Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A War of Self-Destruction
An attack on Iran, which Israeli and Bush administration officials appear set to carry out if Iranian uranium enrichment is not halted, would ignite a regional war in the Middle East and lead to economic collapse and political upheaval in the United States."
In short and simple terms, we would be plunged into a depression that would make the Great Depression of the 1930s in which I spent my childhood look like boom times," said William R. Polk, former professor of history at the University of Chicago and a member of the Policy Planning Council under President Kennedy. "Industries would fail, banks would collapse, government revenues would dry up, universities would have to close, health care, even as limited as it now is for roughly 75 million Americans, would virtually cease. In short, something like [what] the South suffered at the end of the Civil War would plague the country."
The passage of vast amounts of oil and liquefied gas through the Persian Gulf would be disrupted. Iranian attacks, carried out with rocket- and bomb-equipped speedboats and submarines, would be deadly and effective. A classified Pentagon war game in 2002 simulated these swarming attacks by Iranian speedboats packed with explosives in the gulf; the Navy lost 16 major warships, according to a report in The New York Times. Iranian oil, which makes up 8 percent of the world's energy supply, would instantly be taken off the market. And oil would jump to over $500 a barrel and perhaps, as the conflict dragged on, to over $750 a barrel. Our petroleum-based economy would come to a halt.
Israel would be hit by Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missiles. Hezbollah, with its new store of Iranian-supplied rockets that allegedly can reach any part of Israel, including Israel's nuclear plant at Dimona, would enter the conflict. Israel would lash back. Terrorist attacks on U.S. targets would become frequent. U.S. casualties in Iraq would mount as the Iranians rained missiles down on U.S. bases and installations, including our imperial city, the Green Zone. Chaos and mayhem would grip the Middle East. The world financial markets would go haywire.
"Even at today's price, as you know, 14 airlines have gone out of business while others are hovering on the brink of bankruptcy and most have curtailed service and laid off personnel," said Polk, one of the country's leading scholars of the Arab world. "At double or triple today's price, none could fly unless nationalized. A whole range of other industries would be quickly drawn into the quicksand. Ironically, war would push America into a form of socialist economy."
The U.S. economy is already tottering. We recently witnessed the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history, and there are fears that as many as 150 banks could fail over the next 12 to 18 months. There will be 6.5 million foreclosures over the next five years, according to Wall Street analysts. The government is furiously pumping billions of taxpayer dollars into private corporations to keep them afloat. The Congress bailed out the shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These bizarre "government-sponsored enterprises" own or guarantee half the mortgages in the country-some $5.1 trillion. The Federal Reserve evoked rarely used emergency powers to put billions of taxpayer dollars at risk to stop the meltdown of a non-bank, Bear Stearns, which it never regulated. More than $300 billion has been written down so far. Losses, by the time we are done, could exceed $1 trillion.
The already staggering debt generated by the war in Iraq would mushroom with an attack on Iran. Fighting wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran, we would soon be struggling to pay off a debt of at least two or three times the present amount. This is a weight the U.S. economy cannot bear, especially as the dollar tumbles against the euro and other major currencies. The government has borrowed abroad roughly a quarter of our annual national income in order to pay for the Iraq debacle. We have been told for the first time by a sovereign fund (South Korean, one of the world's largest) that it will no longer buy U.S. Treasury bonds. Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz estimates that the final cost of the war in Iraq, once all the hidden costs are added up, could be as high as $7 trillion.
"Financial capitalism is crashing," wrote independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader. "So the lights are on late in Washington's Federal Reserve, SEC and Treasury Department trying to figure out how socialism (your tax dollars and credits) can once again bail out these big time gamblers with our money. ... Reckless, self-enriching capitalists get on your knees and thank the rescuing Washington socialists, for without them, you would surely be in chains."
A war with Iran would also have grave political consequences. The specter of millions of Americans driven out of their homes, no longer able to afford basic necessities, out of work and enraged, would, as it has throughout history, embolden messianic right-wing and proto-fascist movements. Given the potential for social unrest, basic freedoms would be curtailed and in some cases abolished in the name of order and national security. The radical fringes of the Christian right could rise up with a vengeance. They would happily ally themselves with an assortment of oddballs, lunatics and corporate behemoths from Blackwater mercenaries to frightened capitalists at Halliburton. It was economic collapse, along with a climate of fear and instability, that was used to build the fascist and communist movements that plagued Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union during the last century. These same forces led to the collapse of the former Yugoslavia. We are not immune to these distortions.
