EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
States, Environmentalists To Sue EPA Over Greenhouse Gases
WASHINGTON - California, New York City, three other states and a coalition of environmental groups will file notice Thursday that they'll sue the Environmental Protection Agency to push it to regulate pollution from ocean ships and aircraft that's causing global warming.
Under the Clean Air Act, a U.S. district court can compel the EPA to take action to protect the public's welfare if the agency delays doing so for an unreasonably long time. The law requires that a notice of intent to sue be filed 180 days in advance, the step that the groups are taking now.
The timing means that any suit would be filed after President Bush leaves office. The groups concluded that they couldn't guess what the next administration would do and should be ready to sue if necessary, said Jackie Savitz of Oceana, a group that's devoted to protecting the world's oceans.
"It's basically what we have to do to maintain our progress going forward to get ships and aircraft regulated," she said.
The environmental legal-rights group Earthjustice, acting on behalf of Oceana, Friends of the Earth and the Center for Biological Diversity, planned to send the notice as a letter to the EPA. California, Connecticut, New Jersey, Oregon, New York City, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the California Air Resources Board and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection planned to file similar notices.
Aircraft and ships are a large and growing source of carbon dioxide, the main heat-trapping gas that's causing the Earth's average temperature to increase.
The environmental groups filed petitions late last year asking the EPA to determine whether greenhouse gases from aircraft and ships endanger public health and welfare, and if they do, to regulate them as federal law requires.
The EPA issued a notice this month about future rule-making calling for a comment period. Bush opposes mandatory controls on emissions.
EPA spokesman Jonathan Shradar said the agency plans no further steps. "EPA has been responsive to these petitions with our advanced notice of proposed rulemaking and we will continue down that path," he said.
"When we filed the petition, the EPA didn't respond. . . . (Then) they came out with a 500-page document that does everything but make a rule," Savitz said. The comment period, she said, "basically guarantees they won't have to do anything in their lifetime."
The environmental groups reported that aircraft produce 12 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted by all forms of American transportation. They also emit nitrogen oxides, which add to ozone - another greenhouse gas - and water vapor, which forms contrails - which are associated with increased cirrus cloud cover, another warming factor.
Oceana, in a new report about shipping and global warming, says the world's ocean-going vessels release nearly 3 percent of global carbon dioxide.
Oceana reported that ships could reduce those emissions by 23 percent by traveling 10 percent more slowly. The slower speed would mean a 23 percent fuel savings as well, it said.
Oceana's report "Shipping Impacts on Climate: A Source With Solutions": www.oceana.org/climate/shipping-impacts
© 2008 McClatchy Newspapers
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

4 Comments so far
Show AllNader for EPA Chief.
And now for your up to date methane forecast.
The permafrost in Alaska has gotten 2 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit warmer and on the average is 1 or 2 degrees below melting. In some places in Alaska the permafrost is now melting and it "smells bad" (that's a sure sign of methane release from the permafrost).
http://newsminer.com/news/2008/jul/30/melting-permafrost-poses-threats-infrastructure-al/
The Arctic Ocean has turned into leads and bergs. About 1/3 of the Arctic Ocean, especially the areas over all of the continental shelves, has long since melted off all its ice and is warming in the sun. This heat is slowly migrating down through layers of water to the continental shelf clathrates, and it is also helping to heat the adjacent land masses such as Alaska and Siberia. The next third of the Arctic Ocean is noticably not reflecting much light back into space, and the final third has water leads forming.
There is no world discussion of spraying salt water into the air in midwinter, which would create thick icebergs, which would help keep the arctic cool in summer at low expense. We need a volunteer committee to test such an invention soon.
Nor is there any worldwide discussion of putting water vapor into the arctic air at cirrus cloud level over the oceans, say, pumping warmed water vapor up the center of a vertical balloon on low-wind days, which would also reflect heat away and keep the arctic cool.
If I were the press I'd be covering the great methane release, a worldwide disaster in the making, and pretty soon too. As it is, CommonDreams and its reporters aren't exactly covering the problem either, just me in the comments section. Hi guys!
Hi PAULK, don't ever give up bud.
Not much sense picking on shipping. In Australia there have been calls to move more freight by ships instead of trucks (slower but better) to save a lot of fuel. Either that or go totally local, nothing imported.