cause themselves to suffer, but that wasn't the Israeli choice. It was the Palestinian choice. When and if they change their minds Israel and the rest of the world is ready to make peace. But until then they will experience war.