But maybe those who advocate a war with Iran know all this. Maybe this is what they want. Maybe they understand that a war with Iran would finally kill off our weakened and anemic democracy. Maybe they see this as the dawn of a new era, an era when the last impediments to a global totalitarian capitalism can finally be removed and we can all be ground under the corporate jack boot, from Shanghai to New Delhi to Ohio. There are huge corporations that make obscene profits from human misery. They run our health care industry. They run our oil and gas companies. They run our bloated weapons industry. They run Wall Street and the major investment firms. They run our manufacturing firms. They also, ominously, run our government.


70 Comments so far
Show AllGood article. I always wondered how it would all end. Now it looks like I may live to see it.
How do we stop it from happening?
Mr. Hedges,
I really enjoy reading your articles. I do not think it will take a war with Iran for the this country's economy to collapse. We are well on our way there. While I agree with the central premise of your article, a couple of your statistics might be a little low. The number of banks expected to go belly up has been revised to 700, and the equity lost in the subprime mortgage fiasco at a minimum will be $3 trillion. But these are minor comments. Again, a terrific article. Thanks for your great work!
I am not sure we can stop invading Iran from happening. All voters in this country need to realize that the Bush Administration, Republicans, and Democrats shafted us. Some of us deserve what we get voting for these people. This will have to be documented as one of the worst periods, if not the worst in United States history. The Bush presidency has been calamitous for this country (with the exception of making his rich friends even richer), and the Congress has been nothing short of abject incompetence and a national embarassment.
Kucinich's economic advisor Michael Hudson is convinced that we have passed a point-of-no-return in terms of debt levels; that there is no way we can create enough capital to repay all that we owe. "We" meaning the United States.
http://www.michael-hudson.com/interviews/080620GameOver.html
A war with Iran, which as Hedges points out appears to be both likely and imminent, would spell doom for the Obama campaign. Obama has said nothing to indicate that he will do anything to try to stop this calamity. Maybe he can't. We don't know what's going on in the back rooms, what Bush and Cheney and Obama's corporate sponsors have threatened. But war with Iran will shift the national conversation in a way that gives McCain a decisive advantage.
If Bush/Cheney get their war with Iran, it's going to be dramatic and ugly, and the media frenzy of jingoism, hate and distortion will be intense. In the face of this, Obama will have three choices. He can play "me too", but try to keep the campaign focused on domestic issues. That's a loser. He can play "war leader", and get more righteous and strident than McCain. Then the issue becomes: who do you want for war leader, Obama or McCain? That's a loser too. Or he can lead the people in resisting this war, and in making the linkage between the disastrous plight of the American working people and the Middle East wars. Obama has already signaled that he has no stomach for such a fight, and has done nothing to prepare for it. It's not going to happen.
So where does that put us, progressives who see an urgent need for Obama to defeat McCain? It appears to me that our only hope for salvaging the Obama campaign and preventing a McCain presidency is for the war with Iran to not happen; and our most vital contribution would be to help stop it before it starts! Now! But How?
There have been so many voices within the military and the foreign service against attacking Iran that it amounts to a split, a division at the top, which means there's an opening for us. If the peace movement would get down to the grass roots level and start telling the people in our neighborhoods, schools and unions what is happening and how it will affect us, we can build some real pressure to help stop it before it starts. Calling Congress and organizing meetings with representatives can make a difference. And there are battles going on all across the country with some legislatures and city councils passing resolutions for sanctions against Iran and others against the Iran war, so your town hall could be a battleground!
Failing to stop this war, there will be a long hard struggle against the war, depression and economic devastation and fascism. Again, the key is getting out and keeping face-to-face with the people, helping them get clarity about what is causing their distress, helping them (and ourselves) learn how to struggle and win.
(If somehow we succeed in blocking the Iran war, then there's the battle to stop the Republicans from stealing another election. We have lots of activists working on big issues like rigable voting machines with legislators and Congress, but to stop the intimidation, the disenfranchisement, the widespread miscounting and ballot-theft at the local level will take a mass movement. In the South I'm told election-stealing has in many counties reached a scale not seen since the days of Jim Crow, but it is spreading throughout the country.)
In any case, we will not win this struggle sitting at our keyboards talking with each other or emailing Congress, although those are both good things to do. So get on the phone, then get out there, meet with other activists face to face, get out and start working with the people! Maybe start with working with your local Obama campaign, or against McCain and on the issues with a group like Progressive Democrats of America (PDA). Or get to work for Nader or the Green Party and McKinney, making sure to level your main fire against the Republicans. Do what is possible and feels right where you live. And whatever you do, keep speaking out and building support for a big push against the Iran war.
Or if your heart is into working with peace activists directly and going to the people about it, with leaflets, rallies, meetings with your representatives, teach-ins, that might even be more valuable. But do get up out of that desk chair and do something!
Feel overwhelmed? Tired? Helpless? Hopeless? Working directly with the people, face-to-face, will give you your juice - and your courage - back!
Chris Horton:
Thanks.
As always, NOW more than ever:
IT'S TIME TO ORGANIZE!
If Bush and Cheney try anything, they should be arrested. Who can do it?
The question is not who can do it, but is there a will to do it in Congress? I think not.
ChrisHorton, thanks for your info. I have already started working with others on a smaller scale but I need to re-double my efforts
JaneM August 4th, 2008 1:47 pm -- "If Bush and Cheney try anything, they should be arrested."
Uh, pardon me for asking, but is there some magic number of war crimes, crimes against humanity and violations of "supreme" constitutional law that would trigger the U.S. system's arrest threshhold? If so, I'd sure like to know what that number is. I'm pretty sure any requirement less than infinity could be satisfied already.
Good comments all. And if the corporatists win and they get to write the history of it all it will be they greatest struggle against the godless and immoral infidels of christianity the world has ever seen. Meanwhile the regular folk will be enslaved for many generations.
Hedges gets it right 100% of the time. Well done! I also noted that he did not sign the latest letter representing the tripe the Nation puts out while living inside of Obama's back pocket. One of the few writers I respect on this site.
okay, there's the abyss, now what? mr. hedges, you're a theologian - how do we generate an alternative reality?
The statements made by Barack Obama during his recent visit to Afghanistan verify that his campaign for president is the mouthpiece for a significant section of the American ruling elite that is insisting on a shift in US policy in the Middle East and Central Asia. Far from proposing any retreat from militarism, Obama is arguing for a faster drawdown of troop numbers in Iraq and a reduction in tensions with Iran, only in order to facilitate a major escalation of US military operations in Afghanistan, potentially extending them into Pakistan.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/jul2008/bara-j21.shtml
Why so serious, CH?
Brad and Angelina had twins and pocketed $14 mill for some pics!
Lindsey likes girls!
NFL training camp is on, baby!
And on YouTube, there's lots of cute animals doing cute stuff!
As Alexander Solzhenitsyn said: "Also, truth is seldom pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter."
My only problem is with the opening sentence. It should just refer more generally to "Israel and the US". It is incorrect to tie this attack only to the Bush Administration.
Two data points. One, the Democrats in Congress have been loudly backing an attack. They've refused to do anything that might limit the attack. And they've taken several actions that help lead that way. They've approved money for regime change. They've declared the Iranian military a 'terrorist organization'. And currently they are very supportive of a resolution that would call for a naval blockade, which would be an act of war in its own right.
Second, Obama clearly supports this attack. Just recently, while in Israel he indicated that the only negotiating he'd do with Iran would be to issue ultimatums (ie, just like Bush and McCain), and he also apparently said that if Iran didn't comply with the ultimatums, an attack would be justified. In essence, he told the Israelies not to worry about doing this before Bush leaves office because he'd be happy to carry through the same policies after 1-21-09.
As usual, don't spend too much time trying to figure out if something has one specific cause. In this case, the collapse of the US economy. Such events usually have multiple causes. And an attack on Iran would be more like adding a steel i-beam to the back of an already struggling camel. The camel is already in trouble from several other causes, and the addition of the weight of the i-beam won't help it any.
As hubristic as this country's leaders are, if they really think that bringing about economic collapse in America would be their "golden opportunity" to make the country over in their image, I suspect they are utter fools, imagining that they can control events. Heck, they couldn't control the events of the past nearly seven years since 9/11!
Paul_GA: What makes you think that "this country's leaders" have not been able to control the events of the past seven years? It appears to me that things seem to be going just the way they wanted them to.
I dunno...
if Iran is allowed to get Nuke weapons (if they indeed are...and it looks that way) then Saudi will want them and egypt and Jordan and the UAE...every nickel dime (oil rich) sheikdom over there...
Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me...I'm not comfy with Ahmidinijad's finger on a Nuclear trigger
Would be nice if the world grew a set of balls and told them NO in one voice...sanctions are good...but EVERYBODY needs to sanction them
Population, economic growth and increase of consumption of the earth will come to an end. We already take and poison as much as would require four earths. Which particular catastrophe will cause irreversible decline in human population first is not a matter for emergency. It is a matter of urgent necessity. The harder we fight to stave off collapse, the deeper the earths systems go into terminal shock. Perhaps the world should unleash all its nuclear weapons now.
"Would be nice if the world grew a set of balls and told them NO in one voice... sanctions are good... but EVERYBODY needs to sanction them"
The same could be applied to Israel and the United States.
So if "we" do attack Iran, does that mean the 2008 elections are cancelled? And if the US economy collapses, does that mean the Leader gets to take over?
CH - why should Nader and/or McKinney only focus on the Republicans, when your dude Obama (lets bomb Afghanistan and Pakistan - and Iran is a threat - and the closest friend of the Zionist entity) has just as much of a killer instinct?
If you are going to vote, then Vote for Nader, and make it clear that both the Democrats and Republicans are rotten to the core.
snowolf: Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me…I'm not comfy with Ahmidinijad's finger on a Nuclear trigger
i guess you don't think iranians and iraqis not being "comfy" with shock and awe courtesy of the US and israel is worth bothering about.
as long as americans and israelis are comfy, right?
"But maybe those who advocate a war with Iran know all this. Maybe this is what they want. Maybe they understand that a war with Iran would finally kill off our weakened and anemic democracy."
this is the key statement of this article - total all consuming war = world domination
at least it does in the mind of a madman like cheney
fascist control of the continental us - the fema prisons for those who don't like it
blackwater praise jesus to mow us down in the streets
this is what it has come to
P-L-E-A-S-E !!!!!!!!!
Have no delusions for OBAMA and the DLC which are controled by the neo-con zionist " GANGSTERS " and do their bidding at every step of the way,we are more likley to be in a war if the Democrats are elected than the totally alzehimer infected McCain .
Nothing has gone wrong for the leaders of our country,they are on scheduaul for the complete destruction of the USA.
911 was the first attack on " we the people " which scared them,that was followed by the SECOND TERRORIST ATTACK -THE ANTHRAX SCARE which was done to controle any of the poloticians who weren't on board with the program already!
These attacks were preformed to make sure that no citizen would be able to ask pesky questions of the administraion and the gouvernment in regards to the grand scale theft taking place "ENRON " ect or the Three trilion missing from the pentegone ,an iron wall was being set in place with only a one way mirror to look into,only on the public ,not the government and their theft.
Then came the next attack on the people of the USA the attack on two completly helpless countries Afganastan and Iraq to pretend that we were at war so that more theft could be perpetrated on the population through the no bid contracts and the hidden costs that were stolen in plain sight with no congresional oversight ,though hearings were held,no punishment was forthcomming!
Meanwhile back at the ranch we had the administration with the helpf the congress rape the citizens further by the ridicoulos DOT-COM bubble,the RE bubble ,the sub-prime mortgage shenanigans, and soon to be the derivitave bust, the discusting medicare part D discrace ,the outrageous oil profitering all engeneered by our government and withe aquiessentce of the Democrats who also partisipated in the establishment of the patriot act among other such acts gaurenteeing the ability of the citizens to protest these outrageous acts of theft!
An attack on Iran will be just another attack and maybe the final blow the our economy,the police state will have been installed and the population will be reduced to wage slaves just to sustain themselves,but you can be sure that you will still be able to watch DANCING WITHE THE STARS,AMERICAN IDOL,or the endless COP SHOWS and reruns of SIENFELD,so things won't be so bad !
Through all this OBAMA has done nothing except to advance the pace ,as a lawyer and constitutional professor he has willingly aided and abbeded in the wilfull destruction of the constitution,and the immoral illigal presuit of the invasions of both Afganistan and Iraq,while abbeting in the holocast of the Palastians by Isreal to which he has pledged his unconditional support !
How can any America of good faith possibly vot for this man or McCain,they are two sides of the same coin ,both are dedicated to the destruction of the USA!
"Nukes for we, but not for thee" is also recipe for disaster-- especially if the "we" includes an instigator that snuck into the Nuke Club through the back door and was given a secret honorary membership.
Toss one more factor into the mix, the fact that Israel has at least 200 nukes, and you have the makings of a true Armageddon. I think that the majority of the populations of both Israel and the US (through ignorance, avoidance, arrogance, or whatever) grossly underestimate the potential of Iran's retaliation. As I have said many times in many forums, the military forces of Iran realize they will have to use them or loose them, they are not fools. Only a fool could think that any one of the Israeli nukes is not targeting something. And most of the targets are in the middle east.
Ok. It looks like a go, and I've always thought it was being saved to closer to the election. But what about Russia, China, and other countries that are against this attack? Have they been preparing for the fallout like Saudi Arabia, and will just sit on their hands and watch? What a sick sick world if they do.
Read about a passenger in a car that was driving down the road, and she suddenly yells, "OH, JESUS! It's really you. Wait for me!" and climbs out the car window, is promptly hit by another car, and dies. Turned out it wasn't Jesus coming to take his chosen home. Was just a hippie.
Won't there be a lot of disappointed rapture freaks if we bomb Iran and Jesus doesn't come down on a cloud to take them home.
Hey, I can't help it! The retina in my eye just tore, and it blots out words, and I can't help it if I don't know what I'm writing, now can I!
Hedges is my kind of humanist, and he's usually a prescient observer too. But here he sounds hysterical - or at least not thought-through.
The very consequences he predicts from a unilateral US and/or Israeli attack on Iran, if accurate, would as he says, plunge western economies into crisis and virtually guarantee political fragmentation of the west's fragile (because popularly perceived in Europe as fradulent) alliance against what US neocons have concocted as 'The West's war against terrorism.'
I think the fascist economic and political interests that control the policies of Israel and 'the western governments' aren't so tactically stupid as to easily shoot their interlocked profit machines in the foot this way. A western economic depression isn't in their interests. Or so any of us might think....
Also, any such unilateral attack against Iran, especially one that called for direct military backup or morally indirect support by w. European countries, is very likely to galvanize near-the-brink european popular demands that ties with nutcase US middle east policy makers be finally and decisively cut.
The middle classes of w. europe now fully realize - in light of the Iraq quagmire and the US lies that begot it - that their US-slavering parliamentary executives have been drawn into the dying US Empire's sinkhole, and would now, likely throw out of office any of their politicians who proposed to dig them deeper into America's or Israel's fatally flawed schemes.
That is one perspective. There are clearly others.
An attack on Iran's nuclear facilities by the US and/or Israel could still happen I suppose, given the bottomless, irrational moxie of the 'interested parties.' But it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, if its worst consequences were limited to internationally isolating the US/Israel axis, readjusting-thru-pain the US and Israel economies, and turning the balance of American and Israeli citizens finally against their own demonic politicians and power structures.
Some extraordinary comments:
ChrisHorton says "A war with Iran, which as Hedges points out appears to be both likely and imminent, would spell doom for the Obama campaign."
Apparently the fact that is will also spell doom for perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iranians is simply secondary to giving Obama's campaign a hard time.
Zounds says "An attack on Iran's nuclear facilities by the US and/or Israel could still happen I suppose, given the bottomless, irrational moxie of the 'interested parties.' But it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, if its worst consequences were limited to internationally isolating the US/Israel axis, ...."
Apparently the deaths of many Iranians isn't a bad thing, and not to be considered as part of the negative consequences.
Is this what's meant by being a progressive on this forum? The only consequences to be considered are those that affect Americans? Mass murder is merely background for our political stage? Where is our/your humanity?
America was suckered into a "cakewalk" dreamed up by individuals whose primary interest was redrawing the map of the Middle East to comply with zionist objectives to make Israel the sole and only power to command and control their neighbors. That plan has floundered badly and the US is in a no win situation period.
The overriding issue is not nuclear weapons for as Margaret Thatcher said; A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us. The only way way whereby Israel can be #1 in the ME is if the US is #1 in the world. Since the US is becoming less and less #1 in the world it follows that Israel cannot be #1 in the Middle East. In reality the ones responsible for the hastening of the slow demise of the US are the Israelis and their neocon friends in Washington and New York.
Like Uncle Goober said, Israelis are getting close to $12 million dollars a day every day of the year from Uncle Sam. They enjoy free services in education and health that not even Americans get. We've already followed the plans and goals of Nethanyahu, Sharon, Perle and others in Iraq. All we got as a result of such actions is $4.00 a gallon of gas, housing foreclosures, increased unemployment and a dollar not worth the paper its printed on. And over 4000 young dead Americans.
Hopefully with over 4000 young men and women in the US military dead and over 80,000 crippled for life as well as untold thousands of Iraqi men, women and children dead not to mention the close to $4 trillion dollars already spent that saner heads will prevail at least in the US. If the Israelis want to continue their Alice in Wonderland sojourn by attacking Iran then they and they alone should bear the consequences of their acts. and they should be so informed by our Congress and Administration in specific details.
George Bush has a really bad habit of leaving everything he gets involved in FUBAR - fucked up beyond all recognition.
-- He did this in business -- screwing the employees and the stockholders, while he and his cronies walked away rich (re. Harkin Energy).
-- He did this when he was governor of Texas -- taking Texas from the mid-rank of states in health, education and welfare to just about dead-last in all three categories.
-- And now he's done it as president of the United States.
Were Obama and the Democrats to simply tell the truth about what George Bush has done to this country -- meaning: what *Corporate America* has done to this country -- oh, wait a second, the Democrats can't do THAT, they're mouthpieces for Corporate America as well.
See any way out of this problem? ... Vote Nader. Or else vote McKinney. Or else vote socialist. ... Voting for the lesser of the two evils is precisely what's gotten us to this point.
If millions of people keep voting for the lesser of the two evils, we as a species will have fulfilled the definition of insanity -- DOING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND EXPECTING THE SAME RESULTS.
Vote sanity.
Vote like you're not a crazy person.
I remember reading something about Nazi psychology. (Maybe it was something written by Arendt?) In any event, the idea was that Nazism in Germany was just a phase in a larger worldwide Nazi/Fascist movement, and that it was crucial for the Nazis that their propaganda be made to come true. (This is why Hitler wanted to implement Operation Clauswitz to destroy German infrastructure to starve the German people. This would make true Hitler's propaganda that success of Nazism was vital to the survival of the German people.)
Bush/Cheney/Rove have spread similar propaganda that the "War of Terror" is vital to our survival.
.
...Any attack on Iran by Israel, backed by the United States of America is pure suicidal madness.......the destruction of Western Civilization.
Perhaps, the start of New Eastern Empires and Oriental World Orders.
...Israel will be destroyed.......Jews will be hunted down world-wide........and the young U.S.A. will perish just like the Dinasaurs !!!!!!!!!!
.
I posted this comment on another thread recently that was probably not much read, so I am posting it here again.
The Big Mistake today is placing hope in Washington or in candidates such as McCain or Obama. The Congress has narrow-casted it's votes to benefit those who raise money for their reelection campaigns.
The primary source of those funds are Corporations. Corporations through their lobbyists write the legislation and present it to Congress with dollars attached. Congress in turn accepts the money and passes the corporate legislation. This marriage between Corporations and Government is by definition Fascism. American Fascism has thus far not been defined by jack booted police but is moving in that direction as evidenced by the following:
1. The emergence of private civilian armies such as Blackwater and Triple Canopy who unlike the U.S. Armed Forces can legally operate and intervene within the United States.
2. A wholly secret construction now under way–courtesy of a $385-million grant by the US Army Corps of Engineers to Halliburton subsidiary KBR Inc–of detention camps reportedly capable of confining as many as 400,000 people, and a recent report that the Pentagon has a document, dated June 1, 2007, classified Top Secret, which declares there to be a developing 'insurgency' within the U.S, and which lays out a whole martial law counterinsurgency campaign against legal dissent.
3. Today more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are working with the FBI in a program called InfraGard. InfraGard is not readily accessible to the general public. It's communications with the FBI are beyond the reach of the Freedom of Information Act. At a meeting the FBI and Homeland Security discussed in detail what InfraGard members are expected to do. InfraGard was expected to share all it's resources including company data with the FBI and further they said, when, not if, martial law is declared it's members could use deadly force and not be prosecuted.
4. The Patriot Act allows homes to be invaded and searched without the knowledge of the homeowners even if based upon hearsay which could loosely be termed legal political dissent such as supporting peace.
5. The illegal gathering of information on American's without a FISA warrant.
The choice people have today is this: Transform to a new world or remain with the old. The old guard continues it's use of linear extrapolations of where we are headed. Simple linear extrapolations are insufficient for today's world and lead to derailments and chaos. Today requires a complex systems evolution. Order and chaos are normal parts of complex systems evolution. We are now living in the early stages of instability, discontinuity, and chaos. Then, seemingly overnight, we will reach a point of serious and persistent instability and possible collapse. This will confront us with a decision window. The instability will create a hyper sensitivity among the public to new ideas that were in the past considered marginal or way-out.
In periods of stability new ideas are considered deviant and marginalized by society. In periods of instability there develops a much greater acceptance of new ideas and values. So today we have an increasing capability of transforming our future with new ideas and a new vision of the future. We are living in a time of potential transformation. The acceptance of new ideas creates for us the opportunity to tip the arriving chaos in the direction of peace and sustainability. This is a time when small ideas can have great effect.
The transformation will follow a recognizable pattern of change. When we reach the point where the system become critically unstable the status quo will be unsustainable and the systems evolution will tip in one direction or the other. If the values of society are too resistant to change or too slow to change and the established institutions are too rigid, inequity and conflict will break out and the social order will degenerate into further conflict or violence.
However if the minds and hearts of a critical number of people is elevated and evolves in time it will shift society to a more adaptable mode where change will take hold and establish itself , then the economic, political, and ecological dynamics of society will formalize in nonconflictual and sustainable ways.
The dynamics of the new evolved consciousness are many and continuing to develop. Some of them are as follows:
Living in ways that allow other people to live too by satisfying your needs without interfering with others to satisfy theirs.
Living in ways that respect the right to life of all people, all animals, and all living things, in ways that safeguard a supportive environment.
Pursuing happiness and fulfillment in harmony with nature and in consideration of similar pursuits by other people.
Insist that governments interact with other Nations peacefully and in a spirit of cooperation recognizing the legitimacy and sovereignty of those Nations, their resources, and their peoples.
Maintain that business enterprises accept responsibility for their actions and to produce goods and services without impairing nature or engaging in unfair competition.
Require that public media provide reliable and relevant information necessary for citizens to make informed decisions.
Help those living in poverty to live a life of dignity.
Educate the young in the spirit of transformation and the new vision to understand the fluid nature of evolving visions and values required for living in a an age of transformation and sustainability.
Reduce the primary causes of war's, nationalism and religion. Extreme patriotism results in Nationalism and unnecessary wars. Religious dominionist beliefs, the belief that only through my religion can I and others be saved, must be mitigated to result in respect for all religions and an acceptance of their beliefs absent dominionism and violence.
Recognize that change takes place in the minds and hearts of people at the local level and is not the result of centralized leadership in Washington. Change occurs from the bottom up.
Balancing the economy by decentralizing it through support of local farmers, merchants, and service providers thereby strengthening the local fabric of life and making it less effected by national or international problems.
Adopting the values of need not want by purchasing only those things that you need and making things that you have last longer by repairing them instead of replacing them.
The list of new lifeways is dynamic and changing each day. Allowing people to communicate freely and openly sustainins the creativity necessary to live successfully and happily in a changing world.
The window of decision is now. It requires that we each choose between the old ways of existence through increasingly failing decisions based upon outmoded linear extrapolations or the adoption of newer systems approaches that are decentralized in architecture and accept non-linear extrapolations as normal and more effective.
From my perspective neither of the Presidential candidates reflect the values necessary to effect positive change and are part of a corrupt Washington system incapable of assisting citizens in living a better life based upon transformative values. The key to successful transformation is to encourage the rapid acceptance of the new transformative values by a critical mass of citizens before the old system collapses and results in conflict and violence.
So if this information strikes a chord with you, pass this information to all those on your mailing list and encourage others to do the same. We must make this critical change in values during this short decision window. Note: This is not a drill…it is real and it is now.
4thefuture,
Sorry if I appear to be callous. I am acutely aware of and horrified by what would happen in an attack. One of my best friends has family in Teheran and is worried sick about them.
My focus here however is on what *we*, the progressive activists, should be doing over the next 95 days to try to avert the disaster of another 4 years of Bush-Cheney-McCain; and my point is that if we don't stop this war with Iran we get an almost guaranteed twofer: McCain wins plus we get a wider holocaust in the Middle East. Therefore no one can afford to focus just on the election and neglect trying to stop this war.
Mr. Hedges sees things through a moral lens. It appears that both parties refuse to oppose an attack on Iran(the Republicans by their obvious aggressive attitude toward Iran and the Democrats by their timid silence on the issue).
Mr. Hedges recent publicly stated his intention to vote for Ralph Nader.
God bless him. It is time to organize against the war AND vote for a candidate who clearly opposes it.
Because, Rebel Farmer, there's no such thing as controlling events and foreseeing and anticipating everything. Winston Churchill said (and the neocons, who worship the man, have conveniently forgotten this): "Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure the tides and hurricanes he will encounter. The statesman who yields to war fever must realize that once the signal is given, he is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events."
First, if we attack Iran, they are going to give us a ass whipping. No, not to the corporate elite. But us 'little people' who will either have to join a military / industrial corporation just to make a living; the unlucky ones get to go fight it.
Second, the corporate elite probably want our ass to get kicked, because we would then turn to them and be willing to give up more of our freedoms for 'security.'
The reality is that we have all our representatives who have sworn to uphold the constitution, and only a handful of them have tried to stopped the president from violating the constitution on a regular basis by impeachment. The others are all in violation of their oath.
Nor the newspapers write about it. The system is so rigged that we probably already lost, we just don't know it. Yet many will say, Oh, Obama will bring about the change we need.
First, Obama has no intention of protecting the public trust over corporate interests; and second, the public may have already passed the point of no return. And surely, supporting either of the dominant parties is only driving another nail into that coffin.
If Obama was really that beacon of hope that you had hoped for, surely this is the moment when he would say that unilaterally attacking Iran is off the table. It is as simple as that. This would be considered a minor thing. Yet he doesn't even do this minor thing.
If it is the end of the world, I would have to say that I am very sorry to see all the beautiful things that regular people brought to this earth come to and end; but on the other hand I realize that it would be an end of unnecessary misery brought on by other humans, just for money or whatever reason they justified for themselves.
May the universe smile down upon us all and leave us with blessings.
The least painful way to forestall the coming economic collapse and totalitarian response (not painless, mind you, but potentially less bloody than the other options):
Jenna rolls d'Reich
Problem is, there appears to be an insufficient population of non-morons remaining in the States to make it possible.
Bow down, human chattels, bow down to the mighty gods of industry. Prostrate yourself at their feet while ye may, those who have made themselves into the image of God, who daily work to make themselves even more rich without regard for the survival of the planet or most of its people.
Worship at their altar of greed and wonder about why you helped to put them there. Rome is burning and you and others like you struck a thousand matches.
www.dangerouscreation.com
Our Masters have been preparing for massive social unrest for a loooong time. Think of it from a forestry perspective, a controlled burn to get rid of the dead wood. So they drop you in the shit for a while, then they bring you back up for air for a little bit, then they drop you even deeper in the shit, then back up for a bit more air, until they don't want your body anymore and you will be allowed to die by withholding medical care. Welcome to the Corporate techno-slave plantation. Got your chip yet? Americans will make great slaves once they've been fitted with their collars. Very docile. Fuck'em anyway you want. They love it. Gett'em for a very goooood price. Its good for them. Builds character.
"But maybe those who advocate a war with Iran know all this. Maybe this is what they want. Maybe they understand that a war with Iran would finally kill off our weakened and anemic democracy. Maybe they see this as the dawn of a new era, an era when the last impediments to a global totalitarian capitalism can finally be removed and we can all be ground under the corporate jack boot, from Shanghai to New Delhi to Ohio."
_______________________
Hedge's hypothesis makes perfect sense. He's just capsulizing the ageless clash of economic interests called class warfare.
Our so-called ruling classes are radicals with no compunctions about using fear-mongering or crisis capitalism to manipulate and control our political institutions.
An unwinnable, permanent war with Iran and the consolidation of a national security state in the US? Now there's an investment opportunity the neocons can't pass up.
There ain't gonna be a war with Iran and McKane ain't gonna be prez. They are just making noise to fill up the media headlines, to squelch publicity for the myriad disasters they created and opportunties for progressive revolution! The Repuks are hanging off the edge of the cliff and they need the Demoks to pull them back up! This election is rigged for the Demoks! The Likuds said so!
Once again, Hedges is spot on.
The U.S. is so ignorant of history. It can't see that it is being suckered into the same fate as the Russians by walking down the same path they passed over on their way to oblivion as a major empire.
China is bringing the Americans to their knees by playing to their chief weakness which is to think they can work their way out financial ruin by becoming embroiled in one military black hole after another.
But, like a dog with a bone, America refuses to change direction as it inexorably sinks into the financial quicksand of its own making.
It is really scary when such a large, diverse, intelligent group can almost all agree on our future. I hope we are all wrong - but I don't think so.
On Israel - Israel has every right to exist as a country at peace. So does Palestine. The only logical way that might have solved this problem is if the world powers that messed up the original map of the Middle East to create a new location, perhaps in Jordan or Syria that is at least 25k from Israel with a no-man's-land between it and Israel.
Palestine could be a state-of-the-arts country, green, solar-powered and nurtured by both East & West, for a fraction of what the West has spent to keep these population groups from killing each other. A narrow super highway and rail system could link it with Israel - to allow cross-border work & commerce. But the two countries must NOT share borders anymore. There is just too much animosity. Whichever country allowed "annexation" (Egypt, Syria, Jordon) would be richly rewarded. There is no free ride.
I don't think that architects of WW3 care a fig about Israel - it is just another "false flag". It is obvious that Israel will take the brunt of any war, as will Israel's neighbors. This, yet again, is all about the oil.